D1. Attachment 3 Assessor Past Performance Questionnaire.docx

DOCX document 54 KB Posted

Attached to
Marine Corps 250th Birthday Program Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
M0026424Q0058
Issued by
United States Marine Corps

About this file

This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire related to a Request for Quotation (RFQ) for the Marine Corps 250th Birthday Program Support Services (Solicitation Number M00264-24-Q-0058). The RFQ is seeking advising, planning, marketing, advertising, event activation, assessment, and execution support services to support the 250th Marine Corps Birthday Program.

The Questionnaire is to be completed by the assessor (Government personnel) who has experience with the contractor on a relevant past contract. The assessor is to provide an overall assessment of the contractor's performance in areas such as quality, schedule, management, and cost control. The assessor must also identify their role and period of involvement on the referenced contract. This completed Questionnaire is to be submitted directly to the Marine Corps Installations National Capital Region - Regional Contracting Office.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Marine Corps 250th Birthday Program Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
RFQ M00264-24-Q-0058 Amendment 002.docx DOCX document
M0026424Q0058 Amendment 0001 Question Answer Doc.docx DOCX document
Attachment 4 DD 254 - CMC 250th.pdf PDF
RFQ M00264-24-Q-0058 Amendment 001.docx DOCX document
D1. RFQ M00264-24-Q-0058 CMC 250TH Services.docx DOCX document
D1. Attachment 2 Past Performance References.docx DOCX document
D1. Attachment 1 Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

M00264-24-Q-0058 CMC Advising and Execution Support for the 250th Marine Corps Birthday Program RFQ Attachment 3 – ASSESSOR PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions:

· Sections I through III are to be completed by the Quoter/Major Subcontractor and provided to the Assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Quoter/Major Subcontractor on a relevant contract referenced on RFQ Attachment 3). The Quoter DOES NOT submit this attachment to the soliciting agency, instead the Quoter sends this to the assessor after completing I – III, then the assessor is to complete the instructions below and then submits this directly to the soliciting agency.

· The Assessor, in turn, will verify Sections II and III, review Section IV, and complete Section V of this Questionnaire. The assessor will submit the completed Questionnaire directly to the Marine Corps Installations National Capital Region – Regional Contracting Office, at molly.henderson@usmc.mil.

Message to the Assessor:

Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail to the above email address.

I. Solicitation Data (for the proposed effort)

Solicitation Number
M00264-24-Q-0058
Project/Requirement
CMC Advising and Execution Support for 250th Marine Corps Birthday Program
Customer/Agency
Marine Corps
Project/Requirement Description
The United States Marine Corps, Commandant of the Marine Corps, Communication Directorate (CD) is pursuing the acquisition of advising, planning, marketing, advertising, event activation, assessment, and execution support services for the 250th Marine Corps Birthday Program. The primary goal of this acquisition is to seamlessly support a robust community relations program for the 250th Marine Corps Birthday while at the same time, maintaining annual community relations events and steady state communication requirements. The objective of CD is to use all the tools of marketing, outreach, engagement, and communication to share the Marine Corps’ story at the national level with the intent to reach the public, community leaders, prospective recruits, national decision makers, industry, and our own internal audiences. Major areas of support required include Program Management, Strategic Communication Advising and Planning, Marketing Strategy Planning,

Marketing Analysis/Assessment/Survey, Event Production and Event Execution, and Marketing and Advertising Services.

II. Current or Historical Contract Information (Assessor: If any information is incorrect herein, please annotate and provide the correct information accordingly.)

Assessor: The information listed below is |_| Correct |_| Incorrect.

Contractor Name:

Contractor CAGE Code or UEI Number:

Contract Number:

Client / Agency:

Type of Contract (Fixed-Price, Cost Reimbursement, Time & Materials, or Labor Hour):

Total Dollar Value of Contract (including options)

Total Dollar Value of work performed:

Period of Performance:

Program Title:

NAICS Code:

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contractor Role
PRIME
SUBCONTRACTOR
Termination History
Convenience
Default
N/A
Contract in CPARS?
YES
NO

Project/Requirement Description:

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

ü
Role
Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other (Specify)

IV. Evaluation Definitions

Use the following definitions in your assessment of contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation

1. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Quality of Performance

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Quality of Performance in the following areas.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Workmanship

Standards of Workmanship: Technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

2. Schedule Performance (Timeliness)

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Schedule Performance

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Meeting Milestones and Schedules

Submitting Deliverables

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

3. Management Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s management performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Performance

Please provide rationale for assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Management Performance in the following areas.

Management Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Management Responsiveness

Subcontract

Program Management

Management Of Personnel

Integrated Product Team Management

Management Responsiveness: Timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction.

Subcontract Management: Timely award and management of subcontracts and meeting subcontracting goals for small business, small disadvantaged business, etc.

Program Management: Effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices.

Management Of Personnel: Ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget Integrated Product Team Management: Commitment and participation in the Integrated Product Team process.

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? If yes, please explain.

4. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Cost Control

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Cost/Price Estimates

Cost Efficiency

Invoicing

Forecasting Management Cost Control

Cost/Price Estimates: Ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates.

Cost Efficiency: Realization of any cost reductions or operating efficiencies in accomplishing requirements of the Statement of Work.

Invoicing: Accuracy, completeness, and timeliness of invoices submitted.

Forecasting/Management/Cost Control

While all comments are appreciated, please explain below your rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

_____________________________________________________
Assessor’s SignatureDate

Assessor’s Name and Title

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .