S-3_Attachment_Past_Perf_Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted Dec 3, 2015

Attached to: FY16-FY20 Third Party Advanced Planning support for LHA and LHD Class Ships
Solicitation number: N00024-14-R-4405
Issued by: Department of the Navy Naval Sea Systems Command

About this file

From the source

S-3 Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
N00024-14-R-4405_Amend_02.pdf	PDF	Jan 19, 2016
14-4405_Amend_01.pdf	PDF	Jan 12, 2016
J-5_Attachment_DD_2772_Final.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
S-7_Attachment_Fee.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 3, 2015
S-2_Attachment_Sample_Staffing_Plan.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 3, 2015
J-1_Attachment_Shipcheck_Templates.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
LHD_LHA_CDRLS_Final.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
J-2_Attachment_PWS_References_Final.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
J-9_Attachment_Performance_Incentive_Fee_Plan_Final.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
S-4_Attachment_OCI_Mitigation_Plan_Checklist.docx	DOCX document	Dec 3, 2015
J-3_Attachment_PWS_Acronym_List_Final.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 3, 2015
J-6_Attachment_Award_Term_Plan_Final.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
S-1_Attachment_Work_Year_Estimates_Final.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 3, 2015
S-5_Attachment_Minimum_Key_Personnel_and_Desired_Qualifications_Final.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
J-4_Attachment_QASP_Final.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
J-7_Attachment_Allotment_of_Funds.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Dec 3, 2015
S-8_Attachment_Preaward_Survey_Template_SF_1408.docx	DOCX document	Dec 3, 2015
S-6_Attachment_Cost_Summary_Format.xls	XLS spreadsheet	Dec 3, 2015
N00024-14-R-4405.pdf	PDF	Dec 3, 2015
J-3_Attachment_PWS_Acronym_List.pdf	PDF	Mar 9, 2015
Third_Party_Planning_Draft_Performance_Work_Statement.pdf	PDF	Mar 9, 2015
J-2_Attachment_PWS_References.pdf	PDF	Mar 9, 2015

Show all 22

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

ATTACHMENT S-3

CUSTOMER QUESTIONNAIRES

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Contracting Officer Representatives in coordination with the cognizant Contracting Officer are requested to complete the attached past performance questionnaire to be used in evaluating past performance. Upon completion please submit to:

Commander

Naval Sea Systems Command

Attn: Maria E Gomez, SEA 02443

RFP N00024-14-R-4405

1333 Isaac Hull Avenue, SE Stop 2040

Washington Navy Yard, DC 20376-2040

or e-mail to maria.e.gomez@navy.mil

SOURCE SELECTION

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

OFFEROR:

CONTRACT NUMBER:

CONTRACT TYPE:

ORIGINAL CONTRACT VALUE:

CURRENT CONTRACT VALUE:

NATURE OF EFFORT:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:

PLACE OF PERFORMANCE:

Please complete the questionnaire as a coordinated effort for the Contracting Officer. For the first 18 questions, choose the number on the scale of 1 to 4 that most accurately describes the Offeror’s performance on the contract listed above. A “4” represents outstanding, and “1” indicates unacceptable. If the question is not applicable, circle “N/A.” Please add any comments and information that may help to determine the Offeror’s probable performance.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Cont.)

1.
Evaluate the Offeror’s compliance with contractual terms and conditions.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

2.
Evaluate the Offeror’s adherence to schedules and mission requirements.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

3.
How well did the Offeror demonstrate the ability to overcome program, technical, or schedule difficulties?
	1	2	3	4	N/A

4.
Evaluate the Offeror’s responsiveness to technical direction.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

5.
Evaluate the Offeror’s technical judgment as demonstrated by the quality of its work products.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

6.
Evaluate the Offeror’s ability to solve business management problems without extensive guidance from the procuring activity counterpart.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

7.
How responsive and reasonable was the Offeror with regard to negotiating changes and modifications?
	1	2	3	4	N/A

8.
Evaluate the Offeror’s labor force in terms of overall qualifications to perform the work required.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

9.
Evaluate the Offeror’s willingness and ability to integrate as a team with the existing work force (Government and/or other Offerors).
	1	2	3	4	N/A

10.
Evaluate the stability of the Offeror’s work force.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

11.
How well did the Offeror exercise management control over his own personnel?
	1	2	3	4	N/A

12.
If the Offeror used subcontractor(s), how well did the Offeror exercise management control over the subcontractor(s)?
	1	2	3	4	N/A

13.
Evaluate the Offeror’s work control procedures.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

14.
How responsive was the Offeror to after hour’s emergency calls?
	1	2	3	4	N/A

15.
Evaluate Offeror’s cost reporting and estimating system.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

16.
Evaluate the responsiveness and quality of Offeror reports and documentation.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

17.
Evaluate the Offeror’s development and utilization of key personnel.
	1	2	3	4	N/A

18.
If the contract specified subcontracting goals, how well did the Offeror comply?
	1	2	3	4	N/A

19.

Was the Offeror cooperative in negotiations and in resolving issues?

YES

20.

Have there been any terminations of tasks due to inability to meet technical requirements or delivery schedules? If so, how many?

YES

21.

Would you award similar contracts to the Offeror in the future?

YES

22.

What role did you play (e.g., COR, PCO, ACO)? How long?

_________________

NAME (Printed)/Phone/Title

SIGNATURE

DATE

Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Nov 14, 2017.