B2.01 Sec J Attachment 10 Q + A.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 26 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Navy ManTech - Navy Metalworking Recompete Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- N0001421R0002
About this file
This document contains a pre-solicitation notice and description for solicitation number N0001421R0002 to manage and operate the Navy Metalworking Technology Center. The Navy Office of Naval Research will award an indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract with a maximum value of $99 million to provide operations and management of the center, perform special projects as identified by the Navy Manufacturing Technology program, and develop and manage standard and rapid response manufacturing technology projects. The period of performance will be from December 2021 through 2026. Offerors are advised to monitor beta.SAM.gov for release of the full solicitation around May 28, 2021, with award expected in December 2021. The purpose of the center and projects is to improve affordability and production speed of key Navy shipbuilding programs through application of advanced metalworking and manufacturing technologies.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| B2. 01RFP Sec J Attachment 9 ONR Reps_Certs (Rev12-6-21).docx | DOCX document | |
| B2. 01RFP Sec J Attachment 8 CE Summary (Rev12-6-21).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| B2 N00014-21-R-0002_Amd_0003.pdf | ||
| N00014-21-R-0002-0002.pdf | ||
| B2. 01RFP Sec J Attachment 1 SOW MTC Rev1.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Metalworking Technology Center (MTC) | |||||||
| Solicitation No. N00014-21-R-0002 | |||||||
| # | Document | Page | Section | Question | Answer | Solicitation Change? | |
| 1 | Solicitation | 51 | Section L | Will legible font size (and font style) smaller than 10 pt. within an illustration, drawing, callout, logo or image be deemed acceptable? | Language in subparagraph (F)(1)(b) includes "with the exception of charts and graphs," | No | |
| 2 | Solicitation | N/A | Section J, Attachment 8 | In Row 2 of the MS Excel spreadsheet, there is a reference to "N00014-20-R-0007 NCMC Manufacturing Technology"; should this read: "N00014-21-R-0002 Navy Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) Metalworking Technology Center (MTC)"? | yes | yes | |
| 3 | Solicitation | N/A | Section J, Attachment 9 | In the Solicitation section where it reads, Manufacturing Technology, Navy Metal Working Technology Center of Excellence"; should this read: Navy Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) Metalworking Technology Center (MTC)"? | yes | yes | |
| 4 | Solicitation | 2 | Section B | Will the awarded maximum ceiling for the Base IDIQ be $99M? If so, should the two sentences after CLIN 0001 be updated to include "$99,000,000" for each "[To Be Determined]" in this Section? This is consistent with $99M identified in Section G provision "ONR - Minimum Contract Guarantee and Maximum Potential" on Page 7 of 81. | No, "To be determined" will remain until awarded. | No | |
| 5 | Solicitation | 2 | Section C | Should DFARS Clause 252.204-7015 be in Section I instead of Section B? | yes | yes | |
| 6 | Solicitation | 3 | Section C | On page 3 of the solicitation, Section C, ONR - Acknowledgement of Sponsorship, can you confirm “(252.204-7000)” is a DFARS clause? | confirmed: | ||
| https://www.acquisition.gov/dfars/252.204-7000-disclosure-information.?&searchTerms=252.204-7000 | No | ||||||
| 7 | Solicitation | 2 | Section C, ONR - Statement of Work, Paragraph (2) | Consistent with the Statement of Work and Section B, CLIN 0001, would ONR consider a revision of the first sentence read as follows: |
| The Operations and Management, to include administration and technical oversight of the Navy Manufacturing Technology (ManTech) Metalworking Technology Center (MTC) and the performance of Special Projects, will be awarded as the first Task Order Award in accordance with Section J, Attachment 1, Statement of Work."? | Yes | yes | |||
| 8 | Solicitation | 2 | Section C (2), ONR - Statement of Work, First Paragraph | Since "Special Projects" are referenced in the solicitation, would ONR consider adding the definition of Special Project as the last sentence as follows: | |
| "In accordance with Section J, Attachment 1, Statement of Work, Special Projects (generally identified by the ONR ManTech Program) performed under this Task Order can cover any topic approved by the ONR ManTech Program Officer. The parameters of the project will be developed by the project performer and MTC, typically following the traditional project Statement of Work development process."? | Yes | yes | |||
| 9 | Solicitation | 2 | Section C (2), ONR - Statement of Work, Second Paragraph | Would ONR consider adding a second sentence/section with references to ManTech Projects, Mega Rapid Response and Rapid Response projects as follows: |
"In accordance with Section J, Attachment 1, Statement of Work, under this Task Order MTC will initiate, develop and manage ONR Program Officer approved 1) Standard ManTech projects that respond to the need for the production and/or repair of weapon platforms, systems and equipment to improve the affordability of naval platforms critical to the future force; 2) Non-Manufacturing Technology (Non-ManTech) projects that are sponsored by ONR, but are not funded by Navy Manufacturing Technology resources. These projects can support a ManTech weapon platform and may be funded with congressional funds and through other Defense agencies; 3) Rapid Response projects approved by the ONR Program Officer for small dollar, urgent requirements and 4) Mega Rapid Response projects that are larger dollar and address urgent requirements which require transition of the product or technology that can be inserted on a platform at the end of the project."
| Yes | yes | ||||||
| 10 | Solicitation | 6 | Section G | Reference "ONR - Financial Accounting Data" provision: Table with ACRN, List of Item/Sub Number (LI#), Line of Accounting (LOA) and Total Amount is missing. Will this provision be revised to include the table? | This clause is placed in the basic contract for the purpose of flowing down into the task order, where the table is generated by the software when actual funding in placed on the order via Sub Line Item Number (SLIN) | No | |
| 11 | Solicitation | N/A | Section G | Reference Section G of the solicitation. Based on previous ONR Requests for Proposals (RFPs), ONR - Travel Costs provision in Section G is not included as follows: “Travel may be required to support this Statement of Work. For profit Contractor’s travel costs shall be reimbursed in accordance with FAR 31.205-46 at rates not to exceed the maximum locality per diem rates (the combination of lodging, meals and incidentals) in effect at the time of travel, as set forth in the Federal Travel Regulations, Joint Travel Regulation and Standards Regulations, Section 925, as applicable. For educational Contractor’s, travel shall be reimbursed in accordance with OMB Circular A-21. All Contractor travel arrangements including: clearance requests, hotel accommodations, travel orders, and visa/passport requirements, are the Contractor’s responsibility.” Will ONR include this provision in the solicitation and/or resultant contract? However, previous versions of this provision, the first sentence starts with "For profit"; can "For profit" be deleted to account for any offerors that may non-profit corporations? | The provision was removed from availability in the database and can not be included. | No | |
| 12 | Solicitation | 12 | Section H | Reference Section H provision, "ONR - DD254". DoD 5220.22M is expired and as of 2/24/2021, it is replaced with “32 CFR Part 117, “National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM). This became effective as a federal rule which is referred to as the “NISPOM rule”. Per Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency's (DCSA) website (see below), on February 24, 2021, 32 CFR Part 117, National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) became effective as a federal rule. Referred to as the “NISPOM rule,” it provides the contractor no more than six months from the 2/24/21 effective date to comply with the requirements stipulated therein. The NISPOM rule replaces the NISPOM previously issued as a DOD policy (DOD 5220.22-M), which was cancelled shortly after the allotted six-month implementation period ended. Based on this rule, will consider revising the first paragraph, second sentence of the provision as follows: "The information contained in the guides is not considered to be necessary for submitting | |||
| proposals. The project plan proposals shall be marked in accordance with 32 CFR Part 117, “National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM)." This is consistent with Section I, FAR 52.204-2 Security Requirements (MAR 2021) on Page 18 of 81 of the solicitation. | This clause is deleted and the need following award for any DD254 attachment shall be addressed when the need arises. | yes | |||||
| 13 | Solicitation | 12 | Section H (This link provided as part of question above). | https://www.dcsa.mil/mc/ctp/NISPOM-Rule/ | no action | see above | |
| 14 | Solicitation | N/A | Section I | Reference Section I of the solicitation, will ONR consider adding FAR 52.211-15 (APR 2008) in full text or by reference to the solicitation via amendments and/or resultant contract, if determined to be applicable? | The clause is not applicable, as Mantech is not a priority program. | ||
| https://www.dcma.mil/Portals/31/Documents/DPAS/DPAS_Contractors_REV7.pdf | No | ||||||
| 15 | Solicitation | 15 | Section I | On Page 15 of the solicitation, Section I, will ONR consider adding FAR 52.215-13 (JUN 2020) to the solicitation and/or resultant contract, if determined to be applicable? | Added Clause | yes | |
| 16 | Solicitation | 16 | Section I | On Page 16 of the solicitation, Section I, will ONR consider adding FAR 52.215-23 ALT I (OCT 2009) to the solicitation and/or resultant contract, if determined to be applicable? | Replaced 52.215-13 with Alt 1 | yes | |
| 17 | Solicitation | 16 | Section I | On Page 16 of the solicitation, Section I, will ONR consider adding FAR 52.227-14 (MAY 2014) and FAR 52.227-16 (JUN 1987) to the solicitation and/or resultant contract, if determined to be applicable? | Added clauses | yes | |
| 18 | Solicitation | 16 | Section I | On Page 16 of the solicitation, Section I, will ONR consider adding FAR 52.230-2 (JUN 2020) to the solicitation and/or resultant contract, if determined to be applicable? | Added Clause | yes | |
| 19 | Solicitation | 17 | Section I | On Page 17 of the solicitation, Section I, will ONR consider adding DFARS 252.204-7018 (JAN 2021) to the solicitation and/or resultant contract, if determined to be applicable? | Added clause | yes | |
| 20 | Solicitation | 17 | Section I | On Page 17 of the solicitation, Section I, will ONR consider adding DFARS 252.204-7020 (NOV 2020) to the solicitation and/or resultant contract, if determined to be applicable? | The clause exists in Section K. Moved to I. | yes | |
| 21 | Solicitation | 17 | Section I | On Page 17 of the solicitation, Section I, will ONR consider adding DFARS 252.227-7039 (APR 1990) to the solicitation and/or resultant contract, if determined to be applicable? | Added clause | No | |
| 22 | Solicitation | 23 | Section I, FAR 52.216-8 Fixed Fee (JUN 2011) | The not to exceed amount of 15% withhold of fixed fee is not consistent with Section g ONR - Payment of Allowable Costs and Fixed Fee, paragraph (c) which identifies a withhold of 10%. Would ONR consider revising the Section I FAR Clause to 10%? Or if the FAR Clause cannot be revised, could ONR add a paragraph (d) as follows: "The 10% withhold stated herein this takes precedence over the 15% withhold in FAR 52.216-8 (Jun 2011)." | 52.216-8 cannot be altered. Paragrapph (d) "The 10% withhold stated herein this takes precedence over the 15% withhold in FAR 52.216-8 (Jun 2011)" added to "ONR Payment of Allowable Costs" clause. | yes | |
| 23 | Solicitation | N/A | Section I | As prescribed in FAR 4.1705(b), will FAR 52.204-15, Service Contract Reporting Requirements for Indefinite-Delivery Contracts (OCT 2016) be included in this solicitation and resultant award. Although this clause is not required for actions entirely funded by DoD, contracts awarded with a generic entity identifier, or in classified solicitations, contracts, or orders, can you please provide confirmation of its inclusion or exclusion. | Not applicable: Mantech is not subject to Service Contract Reporting | No | |
| 24 | Solicitation | N/A | Section I, Clauses Included by Full Text | In Section I, will ONR consider adding FAR 52.216-18 (AUG 2020) to the solicitation and/or resultant contract in full text, if determined to be applicable? | Not to be included, as the ONR Ordering clause in Section H is preferred and having both would be unnecessary. | No | |
| 25 | Solicitation | 35 | Section J | In Table on Page 35, Item No. 1, should "Attachment 1 SOW CMC", read "Attachment 1 SOW MTC"? | Yes | yes |
https://www.dcsa.mil/mc/ctp/NISPOM-Rule/
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .