D01_M2900025Q7001_Q and A.pdf
PDF 145 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RD25 Yonaguni Barge Support
- Solicitation number
- M2900025Q7001
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document is a Questions and Answers (Q&A) file for Solicitation M2900025Q7001 for Barge Support related to a military logistics operation in Japan. The Q&A covers key operational details for a one-time barge and transportation requirement during Resolute Dragon 25, including cargo movement, equipment specifications, and operational constraints. Critical requirements include providing sufficient lift to move an equipment list, potentially using either roll-on/roll-off or lift-on/lift-off barge solutions, with material handling equipment capable of stacking 20 ft shipping containers up to two containers high. The government allows flexibility in solution design, with the Performance Work Statement potentially being updated upon contract award if proposed solutions meet operational needs.
Key operational considerations include verifying weight distribution limitations at Naha Military Port and Kubura Port, coordinating staging/marshaling areas, and managing potential challenges like tidal conditions and transportation between Kubura Port and Camp Yonaguni. Insurance and vessel requirements specify a preference for U.S.-flag vessels, with options for foreign-flag vessels if U.S. tonnage is unavailable. The government will accept Japanese domestic insurance coverage and past performance from commercial barge/marine contracts in Japan. The solicitation is a one-time requirement with no anticipated follow-on or option periods, and contractors are expected to coordinate subcontracts and include all associated management fees in their quotes.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| E01_Update PWS_RD25 Yonaguni Barge.pdf | ||
| A01_PWS_RD25 Yonaguni Barge.pdf | ||
| D01_M2900025Q7001_RFQ_RD25 Yonaguni Barge.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Questions and Answers (Q&A) M2900025Q7001 Barge Support
1. Can the Government confirm whether the 400 square meter deck space requirement is suƯicient to carry the full list of cargo in a single voyage, or should oƯerors propose multiple trips if required (Ref: PWS §1.0, §3.0)?
a. Answer: Contractor shall provide suƯicient lift to move the contents of the equipment list. If a solution is proposed that diƯers from the current PWS but is adequate, then the PWS will be updated upon contract award.
2. Is a roll-on/roll-oƯ barge mandatory, or will lift-on/lift-oƯ solutions be considered if they meet operational requirements (Ref: PWS §1.0)?
a. Answer: See answer to question 1.
3. In accordance with FAR 47.502, preference is given to U.S.-flag vessels. Will foreign-flag vessels be acceptable if U.S.-flag tonnage is unavailable (Ref: RFQ §Shipment)?
a. Answer: Contractor shall submit a request to the Contracting OƯicer for a foreign flag waiver with submission of quotes.
4. Are there any weight distribution limitations at Naha Military Port and Kubura Port piers (e.g., pier load ratings, axle restrictions) that contractors must account for during planning (Ref: PWS §2.0)?
a. Answer: To be verified by Contractor.
5. For the MHE requirement at Camp Yonaguni, can the Government confirm whether reach stackers are required for container stacking, or if heavy forklifts are suƯicient (Ref: PWS Update §3.1)?
a. Answer: Contractor shall provide MHE suƯicient to stack 20 ft shipping containers up to 2 containers high.
6. Regarding tractor trailers, does the Government require lowboy, highboy, or mixed fleet capacity for container movement (Ref: PWS §3.2)?
a. Answer: Contractor shall provide suƯicient lift to move the contents of the equipment list. If a solution is proposed that diƯers from the current PWS but is adequate, then the PWS will be updated upon contract award.
7. Are there any local road/bridge restrictions between Kubura Port and Camp Yonaguni that limit gross vehicle weight or axle loads (Ref: PWS §3.2)?
a. Answer: To be verified by Contractor.
8. Will the Government provide staging/marshaling areas at SPOE/SPOD, or must the contractor arrange commercial yard space (Ref: PWS §3.0)?
a. Answer: This is to be coordinated by the Contractor.
9. The PWS references conditional load/oƯload times dependent on tides. Can the Government provide historical tidal data for Naha and Kubura for 15–19 September (Ref: PWS §4.0)?
a. To be verified by Contractor.
10. In the event of weather or sea state delays, will the contractor be compensated for standby time, or is this risk borne by the contractor (Ref: PWS §5.7)?
a. Answer: Contractors are provided protections under the commercial clause
52.212-5.
11. Will the Government accept Japanese domestic insurance coverage equivalents (Hull, P&I, War Risk, Pollution) in lieu of U.S.-based policies (Ref:
PWS §11.0)?
a. Answer: Coverage issued by a licensed Japanese commercial insurer is acceptable unless prevented by other regulations or statutes.
12. The PWS requires contractors to waive salvage claims. Can the Government confirm that this does not extend to general average recovery rights in the event of catastrophic damage (Ref: PWS §5.8)?
a. Answer: The Government does not intend to limit ability to perform what is legal and proper in the course of commercial business.
13. During joint load/oƯload operations where U.S. personnel operate government equipment, will the Government assume liability for damage caused to contractor equipment (Ref: PWS §1.0, §6.0)?
a. Answer: The only equipment to be loaded/oƯloaded is containers. There is no requirement for US Government personnel to operate US Government equipment.
14. The RFQ states award will be made in aggregate. If subcontracting of local stevedores or carriers is necessary, will this be acceptable under the evaluation framework (Ref: RFQ §CLIN 0001)?
a. Answer: Prospective oƯerors shall coordinate and direct their own subcontracts. All MHE, overhead, management, and fees associated with accomplishing the tasks in the PWS will be included in quotes.
15. For past performance evaluation, will the Government consider relevant commercial barge/marine contracts in Japan, or only DoD/USG past performance (Ref: RFQ §52.212-2)?
a. Answer: Yes- past performance in Japan will suƯice.
16. Does the Government anticipate any follow-on or option periods beyond
Resolute Dragon 25, or is this strictly a one-time requirement (Ref: RFQ §Evaluation)?
a. Answer: This is a one time requirement.
17. What is the required lead time for personnel and vehicle base pass submissions (Ref: PWS §9.0)?
a. Answer: Contractor shall coordinate this. Historically, USG personnel are able to provide escorts on base as needed with prior coordination.
18. Are there any Japanese Coast Guard or Customs requirements unique to transporting U.S. military cargo from Okinawa to Yonaguni that the contractor must pre-coordinate (Ref: PWS §5.3)?
a. Answer: To be verified by Contractor.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .