Past_Perf._Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 138 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Aircraft Technical Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M00681-15-T-0065
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M00681-15-T-0065-0002.pdf | ||
| 1_MEF_CONTRACT_TRAVEL_-1.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| M00681-15-T-0065_Amendment_01.pdf | ||
| M00681-15-T-0065_Solicitation_27_APR_2015.doc | DOC document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Instructions:
· Sections I through III to be completed by the Contract Specialist. The assessor, in turn, is requested to verify Sections I through III, complete Sections III through VII of the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office.
· With respect to Section II, assessors are requested to validate the information provided by the Offeror. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.
Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In an effort to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: ann.h.session@usmc.mil.
I. Contract Data Contract Number
Project/Requirement
Customer/Agency
Project/Requirement Description
II. Current or Historical Contract Information
Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is FORMCHECKBOX
FILLIN \* MERGEFORMAT correct or FORMCHECKBOX incorrect.
CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:
Contract No
Type of Contract
| Initial |
| Final |
Contract Value
Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule
Project/Requirement Description
Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:
| Contracting Role |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
PRIME
FORMCHECKBOX
SUBCONTRACTOR
| Termination History |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Convenience
FORMCHECKBOX
Default
FORMCHECKBOX
N/A
III. Assessor Information
Assessor Name
Title
Phone Number/Email Address
Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.
| ( |
| Role |
| Period of Involvement |
Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)
Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)
Contract Specialist
Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)
Technical Project Lead/Project Officer
Quality Assurance Specialist
Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor
Other:
IV. Evaluation Definitions
The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.
| OUTSTANDING |
| Performance EXCEEDED MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns. |
| GOOD |
| Performance EXCEEDED SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective. |
| ACCEPTABLE |
| Performance MET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective. |
| MARGINAL |
| Performance MET SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective. |
| UNSATISFACTORY |
| Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective. |
| NEUTRAL |
| Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation. |
V. Performance Evaluation
1. Quality of Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Quality of Performance
Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Conformance to Contract Requirements
Conformance to Specifications
Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
2. Schedule Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Schedule Performance
Please provide rationale for assigned rating.
b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.
| Schedule Performance |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule
Timeliness in Meeting Milestones
Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
3. Management Performance
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Management Performance
b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.
| Management Performance |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS—(timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)
SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc)
PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)
MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)
INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM MANAGEMENT—(commitment and participation to the IPT process)
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.
4. Cost Control
a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
Cost Control
b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.
| COST CONTROL |
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)
COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing SOW)
INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission
FORECASTING/
MANAGEMENT/
COST CONTROL
All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.
VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.
| Outstanding |
| Good |
| Acceptable |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Neutral |
VII. General Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .