About this file

Attachments S1 - S6

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

S-1: PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY

N00024-13-R-4408

DATE OF REQUEST: QUESTION NO:

RFP REFERENCE: PAGE NO: CONTRACTOR:

QUESTION:

DO NOT WRITE BELOW THIS LINE

(FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY)

TECHNICAL REVIEW: SERIAL NO:

PLANNER

REVIEW

DATE: SUPERVISOR REVIEW: DATE:

SPEC CHG: Y/N DWG/REF CHG. Y/N RQMTS CHG: Y/N MAT'L CHG: Y/N

RESPONSE TO CODE 400:

S-2: PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror

Completed questionnaires shall be forwarded directly to the Naval Sea Systems Command points of contact listed below.

NOTE: ONCE COMPLETED BY THE POC, QUESTIONNAIRES MUST BE DIRECTLY

TRANSMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES BELOW. COMPLETED

QUESTIONNAIRES RECEIVED FROM OFFERORS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Instructions to Evaluator

The Naval Sea Systems Command is requesting an evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance for source selection purposes. Accordingly, request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance;

please see Section A below for the identity of the Offeror and contract of interest.

Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes Source Selection Sensitive and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials.

Please forward the completed questionnaire no later than 05 August 2013 to morgan.reese@navy.mil, traci.pichler@navy.mil and Robert.j.larkin@navy.mil.

Hand-written evaluations are acceptable. Please answer each question in SECTION B by circling one of the ratings: E V S M U N/A, where:

Exceptional - Contractor performance substantially exceeded expected levels of performance.

Very Good - Contractor performance exceeded expected levels.

Satisfactory – Performance met expected levels.

Marginal - Performance was less than expected.

Unsatisfactory - Performance was significantly less than expected.

N/A -Not Applicable

In addition, please provide supporting comments for each rating. Please use your supporting comments to highlight the Offeror’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets if required.

Your ratings and comments should reflect only “contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.

Please enter the requested information in SECTION C for the person primarily responsible for completing the questionnaire, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the point of contact identified above.

PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR

SECTION A (To Be Completed by the Offeror)

1. Name and address of Offeror/Contractor: ___________________________________________

2. Contract Number: _______________________________________ Task or Order No., where applicable: ___________________________________________

3. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________

4. Place of Performance: _______________________________________________________

5. Description of Work/Scope of Effort (max. 50 words): _____________________________

6. POC Name:

Address:

Tel. No.:

Email Address:

SECTION B (To Be Completed by Evaluator)

E -Exceptional; V-Very Good; S-Good; M-Marginal; U-Unsatisfactory; N/A-Not Applicable

1. Overall Contract Outcome: E V S M U N/A Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to customer requirements, standards of good workmanship and safe practices.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

2. Technical (Quality of Product): E V S M U N/A Ability to overcome technical challenges by applying sound engineering principles, complete required engineering analyses and develop adequate technical reports and plans.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

3. Schedule: E V S M U N/A Ability to develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules, as well as the ability to adapt to changes in requirements and work schedules.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

4. Business Relations and Management: E V S M U N/A Describe the Offeror’s Business Relations and Management. Was the contractor cooperative and receptive to government concerns affecting production and/or performance requirements? Throughout the contract and at completion of the contract, was the contractor committed to customer satisfaction?

Please explain.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

5. Small Business participation and coordination: E V S M U N/A If a subcontracting plan was required please describe the offerors success in meeting planned goals and/or efforts made to overcome goal deficiencies and challenges as well as the offeror’s ability to successfully manage and integrate subcontractors.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

6. Cost Control: E V S M U N/A Ability to accurately forecast and control costs throughout all phases of the contract.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

SECTION C (To Be Completed by Evaluator)

1. Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________________________________

2. Position Title: _________________________________________________________

3. Administrating Authority/Agency: _________________________________________________

4. Telephone Number: Voice __________________

5. Signature: ______________________________Date: ____________

Please transmit completed questionnaire to morgan.reese@navy.mil, traci.pichler@navy.mil and Robert.j.larkin@navy.mil.

S-3: PIER FACILITIES DATA SHEET

Offeror:

Pier Name/Identification:

Pier Owner:

Pier POC:

POC Phone Number:

POC Email Address:

The proposed pier is capable of non-concurrently berthing a DDG-51 and CG-47 class ship in the San Diego, CA homeport and has, at minimum, the following characteristics:

A minimum water depth of 35’ at mean low water YES NO

4,000 AMPS & 450 Volts Electrical power YES NO

1,250 Gallons/Minute at 125 Pounds/Square Inch Gauge of Saltwater or non-potable water YES NO

16,000 Gallons/Day at 50 Pounds/Square Inch Gauge of Potable water YES NO

1,000 Standard Cubic Feet per Minute at 125 Pounds/Square Inch Gauge of Compressed Air YES NO

Six (6) Telephone direct trunk lines connected to the municipal telephone system YES NO

Ability to accommodate and dispose of 10,000 gallons/day of effluent and 10,000 gallons/day of waste water YES NO

T-1 line capable of delivering Non-secure Internet Protocol Router Network (NIPRNET) and Secure Internet Protocol Router Network (SIPRNET) service YES NO

FOR GOVERNMENT USE ONLY:

PIER MEETS SOLICITATION REQUIREMENT: YES NO

Straight Time Rate Price Over Time Rate Price Double Time Rate Price Total Price Hours $ ($ * hours) $ ($ * hours) $ ($ * hours) (ST + OT + DT)

Supervision/Program Managemen 18,576 $0 4,644 $0 2,580 $0 25,800 $0 Shipfitter 5,262 $0 1,316 $0 731 $0 7,309 $0 Sheetmetal 1,331 $0 333 $0 185 $0 1,849 $0 Welder/Burner 7,397 $0 1,849 $0 1,027 $0 10,274 $0 Inside Machinist 3,134 $0 783 $0 435 $0 4,353 $0 Outside Machinist 3,184 $0 796 $0 442 $0 4,422 $0 Electrician 18,884 $0 4,721 $0 2,623 $0 26,228 $0 Pipefitter 1,903 $0 476 $0 264 $0 2,642 $0 Insulation/Lagger 1,056 $0 264 $0 147 $0 1,466 $0 Carpenter/Shipwright 1,844 $0 461 $0 256 $0 2,561 $0 Electronics/Ordnance 302 $0 75 $0 42 $0 419 $0 Painter/Sandblaster 6,183 $0 1,546 $0 859 $0 8,588 $0 Rigger 2,328 $0 582 $0 323 $0 3,234 $0 Quality Assurance 2,973 $0 743 $0 413 $0 4,130 $0 Firewatch 9,426 $0 2,356 $0 1,309 $0 13,091 $0 Total Labor 116,366 $0

Straight Time Rate Price Over Time Rate Price Double Time Rate Price Total Price Hours $ ($ * hours) $ ($ * hours) $ ($ * hours) (ST + OT + DT)

Supervision/Program Managemen 18,576 $0 4,644 $0 2,580 $0 25,800 $0 Shipfitter 5,262 $0 1,316 $0 731 $0 7,309 $0 Sheetmetal 1,331 $0 333 $0 185 $0 1,849 $0 Welder/Burner 7,397 $0 1,849 $0 1,027 $0 10,274 $0 Inside Machinist 3,134 $0 783 $0 435 $0 4,353 $0 Outside Machinist 3,184 $0 796 $0 442 $0 4,422 $0 Electrician 18,884 $0 4,721 $0 2,623 $0 26,228 $0 Pipefitter 1,903 $0 476 $0 264 $0 2,642 $0 Insulation/Lagger 1,056 $0 264 $0 147 $0 1,466 $0 Carpenter/Shipwright 1,844 $0 461 $0 256 $0 2,561 $0 Electronics/Ordnance 302 $0 75 $0 42 $0 419 $0 Painter/Sandblaster 6,183 $0 1,546 $0 859 $0 8,588 $0 Rigger 2,328 $0 582 $0 323 $0 3,234 $0 Quality Assurance 2,973 $0 743 $0 413 $0 4,130 $0 Firewatch 9,426 $0 2,356 $0 1,309 $0 13,091 $0 Total Labor 116,366 $0

Base Year Material $750,000 Base Year Material Burden Rate Insert Rate -> Base Year Total Material Price = Base Year Material * (1+ Base Year Material Burden Rate) $750,000

Option Year Material $750,000 Option Year Material Burden Rate Insert Rate -> Option Year Total Material Price = Option Year Material * (1+ Option Year Material Burden Rate) $750,000

Total = Sum of Base Year Total Labor Price + Option Year Total Labor Price + Base Year Total Material Price + Option Year Total Material Price $1,500,000

Option Period

Base Period

S-5: Offerors - Please note that the excel file has imbedded formulas that calculate "price" for each trade and hour type for both the base year and option year, as well as the price associated with Material and Material Burden. Please provide the proposal in the fomat provided, with the formulas maintained.

S-6: CORPORATE EXPERIENCE DATA SHEET

Project / Contract Number:

Project Title and Location:

Prime Contractor (as shown on contract documents):

Role in contract (Prime, Sub, JV Partner):

Percentage of work performed by the Offeror:

Original Contract Completion Date:

Actual Date of Contract Acceptance:

Reason for delta:

Award Amount:

Final Contract Amount:

Reason for delta:

Name of Client Entity/Organization:

Point of Contact:

Email Address:

Phone Number:

Description of work and contract type (FP, Cost, Delivery Order, etc.):

Description of Subcontracting Effort, including coordination and management effort:

Additional information to demonstrate relevancy:

S-1 Pre-Proposal Inquiry
S-2 Past Performance Questionnaire
S-3 Pier Facilities Data Sheet (Rev Amend 0002)
S-5 Labor and Material Burden Rates
S-6 Corporate Experience Data Sheet

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .