Morodok Baitang_72044221R00006_ Solicitation.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- USAID Morodok Baitang Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 72044221R00006
About this file
This is a request for proposals from the United States Agency for International Development in Cambodia seeking proposals from organizations to implement the USAID Morodok Baitang Activity. USAID anticipates awarding a cost-plus-fixed-fee completion form contract with a period of performance of five years. The activity seeks to contribute to mitigating carbon emissions, conserving biodiversity, increasing economic growth, and promoting natural resource governance in Cambodia through market-based approaches. Proposals are due by July 2, 2021 with questions due by June 1, 2021. The activity will implement private sector-led, market-based approaches that generate sustainable natural resource use and income for communities while reducing emissions and improving governance. The contractor will assess sites for partnerships and engage stakeholders, particularly marginalized groups, to strengthen land tenure and management through collaborative management.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Morodok Baitang_72044221R00006_Amendment 02.pdf | ||
| Morodok Baitang_72044221R00006_Amendment 01.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Issuance Date: May 21, 2021
Questions Due Date: June 1, 2021
9:00 a.m., Cambodia time
Closing Date: July 2, 2021
Closing Time: 9:00 a.m., Cambodia time
Subject: Request for Proposals (RFP) No. 72044221R00006, USAID Morodok Baitang
To All Prospective Offerors:
The United States Agency for International Development (USAID) in Cambodia is seeking proposals from U.S. or non-U.S. non-profit or for-profit organizations to achieve the objectives set forth in the attached Request for Proposals (RFP). USAID/Cambodia anticipates awarding one cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) completion form contract with a period of performance of 5 years. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code for this acquisition is
813312. The authorized geographic code is 937.
This procurement will be conducted under full and open competition procedures, pursuant to Part
15 of the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) (48 CFR Chapter 1).
Questions and proposals must be submitted electronically on or before the dates/times stipulated above to ssao@usaid.gov, atusjak@usaid.gov and phnompenhoaa@usaid.gov. No other form of submission will be accepted. Section L of the RFP sets forth proposal requirements including instructions for the preparation and submission of required proposal content. Section M states the criteria by which proposals will be evaluated. Oral explanations or instructions given before award of the Contract will not be binding. Proposals received after the closing date and time will be processed as late and handled in accordance with FAR 15.208.
If substantive questions are received which affect the response to the solicitation, or if changes are otherwise made, USAID may amend this solicitation. Amendments will be issued and posted on https://beta.sam.gov/. Offerors are strongly encouraged to check the beta.sam.gov website periodically as acknowledgement of amendments is required as part of the Offeror’s submission.
It is the responsibility of the Offeror to ensure that the RFP has been downloaded and received in its entirety, including subsequent solicitation amendments, if any. USAID bears no responsibility for data errors resulting from download, transmission or conversion processes. Furthermore, Offerors are advised to read the solicitation carefully.
mailto:ssao@usaid.gov mailto:atusjak@usaid.gov mailto:phnompenhoaa@usaid.gov
RFP No.: 72044221R00006
USAID Morodok Baitang
This RFP in no way obligates USAID to award a Contract nor does it commit USAID to pay any cost incurred in the preparation and submission of a proposal. Award of a Contract under this
RFP is subject to availability of funds and other internal USAID approvals.
Sincerely, Paul Martin
Contracting Officer
USAID/Cambodia
PART I—THE SCHEDULE
SECTION A – SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
[See next page]
72044221R00006
SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD
4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION2. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. SOLICITATION NUMBER
7. ISSUED BY CODE 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If other than Item 7)
ORDER UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 700)
6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NUMBER
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
SEALED BID (IFB)
5. DATE ISSUED
1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED RATING PAGE OF PAGES
4 185
C. E-MAIL ADDRESS
EXT.NUMBERAREA CODE
B. TELEPHONE (NO COLLECT CALLS)A. NAME
10. FOR
INFORMATION
CALL:
CAUTION: LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.
(Date)(Hour) local timeuntildepository located in copies for furnishing the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in Item 8, or if hand carried, in the
SOLICITATION
9. Sealed offers in original and
PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
CONTRACT CLAUSES
PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACH.
I
J
K
L
M SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA
DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
PACKAGING AND MARKING
DESCRIPTION/SPECS./WORK STATEMENT
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS
SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSESPART I - THE SCHEDULE
H
G
F
E
D
C
B
A
SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) (X) DESCRIPTION SEC. (X)
11. TABLE OF CONTENTS
18. OFFER DATE17. SIGNATURE
SUCH ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.
IS DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER
15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS
EXT.NUMBERAREA CODE
15B. TELEPHONE NUMBER
(Type or print)AND
ADDRESS
OF
OFFEROR
CODE FACILITY
16. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER15A. NAME
DATEAMENDMENT NO.DATEAMENDMENT NO.
and related documents numbered and dated):
amendments to the SOLICITATION for offerors
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of
14. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENTS
CALENDAR DAYS (%)30 CALENDAR DAYS (%)20 CALENDAR DAYS (%)10 CALENDAR DAYS (%)
(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232.8)
13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT
designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.
by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the price set opposite each item, delivered at the
NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.
OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)
IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.
28. AWARD DATE
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
CODE 24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7)
ITEM
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
41 U.S.C. 253 (c) ( 10 U.S.C. 2304 (c) (
22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION:
21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION20. AMOUNT19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS NUMBERED
AWARD (To be completed by government)
CODE
REQ-442-21-000019
X
720442
USAID/Cambodia Office of Acquisition and Assistance #1 Street 96 Khan Daun Penh Phnom Penh, Cambodia
Samsak Sao ssao@usaid.gov
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
PAGE(S)
Paul Martin
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
Previous edition is unusable
STANDARD FORM 33 (Rev. 9-97)
Prescribed by GSA - FAR (48 CFR) 53.214(c)
12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within _____0_________ calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period is inserted
07/02/2021
TABLE OF CONTENS
PART I—THE SCHEDULE
SECTION A – SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
SECTION B—SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS
B.1 PURPOSE
B.2 CONTRACT TYPE
B.3 ESTIMATED COST, CEILING PRICE, FIXED FEE, AND OBLIGATED AMOUNT ..11
B.4 PRICE/COST SCHEDULE
B.5 INDIRECT COSTS
B.6 COST REIMBURSABLE
B.7 PAYMENT OF FIXED FEE
B.8 MULTI-YEAR CONTRACT AND CANCELLATION CEILING
SECTION C— DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK
C.1 TITLE
C.2 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT
C.3 PROBLEM STATEMENT
C.4 USAID MORODOK BAITANG’S RESULTS FRAMEWORK
C.5 ACTIVITY GOAL AND OBJECTIVES
C.6 ADAPTIVE RESPONSE CAPABILITY
C.7 GUIDING PRINCIPLES
C.8 MONITORING, EVALUATION AND LEARNING
C.9 STATEMENT OF WORK
SECTION D—PACKAGING AND MARKING
D.1 AIDAR 752.7009 MARKING (JAN 1993)
D.2 BRANDING STRATEGY
D.3 BRANDING IMPLEMENTATION PLAN (BIP) AND MARKING PLAN (MP)
SECTION E—INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
E.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
E.2 INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
SECTION F—DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE
F.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
F.2 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
F.3 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
F.4 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
F.5 KEY PERSONNEL
F.6 REPORTS AND DELIVERABLES OR OUTPUTS
F.7 AUTHORIZED WORK DAY/WEEK
SECTION G—CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA
G.1 AIDAR 752.7003 DOCUMENTATION FOR PAYMENT (NOV 1998)
G.2 CONTRACTING OFFICE
G.3 CONTRACTING OFFICER’S REPRESENTATIVE (COR)
G.4 CONTRACTOR PRIMARY POINT OF CONTACT
G.5 PAYING OFFICE
G.6 ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA
G.7 TECHNICAL DIRECTIONS/RELATIONSHIP WITH USAID
G.8 SHORT-TERM PERSONNEL AND MEETINGS
SECTION H—SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
H.1 USAID-FINANCED THIRD-PARTY WEB SITES (AUGUST 2013)
H.2 SUBMISSION OF DATASETS TO THE DEVELOPMENT DATA LIBRARY (DDL)
(OCTOBER 2014)
H.3 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR PERSONNEL COMPENSATION
H.4 AUTHORIZED GEOGRAPHIC CODE
H.5 DEFENSE BASE ACT (DBA) INSURANCE
H.6 LOGISTIC SUPPORT
H.7 LANGUAGE REQUIREMENTS
H.8 EXECUTIVE ORDER ON TERRORISM FINANCING (FEB 2002)
H.9 FOREIGN GOVERNMENT DELEGATIONS TO INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES
(JAN 2002)
H.10 PROHIBITION OF ASSISTANCE TO DRUG TRAFFICKERS
H.11 ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
H.12 ELECTRONIC PAYMENTS SYSTEM
H.13 RESTRICTIONS AGAINST DISCLOSURE (MAY 2016)
H.14 ELECTRONIC AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ACCESSIBILITY (APRIL
2018)
H.15 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY APPROVAL (DEVIATION NO. M/OAA-DEV-FAR-
20-3C (APRIL 2020)
H.16 PRIVACY AND SECURITY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SYSTEMS INCIDENT
REPORTING (APRIL 2018)
H.17 SKILLS AND CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENTS FOR PRIVACY AND SECURITY
STAFF (APRIL 2018)
H.18 SECURITY REQUIREMENTS FOR UNCLASSIFIED INFORMATION
TECHNOLOGY RESOURCES (APRIL 2018)
H.19 CLOUD COMPUTING (APRIL 2018)
H.20 COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 508 OF THE REHABILITATION ACT OF 1973, AS
AMENDED
H.21 INHERENTLY GOVERNMENTAL AND CLOSELY ASSOCIATED FUNCTIONS ...88
H.22 GRANTS UNDER CONTRACT
H.23 LIMITING PLASTIC POLLUTION AND MISMANAGED WASTE (MAR 2020)
H.24 USAID/CAMBODIA COMMUNICATIONS AND OUTREACH REQUIREMENTS ...91
H.25 ACTIVITY LOCATION DATA
H.26 ADDITIONAL APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS
H.27 FAR PART 4.21 PROHIBITION ON CONTRACTING FOR CERTAIN COVERED
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR
EQUIPMENT (SECTION 889) (JANUARY 2021)
PART II—CONTRACT CLAUSES
SECTION I – CONTRACT CLAUSES
I.1 NOTICE LISTING CONTRACT CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
I.2 FAR 52.204-1 APPROVAL OF CONTRACT (DEC 1989)
I.3 FAR 52.204-21 BASIC SAFEGUARDING OF COVERED CONTRACTOR
INFORMATION SYSTEMS (JUN 2016)
I.4 FAR 52.222-2 PAYMENT FOR OVERTIME PREMIUMS (JUL 1990)
I.5 FAR 52.222-35 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR VETERANS (JUN 2020)
I.6 FAR 52.222-36 EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR WORKERS WITH DISABILITIES (JUN
2020)
I.7 FAR 52.227-23 RIGHTS TO PROPOSAL DATA (TECHNICAL) (JUN 1987)
I.8 FAR 52.229-8 TAXES - FOREIGN COST-REIMBURSEMENT CONTRACTS (MAR
1990)
I.9 FAR 52.247-67 SUBMISSION OF TRANSPORTATION DOCUMENTS FOR AUDIT
(FEB 2006)
I.10 FAR 52.252-2 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FEB 1998)
I.11 AIDAR 752.229-71 REPORTING OF FOREIGN TAXES (JULY 2007)
I.12 AIDAR 752.7005 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS FOR DEVELOPMENT
EXPERIENCE DOCUMENTS (SEP 2013)
I.13 AIDAR 752.7013 CONTRACTOR-MISSION RELATIONSHIPS (JUN 2018)
I.14 AIDAR 752.7027 PERSONNEL (DECEMBER 1990)
I.15 AIDAR 752.7032 INTERNATIONAL TRAVEL APPROVAL AND NOTIFICATION
REQUIREMENTS (APR 2014)
I.16 AIDAR 752.7034 ACKNOWLEDGMENT AND DISCLAIMER (DEC 1991)
I.17 AIDAR 752.7101 VOLUNTARY POPULATION PLANNING ACTIVITIES (JUN 2008)
I.18 AIDAR 752.245-70 GOVERNMENT PROPERTY – USAID REPORTING
REQUIREMENTS (OCTOBER 2017)
PART III—LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS, AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS
SECTION J – LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
PART IV—REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
SECTION K—REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS, AND OTHER
STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS
K.1 NOTICE LISTING SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE
K.2 FAR 52.204-8 ANNUAL REPRESENTATIONS AND CERTIFICATIONS (MAR 2020)
K.3 FAR 52.204-20 PREDECESSOR OF OFFEROR (AUG 2020)
K.4 FAR 52.204-24 REPRESENTATION REGARDING CERTAIN
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES OR
EQUIPMENT (OCT 2020)
K.5 FAR 52.204-26 COVERED TELECOMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT OR SERVICES-
REPRESENTATION (OCT 2020)
K.6 FAR 52.209-5 CERTIFICATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (AUG
2020)
K.7 FAR 52.209-7 INFORMATION REGARDING RESPONSIBILITY MATTERS (OCT
2018)
K.8 FAR 52.209-11 REPRESENTATION BY CORPORATIONS REGARDING
DELINQUENT TAX LIABILITY OR A FELONY CONVICTION UNDER ANY
FEDERAL LAW (FEB 2016)
K.9 FAR 52.209-13 VIOLATION OF ARMS CONTROL TREATIES OR AGREEMENTS-
CERTIFICATION (FEB 2021)
K.10 FAR 52.222-22 PREVIOUS CONTRACTS AND COMPLIANCE REPORTS (FEB
1999)
K.11 FAR 52.222-25 AFFIRMATIVE ACTION COMPLIANCE (APR 1984)
K.12 FAR 52.227-15 REPRESENTATION OF LIMITED RIGHTS DATA AND
RESTRICTED COMPUTER SOFTWARE (DEC 2007)
K.13 FAR 52.230-1 COST ACCOUNTING STANDARDS NOTICES AND
CERTIFICATION (JUN 2020)
K.14 FAR 52.230-7 PROPOSAL DISCLOSURE-COST ACCOUNTING PRACTICE
CHANGES (APR 2005)
K.15 INSURANCE - IMMUNITY FROM TORT LIABILITY
K.16 AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS
K.17 SIGNATURE
SECTION L—INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
L.1 NOTICE LISTING SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE
L.2 FAR 52.216-1 TYPE OF CONTRACT (APR 1984)
L.3 FAR 52.233-2 SERVICE OF PROTEST (SEP 2006)
L.4 FAR 52.252-1 SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
(FEB 1998)
L.5 AIDAR 752.252-1 AIDAR SOLICITATION PROVISIONS INCORPORATED BY
REFERENCE (MAR 2015)
L.6 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
L.7 DELIVERY INSTRUCTION
L.8 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL
L.9 INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE PREPARATION OF THE COST/BUSINESS PROPOSAL
L.10 WAIVERS UNDER FAR PART 4.2101 PROHIBITION ON COVERED
TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SERVICES AND
EQUIPMENT (AUGUST 13, 2020)
SECTION M—EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
M.1 GENERAL INFORMATION
M.2 TECHNICAL EVALUATION CRITERIA
M.3 COST/PRICE EVALUATION
M.4 DETERMINATION OF THE COMPETITIVE RANGE
M.5 SOURCE SELECTION
M.6 CONTRACTING WITH SMALL BUSINESS CONCERNS
ATTACHMENT 1 - INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EXAMINATION
ATTACHMENT 2 - CONTRACTOR PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION
ATTACHMENT 3 - CERTIFICATION REGARDING TRAFFICKING IN PERSONS
COMPLIANCE PLAN
ATTACHMENT 4 - LOCAL COMPENSATION PLAN PAY RANGES
SECTION B—SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS
B.1 PURPOSE
The purpose of this contract is to provide services described in Section C to implement the
USAID Morodok Baitang Activity.
B.2 CONTRACT TYPE
This is a Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF) completion form contract. For the consideration set forth below, the Contractor must provide the results, deliverables and outputs described in Section C and Section F.
B.3 ESTIMATED COST, CEILING PRICE, FIXED FEE, AND OBLIGATED
AMOUNT
(a) The estimated cost for the performance of the work required hereunder, exclusive of fixed fee, if any, is [TBD]. The fixed fee, if any, is [TBD]. The total estimated cost plus fixed fee, if any, is [TBD].
(b) Within the estimated cost plus fixed fee, if any, specified in paragraph (a) above, the amount currently obligated and available for reimbursement of allowable costs incurred by the Contractor (and payment of fee, if any) for performance hereunder is [TBD] of which [TBD] is allocated for Grants under Contract (GUC) and [TBD] is allocated for the Windows of Opportunity (WOO) Fund. The Contractor must not exceed the aforesaid obligated amounts nor will the U.S. Government (USG) be responsible for cost incurred should the Contractor do so.
(c) [Note to Offerors: The following language will be added to the award only if the apparently successful Offeror elects to use a payment method through Letter of Credit for the GUC component. Otherwise, this section will be deleted from the award document.]
For GUC using Letter of Credit (LOC): The contractor must use funds obligated under this award and any subsequent modifications from the specific Operating Units (OU) and Program Areas (PA) for activities approved in the award and detailed in the work plan, as applicable. Program disbursements for each OU/PA must not exceed the amounts specified in the Accounting and Appropriation data for each OU and PA.
(d) Funds obligated hereunder are anticipated to be sufficient through [TBD].
B.4 PRICE/COST SCHEDULE
Line
Item Supplies/Services (Description)
Amount
0001 Activity Costs TBD
0002 Grants under Contract $3,000,000.00
0003 Windows of Opportunity Fund $1,000,000.00
Total Estimated Cost TBD
Fixed Fee TBD
Total Estimated Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) TBD
B.5 INDIRECT COSTS
Pending establishment of revised provisional or final indirect cost rates, allowable indirect costs shall be reimbursed on the basis of the following negotiated provisional or predetermined rates and the appropriate bases:
[the following to be inserted at award]
Description Rate Base Type Period
[TBD] [TBD] 1/ 1/ 1/
[TBD] [TBD] 2/ 2/ 2/
[TBD] [TBD] 3/ 3/ 3/
1/ Base of Application:
Type of Rate:
Period:
2/ Base of Application:
Type of Rate:
Period:
3/ Base of Application:
Type of Rate:
Period:
B.6 COST REIMBURSABLE
Allowable costs shall be limited to reasonable, allocable and necessary costs determined in accordance with FAR 52.216-7, Allowable Cost and Payment, FAR 52.216-8, Fixed Fee, if applicable, FAR 52.232-22 Limitation of Funds, and AIDAR 752.7003, Documentation for
Payment.
B.7 PAYMENT OF FIXED FEE
Payment of fixed fee will be made upon receipt of a proper invoice and shall directly correspond to the percentage of allowable costs being paid. In accordance with FAR 52-216-8, Fixed Fee, the CO will withhold 15% of the total fee or $100,000, whichever is less until the required awards conditions under the reference clause have been met.
B.8 MULTI-YEAR CONTRACT AND CANCELLATION CEILING
(a) This contract is considered non-severable, and is therefore a multi-year contract as defined in FAR 17.103. Consequently, this contract is subject to the requirements of
FAR 17.106.
(b) Cancellation Dates: in the event that the Government cancels requirements for services in subsequent program years under this contract, the following conditions will apply:
[Amount and dates to be filled in at the time of award]
Contract Year Cancellation Date Cancellation Ceiling Amount
Year 1 N/A N/A
Year 2 Month [TBD], 2022 $ [TBD]
Year 3 Month [TBD], 2023 $ [TBD]
Year 4 Month [TBD], 2024 $ [TBD]
Year 5 Month [TBD], 2025 $ [TBD]
(c) Cancellation Ceiling: This is a CPFF completion type contract where the Contractor is authorized to be reimbursed for all costs which are allowable in accordance with FAR
52.216-7, “Allowable Costs and Payment.” Therefore, the Contractor must not incur any costs which would have been amortized over the life of the contract should the contract be cancelled in accordance with FAR 52.217-2. The cancellation ceiling for each cancellation date is indicated above.
[END OF SECTION B]
SECTION C— DESCRIPTION/SPECIFICATIONS/STATEMENT OF WORK
C.1 TITLE
USAID Morodok Baitang [USAID មរតកបៃតង]
Introduction
The USAID Morodok Baitang (or “Green Heritage” in Khmer) activity seeks to contribute to the mitigation of carbon emissions at a national scale, conserve biodiversity, increase economic growth, and promote inclusive natural resource governance. It will build on past and current
USAID/Cambodia investments in emissions reductions and biodiversity conservation; community income generation from ecotourism, carbon credits, and wildlife-friendly agricultural practices; and natural resource governance. This activity will reorient USAID’s environmental programming beyond landscapes approaches and will add market-based approaches as a primary focus. USAID
Morodok Baitang will directly support USAID/Cambodia’s Country Development and
Cooperation Strategy (CDCS) through Development Objective 1 (DO 1), Inclusive and Sustainable
Economic Growth Broadened, and DO 1’s Intermediate Result (IR) 1.3, Improved Management of
Natural Resources for Sustainable and Accountable Development. This activity will also strongly contribute to DO 1’s IR 1.1, Accelerated Economic Diversification for Improved Livelihoods, and
IR 1.2, Improved Business Climate to Attract Investment and Create Jobs. In addition, it will contribute to other cross-cutting CDCS priorities for private sector engagement and socio-economic inclusion, including gender and youth considerations. The expected period of performance for USAID Morodok Baitang is five years.
Definitions for terms mentioned in this section:
Climate-smart agriculture (CSA): CSA is an integrated approach to managing landscapes such as croplands, livestock, forests, and fisheries to address the interlinked challenges of food security, productivity, and climate change.
Forest landscape restoration (FLR): FLR is defined as a process that aims to regain ecological functionality and enhance human well-being in deforested or degraded landscapes.
Low Emissions Development: A development approach to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, increase resilience to climate change impacts, and achieve social, economic, and environmental development goals.
Market-based approaches: Use of business models and market forces to address development and humanitarian challenges more sustainably and/or at scale.
Natural Climate Solutions (NCS) - Programs and activities that conserve, sustainably manage, and restore forests and lands to reduce land-based emissions or increase carbon sequestration.
Resilience: Ability of people, households, communities, organizations, countries, natural systems, economic systems, and other man-made systems to mitigate, adapt to, and recover from shocks and stresses in a way that reduces chronic vulnerability and facilitates inclusive growth.
Watershed management: Comprehensive maintenance of land and water resources in an area where streams drain to a defined location along a river or other water body, which meets human needs for clean water, reliable water flows, food, energy, and other natural resources while sustaining ecosystem services for ecological function, carbon storage, recreation, and other uses.
C.2 BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT
Importance of Cambodia’s biodiversity and natural resources
Cambodia is one of the most biodiverse countries in Southeast Asia, with as many as 8,260 plant species (up to 10 percent of which may be endemic) along with more than 250 species of amphibians and reptiles, and over 500 bird species.1 Forests are the dominant land type in
Cambodia, with 49% of the country, or roughly 8.7 million hectares, estimated to be covered in forests.2 The country’s protected area system predominantly encompasses forest ecosystems and represents 41% of the country’s land base.
The three principal forest types found in Cambodia are relatively open deciduous forest; mostly closed semi-deciduous (also called semi-evergreen) forest; and evergreen closed forest.3 In terms of deciduous forests, Cambodia is home to the third-largest lowland open deciduous forests in
Southeast Asia while the closed semi-deciduous forests are deemed to contain some of the most productive timber stands in terms of carbon storage. The Southwest of the country contains areas of evergreen closed forests in the Cardamom Mountains and the Elephant Range that are considered among the most species-rich and intact natural habitats in the region though among the least documented. Cambodia’s forests are globally outstanding for species richness, particularly for 160 mammals such as Asian elephant, douc langur, red-cheeked gibbon, pileated gibbon, wild dog, Malayan sun bear, clouded leopard, common leopard, gaur, banteng, Eld’s deer, and southern serow. In addition, 455 bird species occur in these forests including the green peafowl, greater adjutant, and critically endangered giant ibis.4
Cambodia’s forests support the livelihoods of the country’s large rural population through the sale and use of timber and non-timber forest products, fisheries, ecotourism, and the provision of important ecosystem services such as climate regulation, stabilization of water flows, mitigation of droughts and floods, and reduction of waterway sedimentation, which are closely linked to the agricultural production as well as inland fisheries. Non-timber forest products are estimated to
1 https://www.fauna-flora.org/countries/cambodia. Accessed March 2021.
2 Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. 2019.
http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/index/en/?iso3=KHM. Accessed March 2021.
3 Measuring, Reporting, and Verification Technical Team. 2018. “Cambodia Forest Cover 2018.” Cambodia Ministry of Environment. https://redd.unfccc.int/uploads/54_3_cambodia_forest_cover_resource__2016_english.pdf. Accessed
March 2021.
4 Southeastern Asia: Southern Cambodia stretching into Thailand and Vietnam.
WWF. https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/im0106. Accessed February 2021.
https://www.fauna-flora.org/countries/cambodia http://www.fao.org/countryprofiles/index/en/?iso3=KHM https://redd.unfccc.int/uploads/54_3_cambodia_forest_cover_resource__2016_english.pdf https://www.worldwildlife.org/ecoregions/im0106 contribute over $26 million annually to the Cambodian economy and include honey ($18.3 million), resins ($6 million), and bamboo products ($1.6 million).5 Carbon credit sales have brought increased revenues to rural communities with the Keo Seima Wildlife Sanctuary Reducing
Emissions from Deforestation and Forest Degradation (REDD+) Project alone selling 14.6 million carbon credits, ranging from $3-10 per credit, in the period from 2010-2021. Tourism, which is heavily focused on forests and forested cultural sites, employs 500,000 Cambodians and has continued to grow rapidly with foreign arrivals increasing from 2 to 5.6 million visitors between
2007 and 2017.6 Domestic tourism has also become more important as domestic incomes have increased and as the COVID-19 crisis has reduced opportunities for international travel. The tourism sector as a whole represented 21 percent of the country’s GDP in 2019 (or $5.8 billion), with ecotourism being a notable and growing sub-sector.7
Cambodia sits at the heart of the lower Mekong Basin. The annual pulse of floodwater in the basin during the rainy season dramatically increases the extent and depth of the Tonle Sap, the largest freshwater lake in southeast Asia, and forms large areas of seasonally flooded forests, creating ideal conditions for fish productivity. This productivity is then exported to the Mekong as the lake drains, supporting one of the most important fisheries in the system. Overall these freshwater systems contain 874 fish species, including the giant Mekong catfish, one of the largest freshwater fishes in the world. The “3S” Rivers (Se Kong, Se San, and Sre Pok) flow into the Mekong at
Stung Treng and in the rainy season create flooded forests that are important for biodiversity conservation due to their species diversity and endemism. This region alone harbors over 300 fish species, including at least 100 endemic and 14 endangered species.8 These areas also host critically endangered birds, such as the white-shouldered ibis, as well as the largest remaining population of freshwater Irrawaddy dolphins in Southeast Asia.9
The Mekong is the one of the most productive freshwater fisheries in the world and many of the most economically-important fish species migrate for long distances between habitats in the lower basin, including the Mekong delta, Tonle Sap Lake, and spawning habitats further upstream. The inland fishery of the lower Mekong Basin produces 2.6 million tons of fish annually and supports the daily dietary consumption, food security, and livelihoods of 60 million people living in the basin10. The lower Mekong Basin in Cambodia encompasses freshwater habitats as well as
5 Watkins, K., Sovann, C., Brander, L., and Neth, B. 2016. “Mapping and Valuing Ecosystem Services in Mondulkiri:
Outcomes and Recommendations for Sustainable and Inclusive Land Use Planning in Cambodia.” WWF Cambodia.
6 Central Intelligence Agency. 2019. “Cambodia Profile.” The World Factbook:
Cambodia. https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cb.html. Accessed March 2021.
7 Maurice Andres Rawlins, Elisabeth Steinmayr,and Werner Kornexl. September 2020. “Enabling ecotourism development in Cambodia.” World Bank Blog. https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/enabling-ecotourism-development-cambodia. Accessed March 2021.
8 Baran, E., P. Starr, and Y. Kura. 2011. “Influence of Built Structures on Tonle Sap Fisheries.” Cambodia National
Mekong Committee and the WorldFish Center. Phnom Penh, Cambodia. 2007, p 23.
https://www.worldfishcenter.org/content/influence-built-structures-tonle-sap-fisheries-synthesis-report-0. Accessed
March 2021.
9 Stefan Lovgren. April 2019. “Cambodia’s endangered river dolphins at highest population in 20 years.” National
Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/irawaddy-river-dolphin-population-biggest-20-years.
Accessed March 2021.
10 Brian Eyler and Courtney Weatherby. March 2019. “Sustaining the Heartbeat of the Mekong Basin.” China
Dialogue. https://chinadialogue.net/en/energy/11126-sustaining-the-heartbeat-of-the-mekong-basin/. Accessed March
2021.
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/cb.html https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/enabling-ecotourism-development-cambodia https://blogs.worldbank.org/eastasiapacific/enabling-ecotourism-development-cambodia https://www.worldfishcenter.org/content/influence-built-structures-tonle-sap-fisheries-synthesis-report-0 https://www.nationalgeographic.com/animals/article/irawaddy-river-dolphin-population-biggest-20-years https://chinadialogue.net/en/energy/11126-sustaining-the-heartbeat-of-the-mekong-basin/ seasonally flooded forests including the Tonle Sap, which alone provides ~500,000 tons and an estimated 75% of the protein intake of all Cambodians.11 Fisheries are also a significant source of employment for an estimated 1.3 million Cambodians who are actively engaged in fisheries across the country, with roughly 1 million being engaged in fishing, over 200,000 working as fish processors, and roughly 81,000 working as fish farmers.
Cambodia has a 435 km coastline and an Exclusive Economic Zone of 55,600 km² including 69 offshore islands.12 Cambodia’s coastal and marine areas contain marine mammals such as dugongs, marine dolphins, and whales as well as marine turtles, crustaceans, and mollusks.13 The coastal region also features beach, forest and strand vegetation, mangroves, estuarine ecosystems, seagrass, and coral reefs that contain a wide variety of economically-important species. The offshore marine zone harbors approximately 70 species of coral, with coral reefs surrounding most islands.14 There are over 32,000 hectares of seagrass with 10 seagrass species. The coastline in Kampot Province is home to one of the most important seagrass areas in all of Southeast Asia, providing spawning and nursery grounds for many aquatic species and sequestering large amounts of carbon.15 The four coastal provinces harbor 30 species of mangroves across an estimated 50,000 hectares, with 80 percent of mangroves concentrated in Koh Kong Province.16
The coastal and near-shore marine ecosystems of Cambodia contribute significantly to local livelihoods through employment opportunities and subsistence fishing. These areas contain about
7.1% of its total population and Cambodia’s ocean economy contributes $2.5 billion or 16 percent of GDP.17 The marine fishery produced 121,000 tonnes (or 18.6%) of the national fish catch in
2017.18 Coastal and marine tourism is also an important and growing economic driver. For example, in 2016 Preah Sihanouk Province alone welcomed nearly 2.4 million tourists, which generated $96 million in revenue.19 In addition, coastal communities depend upon the physical structure of coral reefs, seagrass beds, and mangroves to buffer them against the impacts of climate
11 Ibid. Accessed March 2021.
https://chinadialogue.net/en/energy/11126-sustaining-the-heartbeat-of-the-mekong-basin/.
12 United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. May 2019. “Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles: The
Kingdom of Cambodia”. http://www.fao.org/fishery/facp/KHM/en. Accessed March 2021.
13 Cambodia Country Page. Accessed February 2021. Mangroves for the Future.
http://www.mangrovesforthefuture.org/countries/members/cambodia/. Accessed March 2021.
14 Sea Circular, Country Profile Cambodia, May 2020. UN Environment Programme. https://www.sea-circular.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SEA-circular-Country-Profile_CAMBODIA.pdf. Accessed March 2021.
15 Kaarlep, A. 2015. “Socioeconomic survey on the importance of seagrass beds to coastal communities in Kampot
Province.” Thailand: IUCN. 46 pp.:
http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/jan_2015_bcr_kampot_seagrass_report__final_draft_26_3_15__final.pdf.
Accessed March 2021.
16 Ministry of Environment and Mangroves for the Future. 2013 “National Strategy and Action Plan: 2014-2016.”
http://www.mangrovesforthefuture.org/assets/Repository/Documents/Cambodia-NSAP-2013-07-04-Webversion.pdf.
Accessed March 2021.
17 Partnerships in Environment for the Seas of Southeast Asia. 2018. State of the Oceans and Coasts - Cambodia.
http://pemsea.org/sites/default/files/NSOC_Cambodia.pdf. Accessed March 2021.
18 United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization. May 2019. “Fishery and Aquaculture Country Profiles: The
Kingdom of Cambodia”. http://www.fao.org/fishery/facp/KHM/en. Accessed March 2021.
19 Sea Circular, Country Profile Cambodia, May 2020. UN Environment Programme. https://www.sea-circular.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SEA-circular-Country-Profile_CAMBODIA.pdf. Accessed March 2021.
https://chinadialogue.net/en/energy/11126-sustaining-the-heartbeat-of-the-mekong-basin/ http://www.fao.org/fishery/facp/KHM/en http://www.mangrovesforthefuture.org/countries/members/cambodia/ https://www.sea-circular.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SEA-circular-Country-Profile_CAMBODIA.pdf https://www.sea-circular.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SEA-circular-Country-Profile_CAMBODIA.pdf http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/jan_2015_bcr_kampot_seagrass_report__final_draft_26_3_15__final.pdf http://www.mangrovesforthefuture.org/assets/Repository/Documents/Cambodia-NSAP-2013-07-04-Webversion.pdf http://pemsea.org/sites/default/files/NSOC_Cambodia.pdf http://www.fao.org/fishery/facp/KHM/en https://www.sea-circular.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SEA-circular-Country-Profile_CAMBODIA.pdf https://www.sea-circular.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/SEA-circular-Country-Profile_CAMBODIA.pdf change, including sea-level rise and increased storm surges, and the effective interaction of these three ecosystems operating in concert provides far more protection than they would individually.20
Threats to Cambodia’s biodiversity and natural resources
In spite of their significant economic, environmental, and cultural importance Cambodia’s biodiverse and productive ecosystems face pressure from other land uses, subsistence needs, and illegal activities.21 As the country has emerged from its protracted and violent period of civil unrest there have been significant improvements in economic status and living conditions for a considerable percentage of the population. According to 2020 Asian Development Bank statistics, the poverty rate in 2018 was 12.9%, compared to 47.8% in 2007, and Cambodia has now attained lower middle-income status, though many rural families have only slightly emerged from poverty.
Also, with the return to peace a considerable amount of Foreign Direct Investment has been injected into the economy, most notably in the infrastructure, textile, agricultural, and tourism sectors. This rapid, often opportunistic, development is putting severe pressure on remaining natural habitats and rare species and actions required to manage these resources sustainably are underfunded and de-emphasized by the government over other priorities. In addition, land security is a major issue in Cambodia, fueled by land concessions that have negatively affected livelihoods and economies of rural communities.22
In recent years, Cambodia has experienced one of the fastest deforestation rates in the world with many of the forested areas in the country, including those in protected areas, being cleared for agriculture, rubber plantations, and timber extraction.23 Cambodia lost nearly 2.2 million hectares of tree cover between 2001 and 2018, and the annual rate of loss increased by almost 300 percent during the same period. Data from Global Forest Watch show that, since 2001, Cambodia has lost about 24 percent of its tree cover, a much higher percentage than larger forested countries such as
Brazil and Indonesia.24 This rapid deforestation rate, which has reduced forest cover to ~49 percent, undermines Cambodia’s efforts to reach its goal of 60 percent forest cover by 2030
(Scenario 1) set in its first Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) under the United Nations
Framework Convention on Climate Change.25
Additionally, the undervaluation of ecological services provided by forests such as soil fertility, carbon sequestration, and watershed stability are also contributing to poor decision making that
20 Guannel, G., K. Arkema, P. Ruggiero, and G. Verutes. 2016. “The Power of Three: Coral Reefs, Seagrasses and
Mangroves Protect Coastal Regions and Increase Their Resilience.” PLoS ONE 11(7): e0158094. Available:
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158094. Accessed March 2021.
21 USAID/Cambodia Foreign Assistance Act 118/119 Tropical Forests and Biodiversity Analysis. July 2019.
22 Chanrith, N., N. Baromey, and H. Naret. 2016. “Impacts of Economic Land Concessions on Project Target Communities Living Near Concession Areas in Virachey National Park and Lumphat Wildlife Sanctuary, Ratanakiri Province.” Save Cambodia’s Wildlife.
23 NASA Earth Observatory. 2017 https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/89413/cambodias-forests-are-disappearing. Accessed March 2021.
24 “What’s Happening in Cambodia’s Forests?” September 2019. Global Forest Watch.
https://blog.globalforestwatch.org/data-and-research/whats-happening-in-cambodias-forests/. Accessed March 2021.
25 Cambodia’s Updated National Determined Contribution. December 2020. Royal Government of Cambodia.
https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Cambodia%20First/20201231_NDC_Update_Cambodi a.pdf. Accessed March 2021.
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0158094 https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/89413/cambodias-forests-are-disappearing https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/89413/cambodias-forests-are-disappearing https://blog.globalforestwatch.org/data-and-research/whats-happening-in-cambodias-forests/ https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Cambodia%20First/20201231_NDC_Update_Cambodia.pdf https://www4.unfccc.int/sites/ndcstaging/PublishedDocuments/Cambodia%20First/20201231_NDC_Update_Cambodia.pdf fuels Cambodia’s rapid deforestation rate. For example, a recent assessment of business models for low-emission land-use management in Asia confirmed that the key barriers impeding private sector investments in low emissions development are the apparent lack of ‘investible’ agriculture, forestry and other land use (AFOLU) sector businesses due to undervaluation and other issues related to secure tenure and oversight of land-based biological resources.26 A recent study on commodity-driven forest loss in the Southeast Asia region provided recommendations for Cambodia to establish profitable, carbon-intense crops on degraded lands, reduce charcoal and fuelwood use, scale up climate smart agriculture practices, and improve forest policy and law enforcement to address forest loss in Cambodia.27
The main threats facing forests, in Cambodia are land clearing in economic land concessions
(known as ELCs); land grabbing primarily for small-scale land conversion for agriculture
(including the conversion of flooded forests in the wider Tonle Sap floodplain); and timber and wildlife poaching, especially of high-value species such as Siamese rosewood, which is in high demand in nearby markets in Vietnam and China. Emerging threats to forest ecosystems due to expanding economic activity in Cambodia include mining operations and the construction of infrastructure such as roads, railways, and powerlines.28
Large-scale land conversion in Cambodia has primarily occurred through the granting and development of ELCs for numerous export crops, including rubber, cashews, cassava, and sugar.
Nearly half of the areas where ELCs were granted between 2000 and 2012 were forested in 2000, representing 12.4% of forest land cover in Cambodia. However, within ELCs the annual rate of forest loss was between 29% and 105% higher than in comparable land areas outside these concessions.29 Despite a 2012 moratorium on issuance of new ELCs sources indicate that over
32,000 hectares of concessions have been granted since that time, 25,000 hectares of which are in protected areas.30 ELCs also are often granted without consultations concerning traditional use or customary land rights, consideration of protected area status, and analysis of the disproportionate impacts that women and marginalized groups face due to displacements and relocations associated with ELCs.31 According to information from provincial leaders, central ministries in Phnom Penh often grant ELCs without consulting with the local authorities or communities.32 These illegal activities extend beyond the corrupt individuals participating in the illicit trade, implicating ELC operators who have licenses to cut wood legally to clear areas for agriculture, but often expand timber cutting beyond the designated areas in their concessions or purchase and sell illegally-felled
26 USAID. The Assessment of Business Models for Low-Emission Land-Use Management in Asia. February 2017.
https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pa00mk9d.pdf 27 USAID. Commodity-driven Forest Loss, A Study of Southeast Asia: A Summary for Policy Makers. March 2021.
https://servir.adpc.net/sites/default/files/public/publications/attachments/Commodity%20Driven%20Forest%20Loss%2
0Study%20SE%20Asia%20%E2%80%93%20Policymaker%20Summary.pdf 28 USAID/Cambodia Foreign Assistance Act 118/119 Tropical Forests and Biodiversity Analysis. July 2019.
29 K.F. Davis et al. September 2015. “Accelerated deforestation driven by large-scale land acquisitions in Cambodia.”
Nature Geoscience. https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2540. Accessed March 2021.
30 Beauchamp, E., T. Clements, E. J. Milner-Gulland. 2018. “Exploring trade-offs between development and conservation outcomes in Northern Cambodia.” Land Use Policy 71: 431-444.
31 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women. Concluding observations on the combined fourth and fifth periodic reports of Cambodia. https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/52f386a94.pdf.
32 USAID/Cambodia Foreign Assistance Act 118/119 Tropical Forests and Biodiversity Analysis. July 2019.
https://pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/pa00mk9d.pdf https://servir.adpc.net/sites/default/files/public/publications/attachments/Commodity%20Driven%20Forest%20Loss%20Study%20SE%20Asia%20%E2%80%93%20Policymaker%20Summary.pdf https://servir.adpc.net/sites/default/files/public/publications/attachments/Commodity%20Driven%20Forest%20Loss%20Study%20SE%20Asia%20%E2%80%93%20Policymaker%20Summary.pdf https://www.nature.com/articles/ngeo2540 https://www.refworld.org/pdfid/52f386a94.pdf trees from outside their ELCs.33 There are regular news reports citing that ELC operators are laundering illegal timber from adjacent areas, including protected areas such as the Prey Lang
Wildlife Sanctuary.
Habitat conversion for agriculture, expanded settlements, and more recently, land speculation, is widespread in Cambodia and adversely impacts protected areas as well. Though roughly 41 percent of Cambodia’s land is under protected status,34 between 2001 and 2018 Cambodia’s protected areas lost 557,000 hectares of tree cover,35 or about 7 percent of the total protected area in the country.
Primary threats to wildlife in these areas are deforestation from large-scale conversion of forests and wetlands to agriculture and other land uses, timber and wildlife poaching, loss of habitat, and overfishing. Weak law enforcement and rampant domestic and cross-border trade in wildlife with neighboring countries have fueled an increase in the rates of hunting and illegal logging inside
Cambodian protected areas, including in remote regions where these issues had not formerly been a problem. The case of illegal logging by the Think Biotech ELC in the Prey Lang Wildlife
Sanctuary exemplifies this issue.36 Human displacement due to ELCs, land degradation, and weak land tenure rights has also caused encroachment into natural areas, including protected areas. Land conversion is widespread in forested and other terrestrial areas including flooded forests and grasslands. Small-scale land grabbing is an issue that is likely facilitated by local or provincial officials in exchange for bribes or political allegiances.37 Also, the creation of protected areas often disproportionately impacts the poor, as traditional lands or rights holders are displaced, access to forest products are curtailed, and the benefits of tourism are poorly distributed. Stakeholders interviewed near the Ramsar Prek Toal site reported little advantage from this globally significant protected area and UNESCO site.38 This has been borne out by researchers working on the Foreign
Assistance Act Sections 118 and 119 Analyses (FAA 118/119 Report) who reported that stakeholders working in or near protected areas indicated that land grabbing was increasing while most villagers living adjacent to these areas lacked even basic access to clean water. While the relationship between poverty and biodiversity loss is complex, in general poverty contributes to timber and wildlife poaching, land grabbing and other encroachment, and unsustainable uses of non-timber forest products.39
33 Sabados, Katarina. March 6, 2018. “Corruption is Destroying Cambodia’s Forests”. Organized Crime and
Corruption Reporting Project. https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/7732-corruption-is-destroying-cambodia-s-forests.
Accessed March 2021.
34 “Government renews vow to protect Prey Lang.” March 9, 2021. Phnom Penh Post.
https://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/govt-renews-vow-guard-prey-lang. Accessed March 2021.
35 “What’s Happening in Cambodia’s Forests?” September 2019. Global Forest
Watch. https://blog.globalforestwatch.org/data-and-research/whats-happening-in-cambodias-forests/. Accessed March
2021.
36 Keeton-Olsen, Danielle. May 2020. “Cambodian firm accused of creating a ‘monopoly in the timber business’.”
Mongabay. https://news.mongabay.com/2020/05/cambodian-firm-accused-of-creating-a-monopoly-in-the-timber-business/. Accessed March 2021.
37 MacInnes, Megan. August 2015. “Land is life: An analysis of the role ‘grand’ corruption plays in enabling elite grabbing of land in Cambodia”. Land Advisor.
https://www.globalwitness.org/documents/18074/Global_Witness_Corruption_and_large-scale_land_acquisitions_in_Cambodia_reformatted_28Aug15.pdf. Accessed March 2021.
38 USAID/Cambodia Foreign Assistance Act 118/119 Tropical Forests and Biodiversity Analysis. July 2019.
39 Barrett, C.B., A. J. Travis, and P. Dasgupta. 2011. “On biodiversity conservation and poverty traps.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 108 (34): 13907-13912. https://www.pnas.org/content/108/34/13907/tab-article-info. Accessed March 2021.
https://www.occrp.org/en/daily/7732-corruption-is-destroying-cambodia-s-forests https://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/govt-renews-vow-guard-prey-lang https://www.phnompenhpost.com/national/govt-renews-vow-guard-prey-lang https://blog.globalforestwatch.org/data-and-research/whats-happening-in-cambodias-forests/ https://news.mongabay.com/2020/05/cambodian-firm-accused-of-creating-a-monopoly-in-the-timber-business/ https://news.mongabay.com/2020/05/cambodian-firm-accused-of-creating-a-monopoly-in-the-timber-business/ https://www.globalwitness.org/documents/18074/Global_Witness_Corruption_and_large-scale_land_acquisitions_in_Cambodia_reformatted_28Aug15.pdf https://www.globalwitness.org/documents/18074/Global_Witness_Corruption_and_large-scale_land_acquisitions_in_Cambodia_reformatted_28Aug15.pdf https://www.pnas.org/content/108/34/13907/tab-article-info https://www.pnas.org/content/108/34/13907/tab-article-info
Wildlife trafficking, which includes illegal timber trade and wildlife extraction, is a major threat to biodiversity in Cambodia. Poaching is perhaps the biggest threat to species diversity due to the fact that Cambodia still has valuable wildlife resources to extract, is close to markets in neighboring countries and China, poorly enforces its wildlife and other criminal laws, and suffers from persistent corruption. Siamese rosewood is a major source of wildlife crime, although almost all species of wood are now poached.40 While all wildlife species are targeted, illegal hunting of wild cats, pangolins, civets, Siamese crocodiles, turtles, wild ungulates, bears, and hornbills is pronounced. For example, the results of a recent ten-year study of ungulate populations in the
Eastern Plains showed that the use of wildlife snares and other lethal traps increased a hundred-fold from 2010-2020 generating a corresponding sharp decline in all previously common hoofed mammals except wild pigs.41 The construction of access roads and trails for timber and wildlife poaching also facilitates biodiversity loss, opens areas to further degradation, and increases the risk of fires. Cambodia is a transit country for many of the world’s most trafficked wildlife products such as precious woods, elephant ivory, rhino horn, pangolin scales, and big cat bones.42 The military has been implicated in illegal logging and linked to the murder of three anti-logging activists in 2018.43 In addition, the murders of forest rangers and other environmental activists in recent years have been poorly uninvestigated. Because of this illegal behavior Cambodia was named a country of concern under the U.S. Eliminate, Neutralize, and Disrupt Wildlife Trafficking
(END Wildlife Trafficking) Act of 2016.44
Wildlife crime also disproportionately affects indigenous groups who depend on natural resources and may even create perverse incentives to commit additional poaching. For example, the Bunong people in Mondulkiri Province rely on subsistence agriculture, primarily rice, for their livelihoods, but when their rice stocks run low during the lean season they also depend on the sale of valuable forest tree resins, which are used in the manufacture of paints, sealants, and varnishes. Natural resource tenure rights over their resin trees are passed down through families based on their customary tenure systems.
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .