Logic Model Template (1).xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 29 KB Posted

Attached to
Peacebuilding Through Economic Resilience in Host Communities in Northern Cote d'Ivoire and Northern Ghana
Opportunity number
SFOP0010339
Issued by

About this file

This document is a Logic Model Template for a federal grant opportunity. The template provides a framework for applicants to outline their program's goals, objectives, activities, outputs, and outcomes, as well as associated indicators, data collection tools, and risks and assumptions. The related federal grant opportunity is titled "Peacebuilding Through Economic Resilience in Host Communities in Northern Cote d'Ivoire and Northern Ghana" and is funded by the Department of State's Bureau of Conflict Stabilization Operations under the Conflict and Stabilization Operations program (CFDA 19.121). The program aims to build social cohesion between at-risk groups in northern Ghana and northern Cote d'Ivoire by improving equitable access to livelihoods in communities hosting refugees and asylum seekers. Eligible applicant types are for-profit organizations.

Logic Model

View the file

Other files

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

Program Title:
Program Logic Model
LevelOutcome/Output IndicatorsData Collection ToolsRisks and Assumptions
Goal: (overarching envisioned end-state)
Overall Theory of Change: IF we do x/y/z, THEN we will achieve a/b/c BECAUSE (project assumptions)
Theory of Change 1: (relates to Objective 1 logic frame)
Objective 1: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal)OutCOME 1.1:

Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:

include both qualitative and quantitative indicators OutCOME 1.2:

Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:

this section might include important intermediate outcomes that are short of objective but bridge several activities

Activity 1.1:OutPUT 1.1.1:
OutCOME 1.1.2:

Bruce Hemmer: Bruce Hemmer:

add additonal outcome indicators as appropriate

Activity 1.2:OutPUT 1.2.1:
OutCOME 1.2.2:
Theory of Change 2: (relates to Objective 2 logic frame)
Objective 2: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal)OutCOME 2.1:
OutCOME 2.2:
Activity 2.1:OutPUT 2.1.1:
OutCOME 2.1.2:
Activity 2.2:OutPUT 2.2.1:
OutCOME 2.2.2:
Theory of Change 3: (relates to Objective 3 logic frame)
Objective 3: (envisioned end-state contributing to goal)Outcome 3.1:
Outcome 3.2:
Activity 3.1:OutPUT 3.1.1:
OutCOME 3.1.2:
Activity 3.2:OutPUT 3.2.1:
OutCOME 3.2.2:
Notes: Adjust number of objectives and activities as needed. Objectives and goal must be worded as end-states to be achieved, not restatements of activities. There should be a minimum of one output and one outcome per activity, as well as at least one outcome at the objective level. Add more levels of outcomes if appropriate for monitoring needs or tracing causal processes, but keep number of indicators managable.

Sheet2

Sheet3

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .