Tab_E1_Solicitation_Amendment.pdf

M1100919SU00011

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Please See Summary of Changes.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Dec-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M0068119Q0005

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Dec-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Dec-2018

CODE

REGIONAL CONTRACTING OFFICE-MCIWEST

P O BOX 555027

CAMP PENDLETON CA 92055-5027

M00681 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M0068119Q0005

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Questions/Answers M0068119Q0005 CPEN HAHO Jumping Capability

Question 1: Most HAHO training packages seem to train at 19,999 feet which negate the mandatory need of the USAF Phys Tech, thus the Sherpa C-23b and Skyvan SC-7 are more cost efficient aircraft for the government to use. Will the government consider using either a Sherpa or Skyvan that are capable of operating at 19,999 feet MSL?

Answer 1: Majority of jumps will be below 19,999 feet which would make the Skyvan SC-7 an acceptable aircraft. In the event that it is identified that the using unit will exceed 20,000 MSL a request will go out in enough of an advance so that a CASA 212, or a military aircraft can be procured. Using unit will coordinate with USAF in securing a Phys Tech.

Reference Section 4.1 in Performance Work Statement.

Question 2: The period of performance is stated as being between 1st Feb, 2019 - 31st Aug, 2019 with a maximum quantity of 40 days facility use. Can the government outline how long each training evolution will be (i.e. if it’s a 10 day training evolution, then are we to assume that as 4 iterations)?

Answer 2: Each iteration is different, some may include sustainment intervals which only require approximately 3-5 days. The duration depends on the Operations Chief planning the event. There is not an exact template that can be adhered to, in order to give precise days per package. These will be identified in the task order submitted for the iteration used.

Question 3: The government has requested 100 blade hours of aircraft time. As the government is planning on multiple evolutions this will require the aircraft to be repositioned for each event.

Does the government wish to deduct the ferry time from the 100 hrs.?

Answer 3: There is a consideration of 3 blade hours being charged for ferry time per task order. This is a consideration that was expected by the using unit.

Question 4: Does the Combined Synopsis/Solicitation posted as solicitation number M0068119Q0005 on FBO contain requirements similar to an existing contract or

M0068119Q0005 will this be a new requirement?

Answer 4: This requirement is similar to an existing contract.

(End of Summary of Changes)