LPTA Eval Criteria -20Q0011 -Hensley Security Alarm .pdf

PURCHASE ORDER EVALUATION PLAN

Title

Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Technical, Experience and Past Performance minimums must be met in order to be determined technically acceptable.

Factors 1& 2 – Technical & Experience Evaluation Ratings:

Rating Definition

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Factor 3 - Past Performance Evaluation Ratings:

OFFEROR:

Evaluation Criteria Rating

Factor 1 – Technical The offeror shall list all equipment, chemicals, certifications and staff that will be necessary to perform the tasks listed in the PWS

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Factor 2 - Experience The offeror shall provide a list for up to three (3) previous jobs where the same or similar services were performed. Include the name of the business, contact information, the types of services performed, and duration and dollar value of each job.

Acceptable

Unacceptable

Factor 3 – Past Performance The offeror shall provide references for up to three (3) previous jobs for previous projects for services similar to the tasks in the PWS. To include, but not limited to, point of contact name, title, company name, phone number and email address. A minimum Relevant rating of “Somewhat Relevant”, and a minimum Confidence rating of “Neutral Confidence” shall be considered Acceptable.

Factor 4 – Price Contractor shall provide a Firm-Fixed price for each CLIN. Price will be based on the grand total for the base and all option years. Offeror shall also break out labor categories, labor rates, estimated hours, and profit rate.

To be performed by Contracting Personnel

Past Performance Relevancy Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description

Very Relevant Present/past performance effort involved essentially the same scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Relevant Present/past performance effort involved similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Somewhat Relevant Present/past performance effort involved some of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

Not Relevant Present/past performance effort involved little or none of the scope and magnitude of effort and complexities this solicitation requires.

PURCHASE ORDER EVALUATION PLAN

Title

Performance Confidence Assessment Rating Method Adjectival Rating Description

Substantial Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a high expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

Neutral Confidence No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

The offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on the factor of past performance.

Limited Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has a low expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the Government has no expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.