MARKET SURVEY-Bayou Meto Canal 1000 Phase 3.2.docx

DOCX document 18 KB Posted

Attached to
Bayou Meto Canal 1000 Phase 3. 2
Solicitation number
W912EQ25S0002
Issued by

About this file

This is a market survey document for the Bayou Meto Canal 1000 Phase 3.2 project issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Memphis District. The survey collects contractor information including business size status, bonding capability, geographic capabilities, and past performance on up to 5 relevant projects completed within the last 5 years under NAICS code 237990 (Other Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction).

The project involves construction of 15,165 linear feet of irrigation canal in Lonoke County, Scott, Arkansas, requiring 560,000 cubic yards of fill and 412,000 cubic yards of excavation, along with installation of farm offtakes, siphon structures, pump turnouts, and a gatewell turnout. The estimated price range is $25-100 million, with an anticipated award date of July 15, 2025. Responses are due by December 30, 2024, at 10:00 AM Central Time. The survey also seeks input on the use of Project Labor Agreements (PLAs) through specific questions about local PLA usage, labor availability, scheduling requirements, and potential benefits or drawbacks of PLAs for this procurement.

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

MARKET SURVEY

Memphis District (MVM) Bayou Meto Canal 1000 Phase 3.2

Contractor Name: _______________________________________________________ Contractor Address: _____________________________________________________ Contractor Point of Contact: _______________________________________________ Contractor Phone / Email: __________________________________________________ UEI Number: ___________________________________________________________ CAGE Code: _____________________________________________________________

1. NAICS: This market survey applies to work associated with NAICS 237990, Other Heavy & Civil Engineering Construction, as described in the sources sought posting. Please indicated below whether your company is currently registered under this code in System for Award Management (SAM) https://www.sam.gov/

_____YES

_____NO

2. BUSINESS SIZE: NAICS Code 237990 has a size standard of $45M. Check all of which applies to your firm:

_____ 8(a) _____ HUBZone Small Business _____ Veteran Owned Small Business (VOSB) _____ Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDVOSB) _____ Small Disadvantaged Business (SDB) _____ Women-Owned Small Business (WOSB) _____ Small Business _____ Large Business

3. BONDING CAPABILITY:

_____________________________________ Per Project* _____________________________________ Aggregate*

*As evidenced by submission of Surety Company letter stating bonding capacity.

4. GEOGRAPHIC/CAPABILTY:

a. Please select the appropriate geographical area(s) where your company has the capability to perform work.

_____ Memphis District

b. Of the geographical areas listed above, please check the areas below that your company has executed projects simultaneously.

_____ Memphis District

c. Please submit projects (maximum of 5) in which your company served as the Prime Contractor. Projects submitted need to be relevant (fall within the basic scope) and recent (completed within the last 5 years). Project details to be submitted include:

· Project Title

· Project Description

· Contract

· Dollar Value

· Location

· Completion Date

5. The Construction community is invited to comment on the use of PLAs. Of particular interest to the Government are responses to the following questions:

i. Do you have knowledge that a PLA has been used in the local area on projects of this kind? If so, please provide supporting documentation.

ii. Are you aware of skilled labor shortages in the area for those crafts that will be needed to complete the referenced project? If so, please elaborate and provide supporting documentation where possible.

iii. Are you aware of time sensitive issues/scheduling requirements that would affect the rate at which the referenced project should be completed? If so, please elaborate and provide supporting documentation where possible.

iv. Identify specific reasons why or how you believe a PLA would advance the Federal Government’s interest in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement.

v. Identify specific reasons why you do not believe a PLA would advance the Federal Government’s interest in achieving economy and efficiency in Federal procurement.

vi. Identify any additional information you believe should be considered on the use of a PLA on the referenced project.

vii. Identify any additional information you believe should be considered on the non-use of a PLA on the referenced project.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .