Lead Survey Final_Bldg-127_20150127.pdf

January 27, 2015

Mr. Aaron Williams USACE, Tulsa District 1645 South 101st East Avenue Tulsa, OK 74128 Phone: (918) 669-4915

RE: Submittal of Hazardous Building Material Surveys

Contract No. W912BV-10-D-2011, Task Order 0002 Ft. Bliss Bldg. # 127

Dear Mr. Williams, This document summarizes the Asbestos Survey and/or Lead Paint Survey Reports for the subject building. The below listed information was utilized to complete the Scope of Work Tasks:

Bldg. No. 127 POC: Jessie Moncada Phone No: 915-568-1838 Building Square Footage (SF) Reported: 2656 Technical Summary:

1. LEAD PAINT. A prior (2014) Regulated Materials Inspection Report confirmed the presence of lead in paint. ENCON performed a total of one-hundred thirty-seven (137) XRF analyses, which included one-hundred-twenty three (123) building component measurements and fourteen (14) calibration checks. Fifty-six (56) of the building readings tested positive for lead paint. Refer to the attachments for more details.

2. ASBESTOS. An Asbestos Survey was not performed under this contract. Per Ft. Bliss, prior Asbestos Reports had been performed by others. The prior 2014 Regulated Materials Inspection Report indicated that sixteen (16) building materials were sampled and three (3) contained asbestos. The prior 1991 Asbestos Report indicated that two (2) suspect materials were sampled and one (1) contained asbestos.

Contact Ft. Bliss, DPW regarding the prior Asbestos related Reports (which were not performed per current TDSHS standards), and current asbestos status.

SUMMARY TABLE

Previously Surveyed by others

Were Found

Were Not Found

Actions Required Yes / No

1. Lead Containing Paint Materials (>0.3 mg/cm2) X X Yes

2. Asbestos Containing Materials (>1 %) X X Yes

Please contact me with any technical questions, or follow-up needs that you may have.

Sincerely, David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Project Manager CC: Jessie Moncada (Ft Bliss DPW) Barry Vercoe (CESFW-PEC-TM)

ATTACHMENTS:

1. Lead Survey Report

2. Prior (2014) Regulated Materials Inspection Report

3. Prior (1991) Asbestos Report

ATTACHMENT 1

Lead Survey Report

COMPREHENSIVE LEAD PAINT SURVEY

BUILDING 127

FORT BLISS, TEXAS 79916

Prepared for:

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers

Tulsa District

Prepared by:

ALL CONSULTING TEAM

ENCON International, Inc.

7307 Remcon Circle, #103

El Paso, TX 79912 and

ALL Consulting, LLC 1718 S. Cheyenne Ave.

Tulsa, OK 74119

Inspection Start Date:

December 15, 2014

1!

LEAD PAINT SURVEY REPORT

Ft. Bliss, Texas ─ Building 127

PURPOSE

The ALL Consulting Team was contracted by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), Tulsa District, to perform comprehensive Hazardous Building Materials Surveys to identify the presence of any asbestos or lead paint at a number of facilities at Ft. Bliss, Texas. This project also included the development and population of a database to store the survey reports for access by the Ft. Bliss Department of Public Works (DPW), and others. The facilities that are included within this contract scope of work includes buildings within the New Mexico installations of

McGregor Range and Dona Ana Range, in addition to the Ft. Bliss facilities in Texas.

BACKGROUND

Ft. Bliss has a large number of buildings constructed before 1990 when the use of asbestos and lead paint was prevalent in the construction of buildings. Because the presence of these materials still exists in these facilities, Ft. Bliss is required to identify the extent of the lead paint remaining at these buildings, as well as their condition. Lead in paint is a hazard that is regulated by the

Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) under 29 CFR 1926.62 for worker exposure. In addition to the dangers of occupational exposure to construction and maintenance workers, as well as building occupants, lead particles and lead dust may be inadvertently carried home on clothes and shoes to expose their families. Identifying components containing lead paint present will not only protect the workers and their families, but will help to indemnify Ft.

Bliss by preemptively identifying the location of these potential hazardous materials.

INTRODUCTION

In accordance with OSHA Lead Regulation 29 CFR 1926.62, and the OSHA Hazard

Communication standard (29 CFR 1910.1200), where lead exists workers must be notified and steps must be taken to protect them from the inherent hazards. By identifying the lead containing components in these facilities, and, when appropriate, removing the hazards or potential hazards, Ft. Bliss avoids the liability of workers becoming exposed. Lead paint was banned for use in

2!

residential dwellings starting in January of 1978, but lead paint is still available for non-residential applications.

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The Facility known as Building 127 was constructed in 1915, and was unoccupied at the time of inspection. Its previous use was listed as “police / military police station.” A description of this facility is presented in the following table:

BUILDING 127

BUILDING ITEMS DESCRIPTION

Area of building 2656 square feet Date of Construction 1915 Number of floors One (1) floor with basement Exterior wall materials Brick Roof type Pitched Roof material Shingles Interior walls Plaster and Gypsum board Interior floors Concrete Interior floor coverings Floor tile Ceilings Gypsum board and wood Notes:

UNIQUE PAINTING HISTORY

Lead can be found in paint, varnish, shellac, and stain, so any coated surface other than a factory coating, is suspect for lead paint. A Lead Paint Survey is based upon coated components which are grouped into similar components with a similar (unique) painting history. This would include components with the same substrate, built or installed at the same time, with a common painting history. Items such as window components (sash and mullions), window frame (trim, header, sill, and apron), doors, and door frame materials, should be considered to have a possible separate painting history, and could have had different coatings applied throughout the years.

REGULATORY STANDARDS

Lead-based paint in residential structures, or Child Occupied Facilities (day care facilities, etc.), is regulated by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) under 24 CFR

35, and also by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) under 40 CFR 745. Only a few of these types of facilities have been identified in the buildings included in this contract. For all facilities included in this category, both HUD and EPA regulations will apply. All other

3!

buildings identified in this project would be regulated under the OSHA standards pertaining to worker protection from hazards (29 CFR 1926.62).

Sampling protocols have already been thoroughly established by the HUD and the EPA for residential housing units. For non-residential structures, there is no specified lead paint sampling protocol, but HUD / EPA protocols were generally followed. These comprehensive lead paint surveys include thorough inspections to identify all lead painted components.

SAMPLING METHODOLOGY

The building materials survey tasks were performed in accordance with the Final Hazardous

Building Materials Surveys, Sampling Plan, Fort Bliss, Texas, December 2014, prepared by ALL

Consulting and ENCON International, Inc. A visual inspection of the Facility was conducted to develop a sampling strategy. This included identifying component groups with similar painting histories. Each component group was sampled throughout the facility to establish whether or not the building contained lead at the prescribed action level for this project, at the time of the survey.

This Lead Paint Inspection was performed on December 15, 2014, using an x-ray fluorescence

(XRF) analyzer, to identify if any lead paint amounts were at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. A total of

One-hundred thirty-seven (137) XRF analyses were performed, which included one-hundred twenty-three (123) building component measurements and fourteen (14) calibration checks.

Drawings that illustrate the locations of all building measurements have been provided in

Appendix A of this Report.

XRF RESULTS

The XRF analyzer indicated that lead-containing paint was identified in the following building component types. The table also provides additional details regarding the location, color, condition, and substrate of these components.

COMPONENT SUBSTRATE CONDITION COLOR

PORCH

FLOOR CONCRETE POOR GREY

WALL CONCRETE POOR RED

COLUMN BRICK FAIR RED

4!

CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN

EXT SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE

CEILING WOOD FAIR GREEN

SOFFIT WOOD FAIR GREEN

OUTSIDE

CURB CONCRETE FAIR YELLOW

WALL BRICK FAIR RED

WALL BRICK FAIR GREEN

BASEMENT

WALL BRICK POOR RED

DOOR FRAME WOOD FAIR GREY

CEILING CONCRETE FAIR GREY

WALL BRICK FAIR GREY

WALL CONCRETE FAIR GREY

FIRST FLOOR

CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE

WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE

WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE

BEAM WOOD FAIR WHITE

BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR BROWN

CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN

JAMB WOOD FAIR BROWN

WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE

CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN

WINDOW WOOD POOR WHITE

WINDOW WOOD FAIR BROWN

CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN

DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE

A total of fifty-six (56) of the building measurements tested positive, which indicated the presence of lead at or above 0.3 mg/cm2. The complete XRF lead paint data have been provided in Appendix B of this Report. In this Report some of the XRF lead paint results indicated “<

LOD” (less than Limits of Detection). This reading indicated the concentration at which the instrument could determine whether an element was present or not; that is, the point at which the instrument can distinguish a measurement from the background levels. The LOD is not a fixed number, but is affected by the matrix of the component (substrate) and other factors such as temperature, etc. In addition, a result reading of “null” indicates that an inconclusive measurement was obtained, and was therefore repeated.

5!

QUALIFICATIONS

This Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was performed by a Texas Department of State Health

Services (DSHS) and New Mexico (USEPA) Licensed Lead Paint Inspector. This individual has received training under the HUD / EPA training criteria for the required Lead Paint Inspector and/or Risk Assessor courses and has received the refresher training within the prescribed period for each jurisdiction. Company and individual licenses and credentials have been provided and are available for review in the project sampling plan documents, which have been submitted to the USACE.

LIMITATIONS

The overall purpose of this Comprehensive Lead Paint Survey was to identify if lead-containing components were present, within the qualifications and limitations summarized below. Reliance on this Report is specifically limited to gathering initial information regarding the presence of lead in paint. Any time that lead-based paint may be identified during the performance of a lead inspection, the owner of the building is responsible to the occupants and to the public to properly manage these materials, per Local, State and Federal regulations. Prior to the abatement or removal of any lead containing materials, a Lead Project Design should be properly performed, by a qualified Lead Firm, to 1) ensure that materials will be properly managed, and 2) to prepare a more accurate estimate of actual materials to be addressed. This Survey Report was specifically prepared for ALL Consulting’s Client (USACE and Ft. Bliss), and the extent of liability incurred, is limited to the amount of the Report Fee paid by its Client. The USACE agrees that the ALL Consulting Team cannot be held responsible for any liability based on reliance of this Report by any third party.

CONCLUSIONS

1. Specific Conclusions. Lead-containing paint was found on components inside and outside of this building.

• Lead paint should not be disturbed without proper procedures in place. Should the lead paint need to be disturbed, personnel should be evacuated in advance, and only properly trained persons with adequate personal protective equipment (PPE) should be allowed to disturb the lead paint material.

6!

• Lead painted components in poor condition should be stabilized with interim controls or abatement procedures by properly trained personnel.

• Lead Hazard air monitoring should be performed during abatement activities.

• Following abatement activities, clearance wipe samples should be collected and sent to an approved lead laboratory for analysis.

• The OSHA Hazard Communication Standard and the Lead Paint Standard both require anyone working in such areas to be informed of lead paint hazards and methods to avoid the hazards.

2. General Conclusions. Proper notification should be made to the appropriate authorities prior to disturbance of any lead-containing materials, including abatement activity, renovations, or operations and maintenance (O&M) activities, or demolition of any facilities or public buildings.

Other personnel working in the area must be alerted by signage and the appropriate regulated area designations. OSHA specifies worker protection and engineering controls, as well as work practices to ensure the safety of workers and anyone who will be in the area after the conclusion of the work.

Contact the personnel listed below with any clarifications that may be needed.

Inspected by: Reviewed by: Approved by:

Tim Jones, RPIH Alex Woelper, P.E., RPIH David Epperly, Ph.D., P.E.

Lead Inspector Environmental Consultant Project Manager License # 2070306

APPENDICES:

A. Lead Paint Sample Location Drawing(s) B. XRF Lead Paint Data

APPENDIX A

Lead Paint Sample Location Drawing(s)

Project: # 139-14

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Draw by:

JC

Location:

Building # 127 Fort Bliss, TX 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103

El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-1

1 of 2Date:

01-09-2015

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

1st Floor

9 102930

10298

93 92

91 89

90 12

110 113

125123

132133

19188

66 70

37 38 39

124121120

Note: #46-52 Calibration

LEAD PAINT Sample Location Drawing - Building # 127 N

Lead Sample Locations

Positive Lead Sample Locations##

Project: # 139-14

Hazardous Materials Surveys

Draw by:

JC

Location:

Building # 127 Fort Bliss, TX 7307 Remcon Cir, Ste 103

El Paso, Texas, 79912 915.833.3740

Sheet

ENV-2

2 of 2Date:

12-29-2014

ENCON INTERNATIONAL, INC

NOT TO SCALE

Basement

LEAD PAINT Sample Location Drawing - Building #127

Lead Sample Locations

Positive Lead Sample Locations##

N

APPENDIX B

XRF Lead Paint Data

Fort Bliss, Texas XRF Lead Paint Data Bldg. 127

No. Type Component Substrate Condition ColorInspectorRoom Results Action Level

PbC

1 SHUTTER_CAL 9.08

2 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.29

3 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.3

4 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.28

5 PAINT TREAD CONCRETE POOR GREY OUTSIDE Null 0.3 < LOD* 6 PAINT TREAD CONCRETE POOR GREY OUTSIDE Null 0.3 < LOD* 7 PAINT FLOOR CONCRETE POOR GREY PORCH Positive 0.3 0.9 8 PAINT FLOOR CONCRETE POOR GREY PORCH Null 0.3 0.4 9 PAINT RAIL METAL POOR BLACK PORCH Null 0.3 < LOD*

10 PAINT RAIL METAL POOR BLACK PORCH Null 0.3 < LOD* 11 PAINT WALL CONCRETE POOR RED PORCH Positive 0.3 11.7 12 PAINT WALL CONCRETE POOR RED PORCH Positive 0.3 14.8 13 PAINT COLUMN BRICK FAIR RED PORCH Positive 0.3 16.7 14 PAINT COLUMN BRICK FAIR RED PORCH Positive 0.3 14.6 15 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN PORCH Negative 0.3 0.07 16 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN PORCH Positive 0.3 10.2 17 PAINT EXT SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE PORCH Positive 0.3 15 18 PAINT EXT SILL WOOD FAIR WHITE PORCH Positive 0.3 13.8 19 PAINT WINDOW GRILL METAL FAIR BLACK PORCH Negative 0.3 < LOD* 20 PAINT WINDOW GRILL METAL FAIR BLACK PORCH Negative 0.3 < LOD* 21 PAINT DOOR GRILL METAL FAIR BLACK PORCH Null 0.3 < LOD* 22 PAINT DOOR GRILL METAL FAIR BLACK PORCH Negative 0.3 < LOD* 23 PAINT CEILING WOOD FAIR GREEN PORCH Positive 0.3 14 24 PAINT CEILING WOOD FAIR GREEN PORCH Positive 0.3 14.5 25 PAINT SOFFIT WOOD FAIR GREEN PORCH Positive 0.3 15.5 26 PAINT SOFFIT WOOD FAIR GREEN PORCH Positive 0.3 20.7 27 PAINT CURB CONCRETE FAIR YELLOW OUTSIDE Positive 0.3 2 28 PAINT CURB CONCRETE FAIR YELLOW OUTSIDE Positive 0.3 1.2 29 PAINT EXT SILL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE OUTSIDE Null 0.3 0.8 30 PAINT WINDOW GRILL METAL FAIR BLACK OUTSIDE Negative 0.3 < LOD* 31 PAINT WINDOW GRILL METAL FAIR BLACK OUTSIDE Null 0.3 < LOD* 32 PAINT WINDOW GRILL METAL FAIR BLACK OUTSIDE Null 0.3 < LOD*

12/15/14 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 1

Action Level

PbC

33 PAINT WALL BRICK FAIR RED OUTSIDE Positive 0.3 3 34 PAINT WALL BRICK FAIR RED OUTSIDE Null 0.3 1.6 35 PAINT WALL BRICK FAIR GREEN OUTSIDE Positive 0.3 1.4 36 PAINT WALL BRICK FAIR GREEN OUTSIDE Positive 0.3 0.8 37 PAINT EXT SILL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE OUTSIDE Null 0.3 0.5 38 PAINT EXT SILL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE OUTSIDE Null 0.3 0.8 39 PAINT PIPE CONCRETE FAIR RED OUTSIDE Negative 0.3 0.04 40 PAINT RAIL METAL FAIR BLACK OUTSIDE Null 0.3 0.5 41 PAINT RAIL METAL FAIR SILVER OUTSIDE Negative 0.3 < LOD* 42 PAINT RISER METAL POOR SILVER BASEMENT Null 0.3 0.09 43 PAINT TREAD METAL POOR SILVER BASEMENT Null 0.3 < LOD* 44 PAINT WALL BRICK POOR RED BASEMENT Positive 0.3 7.5 45 PAINT DOOR GRILL BRICK FAIR BLACK BASEMENT Negative 0.3 < LOD*

46 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.3

47 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.3

48 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.29

49 SHUTTER_CAL 8.68

50 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.3

51 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.3

52 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.3

53 PAINT DOOR FRAME WOOD FAIR GREY BASEMENT Negative 0.3 < LOD* 54 PAINT DOOR FRAME WOOD FAIR GREY BASEMENT Null 0.3 0.6 55 PAINT DOOR FRAME WOOD FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 0.7 56 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 2.6 57 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 4.2 58 PAINT WALL BRICK FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 4.1 59 PAINT WALL BRICK FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 9.6 60 PAINT WALL BRICK FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 4.4 61 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 1.7 62 PAINT CEILING CONCRETE FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 1.1 63 PAINT WALL CONCRETE FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 1.6 64 PAINT WALL CONCRETE FAIR GREY BASEMENT Positive 0.3 4.5

12/15/14 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 2

Action Level

PbC

65 PAINT DOOR CASING METAL FAIR GREY BASEMENT Negative 0.3 < LOD* 66 PAINT CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 67 PAINT CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 7.8 68 PAINT WALL CONCRETE FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 23.6 69 PAINT WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 70 PAINT CASING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 71 PAINT PLATFORM WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 72 PAINT WALL DRYWALL FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 73 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 0.09 74 PAINT SILL WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 75 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 76 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 22.4 77 PAINT BEAM WOOD FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 24.4 78 PAINT BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 1.8 79 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 0.6 80 PAINT JAMB WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 21.2 81 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 17.9 82 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 12.7 83 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 16.5 84 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 0.21 85 PAINT CEILING DRYWALL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 86 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 87 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 88 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 11.8 89 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 90 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 15.2 91 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 92 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 93 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 94 PAINT BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 95 PAINT WINDOW WOOD POOR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 15 96 PAINT WINDOW WOOD POOR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 14.3

12/15/14 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 3

Action Level

PbC

97 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 15 98 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 14.5 99 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD*

100 PAINT WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 101 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 102 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 103 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 104 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 105 PAINT WINDOW WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 15.7 106 PAINT WINDOW WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 15.9 107 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 0.7 108 PAINT VENT TRIM METAL FAIR WHITE FIRST Null 0.3 < LOD* 109 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 6.8 110 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 111 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 10.9 112 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 11.6 113 PAINT LIGHT SW. METAL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 114 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 115 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 24.9 116 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 117 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 118 PAINT CASING WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 0.21 119 PAINT DOOR WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 120 PAINT WINDOW WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 22.5 121 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 24 122 PAINT BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 123 PAINT BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 124 PAINT PARTITION WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 0.2 125 PAINT PIPE METAL FAIR WHITE FIRST Null 0.3 0.23 126 PAINT PIPE METAL FAIR WHITE FIRST Null 0.3 0.1 127 PAINT WALL DRYWALL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 128 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 19.8

12/15/14 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 4

Action Level

PbC

129 PAINT WALL PLASTER FAIR WHITE FIRST Positive 0.3 18.9 130 PAINT WINDOW WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Positive 0.3 20.5 131 PAINT VENT METAL FAIR WHITE FIRST Null 0.3 < LOD* 132 PAINT VENT METAL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 133 PAINT BASEBOARD WOOD FAIR BROWN FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD* 134 PAINT VENT METAL FAIR WHITE FIRST Negative 0.3 < LOD*

135 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.29

136 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.3

137 PAINT CALIBRATE N/A 0.3 0.29

12/15/14 ALL CONSULTING TEAM 5

ATTACHMENT 2

Prior (2014) Regulated Materials Inspection Report

Regulated Materials Inspection Report Building 127

Fort Bliss, Texas August 2014

Lead-based paint (LBP) and asbestos containing material (ACM) inspections at Building 127 were conducted on 12 August 2014 by Ms. Suzanne Simpson and Mr.

Barry Vercoe of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Fort Worth District, Regional Planning & Environmental Center (USAED, CESWF-PEC). The purpose of the inspections was to identify regulated materials at this building including LBP and ACM, which may require abatement prior to proposed renovation.

The LBP inspection included screening of painted surfaces to indicate the presence of lead in paint with an x-ray fluorescence (XRF) analyzer, model LPA-1 manufactured by RMD Instruments, LLC, Watertown, Massachusetts. Mr. Vercoe is certified through manufacturer training to operate this model of analyzer, and is also certified by the Texas Department of State Health Services (DSHS) as a Lead Inspector, License Number 2060570, and Lead Risk Assessor, License Number 2070346, both with expiration date 25 April 2016. For the purpose of this inspection, the presence of LBP was confirmed on surfaces where XRF readings were equal to or greater than the HUD and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulatory threshold of 1.0 mg/cm2, and the presence of lead containing paint (LCP) was indicated on surfaces where XRF readings were 0.2 mg/cm2 or greater based on data in the Performance Characteristic Sheet (PCS) for this XRF model provided by HUD. Worker protection measures are required under Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations listed in 29 CFR 1926.62 where materials containing any lead, including LBP or LCP, will be disturbed. XRF screening results are summarized in Table 1 of this report.

The presence of LBP was confirmed on the plaster entry corridor wall (>9.9 mg/cm2), a wooden door frame in the entry (>9.9 mg/cm2), a wooden window frame in room 5 (>9.9 mg/cm2), a brick wall in the basement (2.5 mg/cm2) and on the wooden soffit exterior roof (4.8 mg/cm2). The presence of LCP at concentrations below the regulatory threshold for LBP was confirmed on the exterior concrete porch floor (0.3 mg/cm2) and a wooden door in restroom 3 (0.3 mg/cm2).

The ACM inspection included collection of bulk samples of suspect material for laboratory analyses by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Ms. Simpson and Mr. Vercoe are certified as an Asbestos Inspectors by EPA approved training provided through GEBCO Associates, LP, Hurst, Texas, with respective Certificate Numbers 14033 (expiration date 29 January 2015) and 13007 (expiration date 02 January 2015). Samples were analyzed by EMC Labs Inc., Phoenix, Arizona, which is certified by the Texas DSHS for PLM analyses, License Number 300296, expiration date 30 July 2016.

Analytical results are summarized in Table 2 of this report, with the complete laboratory analytical report included as Appendix A. ACM is defined by the EPA to be any material containing greater than 1% asbestos as determined by PLM analysis.

Results reported by the analytical laboratory indicated ACM is present in the following material: floor tile (2% Chrysotile).

Table 1 Fort Bliss - Building 127

Lead Containing Paint XRF Screening Results

Reading XRF Result XRF Number (mg/cm2) Mode

001 1.0 002 0.9 003 1.0 004 0.0 005 0.0 006 -0.1 028 >9.9 Quick Mode Entry Corridor Wall Plaster White 029 0.3 Quick Mode Restroom 3 Door Wood Beige 030 -0.1 Quick Mode Restroom 2 Wall Gypsum Board White 031 >9.9 Quick Mode Entry Door Frame Wood Beige 032 >9.9 Quick Mode Room 5 Window Frame Wood Beige 033 0.1 Quick Mode Room 6 Baseboard Wood Beige 034 2.5 Quick Mode Basement Wall Brick White 035 0.3 Quick Mode Exterior Porch Floor Concrete Gray 036 4.8 Quick Mode Exterior Roof Soffit Wood Dark Green

NOTE: Readings in bold indicate the presence of lead containing paint as determined by XRF analysis

Time Corrected

Mode

0.0 mg/cm2

Unpainted Standard

Paint ColorComponentLocation Substrate

Time Corrected

Mode

1.0 mg/cm2

Paint Standard Calibration

Calibration

FORT BLISS BUILDING 127 ACM RESULTS 2014

Description Sample Identification Analytical Results Location 1-A None Detected Room 6

Floortile 1-B None Detected Room 9 1-C None Detected By door 2-A None Detected Room 6

Gypsum Wall Panel 2-B None Detected Room 9 2-C None Detected Across from mens restroom 3-A 2% Chrysotile Room 6

Floortile 3-B 2% Chrysotile Room 9

3-C 2% Chrysotile By front door

4-A None Detected Room 6 Oxychloride Flooring 4-B None Detected Room 9

4-C None Detected By front door Ceramic Tile 5-A None Detected Mens Restroom

Floor Tile 6-A None Detected Hall in front of Mens Restroom Shingle 7-A None Detected Roof Over Porch

Exterior Window Glaze 8-A None Detected Room 6

Appendix A

Asbestos Analytical Reports EMC Labs, Inc.

August 2014

Asbestos Detected

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0144969

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 819 TAYLOR ST.

FT. WORTH TX 76102

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Date Received: 08/14/2014

08/26/2014Date Analyzed:

444064Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 08/12/2014 EPA Method: Project Name: FT. BLISS BLDG 127 Submitted By: BARRY VERCOEAddress: PO #W9126G-11-A-0002 Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

08/26/2014Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

NoLAYER 1 12"x12" Floor Tile, Brown/ Beige/ Gray

None Detected0144969-001 127-1A Carbonates

Quartz Binder/Filler

100%

Cellulose Fiber Synthetic Fiber

NoLAYER 2 Mastic, Yellow

None Detected 1% <1%

Carbonates Gypsum

98%

NoLAYER 1 12"x12" Floor Tile, Brown/ Beige/ Gray

None Detected0144969-002 127-1B Carbonates

Synthetic Fiber

NoLAYER 2 Mastic, Yellow

None Detected 1% <1%

Carbonates Gypsum

12"x12" Floor Tile, Brown/ Beige/ Gray

None Detected0144969-003 127-1C Carbonates

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 2 Mastic, Yellow

None Detected <1%

Carbonates Gypsum

99%

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0144969

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 819 TAYLOR ST.

FT. WORTH TX 76102

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Date Received: 08/14/2014

08/26/2014Date Analyzed:

444064Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 08/12/2014 EPA Method: Project Name: FT. BLISS BLDG 127 Submitted By: BARRY VERCOEAddress: PO #W9126G-11-A-0002 Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

08/26/2014Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Gypsum Wall Panel, White/ Brown

None Detected0144969-004 127-2A

10%

Gypsum

Carbonates

90%

NoLAYER 2 Joint Compound, White

None Detected

Carbonates Mica Quartz Perlite

NoLAYER 3 Texture, White

None Detected

Carbonates Mica Quartz

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Gypsum Wall Panel, White/ Brown

None Detected0144969-005 127-2B

10%

Gypsum

90%

Joint Compound, White

None Detected

Carbonates Mica Quartz

Texture, White

None Detected

Carbonates Mica Quartz

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0144969

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 819 TAYLOR ST.

FT. WORTH TX 76102

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Date Received: 08/14/2014

08/26/2014Date Analyzed:

444064Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 08/12/2014 EPA Method: Project Name: FT. BLISS BLDG 127 Submitted By: BARRY VERCOEAddress: PO #W9126G-11-A-0002 Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

08/26/2014Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose Fiber Fibrous Glass

NoLAYER 1 Gypsum Wall Panel, White/ Brown

None Detected0144969-006 127-2C

10% 1%

Gypsum

89%

Texture, White

None Detected <1%

Gypsum Mica Carbonates

Cellulose FiberYesLAYER 1 12"x12" Floor Tile, Greenish/ Beige

Chrysotile0144969-007 127-3A

2% 2%

Carbonates

96%

Mastic, Yellow

None Detected 1%

Carbonates Gypsum

Cellulose FiberYesLAYER 1 12"x12" Floor Tile, Greenish/ Beige

Chrysotile0144969-008 127-3B

2% 3%

Carbonates Gypsum

95%

Mastic, Lt. Brown

None Detected 5%

Carbonates Gypsum

Synthetic FiberNoLAYER 3 Mastic, Yellow

None Detected <1%

Carbonates Gypsum

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0144969

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 819 TAYLOR ST.

FT. WORTH TX 76102

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Date Received: 08/14/2014

08/26/2014Date Analyzed:

444064Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 08/12/2014 EPA Method: Project Name: FT. BLISS BLDG 127 Submitted By: BARRY VERCOEAddress: PO #W9126G-11-A-0002 Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

08/26/2014Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberYesLAYER 1 12"x12" Floor Tile, Greenish/ Beige

Chrysotile0144969-009 127-3C

2% 3%

Carbonates Gypsum

Mastic, Lt. Brown

None Detected 5%

Carbonates Gypsum

Synthetic FiberNoLAYER 3 Mastic, Yellow

None Detected 1%

Carbonates Gypsum

Synthetic Fiber

NoLAYER 1 Oxychloride Flooring, Red/ Brown

None Detected0144969-010 127-4A

15% 3%

Carbonates Gypsum

82%

Mastic, Brown

None Detected 5%

Carbonates Gypsum

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 3 Vapor Barrier, Black

None Detected 55%

Carbonates Gypsum

45%

Synthetic Fiber

NoLAYER 4 Mastic, Yellow

None Detected 1% <1%

Carbonates Gypsum

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0144969

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 819 TAYLOR ST.

FT. WORTH TX 76102

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Date Received: 08/14/2014

08/26/2014Date Analyzed:

444064Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 08/12/2014 EPA Method: Project Name: FT. BLISS BLDG 127 Submitted By: BARRY VERCOEAddress: PO #W9126G-11-A-0002 Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

08/26/2014Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Oxychloride Flooring, Red/ Brown

None Detected0144969-011 127-4B

15%

Carbonates Gypsum

85%

Mastic, Brown

None Detected 3%

Carbonates Gypsum

97%

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Oxychloride Flooring, Red/ Brown

None Detected0144969-012 127-4C

15%

Carbonates Gypsum

85%

Mastic, Brown

None Detected 3%

Carbonates Gypsum

97%

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0144969

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 819 TAYLOR ST.

FT. WORTH TX 76102

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Date Received: 08/14/2014

08/26/2014Date Analyzed:

444064Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 08/12/2014 EPA Method: Project Name: FT. BLISS BLDG 127 Submitted By: BARRY VERCOEAddress: PO #W9126G-11-A-0002 Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

08/26/2014Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

NoLAYER 1 Ceramic Tile, White

None Detected0144969-013 127-5A Quartz

Gypsum

Grout, Off White

None Detected

Carbonates Gypsum

Thin Set, Gray

None Detected

Quartz Carbonates Gypsum Mica

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 4 Mastic, Tan

None Detected 1%

Carbonates Gypsum

12"x12" Floor Tile, Beige

None Detected0144969-014 127-6A Carbonates

Synthetic Fiber

NoLAYER 2 Mastic, Yellow

None Detected 1% <1%

Carbonates Gypsum

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 3 Concrete Floor, Gray

None Detected <1%

Carbonates Gypsum

Layer Name / Sample Description

Lab ID Sample Location

Bulk Asbestos Analysis by Polarized Light Microscopy

Non-Asbestos Constituents

Laboratory Report

0144969

NVLAP#101926-0

Client ID

Client:

Address: 819 TAYLOR ST.

FT. WORTH TX 76102

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

Date Received: 08/14/2014

08/26/2014Date Analyzed:

444064Job# / P.O. #:

EMC LABS, INC.

Collected: 08/12/2014 EPA Method: Project Name: FT. BLISS BLDG 127 Submitted By: BARRY VERCOEAddress: PO #W9126G-11-A-0002 Collected By:

9830 S. 51st Street, Suite B109, Phoenix, AZ 85044 Phone: 800-362-3373 or 480-940-5294 - Fax: (480) 893-1726

08/26/2014Date Reported:

EPA 600/R-93/116

Asbestos Type

Cellulose FiberNoLAYER 1 Roof Shingle, Gray/ White/ Black

None Detected0144969-015 127-7A

25%

Carbonates Gypsum

75%

Roof Felt, Black

None Detected 55%

Carbonates

45%

Fibrous GlassNoLAYER 3 Roof Felt, Black

None Detected 45%

Carbonates

55%

Fibrous GlassNoLAYER 4 Roof Felt, Black

None Detected 20%

Carbonates

80%

TalcNoExterior Window Glaze, White/ Lt.

Brown

None Detected0144969-016 127-8A

2%

Carbonates

Distinctly stratified, easily separable layers of samples are analyzed as subsamples of the whole and are reported separately for each discernible layer. All analyses are derived from calibrated visual estimate and measured in area percent unless otherwise noted. The report applies to the standards or procedures identified and to the sample(s) tested. The test results are not necessarily indicated or representative of the qualities of the lot from which the sample was taken or of apparently identical or similar products, nor do they represent an ongoing quality assurance program unless so noted. These reports are for the exclusive use of the addressed client and that they will not be reproduced wholly or in part for advertising or other purposes over our signature or in connection with our name without special written permission. The report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval by our laboratory. The samples not destroyed in testing are retained a maximum of thirty days. The laboratory measurement of uncertainty for the test method is approximately less than 1 by area percent.

Accredited by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program for selected test method for asbestos. The accreditation or any reports generated by this laboratory in no way constitutes or implies product certification, approval, or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST, or any agency of the Federal Government. Polarized Light Microscopy may not be consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials.

Analyst - Octavio Gavarreteayestas Signatory - Lab Director - Kurt Kettler

ATTACHMENT 3

Prior (1991) Asbestos Report