EIAS_Base_IDIQ-Exhibit_A_Eval_Crit_Cklst.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Engineering, Information Assurance, and Administrative Support (EIAS) Competitive 8(a) Set Aside
- Solicitation number
- M67854-15-R-4802
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
EIAS BASE IDIQ EVALUATION CRITERIA CHECKLIST
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Evaluation Criteria Checklist
| Exhibit A – EIAS Evaluation Criteria Checklist: Offeror XXX | ||||||
| Compliance review | PWS Reference | Yes | No | Proposal Reference (Volume, Page, Paragraph, Line) | If No or Unacceptable, explain Why | Notes or Questions |
| The proposal substantially conforms with the preparation instructions | ||||||
| Compensation Plan | PWS Reference | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Proposal Reference (Volume, Page, Paragraph, Line) | If No or Unacceptable, explain Why | Notes or Questions |
| In accordance with FAR 52.222-46, compensation levels demonstrate a clear understanding of work to be performed and indicate the capability of the proposed compensation structure to obtain and keep suitably qualified personnel to meet mission objectives meets the requirements of the solicitation. | ||||||
| Technical Approach | PWS Reference | Yes | No | Proposal Reference (Volume, Page, Paragraph, Line) | If No or Unacceptable, explain Why | Notes or Questions |
| The offeror provides a statement that they ACKNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTAND, AND SHALL PERFORM, when directed, the following PWS requirements in accordance with Attachment 1 PWS and Attavchment 2 QASP of the Base ID/IQ contract, and as directed in any Task Order specific attachments: |
3.1 - 3.5 4.1
4.2.1.1 - 4.2.1.9, 4.2.1.13 - 4.2.1.17 4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.3
4.2.3 - 4.2.5 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.4, 4.3.5
4.3.7 - 4.3.10 4.3.13.2
4.3.14.1 - 4.3.14.3 4.3.14-5 - 4.3.18 7 3.1 - 3.5 4.1
4.2.1.1 - 4.2.1.9, 4.2.1.13 - 4.2.1.17 4.2.2.1, 4.2.2.3
4.2.3 - 4.2.5 4.3.1, 4.3.2, 4.3.4, 4.3.5
4.3.7 - 4.3.10 4.3.13.2
4.3.14.1 - 4.3.14.3 4.3.14-5 - 4.3.18
| The offeror provides a statement that they ACKNOWLEDGE, UNDERSTAND, AND WILL ASSIGN personnel to the IA requirements that have an active Secret level clearance, or will be able to achieve one within 30 days of the beginning of the period of performance. | 4.3 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop the Program and Protection Plan (PPP). | 4.2.1.10 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the Program and Protection Plan (PPP). | 4.2.1.10 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop the Programmatic Environment, Safety & Occupational Health Evaluation (PHESHE). | 4.2.1.11 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the Programmatic Environment, Safety & Occupational Health Evaluation (PHESHE). | 4.2.1.11 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop the Engineering input into the Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP). | 4.2.1.12 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the Engineering input into the Life Cycle Sustainment Plan (LCSP). | 4.2.1.12 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to update existing DoDAF architectural artifacts and documents based on approved ECPs. | 4.2.2.2 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop the Information Support Plan (ISP)/Tailored ISP/eISP. | 4.2.2.4.1 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the Information Support Plan (ISP)/Tailored ISP/eISP. | 4.2.2.4.1 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF). | 4.2.2.4.2 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the Department of Defense Architecture Framework (DoDAF). | 4.2.2.4.2 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop the Department of Navy (DON) Enterprise Architecture Compliance Confirmation and Waiver Request. | 4.2.2.4.3 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain Department of Navy (DON) Enterprise Architecture Compliance Confirmation and Waiver Request. | 4.2.2.4.3 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop the Architecture Compliance and Requirements Traceability (ACART), or government equivalent tool. | 4.2.2.4.4 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the Architecture Compliance and Requirements Traceability (ACART), or government equivalent tool. | 4.2.2.4.4 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to develop the Department of Defense (DoD) Information Technology Portfolio Repository - DON (DITPR-DON). | 4.2.2.4.5 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to maintain the Department of Defense (DoD) Information Technology Portfolio Repository - DON (DITPR-DON). | 4.2.2.4.5 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to confirm that IA policies and procedures are being followed during SI system development, operation, and maintenance activities during each quarterly release cycle. | 4.3.3 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to review and provide feedback regarding SI security architectures, network diagrams, ports, protocols, data flows, and accreditation boundaries for IA compliance as needed. | 4.3.6 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to prepare an Information Assurance Strategy (IAS) per TFITS project in support of Clinger Cohen Act (CCA) requirements. | 4.3.11 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to prepare Program Protection Plans (PPP). | 4.3.12 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to prepare the TFITS Project for IV&V test events via IA documentation update. | 4.3.13.1 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to prepare the TFITS Project for IV&V test events via pre-assessment support. | 4.3.13.1 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to prepare the TFITS Project for IV&V test events via self-assessment result evaluation. | 4.3.13.1 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to prepare the TFITS Project for IV&V test events via Plan of Action & Milestone (POA&M) review and maintenance. | 4.3.13.1 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to verify vulnerability scans are performed in preparation for IV&V. | 4.3.13.1 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to verify Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs) are performed in preparation for IV&V. | 4.3.13.1 | |||||
| The offeror's approach successfully demonstrates and meets the requirement to track the progress of accreditation packages throughout the C&A process. | 4.3.14.4 | |||||
| Based on the Technical Approach and Historical Information (Exhibit E), the Level of effort appears balanced and realistic. | ||||||
| Past Performance | Acceptable | Unacceptable | Neutral | Proposal Reference (Volume, Page, Paragraph, Line) | If No or Unacceptable, explain Why | Notes or Questions |
| Based on the Offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Offeror will successfully perform the required effort in a DoD environment. |
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .