MJU-75 JQR Signed_R.pdf
PDF 820 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MJU-75 Flare
- Solicitation number
- FA821325RB0XX
About this file
This document is a Justification for Qualification Requirements (JQR) for the MJU-75/B Countermeasure Flare, a critical military equipment item used primarily on fighter aircraft. The document outlines detailed qualification requirements for potential offerors, including strict technical, manufacturing, and testing specifications. Key requirements include demonstrating specialized manufacturing capabilities, possessing required facilities and equipment, verifying technical data packages, conducting comprehensive testing, and handling classified military technology.
The qualification process is estimated to take 360 days and will cost approximately $200,000 for testing and evaluation. The Air Force will only consider U.S. suppliers, with potential exceptions for special permissions. Offerors must meet extensive criteria, including the ability to interpret engineering drawings, verify data packages, develop specialized test procedures, and produce production-equivalent flares. The document emphasizes the critical nature of the flares, noting that failure to procure from a fully qualified source could result in part failure, aircraft mission capability degradation, or potential loss of aircraft and crew.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| MJU-75B SSS 2025.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
JUSTIFICATION FOR QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENTS
FAR 9.202(a) and DoD 4120.24M
(Public Law 98-525, Title 10 USC Section 2319)
DISTRIBUTION STATEMENT D: Distribution authorized to Department of Defense and U.S.
DoD contractors only, CTI and Export Controlled, 21 May 2025. Other requests for this document must be referred to AFLCMC.EBHCC.CMFLARES@US.AF.MIL.
1. Stock Number (NSN): 1370-01-670-3077/ LA85
2. 201719320
3. Noun: MJU-75/B FLARE, COUNTERMEASURE
4. Fighters, possible other Aircraft in the future
1.
not correct, would result in product functional degradations. This item performs a critical function on the aircraft and special equipment is required for its manufacture and testing.
Special care and attention are required but not limited to , processing, assembly, performance, and part interchangeability of this item.
2.
item being procured.
3.
part, degradation of aircraft mission capability, or loss of aircraft and crew.
4. -within the schedule and economic constraints of our contracts. To protect the interests of the Air Force, only suppliers in the United States will be considered, with the exception of special permissions.
completion of the requirements prior to contract award.
1.
2.
When the d inspection by the government.
3.
currently in their possession related to the manufacture of the MJU-75/B IRCM Flares. This
When the -75
4.
for the utilization of any special test or inspection facilities and/or equipment. This documentation evelopment of develop those procedures for review and approval by the design control activity. The contractor must be capable of locating alternative components to minimize any diminishing manufacturing source and material shortage (DMSMS) problems.
5.
activity an explanation of how they will certify that the test methods and production
-75/B IRCM Flares. The government retains t or 60 days written -NDTI-81307A and
-NDTI-
201719320B, initial release or latest revision, paragraph 4.3, First Article Sample.
6. Upon satisfactory compliance with the provisions of -75/B
7. -as
8.
complete test report for the production capability demonstration verifying compliance with all performance, environmental, mechanical, and quality assurance requirements addition, the test report shall contain detailed documentation describing the testing procedures during production. This data shall describe in detail the point(s) in the production process that testing occurred, and if government retains the option to inspect the production and testing process, including on-provide advance so that the government can witness, if needed, coordinate needed activities, support, etc.
9. It is the estimate of the design control activity that decrease, depending on individual circumstances.
10.
the the
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .