A1_JA.pdf

PDF 197 KB Posted

Attached to
Electronic Control Unit
Solicitation number
M6700425Q0016
Issued by

About this file

This is a Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition (JOFOC) for a FAR Part 13 acquisition under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold, submitted by the Marine Corps Logistics Command (MARCORLOGCOM) Contracts Department. The document justifies sole-sourcing to Oshkosh Defense LLC for 10 REPLT KIT, SPNSN, ECU, MK31 (Part No. DOO0K762) units for the Marine Depot Maintenance Command Depot in Barstow, CA.

The justification is based on Oshkosh Defense LLC being the only responsible source, specifically due to exclusive licensing agreements. The document indicates that Oshkosh is the only contractor with rights to technical data who can meet the Government requirement, and if not sole-sourced, the Government would need to solicit and compete for the design, testing, and production of kits meeting the requirement. The document is signed by David M. Merica on 11-21-24 as the Technical/Requirements Certification and by GySgt Matthew S. Radi on 1/16/25 as the Contracting Officer.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
D1_M6700425Q0016 Replt Kit MK31.docx DOCX document

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Controlled by: DON, USMC, I&L HCA Controlled by: MARCORLOGCOM MCFCS

CUI Category(ies): PROCURE

Limited Dissemination Control: DISPLAY ONLY POC: MARCORLOGCOM Contracts Department

Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition – FAR Part 13 Acquisitions under the SAT

V 1.5 (14 March 2023)

MEMORANDUM TO THE FILE

Subj: JUSTIFICATION FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION FOR A FAR PART

13 ACQUISITION UNDER THE SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION THRESHOLD

I. BACKGROUND:

1. FAR 13.106-1(b)(1)(i) states for purchases not exceeding the simplified acquisition threshold, Contracting Officers may solicit from one source if the Contracting Officer determines that the circumstances of the contract action deem only one source reasonably available (e.g., urgency, exclusive licensing agreements, brand-name or industrial mobilization).

2. As required by FAR 13.106-3(b)(3)(i), this memorandum explains the absence of competition for this acquisition, as only one source will be solicited for this requirement (or for a portion of the requirement) and the requirement (or portion of the requirement to be sole-sourced) is not expected to exceed the simplified acquisition threshold.

II. DESCRIPTION OF ITEM OR SERVICE:

III. THE DETERMINATION FOR USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING (select all that apply):

A. ___ ONLY ONE RESPONSIBLE SOURCE (select all that apply):

1. ___ RESTRICTIVE RIGHTS. The source has established proprietary rights, limited rights in data, patent rights, copyrights or secret processes in the item or service required.

2. ___ EXCLUSIVE LICENSING AGREEMENTS. The item or service is only available from the Original

Equipment Manufacturer (OEM), or there is only one authorized distributor or technical representative for the OEM.

3. ___ OTHER REASONS.

CUI//SP-PROCURE//DL-ONLY

Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition – FAR Part 13 Acquisitions under the SAT

V 1.5 (14 March 2023)

B. ___ BRAND NAME

Item required must be a brand name, product, or feature of a product, particular to one manufacturer.

C. ___URGENT AND COMPELLING. The supplies or services are of such unusual and compelling urgency that the Government would be seriously injured unless the agency is permitted to limit the number of sources from which it solicits bids or proposals. Urgent requirements are supplies or services that will result in a work stoppage, or are mission critical and the routine processing time would result in injury to the Government. The determination that the procurement for the above item/service is an urgent and compelling requirement is based on the following:

1. Date on which the requirement was first identified: __________________________________

2. Required delivery date/period of performance: __________________________________

3. Explanation of why delivery/commencement of services by the date mentioned above is required:

4. If appropriate, include any additional pertinent information.

IV. CERTIFICATIONS:

A. Technical / Requirements Certification: I certify that the facts and representation under my cognizance which are included in this justification are complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Signature Name (Printed) / Phone # Date

B. Contracting Officer Certification: I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

Signature Name (Printed) / Phone # Date

Date on which the requirement was first identified:
Required delivery dateperiod of performance:
2024-11-21T06:31:29-0800
MERICA.DAVID.M.1168336949
Name Printed Phone: David M. Merica / (760) 514-5548
Date: 11-21-24
2025-01-16T10:50:14-0500
RADI.MATTHEW.SCOTT.1284456935
Name Printed Phone_2: GySgt Matthew S. Radi
Date_2: 1/16/25
Text1: Marine Depot Maintenance Command Depot Barstow, CA has a request for REPLT KIT, SPNSN, ECU, MK31

Part No. DOO0K762 Qty 10 each

Text2:
Text3: Oshkosh Defense LLC is the only contractor with the rights to technical data who can meet the Government requirement. No other vendor can supply the kits. If the Government does not utilize this sole-source, it will likely need to solicit and compete for the design, testing, and production of kits that meets the requirement need.
Text4:
Text5:
Text6: Explain the impact to the mission if the date above is not met, any special circumstances or conditions that exist which validate the requirement as “urgent,” estimated production lead time for the item, etc.
Text7:
Check Box8: Yes
Check Box9: Off
Check Box10: Yes
Check Box11: Off
Check Box12: Off
Check Box13: Off

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .