MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT_Draft Statement of Work.pdf

v2.6 – MAY2021

PR #

STATEMENT OF WORK

(SOW)

MK 39 Mod 3 Expendable Mobile Antisubmarine Warfare (ASW) Training Target

(EMATT)

PR No. 1300TBD

1.0 Background

The Undersea Weapons Program Office (PMS404) has tasked the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Newport (NUWCDIVNPT), Code 85, to procure MK 39 Mod 3 Expendable Mobile Antisubmarine Warfare (ASW) Training Target (EMATT). The MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT is the next evolution of the expendable ASW training target that will provide the fleet with an improved, realistic, ASW target for open ocean and range use.

The MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT is the US Navy’s open ocean ASW Training Target. MK 39 Mod 3 EMATTs simulate the acoustic and dynamic characteristics of a submarine threat. This allows all the Navy ASW, surface, air and subsurface communities to practice their detection, tracking and weapon employment skills against a threat representative target. MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT are launched from surface ships, range support craft, and from ASW aircraft via sonobuoy tubes.

Target run profiles will be programmable externally through a portable programmer to produce customized runs for specific training needs. The MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT will be capable of generating discrete tonals and tonal families, broadband noise, and transient signals.

The Portable Target Programmer (PTP) allows Fleet users to reprogram EMATTs in the field to meet real time specific training needs. The PTP has the capability to perform Built-In-Test of the EMATT and can be used to download new operating system software to upgrade the EMATT.

Foreign Military Sale variants of the MK 39 EMATT configuration are country specific; the specific countries and configuration of each FMS target will be provided at the time the FMS CLIN option is awarded.

1.1 Places of Performance: Contractor’s Facility

1.2 Authorized Users: MK 39 EMATT Program

1.3 Sponsors: PMS404 (Undersea Weapons)

1.4 Types of Funding: Research, Development, Test & Evaluation, Navy (RDT&EN), Weapons Procurement, Navy (WPN), Operations and Maintenance, Navy (OMN), and Foreign Military Sales (FMS)

2.0 Scope

This Statement of Work (SOW) sets forth the work efforts required by the Contractor for production, test and delivery of MK 39 Mod3 EMATT and to perform Engineering Services in support of the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT program to include inspection, test, repair, operational and testing support, and software development.

3.0 Applicable Documents

The contractor shall perform the tasking required in Section 4.0 in accordance with the below Applicable Documents.

Applicable

Document # Document # Document Title Date or Revision

3.1 7490774 Prime Item Product Performance Specification for the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT

Rev C

3.2 ANSI/ISO/ASQ

9001‐2008

Quality Management Systems 2008

3.3 N/A TDP Option Selection Worksheet 12/03/2020

3.4 N/A PMS 404 Risk, Issue, and Opportunity

Management Plan (RIOMP)

15 April 2019

4.0 Technical Requirements

The following tasks shall be performed in accordance with Applicable Documents listed in section 3.0 and using Government Furnished Information (GFI) listed in section 6.0.

4.1 MK 39 EMATT Production

4.1.1 Program Management Review and Technical Interchange Meetings

The Contractor shall conduct Program Management Reviews (PMR) semiannually and shall participate in Technical Interchange Meetings (TIM) weekly to provide working level status reporting including technical presentations and tasking. The Contractor shall provide presentation materials prior to PMRs and TIMs. Monthly production metrics must be included in each presentation. Program risks will be managed in accordance with PMS 404’s AD 3.4 updated Risk, Issue, and Opportunity Management Plan (RIOMP), approved 15 April 2019.

CDRL A001: Presentation Material

4.1.2 Quality Assurance Plan

The Contractor shall apply engineering and analytical disciplines to ensure that the processes and products used meet the requirements of this SOW. The Contractor shall establish, implement, document, and maintain a quality system that ensures conformance to order requirements and meets the requirements of Applicable Document 3.2. The Contractor shall generate a Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) for review and approval. The QAPP shall describe the Quality Management System methodology and approaches to be used under the contract. The Quality Management System shall meet the requirements of Applicable Document 3.2.

CDRL A002: Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP)

4.1.3 Pre-Production Validation and First Lot Validation

In accordance with Applicable Document 3.1, the Contractor shall build, test and deliver Pre- Production Validation and First Lot Validation units of MK 39 EMATTs.

CDRL A003: Test Report (Pre-Production Validation Test Report, First Lot Validation Test Report, Electronics Assembly Pre-Production Test Report)

4.1.4 MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT Production

In accordance with Applicable Document 3.1, the Contractor shall build, test and deliver MK 39 Mod 3 EMATTs. TPOC or COR will provide delivery locations at least 30 days prior to Required Delivery Date. The Contractor shall deliver Factory Acceptance Functional Test Report, Environmental Test Report, In-Water Test Report, and Serial Number report with each lot.

CDRL A003: Test Report (Factory Acceptance Functional Test Report, Environmental Test Report, In-Water Test Report)

CDRL A004: Technical Report - Study/Services (Serial Number report)

4.1.4.1 Early Sampling

Sampling occurs at completion of each lot. In accordance with Applicable Document 3.1, the Contractor must request to have the procuring activity's source inspector randomly select the periodic sample upon completion of 30% of the anticipated inspection lot quantity but less than 100%. For the Contractor to request early sampling for any lot, the Contractor shall provide written proof that subsystem components for the entire lot are from the same manufacturer and build process prior to sampling. The subsystems shall include, but are not limited to:

a) Acoustic ceramic vendor

b) Hull assemblies

c) Battery

d) Solenoids

e) Motors

f) DSP/G&C/RGA Rev changes

g) Electronics modifications or changes.

CDRL A005: Certificate of Compliance

4.1.4.2 Reliability Inspection Sample

In accordance with Applicable Document 3.1, the reliability inspection sample shall be submitted for inspection with a DD Form 1222 (Request for and Results of Tests). The Contractor may request a meeting to discuss the results of any Government test, prior to final determination of the results by the Government.

4.1.4.3 Recovered Reliability Inspection Sample Units

If the Government recovers defective units from an accepted sample, the Government may return the units to the Contractor for failure analysis. The Contractor shall be responsible for all failure analysis costs.

4.1.4.4 Reliability Test Plan

In accordance with Applicable Document 3.1, if reliability is below 80%, as measured at the end of each CLIN’s Period of Performance, the Contractor shall develop a Reliability Test Plan. The Contractor shall document efforts to improve EMATT reliability in the initial delivery. The Contractor shall document results of the test and investigation in the final delivery. The Government reserves the right to halt production until the investigation and testing is completed.

The costs of the Reliability Test Plan, subsequent investigation and corrective action shall be the responsibility of the Contractor.

CDRL A006: Reliability Test Plan

4.1.4.5 Failure Review Board

If the reliability inspection sample does not meet the requirements of Applicable Document 3.1, the Contractor shall conduct a Failure Review Board. The Failure Review Board will consist of both Government and Contractor personnel. Upon completion of Failure Review Board, the Contractor shall submit a Corrective Action plan. Upon Government approval of the Corrective Action plan, the Contractor must submit a reliability inspection sample in accordance with Applicable Document 3.1.

The costs of the Failure Review Board, corrective action and retest sample are the responsibility of the Contractor.

CDRL A007: Technical Report - Study/Services (Corrective Action Plan)

CDRL A008: Technical Report - Study/Services (Failure Review Board Report)

4.1.5 Air Launch Certification

In accordance with Applicable Document 3.1, all changes to NAVSEA Drawing #8721731 shall be reviewed by the appropriate NAVAIR personnel prior to incorporation into production units.

The Contractor shall review NAVSEA Drawing #8721731 and submit updates as required when any RFV or ECP is submitted.

The Contractor shall submit five (5) modified test units with minor changes to NAVSEA Drawing #8721731 for non-destructive testing. Minor changes are defined as changes to the Center of Gravity changes within 10% of the existing tolerance, or material changes.

The Contractor shall submit fifteen (15) modified test units with major changes to NAVSEA Drawing #8721731 for destructive testing. Major changes are defined as any changes not defined as minor in paragraph 4.1.5.

CDRL A009: Technical Report - Study/Services (Air Launch certification package)

4.1.6 Battery Certification

In Accordance with Applicable Document 3.1, Lithium batteries shall comply with all Navy Lithium Safety Program Responsibilities and Procedures of S9310-AQ-SAF-010. If total stored system energy equals or exceeds 1,000 watt-hours, then the Contractor shall comply with the requirements of SG270-BV-SAF-010. If the batteries have not been previously tested, the Contractor shall fabricate and delver eighteen (18) cells, and five (5) full assembly batteries as certification test assets to the Government. The Government will perform destructive testing on these items to verify the items meets the performance requirements detailed in Applicable Document 3.1. The Contractor shall submit a Battery certification package with any RFVs, or ECPs to NAVSEA Drawing #312454 or lower level drawings

CDRL A00A: Technical Report - Study/Services (Battery Design Package)

4.1.7 Transportation Account Codes

The Contractor shall place the Government assigned Transportation Account Code (TAC) on shipping documentation to enable payment of transportation bills by the U.S. Government under contracts with F.O.B. origin terms.

The applicable TAC for this contract is: NSSM.

The cognizant DCMA office may be contacted for additional information or assistance on preparation of shipping documents or other transportation concerns.

4.2 Configuration Management

The Contractor shall implement Configuration Management (CM) in accordance with the CM Plan for Undersea Weapons Program (PMS 404) PEO SUB S0199-133-A-O-C, Revision D dated August 2010, to establish and maintain a configuration baseline. The Contractor shall prepare a Configuration Management Plan. The Contractor shall submit an Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) to the Government for any change(s) to the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT baseline.

Class 1 ECPs to include changes to Form, Fit, Function, or Cost, shall be submitted in accordance with CDRL A00B Class II ECPs may be submitted quarterly. ECPs shall be submitted via the CMPro Database.

Costs for ECPs submitted prior to Preproduction Validation shall be included in CLIN 0001.

Costs for ECPs submitted in response to Reliability Test Plans or Failure Review Boards are the responsibility of the Contractor.

CDRL A00B Supplier’s Configuration Management Plan (Configuration Management Plan)

4.2.1 Technical Drawings

As part of any ECP, the Contractor shall develop and provide technical drawings that fully disclose the hardware and electrical/electronic design. The Contractor shall prepare the drawings that support the production and manufacture of hardware configuration items. The Contractor shall deliver all software and source code for software configuration items. The Contractor shall document COTS and NDI items to a level of detail needed to support product specification analysis and procurement. The Contractor shall maintain Interface Control Documents (ICD) to document external interface design requirements for external interfaces to ship systems such as handling, launch and recovery equipment when associated drawings are updated.

Technical drawings and documentation shall be Production Level as specified in MIL- STD-31000. The Contractor shall document any changes to; product drawings and associated lists, commercial drawings and associated lists, and test equipment drawings for the production and manufacture of the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT System. The Contractor shall develop and maintain Computer Aided Design (CAD) drawing files in a Government-approved format. All drawings and CAD files shall meet the requirements of the Technical Data Package (TDP) Option Selection Worksheet. Contractor shall identify any software that will be delivered with restrictive rights or special license rights as required by DFARS 252.227-7014.

4.2.2 MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT Drawing Tree

As part of the TDP, the Contractor shall maintain the drawing tree for the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT. The Contractor shall develop the drawing tree in a structured, top down order, beginning with the top assembly drawing for the equipment/system and ending at the lowest component or piece part.

4.2.3 Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Review

The Contractor shall actively review the baseline design for Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS), and report findings to the Government. The Contractor shall provide recommendations for lifetime buy, redesign or drop in replacements. The Contractor shall be responsible for DMSMS updates.

CDRL A00C Diminishing Manufacturing Sources and Material Shortages (DMSMS) Health Assessment Report

4.2.4 Software Configuration Management

In accordance with Applicable Document 3.1, the Contractor shall provide a means for identifying and documenting software defects. The Contractor shall maintain a software configuration management database that captures and tracks all software problems and is capable of reporting problem description, version found in, version fixed in, status, priority, probability of occurrence, and other information to accurately track the problem. The software shall have no unresolved Priority-1 or Priority-2 defects upon completion of this contract. The Contractor shall deliver software and source code when modified. The Contractor shall submit a software defect list annually, and participate in a Technical Interchange Meeting to discuss the list.

CDRL A00D Software Product Specification/ Source Code

CDRL A00E Software Bug list

4.3 Engineering Services

The engineering services shall be performed at the Contractor’s location, or at other locations specified by the Government in each Technical Instruction (TI). TIs will be issued to initiate specific tasking as particular needs are identified. TIs will identify the explicit requirement(s) within the scope of the SOW, provide amplifying or clarifying information, specify the applicable facility, describe work to be performed, outline estimated travel, Other Direct Costs (ODCs), and material requirements, list required Government Furnished Property (GFP) and Government Furnished Information (GFI), and list deliverables. In accordance with Applicable Document 3.1 and utilizing GFI, the Contractor shall provide the following engineering services:

The Contractor shall inspect the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATTs and Portable Target Programmers (PTP) for visual damage, expired batteries, or communication errors between the EMATT and PTP. The Contractor shall repair the EMATT and PTPs back to ready for issue state. The Contractor shall test the EMATT and PTPs to ensure the repairs still meet the Applicable Document 3.1.

The Contractor shall modify MK 39 Mod 3 EMATTs, PTPs, or subsystems, to meet specific testing or operational requirements. The Contractor shall provide on-site field support to the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT testing conducted by the Government. The Contractor shall modify the software code, recover vehicles, extract and analyze data.

The Contractor shall perform engineering studies, assessments, trade studies and analyses related to ASW targets, EMATT and alternative missions. The Contractor shall draft computer aided design models and engineering drawings including conceptual designs, system layouts, and detail and assembly drawings. The Contractor shall conduct optimizations and assessments. The Contractor shall perform design for manufacturability reviews.

In order to meet emergent requirements, new technologies or parts obsolescence, the Contractor shall prepare and submit a Preliminary Engineering Change Proposal (PECP) or Engineering Change Proposal (ECP) for the Government’s review and approval for changes to the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT baseline. Technical drawings and documentation shall be at the level as specified in the TI and in accordance with MIL-STD-31000. The Contractor shall document any changes to; product drawings and associated lists, commercial drawings and associated lists, and test equipment drawings for the production and manufacture of the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATT System. The Contractor shall develop CAD drawing files in a Government-approved format. Contractor shall identify any items that will be delivered with limited, restrictive rights or special license rights as required by DFARS 252.227-7014.

The Contractor shall provide software development and software validation testing for the MK 39 Mod 3 EMATTs, PTPs, Run Geometry Application and System Test Console software.

The Contractor shall provide programming and operational training on the MK39 Mod 3 EMATT, PTP and Run Geometry Application Software to Military and Civilian personnel. Training shall be conducted during on-site field testing (at sea or onshore).

The Contractor shall perform at sea testing of MK 39 EMATT, and provide vessel services to complete testing when Government vessels are not available.

5.0 Progress Reports

The Contractor shall prepare a Contractor’s Status Report that indicates the progress of work, status of the program(s), and existing or potential problem areas for all assigned tasks. The Contractor shall submit the Contract Status Report for the same timeframe as each invoice submitted in the Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) Module of the Procurement Integrated Enterprise Environment (PIEE). CDRL A00F – DI-MGMT-81991.

6.0 Government Furnished Information

The following Government Furnished Information (GFI) will be made available under this contract.

Index Document Name Applicable SOW Tasks

5.1 EMATT Technical Data Package 4.1 – 4.3

7.0 Quality Surveillance and Performance Standards

The Government will conduct quality surveillance via various methods including formal and informal meetings, review of technical reports, review of monthly progress reports, and review of deliverables. Contractor performance will be evaluated in the areas of technical quality, cost control, schedule/timeliness, management, utilization of small business, and regulatory compliance as follows:

Technical Quality: The government will evaluate technical quality using the criteria defined in the Performance Requirements Summary Table (PRST), Attachment X;

Cost Control: The government will evaluate the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling actual costs in comparison to negotiated costs;

Schedule/Timeliness: The government will evaluate the contractor’s ability to meet negotiated milestones and delivery schedules;

Management: The government will evaluate the contractor’s ability to integrate and coordinate all activities needed to execute the contract/task order;

Utilization of Small Business: The government will evaluate the contractor’s compliance with the Small Business Subcontracting Plan and any small business subcontracting goals contained in the contract/task order;

Regulatory Compliance: The government will evaluate the contractor’s compliance with the terms and conditions of the contract/task order relating to applicable regulations and codes.