Final_-_Q A's.pdf

Question

Number

RFP

Document/Paragraph/Page Question Answer

1 General Will the Government be conducting an Industry Day?

Industry Day was previously held on 19 March 2013. The Government does not intend to hold any additional Industry Days.

2 General

We request the Government allow for Industry One on One sessions with the Government to facilitate open dialogue regarding the RFP and the scope of work

Industry One-On-One Meetings were previously held on 20-21 March

2013 and 3-4 June 2014. The Government does not intend to hold any additional One-On-One sessions.

3 General

Where is the Transition In period to be priced? What type of contract is transition in?

The Transition In period will be addressed in the Final RFP.

4 General

Can the Government advise on the number of task orders expected to be issued each year?

It is anticipated that individual task orders will be issued on a per aircraft basis.

5 General

Can the Government advise on the expected number of FFP task orders, LH task orders and cost task orders issued each year?

See Response to Question 4. It is anticipated that each task order may contain a combination of each contract type, based on the type of work associated with the aircraft inducted.

6 General

How will parts obsolescence be handled? Please confirm that if parts are no longer available to perform repairs on the aircraft, the

Contractor is not penalized for delays in performing maintenance/inspection activities while an alternate solution is determined.

The U.S. Government intends to supply parts IAW SOW 3.8. The

Contractor will not be penalized due to delays in receipt of U.S.

Government provided parts.

General

Is there a publicly accessible website for all NAVAIR clauses, including those that are tiered from the clauses referenced in the Draft

RFP?

No, all applicable NAVAIR clauses are included in full text.

RFP, Section B.1, Page 13 and

Attachment 16

Is the Government requesting one labor hour rate for CLIN 0X03, 0X04 and 0X06 or can the Offeror propose multiple labor categories/rates under CLIN 0X03, 0X04 and 0X06?

The Offerors shall propose a composite rate for each CLIN (0X03, 0X04 and 0X06).

RFP, Section B.1, Page 13 and

Attachment 16

Should the Contractor assume a 40 hour work week when preparing the Labor Hour rates for CLIN 0X03, 0X04 and 0X06?

The Offeror may propose labor rates however it deems appropriate to meet the requirement.

Solicitation N00019-15-R-0090 Draft RFP Questions

RFP, Section B.1, Page 13, Attachment 0007, Attachment

13 and Attachment 16 Will Attachment 7, 13 and 16 be incorporated into the awarded IDIQ?

Yes, Attachments 7 "Unit Price Matrix (FFP)", Attachment 13

"Government Furnished Property List" and Attachment 16 "Labor

Hour Matrix" will be incorporated into the awarded contract.

RFP, Section B.1, Page 13, Attachment 0007 and

Attachment 16

For CLINs 0X01 and 0X02, instead of progress payments would the

Government allow the contractor to propose performance milestones or invoice in equal monthly increments based on the total task order value? This would eliminate the administrative burden associated with managing progress payments.

No, the Government intends to require progress payments IAW FAR

Clause 52.232-16 as included in the Draft RFP. FAR Subpart 32.1003 prohibits contracts from having both progress payments and performance-based payments on a contract at the same time.

RFP, Section B.1, Page 13, Attachment 0007 and

Attachment 16

For CLINs 0X03, 0X04 and 0X06, will the contractor invoice monthly based on the hours worked multiplied by the labor hour rate on contract?

Yes.

RFP, 5252.211-9507 (PERIOD

OF PERFORMANCE

(NAVAIR)(SEP 2013), page 23

Clause states "The contract shall commence on contract award and shall continue for a period of time, Not To Exceed, 540 calendar days from date of last aircraft inducted under the Base year ordering period.

" However the base period of performance as specified in Section F indicates AWARD through 30 September 2016 which is less than 540 days. Please clarify what the timeframe of the base period is and what the 540 days means?

The ordering period for purpose of issuing task orders is based on the pricing established in a particular year as defined in the CLINs under

Section B. The RFP distinguishes between the "Ordering Period" and the "Period of Performance" in Section F.

NAVAIR clause 5252.211-9507 only speaks to the "Period of

Performance" not the "Ordering Period".

D/RFP, Section F, Page 24 of 115

Reference provides Turn Around Times (TATs) for CLINs 0X01 and

0X02, including combined HFH and Modification aircraft, Standalone

Modification aircraft, and HFH Recurring Inspection aircraft. Will

NAVAIR provide the expected TAT for an aircraft just receiving an

HFH Inspection, or is this not a foreseen option?

If an aircraft requires an HFH inspection only, the TAT will be the same as a combined HFH and modification aircraft.

D/RFP, Page 28 of 115, Para

5252.216-9506

Reference provides Labor Hour (LH) figures and dollar amounts against the various CLINs for O&A and other activity for the

'Maximum' aircraft induction scenario. Are these numbers hard ceiling amounts or planning figures? Can NAVAIR provide similar numbers for the 'Minimum' aircraft induction scenario?

NAVAIR clause 5252.216-9506 provides the minimum and maximum quantities for each CLIN.

D/RFP, Page 28 of 115, Para

5252.216-9506

Reference provides an IDIQ minimum and maximum aircraft induction forecast. Given the high Out of Reporting (OOR) aircraft rates on the F/A-18A-D fleet would NAVAIR consider increasing the

'Maximum' ceiling to allow more flexibility in managing future operational demands?

NAVAIR does not intend to increase the maximum ceiling at this time.

RFP, H-3 OVER AND

ABOVE WORK REQUEST

PROCEDURES, pg 37

Clause states "The Contractor shall compile a list of all nonconformances (O&A) by BUNO and submit to DCMA for review and authorization. What is considered a nonconformance? Is it at the

Contractors discretion what constitutes a nonconformance?

The definition of a nonconformance is found on page 50 of

Attachment 1, F/A-18A/B/C/D Contractor Depot Level Maintenance

Statement of Work.

RFP, H-3 OVER AND

ABOVE WORK REQUEST

PROCEDURES, pg 37

Clause states "The Contractor shall compile a list of all nonconformances (O&A) by BUNO and submit to DCMA for review and authorization. The Contractor shall initiate and continuously update this list during the course of performing the T/O ." Attachment

7 Unit Price Matrix list various tasks associated with CLIN 0X01 and

0X02, if the Contractor is requested to perform tasking on CLIN 0X01 and/or 0X02 that is not an identified tasking on Attachment 7 does that constitute an O&A that will be approved by DCMA?

Attachment 1, F/A-18A/B/C/D Contractor Depot Level Maintenance

Statement of Work, paragraph 3.5.19 will be revised in the Final RFP to address this situation.

RFP, H-3 OVER AND

ABOVE WORK REQUEST

PROCEDURES, pg 37

If the Contractor determines effort in CLINs 0X01 and/or 0X02 to be

O&A, but the DCMA representative and/or PCO determines the effort to be within the scope of CLINs 0X01 and/or 0X02 how will the disagreement be resolved? Please confirm that Contractor is not penalized for schedule delays while the disagreement is resolved.

Disagreements between Contractor and Government will be resolved

IAW FAR Clause 52.233-1 ALTI.

RFP, H-3 OVER AND

ABOVE WORK REQUEST

PROCEDURES, pg 37

"The contractor shall certify in the OAWR that the work is not covered by the fixed price maintenance effort. " Is the Contractor certification that this effort is OAWR sufficient for DCMA and ACO to provide authorization to proceed?

DCMA will assess every OAWR and determine if additional information is needed or whether to provide authority to proceed.

Authorization to proceed will be made IAW Clause H-3.

RFP, H-3 OVER AND

ABOVE WORK REQUEST

PROCEDURES(5)(b)(iii), pg

"The ACO will verify hours submitted on each voucher and recommend disallowance if not acceptable." How will the ACO make the determine if the hours performed are not acceptable? Will the

Government allow for discussion with the Contractor prior to disallowance of the hours?

Disagreements between Contractor and Government will be resolved

IAW FAR Clause 52.233-1 ALTI

H-5 Pricing of Technical

Directives not currently released prior to award, pg 38

For Technical Directives that are released after contract award, please confirm that the Government acknowledges this as a change and

Contractor would be entitled to an adjustment in Attachment 7 unit prices.

Pricing of Technical Directives not currently released shall be made

IAW clause H-5, Pricing of Technical Directives not currently released prior to award. However, no adjustments will be made to existing unit prices in Attachment 7 "Unit Price Matrix (FFP)" for previously approved TDs.

H-6 Receipt of Aircraft prior to

Task Order issuance, pg 39

Clause states "If the event that an aircraft arrives at the Contractor’s facility prior to issuance of a task order for that aircraft’s induction , the Contractor shall absorb any costs associated with safeguarding and storing the aircraft in accordance with Attachment 1, Statement of

Work (SOW) – F/A-18 A/B/C/D Contractor Depot Level Maintenance and Attachment 2, Supplemental SOW F/A-18 A/B/C/D Contractor

Depot Level Maintenance, for a period not to exceed 72 hours from time of arrival." The requirement to have the Contractor safeguard and store the aircraft prior to task order issuance presents a significant risk to the Contractor as the Contractor would be performing effort in the absence of a contractual vehicle and without the coverage of the

Ground and Flight Risk Clause. Is this the Government's intent?

The Government intends to remove this clause, which will be addressed in the Final RFP.

5252.216-9534-TASK ORDER

PROCEDURES, pg 41

Please confirm the Government intends to solicit task order proposals from Contractor for all task orders, regardless if whether the

Government intends to issues task orders bilaterally or unilaterally?

The Government intends to remove this clause, which will be addressed in the Final RFP.

5252.216-9534-TASK ORDER

PROCEDURES, pg 41(d)(2)(ii)

Overtime Will overtime pricing be negotiated at the task order level?

The Government intends to remove this clause, which will be addressed in the Final RFP.

5252.216-9534-TASK ORDER

PROCEDURES, pg 41

Is the Contractor permitted to add additional labor categories and rates for task order proposals?

The Government intends to remove this clause, which will be addressed in the Final RFP.

5252.216-9534-TASK ORDER

PROCEDURES, pg 41

Please confirm that in the event a unilateral task order is issued which the Contractor determines they cannot perform to the estimated costs within the task order, the Contractor is not penalized for delays in performing the task order while the differences are resolved.

The Government intends to remove this clause, which will be addressed in the Final RFP.

5252.216-9534-TASK ORDER

PROCEDURES, pg 41 What is the Government's intent to issue unilateral task orders

The Government intends to remove this clause, which will be addressed in the Final RFP.

5252.217-9507 OVER AND

ABOVE WORK REQUESTS

ITEMS , pg 43

States "The contractor shall prepare and submit the applicable Over and Above Work Request (OAWR) Form similar to the one attached to this contract to the ACO, via the COR, for authorization to proceed.

" However, Clause H-3 indicates submitting the OAWR to DCMA.

Please clarify what the correct process if for OAWR.

The Government intends to remove this clause, which will be addressed in the Final RFP.

5252.232-9509 TRAVEL

APPROVAL AND

REIMBURSEMENT

PROCEDURES, pg 46

Where is travel to occur? Could there be potential travel hazardous locations such as Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan etc…?

Travel is IAW Attachment 1, F/A-18A/B/C/D Contractor Depot Level

Maintenance Statement of Work, paragraph 3.10.2.6 and no other potential travel will be required. The Government intends to remove this clause which will be addressed in the Final RFP.

5252.232-9509 TRAVEL

APPROVAL AND

REIMBURSEMENT

PROCEDURES, pg 46 Will pricing for travel be addressed at the task order level?

See Response to Question 30

D/RFP, Section I, Pg. 53

The draft Contract includes DFARS 252.216-7003, which protects companies against foreign wage and material rate fluctuations. Would the Government also consider including FAR 52.216-4, or other similar agency provision, into the contract to protect against comparable domestic contingencies?

No, the Government does not intend to add FAR clause 52.216-4 in the Final RFP.

52.217-9 OPTION TO

EXTEND THE TERM OF

THE CONTRACT, pg 59

The clause states "The total duration of this contract, including the exercise of any options under this clause, shall not exceed 5 years."

The Period of performance stated in Section F is for 3 years. This the

5 years be changed to 3 years?

See Response to Question 13

52.229-7 TAXES--FORIEGN

FIXED-PRICE CONTRACTS

WITH FOREIGN

GOVERNMENTS , pg 62

Is this clause applicable? What foreign Government will the

Contractor be interacting with?

The clause is applicable if award is made to a Contractor in a foreign country. See Section 1 of Attachment 1, F/A-18A/B/C/D Contractor

Depot Level Maintenance Statement of Work.

52.229-9 TAXES--COST-

REIMBURSEMENT

CONTRACTS WITH

FOREIGN GOVERNMENTS,

pg 62

Is this clause applicable? What foreign locations will the Contractor be performing effort in that would require this clause? The clause is applicable if award is made to a Contractor in a foreign country. See Section 1 of Attachment 1, F/A-18A/B/C/D Contractor

Depot Level Maintenance Statement of Work.

52.243-7 NOTIFICATION OF

CHANGES, pg 66

Would the Government consider a longer notification period. The current 2 day period does not leave much time for the Contractor to determine the extent/impact of the change and draft a notification to the ACO. Would the Government consider a 20 day time period to the

Contractor to provide notification?

Changes will be addressed in Final RFP

252.229-7001 TAX RELIEF -

BASIC, pg 68

Please confirm this clause is only applicable to non-US Contractor's that would prime this effort?

This clause is only applicable to non-US companies performing this effort.

38 RFP, Section I

Would the Government please include DFAR 252.219-7004 for

Contractor who participate in the Test Program?

Yes, changes will be addressed in Final RFP.

D/RFP, Section L, Page 79 of 115, Para 5252.215-9503

Reference provides an anticipated award date of October 20, 2015.

Please confirm if this is still valid and provide a full acquisition schedule.

Anticipated Dates:

Final RFP Release: 2 April 2015

Proposal Due: 20 May 2015

Contract Award: 3 Dec 2015

RFP, 3.0 PROPOSAL

CONTENT AND VOLUMES,

pg 83

Is the Offeror permitted to include an acronym list in each proposal volume. If so, please confirm that acronym list is excluded for the

Volume page count.

Yes, acronym lists can be included but should be inclusive of the

Volume page count as specified in Section L, Paragraph 3.0.

RFP, 2.0 VOLUME 2 -

TECHNICAL, pg 90

Is the Cross Reference Matrix excluded from the Technical Volume page count?

No, the Cross Reference Matrix is included in the Technical Volume page count as specified in Section L.

RFP, 2.1 Management Support

Approach, pg 90

States "b. Describe the management approach for each sub-contractor(s ) and/or critical team member utilized to perform the requirements of this solicitation and identify risks and associated mitigations. " Does the term subcontractor refer or principal subcontractor who would be performing 10% or more of the total proposed price or any subcontractor regardless of effort?

Changes will be addressed in the Final RFP. Attachment 1, F/A-

18A/B/C/D Contractor Depot Level Maintenance Statement of Work, paragraph 2.1 states latest version of documents referenced shall apply.

RFP, 3.1 Authorization

Letter(s), pg 92

3.0 Volume 3-Past Performance section indicates “For this volume, the

Offeror shall identify relevant contracts, or those portions of a relevant contract, whose performance is within five years of the proposal due date and contains efforts similar to those efforts (e.g., end product or service, type effort, contract tasks, contract type, contract dollar value, etc.), required by this solicitation for the prime contractor, JV, critical team members, JV team members, any subcontractor, and corporate parent, division, subsidiary, or affiliate identified in Table ES-1

(Offeror Summary). any subcontractor”. However, RFP, Section 3.1 indicates Authorization Letters for principal subcontractor, critical team member, and JV team member. Is past performance required for any subcontractor, a critical sub and/or a principal subcontractor?

Changes will be addressed in the Final RFP. Attachment 1, F/A-

18A/B/C/D Contractor Depot Level Maintenance Statement of Work, paragraph 2.1 states latest version of documents referenced shall apply.

RFP, 5.0 VOLUME 5 –

CONTRACT

ADMINISTRATION,

Subsection e, pg 106

If an Offeror determines it needs to include an exception or condition in our proposal, section e indicates this to be considered a deficiency.

Usually if a proposal has a section evaluated with a deficiency this proposal is unawardable. If the Offeror includes conditions or exceptions in the proposal will this make the proposal awardable? Can the Offeror include conditions or exceptions and still be awardable?

An exception or deviation is considered a deficiency.

SOW, Section 3.4 Ground and

Flight Operations, pg 15

Will all aircraft be flown by the Government into the Contractor facility? If not, how will aircraft arrive at Contractor's facility?

The U.S. Government will fly the aircraft to the Contractor's facility.

46 SOW General Will the Government be performing the test flights? The U.S. Government will conduct all necessary flights.

SOW, Para 3.3.8, Page 12

Reference calls for an 'Aeronautical Equipment Welding' plan. There is no requirement for welding on the aircraft. Please confirm that this is a requirement.

There will be no welding on the aircraft. However, welding on

Government Furnished Equipment (GFE) may be required in the performance of this contract.

48 SOW, para. 3.5.17, pg. 22

Is "reach back capability" defined to capacity only ? Or does it include into parts, materials, hardware, software, etc.? For which models are they to be required? Please define "reach back capability" more specifically.

Attachment 1, F/A-18A/B/C/D Contractor Depot Level Maintenance

Statement of Work paragraph 3.5.17 will be deleted. These changes will be addressed in the Final RFP.

49 SOW, para. 3.7.5, pg. 29

"…shall coordinate and submit all structural dispositions and / or recommended repairs (including all supporting technical data) via

RFTI and DCMA Engineering." Will DCMA Engineering have access to the same RFTI system (CMPro as per CDRL A00E)? Or will an alternate notification be required?

U.S. Government personnel will have access to applicable U.S.

Government IT systems.

SOW, para. 3.7.5.4.6, pg. 31 & para. 3.7.7 pg. 33

Para. 3.7.5.4.6 states "The Contractor shall define all applicable load conditions as defined by the aircraft manufactured, military specification or other source". Paragraph 3.7.7 states …" The

Government will provide available Government Furnished Information

(GFI), as required,…". Shall the OEM drawings, USN mod drawings, materials, stress reports, fatigue spectrums, be provided with initial contract award? Or will individual RFTI's be required on a case by case basis in order to have the baseline aircraft structural data at the contractor's reference for non-standard repair development?

Individual RFTIs will be required on a case by case basis to obtain additional data.

SOW, Para 3.10.4.3, Pages 38-

Will the Monte Carlo analysis called for at reference be part of just the baseline plan or also used as a recurring analysis throughout the process?

Monte Carlo analysis shall be used as a recurring analysis throughout the performance of this contract IAW F/A-18A/B/C/D Contractor

Depot Level Maintenance Statement of Work, paragraph 3.10.4.3.

Draft RFP, Section C, Item

0001, pg. 17 (Reference. Item

0002)

Item 0001 refers to a SOW dated 15 June 2014. Item 0003 thru 0005 refer to SOW dated 5 Dec 2014. Is the SOW version in Item 0001 different or is it a typo?

Changes will be addressed in the Final RFP.

Draft RFP, Section C, Item

0002, pg. 17

According to Item 0002 states several paragraphs as called out in the

SOW dated 4 December 2014. In SOW dated 4 December 2014, paragraphs 3.5.19.5 & 3.5.19.6 do not exist. RFP Item number 0001 states … , 3.5.19.3-3.5.19.6,…. Are there missing paragraphs in the

SOW or is this a typo?

Changes will be addressed in the Final RFP.

54 SOW, para. 3.5.8, pg. 19

When will reference (r ) be available for review?

(r) Local Engineering Specification (LES) NI F18-001-09, General

Requirements for complying with F/A-18 A-D Service Life

Management Program HFH Bulletins

This document is available in the PMA265 Competition Library as referenced in Section L, paragraph 6.0.

55 SOW 3.1.3.7 page 7

COMSEC and classified are handled by cleared US personnel. Will the same requirements listed in 3.1.3.8 be required by cleared US personnel? If so, who is expected to conduct the full-systems functional checks?

Full Systems Functional Checks will be conducted by the U.S.

Contractor. Requirements in Attachment 1, F/A-18A/B/C/D

Contractor Depot Level Maintenance Statement of Work 3.1.3.8 will require U.S. Contractors.

56 SOW, Page 4

Per the SOW NAS3306 “Facility Requirements for Aircraft

Operations” reflects Revision 2. Revision 3 is the current version.

Please update the SOW to reflect Revision 3.

Changes will be addressed in the Final RFP. Attachment 1, F/A-

18A/B/C/D Contractor Depot Level Maintenance Statement of Work, paragraph 2.1 states latest version of documents referenced shall apply.

57 SOW 3.1.2 page 6

Which work performed will require clearances? Other than COMSEC will any other part of the aircraft is designated “classified”?

The work to remove/install/handle/utilize the equipment listed in

Attachment 2, Supplemental F/A-18A/B/C/D Statement of Work, Appendices 1 and 2, will require Secret clearances.

58 SOW 3.1.3, page 6

Will access to a SIPRnet be required? Will any classified computers be required on site? Is any type of classified system required?

No, SIPRnet access will be required. The U.S. Government will provide any classified equipment that will be required in the performance of this contract.

Based on RFP aircraft delivery requirements and SOW Parts procurement guidance below, what happens if Gov't doesn't have parts and lead-time is longer then RFP induction to delivery time requirement? Also, will the contractor be responsible/allowed to perform component repair if the Gov’t cannot support the requirement?

The U.S. Government may authorize component repair based on an

OAWR IAW H-3 clause.

Draft RFP, Section C, Option

Items 0106 and 0206, pg. 17

The Validation and verification process of TD's listed in para. 3.5.20 of the SOW dated 5 December 2014. Is there a specific process that the USN engineering requires for this validation and verification of

TD's? The majority of the TD's listed in para. 3.5.19.4 of the SOW are unavailable. It is assumed that USN engineering drawings will be utilized in the implementation of the TD's that will be controlled by

USN engineering similar to AFB 591. The USN CCB process for communication, correction and adjustment during the base-line design validation is unknown. Do USN engineering need to be present for the verification process (PCA)?

USN Engineering will be present for all validations and verifications on a case by case basis.

61 SOW, para. 3.5.19.3 (f), pg.23

Will Boeing Process Specifications and NI LES's be made available in order for the work to be compliant with the AFC 494?

No, all related Technical Directive information is located in the

Technical Library.

62 SOW, Page 7

Per the SOW, the Government will provide the EKMS Manager.

Please confirm the EKMS Manager will provide the key codes to the

Contractor COMSEC custodian?

Per 3.1.3.10, The U.S. Government will provide an EKMS Manager.

The U.S. Government will provide applicable key codes to the US

Contractor or US Subcontractor.

Supplemental SOW

Reference provides security restrictions on Canadian companies and outlines what activities must be carried out by a U.S. Company inside the aircraft. Would a Canadian national with appropriate clearance, and authorized by the U.S. Navy under bi'lateral agreement provisions be acceptable for performance of these tasks. Additionally, If a

Canadian military reservist with appropriate security clearances is employed by a Canadian company, can these individuals fulfill the functions outlined in this reference?

As stated in Attachment 2, Supplemental F/A-18A/B/C/D Statement of

Work, paragraph 3.2.1.1, "The U.S. Contractor shall be composed of

U.S. citizens only – dual citizenship is not authorized."

Supplemental SOW

If NAVAIR were to load the aircraft with a generic OFP software load (such as the FMS load which is currently provided to Canada) before arriving at the contractor's facility, could this reduce the imposed restriction on

Canadian access to the cockpit when power is applied?

NAVAIR will not utilize a generic OFP software load

65 Attachment 4

For the CBR+ work effort that is referenced in Attach 7, 9 and 4, AFC

316-Rev. C is the latest tech data to accomplish this work. There are numerous tools and "tool use instructions" (TUI) that are called out in the AFC 316-RC, Enclosure 5-1 (pg. 178) and Enclosure 5-2 (pg. 179) for the aft barrel work. There is also a TUI 137418 for the CBR Jig that has over 14 pieces of tooling. None of this tooling is provided as part of the Attachment 13 GFE list. Will this tooling be provided as part of GFE?

The attachments relate to the aircraft configuration upon induction. No

Center Barrel Replacement (CBR+) work will be performed under this contract.

Supplemental SOW

Reference provides security restrictions on Canadian companies and outlines what activities must be carried out by a U.S. Company inside the aircraft. Would a Canadian national with appropriate clearance, and authorized by the U.S. Navy under bi'lateral agreement provisions be acceptable for performance of these tasks. Additionally, If a

Canadian military reservist with appropriate security clearances is employed by a Canadian company, can these individuals fulfill the functions outlined in this reference?

As stated in paragraph 3.2.1.1 of Attachment 2, Supplemental F/A-

18A/B/C/D Statement of Work", the "U.S. Contractor shall be composed of U.S. citizens only – dual citizenship is not authorized."

Supplemental SOW

If NAVAIR were to load the aircraft with a generic OFP software load

(such as the FMS load which is currently provided to Canada) before arriving at the contractor's facility, could this reduce the imposed restriction on Canadian access to the cockpit when power is applied?

NAVAIR will not utilize a generic OFP software load

Missing Items

The draft Solicitation references several documents that were not included in the posting, as follows. Is it the Government's intent to provide these items for advance review, as well?

Attachment 3, Information Assurance Plan (SOW 3.3.12.7)

Attachment 8, DD-254 (SOW 3.3.12)

Attachment 12, Program Protection Plan (SOW 3.3.12)

Attachment 15, Cost Data Reporting (SOW 3.10.3 (f))

Appendix 1, WRAs identified as removed by Reporting Custodian

(SOW Sup. 3.3.1)

Appendi 2, WRAs identified as removed by Contractor (SOW Sup.

3.3.1)

Attachment L-1, ES Tables (RFP Section 3.0)

Attachment L-2, Past Performance Questionnaire (RFP Section 3.0)

Attachment L-3, Table PP-1 Past Performance Contract Data (RFP

Section 3.0)

Notional Induction Schedule

Attachment 3, Attachment 8, Attachment 12, Appendices 1 and 2 and the Notional Induction Schedule are included in the Competition

Library under tab "Industry Comm".

References to Attachment 15 in the SOW will be revised in the Final

RFP. Attachments L-1 and L-3 are embedded in the RFP Section L.

Attachment L-2 will be posted at time of Final RFP.