REVISED_M67854-14-Q-4400-0002_RFCs-Questions.doc
DOC document 77 KB Posted
- Attached to
- OUTER ROUTER UPGRADE
- Solicitation number
- M6785414Q4400
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
Revised RFCs
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M67854-14-Q-4400-0002_RFQ_Amended.pdf | ||
| M67854-14-Q-4400-0002_SF_30.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_14-Q-4400-0002.doc | DOC document | |
| ORU-Intended-Use-Case.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_14-Q-4400-0001.doc | DOC document | |
| M67854-14-Q-4400-0001_RFQ_Amended.pdf | ||
| M67854-14-Q-4400-0001_SF_30.pdf | ||
| Synopsis_14-Q-4400.doc | DOC document | |
| M67854-14-Q-4400_RFQ.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Solicitation Number: M67854-14-Q-4400-0002 Request for Quotes – Questions and Answers
Solicitation number: M67854-14-Q-4400-0002
OUTER ROUTER UPGRADE
Revised Request for Quotes (RFQ) Questions and Answers
| Document/ Section or Attachment |
| Paragraph/Page |
| Question/Issue/Concern |
Question 1
General
Does the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation under solicitation number M6785414Q4400 contain requirements similar to a current contract?
Answer 1
This is a new requirement.
Question 2
Configuration
Would the government consider a 7RU vs. 6RU Large Site Dimension if there was an appropriate trade-off between enhanced capabilities & expansion capacity and physical dimension?
Answer 2
Please see revised RFQ.
Question 3
Configuration
Would the government consider a 5RU vs. 2RU Small Site Dimension if there was an appropriate trade-off between enhanced capabilities & expansion capacity and physical dimension?
Answer 3
Please see revised RFQ.
Question 4
General
Does NGEN imply it must be bought from the NGEN contract ?
Answer 4
No.
Question 5
General
Will installation and deployment services need to be included in the price of the routers ?
Answer 5
No.
Question 6
FAR 52.212-1
Will the IDIQ be issued to one vendor or multiple vendors competed as delivery orders ?
Answer 6
As stated in RFQ under Instructions to Offerors, this will be a single award.
Question 7
General
What Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) is the current router equipment ?
Answer 7
All OEM current router equipment is Cisco.
Question 8
General
For lifecycle management for the devices will a lifecycle roadmap need to be presented in the RFP or after award?
Answer 8
No.
Question 9
General
Are there any page limitations for the RFP ?
Answer 9
No.
Question 10
FAR 52.212-2 Full Text in RFQ
What are the key evaluating criteria you have set forth ?
Answer 10
See RFQ-FAR 52.212-2 – Evaluation-Commercial Items.
Question 11
General
I have an alternate solution. Can I deviate from the Schedule B?
Answer 11
Yes. Please see RFQ DFARS Clause 252.204-7011 Alternative Line Item Structure.
Question 12
General
What are the modules required for each router build?
Answer 12
Please see revised RFQ.
Question 13
General
For the items that require UID labels, does the government want the awardee to affix all the labels or can the labels be shipped directly to the customer?
Answer 13
Please see the revised RFQ. In accordance with the FAR 52.212-1 Addendum #2, one (1) of each of CLINs 0001-0044 that require a 30-day delivery can mail the labels directly to the facility. Revised RFQ reflects the address.
For the remaining items on a 60-day delivery, the vendor is required to affix the labels, and then ship to the SSC Atlantic DET Norfolk address.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .