Logic Model Template.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Sinjar Agreement Mediation and Dialogue
- Opportunity number
- SFOP0009844
About this file
Logic Model
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SFOP0009844 QandA 07272023.docx | DOCX document | |
| Past Performance Reference Template_NOFO.docx | DOCX document | |
| GANTT Work Plan Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Budget Guidance and Template for New Awards (Oct 2020).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 3.7.G. Data Collection Guidance.docx | DOCX document | |
| Standard F Gender Indicators.docx | DOCX document | |
| Proposal Submission Instructions.docx | DOCX document | |
| NOFO - Sinjar Agreement Mediation and Dialogue.docx | DOCX document | |
| CSO GAOC Tool + GWI GA Template.pdf | ||
| Gender Analysis Sample Questions.pdf | ||
| Combatting Sexual Exploitation and Abuse Policy.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Program Title: | |||
| Program Logic Model | |||
| Level | Outcome/Output Indicators | Data Collection Tools | Risks and Assumptions |
| Goal: (overarching envisioned end-state) | |||
| Overall Theory of Change: IF we do x/y/z, THEN we will achieve a/b/c BECAUSE (project assumptions) | |||
| Theory of Change 1: (relates to Objective 1 logic frame) | |||
| Objective 1: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal) | OutCOME 1.1: |
Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:
include both qualitative and quantitative indicators OutCOME 1.2:
Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:
this section might include important intermediate outcomes that are short of objective but bridge several activities
| Activity 1.1: | OutPUT 1.1.1: |
| OutCOME 1.1.2: |
Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:
add additonal outcome indicators as appropriate
| Activity 1.2: | OutPUT 1.2.1: |
| OutCOME 1.2.2: | |
| Theory of Change 2: (relates to Objective 2 logic frame) | |
| Objective 2: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal) | OutCOME 2.1: |
| OutCOME 2.2: | |
| Activity 2.1: | OutPUT 2.1.1: |
| OutCOME 2.1.2: | |
| Activity 2.2: | OutPUT 2.2.1: |
| OutCOME 2.2.2: | |
| Theory of Change 3: (relates to Objective 3 logic frame) | |
| Objective 3: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal) | Outcome 3.1: |
| Outcome 3.2: | |
| Activity 3.1: | OutPUT 3.1.1: |
| OutCOME 3.1.2: | |
| Activity 3.2: | OutPUT 3.2.1: |
| OutCOME 3.2.2: | |
| Notes: Adjust number of objectives and activities as needed. Objectives and goal must be worded as end-states to be achieved, not restatements of activities. There should be a minimum of one output and one outcome per activity, as well as at least one outcome at the objective level. Add more levels of outcomes if appropriate for monitoring needs or tracing causal processes, but keep number of indicators managable. |
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .