Draft_RFP_Q As_Deferred_Questions_15APR2015.pdf

ITEM

Document

Reference

COMMENTS TO: Alternate Source - F/A-18A/B/C/D Depot Level Maintenance

SOLICITATION DOCUMENT N00019-15-R-0090 (Dated 02 March 2015) Answer

Q&A #39 and Draft

RFP, Section L, Page

79 of 115, Para

5252.215-9503

Reference provides an anticipated award date of October 20, 2015. Please confirm if this is still valid and provide a full acquisition schedule.

Anticipated Dates:

Final RFP Release: 16 Apr 2015

Proposal Due: 3 Jun 2015

Contract Award: 3 Dec 2015

Solicitation Section

L, Part A, Paragraph

4.0, Pg. 85

RFP Section L Section 4.0 PROPOSAL PACKAGING AND SUBMISSION states: “However it is requested that Volume 1

(Executive Summary), Table ES-1 (Offeror’s Summary); Volume 1 (Executive Summary), Table ES-2 (Relevant Contract

Summary); Volume 3 (Past Performance) Table PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data); and Annex C (Final Versions of

Previous SOW/PWS shall be submitted two weeks prior to the submission date/time…” With this statement, it appears that the only the Volume 3 Table PP-1 (Past Performance Contract Data) is due in early submittal. However, the last sentence in this paragraph states: “Failure to submit Volume 3 by the date/time established for receipt will cause the proposal submission to be rejected in its entirety.” Please clarify if the entire volume 3 is due in early submittal or just the Table PP-1.

With respect to Past Performance,only Table PP-1 and Annex C are required for early submittal.

Solicitation, Section

L, Part A, Paragraph

3.0, Table 2 (Pg. 84) -

Annexes &

Section L, Part B, Paragraph 3.3, Pg.

RFP Section L, 3.3 Evaluations, a. Relevancy (Pg. 95) states: “Final Versions of Previous SOW/PWSs for Past

Performance) should only be provided in electronic format and should not be provided in hard copy”. However, in

3.0, Table Gen Inst 2 (Pg. 84) Proposal Structure states:

Annex C // Final Versions of Previous SOW/PWSs // As Needed // 1 Original- // 1 Original-for Past Performance 6 Copies 2 Copies

Do Offerors need to supply Annex C in both hard and soft copies in the final submission in addition to the electronic copy with the early submission?

The Final RFP will be updated to clarify the requirement.

Solicitation Section

L, Part B, Paragraph

2.1, Pg. 91

RFP Section L, 2.1 Management Support Approach, e.3 states: “Large Business Offerors shall provide a Small Business

Subcontracting Plan conforming to the requirements of FAR 19.7 and DFARS 219.7 as part of Annex C (Table T-2

(Small Business Goals) and Small Business Subcontracting Plan)”. Should this be Annex B instead of C, as identified in

Table Gen Inst 2 Proposal Structure on Pg. 84?

Yes, changes will be addressed in Final RFP.

82 SOW

There is no mention of an Authorized Government Technical Representative (AGTR) in the SOW. Will NAVAIR consider locating such a representative on-site to perform this function at a Canadian location?

No, the Government does not intend to utilize an

AGTR.

Attached is the list of documents identified, to date, that will be required to properly estimate the DLM scope. The most critical documents are the missing TDs (2 released and 11 in Val/Ver stage). We also would like to request, if available, the referenced drawings in the discreet mod packages. In certain cases, the technical instruction refers to a specific area of a drawing, so in those cases the drawing is required. We would like to ask for the drawings for all the

Mod packages as these would be the most useful in estimating the job.

See attached list, including status of requested documents. The Government intends to make available modification drawings in the technical library.