BACAPS_Base_IDIQ-Exhibit_A_Eval_Crit.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 14 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Business Management and Analytics, Cost Analysis, and Portfolio Support (BACAPS) Competitive 8(a) Set Aside
- Solicitation number
- M67854-15-R-4803
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Revised Exhibit A - Evaluation Criteria Checklist
View the file
Other files
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria Checklist
| Exhibit A – BACAPS Evaluation Criteria Checklist: Offeror XXX | ||||||
| Compliance review | PWS Reference | Yes | No | Proposal Reference (Volume, Page, Paragraph, Line) | If No or Unacceptable, explain Why | Notes or Questions |
| The proposal subst.antially conforms with the preparation instructions. | ||||||
| Compensation Plan | PWS Reference | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Proposal Reference (Volume, Page, Paragraph, Line) | If No or Unacceptable, explain Why | Notes or Questions |
| In accordance with FAR 52.222-46, compensation levels demonstrate a clear understanding of work to be performed and indicate the capability of the proposed compensation structure to obtain and keep suitably qualified personnel to meet mission objectives meets the requirements of the solicitation. | ||||||
| Technical Approach | PWS Reference | Yes | No | Proposal Reference (Volume, Page, Paragraph, Line) | If No or Unacceptable, explain Why | Notes or Questions |
| The offeror provides a statement that they ACKNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTAND, AND SHALL PERFORM, when directed, the following PWS requirements in accordance with Attachment 1 PWS and, Attachment 2 QASP of the Base ID/IQ contract, and as directed in any Task Order specific attachments: |
3.1 - 3.6
4.1.1 - 4.1.11
4.2.2 - 4.2.3
4.2.5 - 4.2.9
4.2.11 - 4.2.17
4.3.2 - 4.3.4 4.4.2
4.4.5 - 4.5.2
4.5.4 - 4.5.7 7 3.1 - 3.6
4.1.1 - 4.1.11
4.2.2 - 4.2.3
4.2.5 - 4.2.9
4.2.11 - 4.2.17
4.3.2 - 4.3.4 4.4.2
4.4.5 - 4.5.2
4.5.4 - 4.5.7
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to conduct financial risk assessments for scheduled events. | 4.2.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to analyze impact of changes. | 4.2.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to manage preventative and corrective actions. | 4.2.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the Financial Management Planner (Execution Tool). | 4.2.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to conduct Analysis of Phasing/Obligation Rates. | 4.2.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to prepare and deliver Business Case Analyses. | 4.2.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to update the Risk Tracker on a monthly basis. | 4.2.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to perform portfolio aggregate financial analysis on a weekly basis. | 4.2.4 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop and submit the Portfolio Financial Analytical Reports on a weekly basis. | 4.2.4 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to monitor the status of portfolio funds with the PdM Tool set. | 4.2.4 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to consolidate and analyze changes to TFITS financial artifacts. | 4.2.4 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to administer and maintain the TFITS Microsoft SharePoint Site Collection (and WIKIs) and ensure it is in accordance with Information Systems and Infrastructure (IS&I) policies and directives. | 4.2.10 |
| The offeror successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to obtain the appropriate Marine Corps Enterprise Information Technology Services (MCEITS) account(s) in order to manage document libraries, workflows, and Wiki pages. | 4.2.10 |
| The offeror successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to coordinate with the Project Officers and submit annual updates to the Project Cost Estimates. | 4.3.1 |
| The offeror successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to provide an annual CARD for TFSMS and DRRS-MC programs in accordance with the DoD 5000 Series and SECNAVIST 5223.2A requirements. | 4.4.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to update and maintain each CARD for TFSMS and DRRS-MC programs to reflect the life cycle of the programs. | 4.4.1 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to create each Logistics Requirements and Funding Summary annually for the programs. | 4.4.3 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to update each Logistics Requirements and Funding Summary annually for the programs. | 4.4.3 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain each Logistics Requirements and Funding Summary annually for the programs. | 4.4.3 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to deliver each Logistics Requirements and Funding Summary annually for the programs. | 4.4.3 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to create the PLCCE on an annual basis. | 4.4.4 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to update the PLCCE on an annual basis. | 4.4.4 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the PLCCE on an annual basis. | 4.4.4 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to deliver the PLCCE on an annual basis. | 4.4.4 |
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to implement quarterly maintenance changes to Tools to support SharePoint environment changes. | 4.5.3 |
| The Offeror's Corporate Experience demonstrates they have the requisite corporate experience; including experience with the DoD or Federal Acquisition experience. | |
| Based on the Technical Approach and Historical Information (Exhibit E), the Level of effort appears balanced and realistic. |
| Past Performance | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Neutral | Proposal Reference (Volume, Page, Paragraph, Line) | If No or Unacceptable, explain Why | Notes or Questions |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort in a DoD environment. |
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .