Legacy Evaluation Form_.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 24 KB Posted

Attached to
RFQ-484-051426 Statewide Transit Plan Update
Solicitation number
PE-48401-RFQ-2026-000000564
Issued by
Georgia

About this file

This is a Local Project Evaluation Form used by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) to assess consultant performance on state and local projects. The form evaluates consultants across two primary rating categories: Management (Section A) and Prosecution and Progress (Section B). The evaluation covers consultant performance on resource management, scope adherence, communication and cooperation with agency staff, timely delivery of deliverables, quality and completeness of work products, and budget compliance. The form utilizes a five-point scale where 5 represents exceeding requirements and expectations, 3 represents meeting requirements and expectations, and 1 represents failing to meet requirements. Evaluations are documented with project descriptions, service dates, and project phases, with signatures required from the Agency/Owner Project Manager, the consultant's Project Manager, and the Agency Evaluator's Supervisor.

The evaluation framework assigns weighted point values to each rating factor, with Management ratings contributing up to 60 points and Prosecution and Progress ratings contributing up to 40 points, resulting in a total possible score of 100 points. The form requires justification narratives from the Agency/Owner Project Manager/Subject Matter Expert for all scores and provides space for consultant response to evaluation findings. This standardized assessment tool enables GDOT to maintain consistent performance documentation and create a historical record of consultant capabilities for future procurement decisions and vendor management purposes.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
RFQ_484_051426 _ Statewide Transit Plan Updat.pdf PDF

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Project Evaluation Form

Local Project Evaluation Form

Evaluation Date:

Consultant:

GDOT PI No.(if applicable):

GDOT PM (if applicable):

Agency/Owner:

Agency/Owner PM:

Phone:

Email:

Project Description & Scope:

Project Phase:

Service Dates:

Ratings: 5 = Exceeds Requirement and Expectation; 3 = Meets Requirement and Expectation; 1 = Does not Meet Requirement and Expectation; or N/A Requirement and Expectation

AManagementRatingFactor
1Consultant appropriately managed resources (manpower, equipment, subconsultants, etc.)N/A- - -1
2Consultant worked independently and without significant help from Agency's staff on routine tasks.100
3Consultant remained within the scope of work as contracted.5200
4Consultant communicated well and worked cooperatively with agency staff, and Consultant promptly responded to calls, emails, correspondences, and direction given by agency staff.100
3Ratings
Sub Total:20
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

BProsecution and ProgressRatingFactor
5Consultant completed the deliverable(s) by the latest agreed upon date or within the duration contracted, as applicable.3150
6All invoices, studies, reports, design requirements, and details are complete, accurate, clear, and concise. Revisions are minimal.N/A- - -1
7Consultant completed the deliverable(s) within the assigned budget.3150
2Ratings
Sub Total:30
Agency/Owner PM/SME Justification for Scores (required):

Consultant Response to Evaluation (if applicable):

Total Score: 50

Agency/Owner PM:
Signature:Date:
Supervisor's Acknowledgement:
Consultant PM:
Signature:Date:
Agency Evaluator's
Supervisor (if applicable):
Signature:Date:

&12&A Page &P of &N

Scoring

1
3
5
N/A
Factor Table
Section Value:60531
0Ratings000
1Ratings60300
2Ratings30150
3Ratings20100
4Ratings1580

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .