JOFOC-ITC -FOR POSTING.pdf

PDF 126 KB Posted

Attached to
Hotel rooms rental services including equipment and communication lines during VIP visit
Solicitation number
191N6520D0001
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Reference DOSAR 606.303-2

SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED

JUSTIFICATION AND APPROVAL

FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION, PRICE

JUSTIFICATION (JOFOC)

ACQUISITION OF HOTEL ACCOMMODATIONS IN SUPPORT OF A

VIP VISIT

1. I recommend that the Department of State use other than full and open competition for the acquisition of hotel rooms, equipments and communication lines for this VIP visit.

The estimated cost is $750,000.00.

2. Nature and/or description of the action being approved.

Advance team and VIP visit with a delegation inclusive of support elements in: Security, Communications, Logistics and Operations.

3. A description of the supplies or services required to meet the agency’s needs.

The contract is for ITC Maurya, New Delhi – 110021 for hotel rooms, conference rooms, catering, and equipment rental services.

4. An identification of the statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition.

[ X 41 U.S.C. 253 (c) (2), FAR 6.302-2; Unusual and Compelling Urgency;

(Based on the available time and urgency of the requirement as detailed below)

This contract is solely for the VVIP visit to New Delhi, India.

Security concerns prohibit sufficient advanced notification of VIP travel to allow for sufficient time to conduct full and open competition. The Department of State can only communicate with the staff at Posts abroad when authorization is given due to security concerns. They have an extremely short turnaround time when authorization has been granted for negotiations to commence and site selections to be finalized with both the local vendors and Posts before the actual VIP visit occurs. Security and logistical teams make determinations during the site survey as to which hotels are most suitable for the VIP and his traveling staff to remain overnight. Consideration of the Principal and the location are taken into consideration as a determining factor.

The types of events, meetings, locations and availability of venues to support the

VIP and the delegation are often times designated by the host countries.

Unique requirements for communications support are under severe time limitations and always a determining factor in the selection process as its’ capacity to be augmented to the unique requirements necessary to support certain

Principals.

Many of the arrangements for hotel and transportation are often not confirmed until just before the actual visit. In addition, to supporting a large delegation within a short time frame, last minute and frequent changes of itineraries for supporting personnel often result in significant changes in how Posts work with the vendors. With the exception of few trips, contracts are not permitted to be signed until the Department of State (Post) has written confirmation from all supporting agencies, which enables collection of funds from said agencies in the event of cancellation. This results in an unusual and compelling urgency in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 253 (c) (2), FAR 6.302-2

Only three contracts will be awarded.

These unique VIP travel requirements result in only a single or a very limited number of responsible sources with no other supplies or services capable of satisfying agency requirement in accordance with 41 U.S.C. 253 (c ) (2), Far

6.302-2.

5. A demonstration that the proposed contractor’s unique qualifications or the nature of the acquisition requires use of the authority cited.

Security and logistics are the Department of State’s primary considerations when procuring hotel rooms. The Department of State must be able to provide a safe and secure environment for VIP visitors. Frequently VIP visits are not announced or confirmed in sufficient time to conduct a competition, creating an urgent and compelling need. At other times, the security requirements and/or requirements of the host country government limit the acquisition to one or a small number of predetermined hotels.

[X] The VIP visit information was not available in sufficient time thereby creating an urgent and compelling need.

[ ] The host country government requires the use of this/these hotel(s).

[X] The proposed contractor has the following unique qualifications which meet the Department of State’s security and logistical requirements.

[X] Set-back (hotel is safe distance from the street)

[X] Location (able to secure building, travel route; distance to and from event)

[X] Size and number of rooms (able to house everyone in one hotel)

[X] Conference facilities (adequate space for meetings, press conferences)

[X] Communications (able to install equipment/lines, command center)

[X] Accommodating to security needs

6. A description of efforts made to ensure that offers are solicited from as many potential sources as is practicable.

Due to urgency and exception in FAR 25.401(a)(5) this solicitation cannot be posted but the JOFOC will be published in FedBizOpps.

The following other hotels were reviewed but were not adequate because of the following:

Taj Mansingh – insufficient size, insufficient set-back/security

Hyatt – insufficient size, insufficient set-back/security

Leela – insufficient size, insufficient set-back/security

Above mentioned hotels, however, were not capable of fulfilling our requirement at this time as they are not in a position to handle a delegation of over 150 rooms per night and could not adequately support our security requirements in a short period of time.

7. A determination by the Contracting Officer that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

The room night in the contract is $207 for single occupancy and $29 extra for double occupancy plus GST of 18% which is within the correct per diem rate for New Delhi

8. Any other facts supporting the use of other than full and open competition. None

9. A listing of sources, if any, that expressed, in writing, an interest in the acquisition.

None

10. A statement of the actions, if any, the agency may take to remove or overcome any barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition for the supplies or services required. None

CERTIFICATIONS

I certify that the information in this justification is accurate and contains complete data necessary to support the recommendation for other than full and open competition to the best of my knowledge and belief.

February 26, 2020 ______________________

Date: Phong Ngo, PTS Director

Presidential Travel Support

I certify that this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. Based on my assessment, I conclude that other than full and open competition is justified and the proposed price is fair and reasonable.

February 26, 2020 _____________________

Date: Park F. Wollam

Contracting Officer

As the Competition Advocate at post, I approve this justification:

February 26, 2020 _____________________

Date: John Klimowski

S/GSO

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .