M0026424R0006 Instructional Support Evaluation Form (Attachment 3).xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- M0026424R0006
- Issued by
-
United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document provides details for a federal contract opportunity with the United States Marine Corps to provide education, training, planning, advising, research, and wargame facilitation services to Marine Corps University. The single-award hybrid IDIQ contract has a total ceiling value of $49.7 million over five years and is 100% set aside for Service-Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses. Interested parties must register with SAM.gov and WAWF and attend an in-person pre-solicitation conference on March 12, 2024 to receive the draft solicitation. The final solicitation and award are anticipated later in 2024.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M0026424R0006 DRAFT.docx | DOCX document | |
| M0026424R0006 Pricing Workbook (Attachment 2).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| M0026424R0006 PPQ (Attachment 1).docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Excellent (5) | Good (3) | Poor (1) | Absent or Plagiarized (0) | Total Points | |
| 1. Awareness of Wargaming Methods. | Vendor displays an excellent understanding of available wargaming methods and proposed methods that would not only enable and enhance PME learning outcomes. | Vendor displays an base line understanding of available wargaming methods and proposed methods that would meet the PME learning outcomes. | Proposed Methods are not consistent with PME learning frameworks and outcomes. | Missing or plagiarized | |
| 2. Awareness of Wargaming Solutions. | Vendor displays an excellent understanding of available wargaming solutions that could enable and enhance the PME learning outcomes. | Vendor displays an base line understanding of available wargaming solutions that would meet the PME learning outcomes. | Proposed Solutions do not align with PME learning frameworks and outcomes. | Missing or plagiarized | |
| 3. Evaluation of Wargaming Tools and Methods | The vendor demonstrated excellent evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages that various wargaming tools and methods offer for PME use cases. | Vendor articulated an understanding of how to compare two wargaming methodolgies or tools. | Explanation of the advantages and disadvantages does not indicate that the vendor has an understanding of the unique opportunities and challenges of wargaming in a PME environment. | Missing or plagiarized | |
| 4. Wargaming & Joint Force Terminology. | The vendor displayed excellent knowledge of wargaming terms and of joint warfighting doctrinal terms and concepts as they relate to the defined scenario. | Vendor displays a basic understanding of currently joint force terminology and aligns them correctly with the scenario and proposed solution. | Terminology is incorrect or does not align to the scenario and proposed solution | Missing or plagiarized | |
| 5. Educational Frameworks. | The vendor displayed excellent knowledge of educational frameworks, adult learning concepts, and PME learning outcomes and environment. | The vendor displayed suitable knowledge of the professional military education environment, adult learning concepts, and potential learning outcomes | The vendor did not display a clear understanding of adult learning concepts and does not show a clear understanding of PME or Learning outcomes. | Missing or plagiarized |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .