JOFOC SAM.gov.pdf
PDF 3 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Maintenance of Thermo Fisher Scientific Mass Spectrometers, GCs, Ion Chromatography (IC) Systems and etc.
- Solicitation number
- 75D301-22-Q-74639
About this file
This document contains a Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition template and a related Federal Contract Opportunity notice. The template outlines a proposed sole source contract award to Thermo Electron North America LLC for a maintenance agreement for Thermo Fisher Scientific laboratory equipment, including mass spectrometers, gas chromatographs, ion chromatography systems, and other items. The maintenance agreement would provide services such as telephone support, on-site maintenance and repairs, priority response times, and coverage of parts, travel, labor, software and firmware updates through multiple option periods extending to May 2027. The notice seeks responses by May 31st, 2022 regarding the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's intent to award this sole source contract for supplies and services required to maintain equipment that must be serviced by the original equipment manufacturer, Thermo Fisher Scientific.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| JOFOC SAM.gov.pdf | ||
| PWS SAM.gov.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Please wait...
If this message is not eventually replaced by the proper contents of the document, your PDF viewer may not be able to display this type of document.
You can upgrade to the latest version of Adobe Reader for Windows®, Mac, or Linux® by visiting http://www.adobe.com/go/reader_download.
For more assistance with Adobe Reader visit http://www.adobe.com/go/acrreader.
Windows is either a registered trademark or a trademark of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. Mac is a trademark of Apple Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the U.S. and other countries.
Template for Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition Completion Instructions: The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has established a standard template for the preparation of a J&A for Other Than Full and Open Competition. If this is an 8(a) set-aside, please note this form is not required unless the acquisition is valued (including all options) at greater than $22 million. This template is NOT applicable for actions using simplified acquisition procedures (FAR Part 13), Federal Supply Schedule orders (FAR 8.4) or task or delivery orders subject to fair opportunity (FAR 16.505).
Tailor all aspects of this template to the individual acquisition. Consult FAR Subpart 6.3 for guidance. An addendum may be added in case additional space is needed.
When this document is printed, the blue italic instructions are automatically deleted on the printed version.
JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
2. Description of Action:
Nature:
Pricing:
Funds:
3. Description of Services or Supplies:
Basis for Approval (FAR 6.303-1(d)):
As applicable, briefly describe the services or supplies required to meet the agency's needs, including make & model number where appropriate. Include quantities of supplies or period of performance for services. Provide information for any options included. If the action is a modification to an existing contract, distinguish clearly between the work covered by the original contract and the work to be obtained by the proposed modification.
4. Authority and Rationale: Identify the statutory authority, FAR title and FAR citation permitting other than full and open competition. It may be one of the following most commonly used citations by the operating divisions of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), but other exceptions may apply per FAR Subpart 6.3.
Actions other than simplified acquisition procedures (select only one and provide an explanation):
Explain why the intended contractor is the only responsible source who can provide the required supplies or services. Discuss the unique capabilities, expertise, etc. that support the lack of competition/why no other type of supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements. Explain factors/unique qualifications such as proprietary data or exclusive licensing rights, if applicable. When competition is limited to items particular to one manufacturer, this justification must explain why the particular brand name, product, or feature is essential to the Government's requirements, and that market research indicates other companies' similar products, or products lacking the particular feature, do not meet, or cannot be modified to meet the agency's needs in accordance with FAR 11.105. If in connection with a follow-on contract for continued development or production of highly specialized equipment, detail the substantial duplication of cost or unacceptable delays. May not Exceed one year, including all options, unless the head of the agency (Secretary of HHS) determines that exceptional circumstances apply.
If unusual and compelling urgency is the basis for the justification, explain the chronological events leading up to the requirement and explain why time constraints cannot permit even a limited competition. Describe the detrimental effects/serious injury to the mission of the requiring activity or to the government, financial or otherwise, that will result if this justification is not approved. Describe impact of required delivery/performance date. Describe the detrimental effects/serious injury to the mission of the requiring activity or to the government, financial or otherwise, that will result if this justification is not approved and the product or service cannot be provided by the intended sole source contractor. Failure to plan for expiring funds is not a valid reason for citing this exception. May not exceed one year, including all options, unless the head of the agency determines that exceptional circumstances apply.
Provide a citation to the statutory authorization and a brief description of its content, or identify the specified source or other agency.
Provide the authority and citation to the applicable section of FAR 6.3.
Provide a full explanation to justify use of the exception.
5. Agency Actions to Take or Remove Barriers That Led to Other Than Full and Open Competition (If applicable):
Describe the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers that led to the restricted consideration prior to any subsequent acquisition for the supplies of services is made. If no such actions have been taken, explain why.
6. Bridge Contracts:
For contract extensions or bridge contracts when a competitive follow-on is in the process of being developed, summarize history of current contract and explain the reasons for any delays in the acquisition. Include discussion of the milestones for the follow-on action; the milestones should be as efficient as possible. Discuss why it would be neither cost effective nor realistic to expect another contractor to perform during the brief interim period; include issues such as start-up costs, phase-in, transfer of GFP, recruitment and staffing, etc. If the action is because of a protest, provide a brief discussion of the protest including the date the protest was filed and the basis of the protest. Explain that the action will provide the minimum quantity or performance period.
7. Actions to Increase Competition:
Describe efforts made to compete the action, including whether a notice was or will be publicized as required by FAR Subpart 5.2 or which exception under FAR 5.202 applies. If a notice was publicized, discuss the number of written responses to the synopsis and the results of the assessment of the written responses. List sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition. Provide rationale if interested sources were rejected. If applicable, state that no other sources have expressed interest, but all offers received shall be considered. Describe what actions will be taken to increase competition before subsequent acquisition of the supplies or services is required. You may state that an action is a one-time requirement, but if a similar requirement arises, every effort will be made to compete it to the maximum extent possible. If action is sole source because of proprietary data or licensing rights and there will be a continuing need for the requirement, there must be evidence that advanced planning has been initiated to overcome the barriers to competition, or there should be documentation to support an analysis that replacement costs/licensing purchase costs outweigh the benefits of competition. If the action is a contract extension or bridge, explain actions to compete the follow-on. If action is an urgent new requirement and a competitive follow-on is anticipated, explain that efforts are underway to facilitate a full and open competition.
8. Market Research:
Describe the extent of the market research conducted to identify all qualified sources and the results thereof. “Market Research” is defined as those attempts you made to ascertain whether other qualified sources exist, and can include contact with knowledgeable experts regarding similar or duplicate requirements, contact with industry, results of a sources sought synopsis, or draft solicitations. Research of the marketplace may consist of written, electronic (i.e. email) telephonic, or world wide web inquiries. Lack of advanced planning is not an acceptable reason for the lack of market research, but true urgency may necessitate abbreviated market research that is limited to readily available historical and commercial information. If action is a contract extension or bridge contract, describe the market research efforts underway or completed for the follow-on. See FAR 10.002(b)(2).
9. Procurement History:
Was action competed?
If action was not competed, state the cited authority, summarize rationale, and describe the actions that were supposed to be taken to increase competition and the results thereof:
10. Additional Information to support the justification:
If applicable, explain why technical packages or specifications to facilitate competition were not developed or available; describe actions taken to remedy the situation.
11. Technical / Requirements Certification: By my signature below, I certify that the supporting data included in this J&A is accurate and complete.
Program Manager Name:
Position Title:
Email address:
Phone:
Program Manager Supervisor (or one level above Program Manager) Name:
Position Title:
Email address:
Signature:
Date:
12. Fair and Reasonable Price/Cost Determination: As Contracting Officer, by my signature below, I hereby determine that the anticipated price/cost to the Government for this contract action will be fair and reasonable.
Provide the basis for this determination, e.g., describe techniques to be used to determine fair and reasonable price (FAR Subpart 15.402), such as price analysis, cost analysis, cost realism. Per FAR Subpart 15.403-4(a)(1), the threshold for obtaining cost or pricing data is $750,000.
Name:
Phone:
Signature:
Date:
13. Contracting Officer's Approval (Required for proposed contract not to exceed $700,000 (value calculated including all options)): I hereby certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. I approve this justification subject to availability of funds, and provided that the services and supplies herin describe have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.
Name:
Phone:
Signature:
Date:
14. Legal Review:
All J&As greater than $68 million must have a legal review from the General Law Division of the Office of the General Counsel prior to sending it to the Department.
15. OPDIV Competition Advocate Approval (Required for proposed contract over $700,000 but not exceeding $13.5 million value calculated including all options)):
I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.
Name:
Phone:
Signature:
Date:
16. Office of Small and Disadvantaged Business Utilization:
I have reviewed this justification and find that it adequately supports other than full and open competition.
Name:
Phone:
Signature:
Date:
17. OPDIV HCA Approval (Required for proposed contract over $13.5 million but not exceeding $68 million value calculated including all options)):
Name:
Phone:
Signature:
Date:
18. Department Competition Advocate:
Concur:
Non-Concur:
Name:
Phone:
Signature:
Date:
(The below approval paragraph is required if the cumulative contract value, including all options, exceeds $68 million.)
19. HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) Approval:
Based on the foregoing justification, I hereby approve other than full and open competition for the above stated procurement, subject to the availability of funds, and provided that the services herein described have otherwise been authorized for acquisition.
State supplies/services being procured:
State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304:
State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304 Name:
Phone:
Signature:
Date:
11.0.0.20130303.1.892433.887364 Justification & Approval - Other Than Full and Open Competition Health and Human Services Justification & Approval - Other Than Full and Open Competition
| AcquisitionTitle: Service and Maintenance Agreement for Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| Agency: CDC |
| NIHDrop: |
| PSCDrop: |
| PSCOther: |
| AcqusitionYear: 2022 |
| Author: NCEH/DLS |
| CheckBox4: 1 |
| CheckBox5: 0 |
| CheckBox1: 0 |
| Purchase order/contract number: |
| CheckBox8: 1 |
| CheckBox7: 0 |
| CheckBox6: 0 |
| CheckBox9: 0 |
| Agency Actions to Take or Remove Barriers That Led to Fair Opportunity Exception (If applicable): Currently, the CDC requires the described laboratory equipment maintenance services and the only source for the services is the proposed vendor. However, in the future, the CDC will continue to survey the marketplace for other vendors capable of performing the services required. |
| CheckBox10: 0 |
| CheckBox11: 1 |
| Other funds: Annual Funds |
| TextField5: Thermo Fisher Scientific |
| TextField5: 1400 N Point Pkwy |
| TextField5: West Palm Beach, FL 33407-1976 |
| CheckBox2: 1 |
| CheckBox3: 0 |
| TextField7: TBD |
| As applicable, briefly describe the services or supplies required to meet the agency's needs, including make & model number where appropriate. Include quantities of supplies or period of performance for services. Provide information for any options included. If the action is a modification to an existing contract, distinguish clearly between the work covered by the basic order and the work to be obtained by the proposed modification.: This laboratory equipment maintenance agreement will keep all Thermo Fisher instruments running optimally and ensure timely repairs. Per CLIA requirements and CDC policies, this contract is necessary in order to keep the instruments in optimal running condition and performance to assure accurate measurement results and to assure compliance with CLIA regulations. This requirement is currently being performed under contract # 200-2017-93188 which has a period of performance of 6/1/2017 - 5/31/2022 (inclusive of base and option periods). The contract was awarded in 2017 using FAR procedures and an approved Justification for Other than Full & Open Competition . No industry responses were received as a result of the posting the Justification for Other than Full & Open Competition. |
Period of Performance:
Base: 06/01/2022 - 05/31/2023 Option 1: 06/01/2023 - 05/31/2024 Option 2: 06/01/2024 - 05/31/2025 Option 3: 06/01/2025 - 05/31/2026 Option 4: 06/01/2026 - 05/31/2027
| CheckBox12: 1 |
| State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304: The Division of Laboratory Sciences (DLS) utilizes a variety of instrumentation, equipment and software systems from Thermo Fisher Scientific to accomplish its public health mission. To ensure our laboratory efficiency, capability, and emergency readiness laboratory instruments must be operational at least 95% of the time. This means lab equipment must be regularly maintained and rapidly repaired when needed. The maintenance and repairs must be done expertly to maintain the peak performance of the equipment. Thermo Fisher Scientific is the OEM of the instruments, components, and analytical systems to be covered under this maintenance agreement and is the only contractor that can fulfill the requirements of the contract. Acceptable maintenance and repairs vendors must have and maintain the following capabilities: |
1. Provide timely repair using new OEM parts or factory warranted replacement parts which must be either manufactured by the OEM or approved by the OEM for use.
2. Must provide end users acknowledgment within four hours and technical/applications and/or engineer support for Agilent covered instrumentation within 24 hours of initial request.
3. Must possess the specific training and access to proprietary OEM software as well as OEM replacement parts to successfully repair, maintain, and update software on the Waters mass spectrometers and other covered equipment.
4. Service engineers must be certified by Thermo Fisher Scientific-certified trainers. Service engineers must be kept up to date on system updates and able to be trained to repair, troubleshoot and maintain existing and new models of Waters instrumentation which may be added to the contract.
5. Must provide factory-directed updates, instrument and software upgrades for all eligible Thermo Fisher Scientific instruments.
6. Must be capable of repairing all Waters equipment or instrumentation. This includes onsite Thermo Fisher Scientific service engineer support and factory engineer/designer/applications support if needed for repairs.
7. Engineers must have proficient written and oral communication skills in the English language.
| State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304: There is currently no company or individual that has the ability to provide a service agreement that meets all technical requirements for the Thermo Fisher Scientific equipment. In the future, immediate consideration will be given to any company that meets the CDC's minimum vendor qualifications. Market research will continue as an ongoing activity. If any companies are identified then competition will be recommended for future requirements. This requirement will be publicized as required by FAR Subpart 5.2. |
| State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304: Market research began in November 2021 and concluded on 4/4/2022. Market research was conducted by doing an internet search of businesses with the same NAICS code. The COR did an internet search for Thermo Electron North America instruments repair and service. The COR visited the GovCB site, the SAM.gov site, the NAICS site, and GSA schedule site. The COR used a search engine and the NAICS code and the PSC code listed for this category. The COR visited the Thermo Electron North America website and corresponded with Aaron Tamburello , the Executive Territory Manager. Results indicated that REMI, Gentech and Conquer Scientific are equipment and maintenance providers that might have access to Thermo Electron North America new or refurbished equipment, but not the full level of service and support required by DLS. The most recent market research was conducted on 4/4/2022 with Aaron Tamburello to confirm details identified earlier. In regards to Thermo Electron North America parts, approximately 50% of all Thermo Electron North America parts are manufactured by Thermo Electron North America directly. The majority of these parts cannot be alternatively sourced. Thermo Electron North America manufactures its parts using specific quality standards and packages under proprietary critical clean conditions. Thermo Electron North America stocks the appropriate inventory of parts so that global supply is assured. In regards to technical expertise, Thermo Electron North America provides a comprehensive customer technical support and expertise on all Thermo Electron North America instruments, informatics, and chemistry only available from Thermo Electron North America on its systems. Thermo Electron North America offers a platform of tools capable of remotely diagnosing issues to ensure maximum uptime. Thermo Electron North America does not provide software and firmware coverage to any other company. Many fixes for system issues are through software and firmware that are not available to other companies. Only Thermo Electron North America service engineers have access to Thermo Electron North America engineering and development teams for global, expert support when resolving any issues. In regards to training, Thermo Electron North America service engineers are trained and certified by Thermo Electron North America factory-certified trainers who are up to date on all system upgrades and customer feedback. Thermo Electron North America certified customer training is only available from Thermo Electron North America. In regards to upgrades, Thermo Electron North America instruments may be entitled to factory directed updates which are provided only by Thermo Electron North America. Any instrument and software upgrades for Thermo Electron North America systems are only available from Thermo Electron North America. For compliance, Thermo Electron North America provides automated and streamlined qualification protocols for all Thermo Electron North America systems. Customers with a Thermo Electron North America maintenance agreement are provided priority response times for preventative maintenance and repair services. The services required by this contract are not available from a current Best-In-Class mechanism. The services do not fall under a FAR Part 8 mandatory sources. |
| State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304: A Justification and Approval for Other Than Full and Open Competition citing FAR 6.302-1 / 41 USC 3304(a)(1) was approved and posted. There were no industry responses. The CDC was to continue to monitor the marketplace to determine if other vendors were capable of performing the required services. The CDC completed this task and determined that no other vendors are able to provide the required services. |
| State the full statutory authority and FAR cite and title, consistent with paragraph 4, e.g. 41 U.S.C. 3304: The Contracting Officer will use a comparison of the proposed pricing with prior contract pricing to determine price reasonableness. The Contracting Officer will also use cost analysis at the specific equipment level. A discount will be requested. The final pricing will be confirmed as standard commercial pricing or better to establish price reasonableness. |
| CheckBox13: 0 |
| CheckBox14: 0 |
| CheckBox15: 0 |
| TextField9: 200-2017-93188 |
| CheckBox16: 0 |
| CheckBox17: 1 |
| Program Manager name: TBD |
| Program Manager position title: |
| Program Manager email address: |
| Program Manager phone: |
| Program Manager Supervisor name: |
| Program Manager Supervisor position title: |
| Program Manager Supervisor email address: |
| HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) signature: |
| Program Manager Supervisor date: |
| Contract Officer's Approval name: H. Dale Bish |
| HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) phone: 404-498-1312 |
| Contract Officer's Approval date: 2022-05-03 |
| HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) name: |
| DateField6: |
| Office of Small Business date: |
| OPDIV HCA date: |
| Concur with Acquisition: 0 |
| Non-Concur with Acquisition: 0 |
| HHS Senior Procurement Executive (SPE) date: |
| State supplies/services being procured: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .