M00264-24-Q-0019 PPQ (Attachment S-1).DOCX

DOCX document 44 KB Posted

Attached to
Munitions Process Support Services Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
M00264-24-Q-0019
Issued by
United States Marine Corps

About this file

This document is a past performance questionnaire for the solicitation M00264-24-Q-0019 issued by the United States Marine Corps for munitions process support services. The scope of work requires operation and sustainment of methods and resources to produce ammunition requirements models, analysis and modification of the models, database development and management, validation, verification and possibly accreditation, data entry, requirements computation, assessment of results, documentation and on-call munitions requirements analysis to support the Logistics Integration Division. The questionnaire is to be completed by a government reference for a contractor's past performance and addresses factors including customer satisfaction, timeliness, technical success, quality, and cost control. It requests an overall performance rating and provides evaluation definitions for exceptional, very good, satisfactory, marginal and unsatisfactory ratings.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to Munitions Process Support Services, newest first.
File Type Posted
M00264-24-Q-0019 PPQ (Attachment S-1).DOCX DOCX document
Attachment 1 Pricing Template.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
M00264-24-Q-0019 Combined Sinopsis Solicitation.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)

The Quoter shall provide a copy of this PPQ to each of their listed Past Performance references provided in their quote submitted to the Request for Quote identified below.

Instructions:

· Sections I through III to be completed by the Offeror/Major Subcontractor and provided to the assessor (Government personnel who had experience with the Offeror/Major Subcontractor on a previous relevant contract). The assessor, in turn, will verify Sections I through III, making corrections as necessary; complete the questionnaire; and submit it to the Contracting Office at least two (2) days prior to the close of the solicitation listed in block 8 of the 1449.

· Sections IV through VII to be completed in their entirety by the assessor.

Message to the assessor: Your assistance is requested by the USMC to assist with establishing the performance history for the Contractor named below. In efforts to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to: edgar.lopezjimenez@usmc.mil and christian.hernandezsoto@usmc.mil.

Questionnaires must be received from the references and not the contractor.

I. Solicitation Data

Request for Quote
M00264-24-Q-0019
Project/Requirement
Formal Protocol and Professional Etiquette Training Courses
Customer/Agency
USMC Combat Developmebt and Integration (CD&I)
Project/Requirement Description
The scope of work required by this contract requires operation and sustainment of methods and resources to produce ammunitions requirements models, analysis and modification of the models, database development and management, validation, verification and possibly accreditation, data entry, requirements computation, assessment of results, documentation and on-call munitions requirements analysis to support the Logistics Integration Division (LID), Capabilities Development Directorate (CDD), Deputy Commandant Combat Development & Integration (DC CD&I) as authorized by Marine Corps Order (MCO) 8000.7A which delegates responsibility to LCED for the MCMRP Class V (W) process.

II. Current or Historical Contract Information

Assessor: The performance data submitted by the Offeror is |_| correct or |_| incorrect.

CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS:

Contract No

Agency

Type of Contract

Contract Value

Period of Performance/Delivery Schedule

Project Name

Requirement Description/

Please select from the following as it applies to this contract:

Contracting Role
|_| PRIME
|_| SUBCONTRACTOR
Termination History
|_| Convenience
|_| Default
|_| N/A

III. Assessor Information

Assessor Name

Title

Phone Number/

Email Address

Identify your role in the contract award or administration and the period of your involvement.

Role
Period of Involvement

Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO)

Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO)

Contract Specialist

Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR)

Technical Project Lead/Project Officer

Quality Assurance Specialist

Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) Auditor

Other:

IV. Evaluation Definitions

The following definitions should be used in your assessment of Contractor performance.

EXCEPTIONAL
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
VERY GOOD
Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
MARGINAL
Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

V. Performance Evaluation Please mark a rating and provide comments

1. Customer Satisfaction

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the customer satisfaction?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Customer Satisfaction

Please provide the rationale for your assigned rating.

2. Timeliness

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet the schedule (Timeliness)?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Timeliness

Please provide your rationale for the assigned rating.

b. Assess the Contractor’s Schedule Performance in the following areas.

Schedule Performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Timeliness in Completion of Contract/Task Order/Delivery Schedule

Timeliness in Meeting Milestones

Timeliness in Submitting Deliverables

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the Schedule problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

3. Technical Success

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s technical success?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Technical Success

b. Assess the Contractor’s technical success in the following areas.

Technical Success
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Technical Execution—(completeness, and quality of products and service, problem identification, proposal submittal, history of cooperative behavior, effective business relations, teamwork AND customer satisfaction)

SUBCONTRACT MANAGEMENT—(timely award and management of subcontracts)

PROGRAM MANAGEMENT—(effectiveness of integration and coordination of all activities required to execute the contract, use of resources, assignment of responsibility, internal coordination and communication, and risk management practices)

MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL—(ability to select, retain, support, and replace personnel with the experience and expertise necessary to accomplish the Government’s requirements within schedule and budget)

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to any of the management problems identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

4. Quality of Performance

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the quality of the contractor’s performance?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Quality of Performance

b. Assess the Contractor’s quality of performance in the following areas.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Conformance to Contract Requirements

Conformance to Specifications

Standards of Good Workmanship (technical, professional, environmental, safety, etc.)

All comments are appreciated; however, at a minimum, please provide a rationale for ratings of exceptional or unsatisfactory.

c. Did the Government contribute in any way to problems associated with quality as identified in the above assessment? Please explain.

5. Cost Control

a. What is your OVERALL assessment of the Contractor’s ability to forecast, manage, and control costs?

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

Cost Control

b. Assess the Contractor’s cost performance in the following areas.

COST CONTROL
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
N/A

COST/PRICE ESTIMATES—(ability to meet proposed costs and whether actual costs/rates realized reflect negotiated costs/rates)

COST EFFICIENCIES—(realization of any in accomplishing contracted effort)

INVOICING—accuracy and timeliness of submission

FORECASTING/ MANAGEMENT/ COST CONTROL

Comments:

VI. Overall Rating of Contractor’s performance (technical, schedule, management, and cost) on contract being assessed.

Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory

VII. General Comments:

___________________________________________________
Assessor’s SignatureDate

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .