Attachment 3_0001 Question Answer Master.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- T-AVB Training, Program, Planning, and Liaison Support Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- M00264-22-R-0003
- Issued by
- United States Marine Corps
About this file
This document contains a question and answer attachment for a solicitation seeking training, program, planning, and liaison support services. The United States Marine Corps is soliciting proposals to provide project management, operations support, software testing, training and documentation development, and on-site liaison at two Marine Aircraft Wings and Marine Forces. Services will support the T-AVB class of aviation logistics support ships on both coasts and their operational users. Offerors must demonstrate knowledge of all technical and programmatic requirements in the performance work statement and propose their technical approach. The submission deadline was revised to require only an electronic proposal with no binders. Monthly status reports are due no later than 15 days after the end of each period.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| M00264-22-R-0003 Amendment 0002.pdf | ||
| Attachment 3_0002 Additional questions.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP M00264-22-R-0003-Amendment 0001.pdf | ||
| RFP M00264-22-R-0003 ASB-34 T-AVB.pdf | ||
| Attachment 5 Assessor Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 4 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment 3 Question Answer Doc.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Attachment 1 DD254 T_AVB.pdf | ||
| Attachment 2 Pricing Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Q&A
| Attachment 3-T-AVB Training, Program, Planning, and Liaison Support Services | |||
| M00264-22-R-0003 Question & Answer Document | |||
| Insert additional rows in the applicable section as necessary | |||
| Question # | RFP Reference (with PWS Section number, page number, and paragraph number, as applicable) | Question (Please provide clear, concise questions. Any question that is not clear is at risk of not being answered.) | Answer (To be provided by the Government as soon as possible after close of Question period.) |
| Technical Questions | |||
| 1 | Section 4.0, Page 59, Paragraph 4.1 Task 1: Training Support | Are offerors required to develop the training for paragraphs 4.1.2-4.1.4 or is this training already developed and the offeror only required to maintain/update the training, as required/necessary? | The Training is already developed. The offerors will required to deliver, maintain and update the training as necessary. |
| Pricing Questions | |||
| 1 | |||
| Solicitation Questions | |||
| 1 | RFP Section 1.0, page 65 | Given the current remote work climate, most solicitations are being submitted electronically, via DoD SAFE, email or other electronic portal; could the Government please reconsider the requirement for hard copy submittals, to minimize in-person production needs and maintain considerations? | The Government revised Addendum 52.212-1 and will require an electronic copy of the entire proposal. |
| 2 | RFP Sections 1.3.6 and 1.4.2, pages 68-69 | For a contract of this size with such unique technical requirements we question the practicality of requiring an offeror to include a Small Business Participation Plan/Small Business Subcontracting Plan and adding small business partners. We feel this requirement would have a negative impact on cost and fragment the work to a degree that would impact effective performance and management of this important effort. Therefore, we respectfully request that the government reconsider including the Small Business Participation Plan/Small Business Subcontracting Plan requirement in this solicitation. | In accordance with FAR 19.702(a)(1)(i) states that contract expected to exceed $750,000 and that has subcontracting possibilities, shall require the apparently successful offeror to submit an acceptable subcontracting plan. Since this is a statutory requirement, the Government will require the submission of a Subcontracting plan in compliance with FAR clause 52.219-9. |
| 3 | RFP pages 22-43, Representations and Certifications | Should offerors fill-in and submit the representation and certification clauses set forth in RFP pages 22-43? If so, should the completed representation and certifications be included in Volume 1 Compliance Documentation? | The contractor can complete the representation and certifications from pages 22-43 and include them in Volume 1 Compliance Documentation or directly on pages 22-43. Either way will be in compliance with the solicitation. |
| 4 | PWS Section 52.212-1 - ADDENDUM, Pg. 65, Paragraph 1.0 | The Solicitation states "Contractors shall submit a hard copy of the proposal (see table below for the number of copies) with an electronic copy of the entire proposal". Could the Government please confirm a hard copy submission is required? | The Government revised Addendum 52.212-1 and will require an electronic copy of the entire proposal. |
| 5 | PWS Section 52.212-1 - ADDENDUM, Pg. 65, Paragraph 1.0 | The Solicitation states "Contractors shall submit a hard copy of the proposal (see table below for the number of copies) with an electronic copy of the entire proposal". Could the Government please clarify if they would like all proposal volumes to be within a single binder or if they would like each volume to have its own binder for source selection / evaluation purposes? | The Government revised Addendum 52.212-1 and will require an electronic copy of the entire proposal. As a result, no binder will be required. |
| 6 | 1.5 Volume 3 – Factor 2 – Past Performance, Pg. 69, Paragraph 1.5.2 | The Solicitation states "If the Offeror relies on past performance information contained in the Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPARS), it shall ensure that the information is an interim/final CPARS record." If the offeror is relying on information contained in the CPARS, should the offeror include a copy of the CPARS directly into the proposal submission or just make reference of if we are relying on CPARs or using Attachment 5? | The Offerors are not required to include a copy of the CPARS in the proposal submission. If the Offerors have identified that the reference has been completed in CPARS system, the Government will obtain that record separately. If no CPARS record is identified within one of the references in Attachment 4, the Contractor will be required to complete Attachment 5. |
| 7 | 1.4 Volume 2 - Factor 1 – Technical Capability, Pg. 68, Paragraph 1.4.1 Factor 1 - Technical Capability | The Solicitation "The proposal must clearly demonstrate the Offeror’s knowledge and understanding of the technical and programmatic requirements outlined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS)". Are offerors required to respond to PWS Section 3.0, General Requirements? | The proposal must clearly demonstrate the knowledge and understanding of all the technical and programmatic requirement in the PWS. The offerors are required to proposed their best technical approach and respond to all the technical areas within the PWS, including the scope, general requirement and specific requirement sections. |
| Miscellaneous Questions | |||
| 1 | RFP PWS, Section 5.0, page 62 | The due date of the Monthly Status Report reflected in the Deliverables table is “Due to the COR by the end of each month”. Would the Government consider revising the due date to no later than 15 days after the end of the preceding reporting period, to allow time for the contractor to compile progress and status inputs for the preceding month? | Yes, the Government revised the due date of Monthly Status Report and changed it to no later than 15 days after the end of the preceding reporting period. Please see PWS section 5.0 with the changes. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .