Past_Perf._Questionnaire.doc

DOC document 138 KB Posted

Attached to
Aircraft Technical Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
M00681-15-T-0065
Issued by
United States Marine Corps

About this file

Past Performance Questionnaire

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Aircraft Technical Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
M00681-15-T-0065-0002.pdf PDF
1_MEF_CONTRACT_TRAVEL_-1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
M00681-15-T-0065_Amendment_01.pdf PDF
M00681-15-T-0065_Solicitation_27_APR_2015.doc DOC document

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions:

· Sections I through III to be completed by the Contract Specialist. The assessor, in turn, is requested to verify Sections I through III, complete Sections III through VII of the questionnaire, and submit to the Contracting Office.

· With respect to Section II, assessors are requested to validate the information provided by the Offeror. If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In an effort to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: ann.h.session@usmc.mil.

I. Contract Data Contract Number

Project/Requirement

Customer/Agency

Project/Requirement Description

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is FORMCHECKBOX

FILLIN \* MERGEFORMAT correct or FORMCHECKBOX incorrect.

CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract No

Type of Contract

Initial
Final

Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project/Requirement Description

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role
FORMCHECKBOX

PRIME

FORMCHECKBOX

SUBCONTRACTOR

Termination History
FORMCHECKBOX

Convenience

FORMCHECKBOX

Default

FORMCHECKBOX

N/A

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

(
Role
Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

OUTSTANDING
Performance EXCEEDED MOST contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
GOOD
Performance EXCEEDED SOME contractual requirements to the Government’s benefit. The performance of areas being assessed was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
ACCEPTABLE
Performance MET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MET SOME contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed includes significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirement. The performance of the areas being assessed includes serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
NEUTRAL
Performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Quality of Performance

Please provide rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

2. Schedule Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Schedule Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Timeliness in Meeting Milestones

Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Management Performance

b. Assess the Contractor’s management performance in the following areas.

Management Performance
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

MANAGEMENT RESPONSIVENESS—(timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)

MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)

INTEGRATED PRODUCT TEAM MANAGEMENT—(commitment and participation to the IPT process)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

Cost Control

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL
Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)

COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing SOW)

INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission

FORECASTING/

MANAGEMENT/

COST CONTROL

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, rationale must be provided for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Outstanding
Good
Acceptable
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Neutral

VII. General Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .