M00264-23-R-0010 Amend 0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

1. Provide answ ers to questions asked as a result of the posted solicitation; and

2. Changes made to Attachment 3, to correct reference error.

See Summary of Changes.

POC: Shaye Nelson

(703) 432-1927

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

S 1 4

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 07-Jun-2023

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X M0026423R0010

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-May-2023

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

07-Jun-2023

CODE

MCINCR - RCO

2010 HENDERSON RD SHAYE NELSON

QUANTICO VA 22134

M00264 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

M0026423R0010

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

Q&A

Question

Number

Solicitation

Section

Comment/Question Answer

PWS: 2.0

Can some personnel use electronic methods, due to remote working locations, of attendance in support of bi-weekly and monthly meetings? If not, how many personnel are required to attend in person?

Yes. In accordance with the PWS para 2.0, regarding the attendance in support of the bi-weekly and monthly meetings, expectation is that the PM, or other key personnel are available in their office spaces.

PWS: 5.0

Should we submit resumes in support of

Key Personnel?

Yes. Since key personnel are defined by the contractor supporting documentation is needed for the Government to assess replacement personnel that are required possess equivalent or better skills and levels of expertise.

PWS: 6.2

Will the Government require the contractor to develop data input files from raw munition trials data?

No. The Government will not require the contractor to develop input files from raw munition trials data.

Will Government labs be providing the data input files or the ballistic properties required to create the input files?

Yes. In accordance with PWS paragraph 6.2

“data provided by and approved by the COR.”

Will the Government expect libraries to be developed and maintained for model data parameters passed from the visualization tools to WDALab?

Yes. Since a software library generally consists of pre-written code, classes, procedures, scripts, configuration data and more, the Government would expect that if the Contractor added a software library to a program to achieve more functionality or to automate a process without writing code for it would be developed and maintained once incorporated into the data files.

Does the Government expect the contractor to update and maintain the data input libraries for communication between the visualization tools and

WDALab?

Yes. Since a software library is a suite of data and programming code that is used to develop software programs and applications, the libraries will need to be updated and maintained as a part of normal procedures to update the data files input.

PWS: 6.3

Will the Government require libraries to be defined and developed for WDALab output files into USA and UK visualization tools?

Yes. Since a software library is a suite of data and programming code that is used to develop software programs and applications, the libraries will need to be updated and maintained as a part of normal procedures to update the data files output.

PWS: 6.4

Will the Government require an

Interface Control Document for the

WDALab interface with USA and

United Kingdom visualization tools?

The Government will not require an Interface

Control Document for the WDALab interface with USA and United Kingdom visualization tools.

Will the Government require Validation to be in accordance with Mil-Std-3022 or other DOD standards?

The Government will require validation to be in accordance with Mil-Std-3022.

Will the Government require Validation reports to be developed in accordance with Mil-Std-3022 or other DOD standards?

The Government will require validation reports to be in accordance with Mil-Std-3022.

Addendum:

6.6.4

The Government asks the contractor to provide both prime and subcontractor labor rates, but Attachment 3 provides only for CLIN totals. Should the contractor provide a second tab with labor rates? If so, what other information does the Government wish to see?

Yes. The Contractor can provide a second tab with the labor rate.

Attachment 3

Should the contractor remove the reference error in K11 and the comment from cell K4?

The Government has revised to remove reference error.

Section 2

Section 2 states the primary place of performance is the contractor's off base site. Does this mean the development team will be able to access Fortran source code from the contractor site as well? Or will the development team be expected to develop code independently for later integration at a secure location?

The Government expects the development team to have access to their secure code repository from whatever methodology they implement

(cloud, remote repository etc). The secure code access proposed by the contractor development team could allow for developers to independently work on the code and then later integrate.

Section 6.1

Section 6.1 tasks are primarily of the form: "The contract shall update, compile, and process…. into a stand-along form that enables the code to successfully start/run or execute the script to run on a computer utilizing the version of Windows as provided by the

COR." Is this language suggesting than an ultimate goal of this effort is the de-coupling of the current code into modular software pieces that can then be combined when necessary?

The Government expects the contractor to utilize the forward engineering process for the interfaces as well as the models within the

WDALab to allow a successful start/run or execution of the script to run in the WDALab.

All models and GUI’s must be able to run as a standalone form as well as integrate into the overall process of the running of the WDAlab code, methodologies, and graphic user interfaces.

General

Is there any classified data/technology the contractor needs to be aware of?

No. There is no classified data/technology the contractor needs to be aware of.

Does the government have an anticipated level of effort (LOE) with respect to the full SOW?

The Government would like to see the contractor’s approach to meet the PWS requirements as it pertains to the executing the technical portion of the PWS.

Can the government provide any information on the scale of the current

WDALab code and GUI (e.g., number of lines of code, number of forms/pages)?

There are ~400,000 lines total across the

WDALab and GUI’s

(End of Summary of Changes)