JOFOC 74 GS09Q11DLD7004 R9 CA.pdf

JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Contract GS09Q11DLD7004

Region 9 CA

Applicable FAR Reference: 6.302-1 Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements.

1. IDENTIFICATION OF THE AGENCY AND THE CONTRACTING ACTIVITY

This justification supports the extension of General Services Administration (GSA)’s Region 9 California (CA) telecommunications contract with Manhattan Telecommunications Corporation (MetTel), GS09Q11DLD7004. The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is a user agency with active services on this contract requiring this extension beyond the current end date in order to complete transition to their newly awarded contracts, more specifically the following components of DHS: Customs and Border Protection (CBP), National Law Enforcement Coordination Center (NLECC), Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Transportation Security Agency (TSA), Federal Air Marshall’s Service (FAMS), Office of the Under Secretary for Management (USM), Office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A), and Office of Biometrics Management (OBIM)

The mission of DHS is noted below:

DHS is responsible for securing the nation's air, land, and sea borders to prevent illegal activity while facilitating lawful travel. The Department relies upon civilian network and internetwork service providers for vital communications services to support and carry out this mission. This mission is accomplished by many different operational and support components to achieve six overarching homeland security missions that make up DHS’s strategic plan which include:

Countering Terrorism and Homeland Security Threats; Securing U.S. Borders and Approaches;

Securing Cyberspace and Critical Infrastructure; Preserving and Upholding the Nation's Prosperity and Economic Security; Strengthening Preparedness and Resilience; and Championing the DHS Workforce and Strengthening the Department.

The contracting activity is the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) Information Technology Category (ITC), Office of Acquisition Operations, Interagency Contracts, 1800 F Street NW Washington, DC 20405. This document serves as a justification for other than full and open competition in accordance with FAR 6.302-1, “Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements”; justified and approved in accordance with FAR 6.303 and 6.304.

2. NATURE AND/OR DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION BEING APPROVED

The action being approved is to extend the GS09Q11DLD7004 contract and any active Task or Service Orders with MetTel for 18 months, from its current expiration date of November 30, 2024

DocuSign Envelope ID: 51B4EF2D-256C-4F42-9DAB-C7D878B1E58C through May 31, 2026. This extension is necessary so that the agency served by this contract will be able to conclude their transition to their competitively awarded Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) task orders (see Table 2, in Section 6). Additionally, this extension will align this contract’s expiration date with the expiration dates of GSA’s other legacy telecommunications contracts ending on May 31, 2026.

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED TO MEET THE

AGENCY’S NEEDS

The extension of the CA, GS09Q11DLD7004, is required to provide services for the agency in the charts below that receive telecommunications services provided by MetTel. Specifically, this is for the sole purpose of providing additional time for these agencies to complete their transition to their previously awarded task orders under the EIS contract. The contract extension is not intended to be used for the order of new services.

Contract Ceiling: $110,000,000.00 shared (no ceiling increase required)

Expenditure to Date: $1,186,309.91

Monthly Cost: $8,293.09

Duration: 18 months

Total Value of Extension: $149,275.62

LSA Region 9, CA Contract: GS09Q11DLD7004 Contractor: MetTel

Requiring Agency

Active Service Instance Records (SIRs) for Agency

Agency's Anticipated Date for 100% Disconnected

DHS 1,185 05/31/2026

Table 1: Service Transition Dates

4. IDENTIFICATION OF THE STATUTORY AUTHORITY PERMITTING OTHER THAN FULL

AND OPEN COMPETITION

The statutory exception to full and open competition is issued under 41 U.S.C. 3304(a)(1) as implemented by FAR 6.302-1, “Only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy agency requirements”.

5. DEMONSTRATION THAT THE PROPOSED CONTRACTOR’S UNIQUE

QUALIFICATIONS OR THE NATURE OF THE ACQUISITION REQUIRES USE OF

AUTHORITY CITED

5.a. MetTel is the only contractor that can provide these services to DHS for this particular timeframe. MetTel is currently the incumbent contractor for the agency listed above and is providing the listed services. DHS has awarded their Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) task orders in accordance with FAR part 16.505 and are well into their transition off of this MetTel contract and onto their EIS task orders. This extension is necessary to provide enough time for the physical transition of services to the EIS task orders. Other contractors provide the same type of service, however, it is not possible to transition the services to any other contractor faster than to the EIS contractor. Competing and awarding an additional contract or task order would create a transition inside of the transition to EIS and would seriously stall agency progress in fully transitioning from this contract to EIS. As such, MetTel is the only contractor source who can continue to serve as the incumbent provider to DHS while the agency completes the process of transitioning to their new contracts.

5.b. Specific Demonstration

5.b.1 EIS Task Order Awards As noted in section 1, DHS requires an extension of this contract and has already awarded EIS task orders using competitive procedures. DHS is transitioning from services provided on this contract to their competitively awarded EIS task orders.

Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Task Orders, specifically the following components:

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) & National Law Enforcement Coordination Center

(NLECC)

- CBP Task Order 1 (TO1) #70B04C22F00000130 Lumen EIS Contract GS00Q17NSD3006, awarded on April 18, 2022 - Primary Internet Protocol Service (IPS) and other network-related services.

- CBP Task Order 2 (TO2) #70B04C22F00000131 Core Technologies EIS Contract GS00Q17NSD3003, awarded on May 30, 2022 - Secondary IPS and other network-related services.

- CBP Task Order 3 (TO3) #70B04C22F00000132 AT&T EIS Contract GS00Q17NSD3000, awarded on April 18, 2022 – Virtual Private Network Service (VPNS) and other network-related services including voice and conferencing services.

Federal Protective Service (FPS), Office of the Under Secretary for Management (USM), Office of Intelligence & Analysis (I&A), Office of Biometrics Management (OBIM), and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

- USM Task Order 1 #70RTAC21FR00000015 (USM TO 1), was competed and awarded to AT&T on EIS Contract GS00Q17NSD3000 for HQ Core Data TO for Data Services on January 6, 2021.

- USM Task Order 2 #70RTAC22FR0000115 (USM TO 2), was competed and awarded to Core Technologies on EIS Contract GS00Q17NSD3003 for Toll-Free Services on September 22, 2022.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE)

- ICE Task Order 1 #70CTD021FR0000018 (ICE TO1) was competed and awarded to AT&T on EIS Contract GS00Q17NSD3000 for DHS HQ Core Data on January 6, 2021.

- ICE Task Order 2 #70CTD022FR0000092 (ICE TO2) also competed and awarded the DHS ICE Traditional Voice Requirements on Task Order to Granite Telecom on EIS Contract GS00Q17NSD3004 on August 1, 2022.

Transportation Security Agency (TSA) & Federal Air Marshall’s Service (FAMS)

- TSA Task Order #70T03022F7667N027 (TSA TO) was competed and awarded to AT&T on EIS Contract GS00Q17NSD3000 on August 1, 2022.

5.b.2 Impact of not extending, and forcing user agencies to recompete the services currently provided on the subject contract

The extension of this contract is to support active Service Instance Records (SIRs) for user agencies so that there is not a break in service as they transition to their new EIS task orders.Telecommunications service providers use SIRs to keep track of the services they are providing to their customers, to manage billing and invoicing, and to troubleshoot any issues that may arise with the service. A SIR typically includes information such as the customer's account number, the type of service (i.e, analog line, Primary Rate Interface, Centrex line) that has been provisioned, the date and time the service was activated, and any other relevant details that may be needed to manage the service instance.

For example, in the case of a phone service, the SIR might include information about the customer's phone number, the type of plan they are on, and any usage limits or restrictions that apply to their account. SIRs are often integrated with other systems and databases, such as billing systems and network management systems, to provide a comprehensive view of the customer's service experience.

As part of each agency’s transition process, each SIR must first be assessed for implementation of the new service. Most SIRs will then need on-site evaluation of the facilities, wiring, interfaces and configurations to determine the required changes. Where equipment is aging or incompatible, replacement devices need to be ordered (with delayed delivery times due to chip-shortages), installed, and reconfigured.

There are currently over 520,000 active SIRs remaining on all legacy contracts supporting DHS missions, including 1,185 SIRs on GS09Q11DLD7004.

The 1,185 active SIRs provided on this contract support telecommunications for the following DHS components and their ability to successfully perform their duties without disruption to their missions:

● CBP protects the American people, safeguards our borders, and enhances the nation's economic prosperity. Mission priorities include: countering terrorism;

combating transnational crime; securing the border; facilitating lawful trade and protecting revenue; and facilitating lawful travel.

● TSA & FAMS protect the nation's transportation systems to ensure freedom of movement for people and commerce.

● USCG is the nation's premiere maritime first responder, minimizing loss of life and property by searching for and rescuing persons in distress.

● USM is responsible for Department-wide administrative support services and oversight for all support functions, including: IT, budget and financial management, procurement and acquisition, human capital, security, and administrative services.

● I&A’s mission is to equip the Homeland Security Enterprise with the timely intelligence and information it needs to keep the homeland safe, secure, and resilient.

● OBIM provides biometric match, store, share, and analyze services to DHS and mission partners.

DHS has prepared task order solicitations that defined their requirements and then released those solicitations for fair opportunity in accordance with FAR 16.505. Proposals from EIS vendors were received and evaluated on the basis of cost and technical merit resulting in the award of new EIS task orders to transition all active SIRs off of the current contract. They are in the midst of transitioning to EIS. Additional time is required to complete these massive transition efforts. The fastest, most efficient and only feasible way to successfully transition to the competitively awarded EIS task orders is for the user agencies to be able to focus on the current transition and GSA extending this contract to allow transition completion. If GSA does not extend, and requires the user agencies to reprocure these services on a different contract, the only option the agencies would have is to award sole source contracts to the incumbent contractors because transitioning to another contractor is virtually impossible at this stage. This action would result in a transition within the original transition and would be a tremendous distraction from accomplishing the government's goal while wasting time, resources, and tax-payer money. DHS estimates that if GSA does not extend, reprocurement efforts (including creation of solicitation packages, through award and potential protest resolution) for their whole agency would add an additional 12-36 months to their current estimated date for completing transition (May 31, 2026).

To maintain these services, agencies would be required to engage immediately with the incumbent contractors currently providing these services to begin negotiating terms. Agencies would need to craft and obtain approval of justifications for other than full and open competition and begin sole source negotiations, including multiple acquisition packages, solicitations, negotiation of terms, and awards. The newly awarded interim solution contracts might allow for an administrative or back-office transition, which is a transition where the current provider is transitioning the same services from one contract to another to change contract and account numbers. While the administrative transition provided by the interim contract solution could afford agencies further runway to transition legacy services to the originally awarded EIS Task Orders, it would also represent a complete duplication of the transition effort. The agencies would be conducting a transition inside a transition, performing extensive administrative transition efforts, while conducting the larger transition to the already awarded EIS Task Orders.

Additionally, transitioning to an interim solution would not reduce the timeline to EIS, and in fact, would likely delay the transition of agencies to their competitively awarded EIS task orders.

Based on the factors above, having agencies award interim solution contracts to maintain services is duplicative, administratively burdensome, and cost prohibitive. As both Government and EIS Contractor resources are pulled away to support the interim solutions contract administrative transition, the main EIS transition will become secondary, and progress will stall, further increasing risk on the agency’s services and primary transition activities. This would be a tremendously inefficient and wasteful exercise.

5.b.3 User Agency Justification Factors

This additional time is needed for many different reasons. DHS identified several different justification factors that contributed to delays in transition from GS09Q11DLD7004. DHS cited supply chain disruptions, complexities related to modernizing services, delays related to Protest(s) and delayed award of EIS task orders as contributing factors to delays in transition from contract GS09Q11DLD7004. Additionally, over a year-and-a-half was spent collecting EIS requirements across DHS in an effort to implement a department-wide solicitation. After months of additional discussion, this strategy was modified so that components were to conduct individual EIS Solicitations. In late March 2020, the DHS components began developing their own EIS Strategy.

The COVID-19 pandemic presented barriers to transition for DHS that could not have been planned for or avoided. The effects of the pandemic continue to cause disruptions to the supply chain and were a major factor for several DHS components. Prior to COVID-19, telecommunication and network services could be provisioned by contractors faster than post-COVID orders. For instance, a 50 MB Internet Protocol Solution (IPS) in the Continental U.S. (CONUS) could be delivered in as little as 39 calendar days or as long as 550 days. The average was approximately 169 calendar days. The global chip shortage resulted in delays in the delivery of Cisco 8000 series routers taking up to 12 months in some instances.

Service-Related Equipment (SRE) or Service Enabled Devices (SED) impacted by chip, chassis, or other equipment delays entail 6–12-months of additional time. Delivery of a complete 50 MB solution is now taking 319 calendar days, on average.

Transforming to a modernized service while transitioning presents an additional set of challenges for the agencies and for the EIS contractors. This means that the agency is not simply reprocuring the services they previously purchased. Instead the service is converted during the transition, such as to replace a legacy service with a newer technology, improved functionality, or expanded reach. Technical complexities due to modernizing include the transitioning of traditional broadband services into a modernized solution.

An example of complexities related to modernizing: In one instance a DHS component is modernizing and transforming via the EIS transition. The DHS component is faced with modernizing a nationwide mission critical network system with a traditional hub-spoke topology, essentially a central component that’s connected to multiple networks. Due to the unique multicast requirement, the current network design is not compatible with the component's primary operational network which uses a multipoint technology to form a full mesh network. As a result, a complex configuration of static routing ensures end-to-end communications. When the component transitions a Sector Command Center, all static tunnels need to be reconfigured.

In some cases, upwards of 80+ static tunnels need reconfiguration. It is imperative that during transition efforts, the nationwide system is not degraded to avoid risk of “loss of life.”

There were several protests that affected the award of key EIS task orders in the transition of service from this contract. There were two primary protests and five supplemental protests of the TSA TO resulting in a 4-month delay. And finally the post-award protests of USM TO 1 resulted in a 212 day delay that affected USM, CISA, ICE, OBIM and FPS.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic delays, supply chain disruptions, complexities related to modernizing services, delays related to Protest(s) and delayed award of EIS task orders, DHS requires additional time to minimize impacts to operations for the transition of services. For these reasons, current services from MetTel must be retained longer to avoid interruption of DHS’ mission execution.

6. DESCRIPTION OF EFFORTS MADE TO ENSURE THAT OFFERS ARE SOLICITED FROM

AS MANY SOURCES AS PRACTICABLE INCLUDING WHETHER A NOTICE WAS OR WILL

BE PUBLICIZED AS REQUIRED BY SUBPART 5.2 AND, IF NOT, WHICH EXCEPTION

UNDER 5.202 APPLIES.

This contract was competed in accordance with FAR Part 15 and resulted in seven (7) multiple award IDIQ contracts. It was synopsized in accordance with FAR Part 5.2 at that time.

Additionally, the follow-on vehicle to provide the services under this IDIQ contract is EIS.

Transition planning dictates that all agencies using Networx, WITS 3, and Local Telecommunications contracts will transition to EIS contracts or another vehicle. EIS was also synopsized in accordance with FAR Part 5.2 and awards were conducted with full and open competition in accordance with FAR Part 15 and resulted in nine EIS IDIQ Contracts. MetTel is one of the EIS contract holders. Table 2 below provides the dates when the agency components awarded their EIS task order(s) and to whom:

Agency EIS Task Order Award Date EIS Contractor

DHS - CBP TO1 04/18/2022 Lumen

DHS - CBP TO2 05/30/2022 Core Technologies

DHS - CBP TO3 04/18/2022 AT&T

DHS - FPS, ICE, USM, I&A, &

OBIM via USM TO1

01/06/2021 AT&T

DHS - CISA, ICE, FPS, USM,

I&A, & OBIM via USM TO2

09/22/2022 AT&T

DHS - ICE TO1 01/06/2021 AT&T

DHS - ICE TO2 08/01/2022 Granite

DHS - TSA TO 08/01/2022 AT&T

Table 2: EIS Task Order Award Dates

7. DETERMINATION BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER THAT THE ANTICIPATED COST TO

THE GOVERNMENT WILL BE FAIR AND REASONABLE

The anticipated cost of this 18 month extension is approximately $149,275.62 based on the current total monthly invoicing on this contract. As DHS continues to progress in transitioning to EIS this number decreases. GSA does not anticipate any significant increase in modern telecommunications CLIN prices for this extension. Our analysis indicates that commercial prices for modern telecommunications services have been consistently falling, making it unlikely that contractors will be able to justify any pricing increases for many services. Although some older technology services are becoming more expensive, unless a contractor primarily offers these older services, the net effect of these price increases is likely to be offset by the pricing on more modern services. In previous extensions, while there were some price increases, when taken on average, across the contracts, total pricing fell.

Every year GSA updates its commercial telecommunications pricing database using numerous sources. Each month this database is used to calculate the savings recognized by agencies using our telecommunications contracts by comparing prices paid to these commercial prices.

We recently updated the commercial price database for FY23. For comparison purposes only, we ran the fourth quarter FY22 savings using both the FY22 and FY23 commercial prices.

Because FY23 commercial prices had fallen across the board, the overall Q4FY22 savings percentage fell by several percentage points when using the new FY23 commercial prices.

While there are some commercial prices that have increased, these services do not constitute a significant enough portion of the services purchased from GSA to counteract the price decreases on other services.

8. DESCRIPTION OF MARKET RESEARCH CONDUCTED AND THE RESULTS (see part

10) OR A STATEMENT OF THE REASON MARKET RESEARCH WAS NOT CONDUCTED.

GSA conducts market research for network and telecommunication services on a regular basis throughout the year. The research includes assessing contractors' business practices and pricing strategies across the industry. GSA leverages the business intelligence gathered to inform business decisions related to contract establishment and administration as part of its normal business practices. The market research and business intelligence which included customer agency input, industry expertise, and professional publications were leveraged for this effort in order for GSA to make informed decisions about extending the reference contract.

9. OTHER FACTS SUPPORTING THE USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN

COMPETITION, such as: When 6.302-1 is cited for follow-on acquisitions as described in 6.302-1(a)(2)(ii), an estimate of the cost to the Government that would be duplicated and how the estimate was derived.

GSA has been working across the Federal community to assist agencies in transitioning into the competitively awarded EIS program. Transition is a long, complex process spanning multiple years. While a number of agencies have or will complete their transitions on time, several require more time. The purpose of this sole source award is to provide such agencies with additional time to complete transition to their already competitively awarded follow-on task orders under EIS. GSA is continuing to work with these agencies and has asked OMB to provide assistance in ensuring greater progress with transition. GSA remains committed to ensuring all Federal agencies transition from the Networx and LSA contracts to EIS.

It would be a duplication of cost and effort to compete a contract to support these agencies requirements when the new contracts have already been competed and awarded (EIS). Not only have the EIS contracts been awarded, but as described in Section 5 above DHS has already awarded EIS task orders using competitive procedures and is in the midst of transitioning from services provided on this contract to their competitively awarded EIS task orders. The purpose of this extension is to allow for that transition to continue and be completed. Additionally, it is not feasible - nor possible for a different contractor to compete for, be awarded and transition the specific services currently utilized by agencies. Such an effort would require each of these agencies to devote the personnel and resources currently working on transition to the EIS task orders to interrupt that transition progress and switch to working on the same effort to award and then transition the existing services to a bridge contract. These same personnel and resources would then have to be immediately switched to implement a completely duplicative transition from the bridge contract to the EIS task orders. Agencies’ schedules for transitioning inventory from this contract to EIS task orders will not allow another transition from a bridge contract. It is difficult to estimate the exact duplication of cost to the agencies. However, forcing agencies to transition to another contract before transitioning to EIS (a transition within a transition) would require the agencies to go through a wasteful and redundant exercise of re-competing the agency requirements covered by the EIS task orders listed in section 6, table 2 of this document.

Furthermore, if GSA does not extend this contract, and requires the user agencies to reprocure these services on a different contract, most agencies would be forced to attempt to award sole source contracts to the incumbent contractors because transitioning to another contractor is virtually impossible at this stage.

Importantly, user agencies would not only need to sole source for the SIRS on this contract, but for all of the SIRS that still require transition to their EIS task orders (Section 5.b.2). As noted above, user agency SIRs are spread across many existing contracts, not just the contract associated with this JOFOC. So in addition to having to sole source their requirements on this contract, DHS would have to award approximately sixty-four (64) additional sole source contracts to avoid a break in these critical services. Thus, the alternative to extending the contract based on this JOFOC would not result in cost savings to the Government, because user agencies would have to award multiple sole source contracts to incumbent providers resulting in no cost savings. There is no reasonable likelihood that agencies would compete their requirements again (after competing and awarding EIS task orders).

In addition to the cost of agency contracting personnel and subject matter experts to award new task orders, GSA estimates that DHS will incur costs of at least $4,882,475.16. This amount is derived from a cost analysis of GSA’s Transition Ordering Assistance (TOA) contract which provided transition order assistance to agencies (FY17 through FY21). It is fair to estimate that additional costs of transition within a transition would be millions of dollars for each agency.

As mentioned above, the purpose of this extension is not intended to be used for agencies to order new services. All agencies are required to sign a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with GSA in order to remain on the Networks Authorized User List (NAUL) and to use the Networx, Washington Interagency Telecommunications System 3 (WITS 3), and LSA contracts through 31 May 2026. In accordance with the MOU, during this period, “... the Agency will not order any new services or changes and relocation of existing services on any of the expiring Networx, WITS 3, and Local Service telecom contracts. The only orders the Agency may submit are those to disconnect service. In the event of exigencies that may require the Agency to order service on the expiring contracts, there are six scenarios under which the Agency may request GSA waive the prohibition:

1. Disaster relief activities;

2. Activities necessary by law, the Constitution, for safety of human life, or for protection of property;

3. Law enforcement operations;

4. Protective functions of the U.S. Secret Service;

5. Counter-terrorism or intelligence-gathering or -dissemination capabilities;

6. Matters related to diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility."

10. A LISTING OF SOURCES, IF ANY, THAT EXPRESSED, IN WRITING, AN INTEREST IN

THE ACQUISITION

There is no list of sources that have expressed interest in this sole source requirement. All interested parties participated in the competition of the EIS contracts by submitting a proposal and nine of them have EIS contracts to continue this work. This extension provides agencies with additional time to complete their transition from this contract to the EIS contracts.

11. A STATEMENT OF ACTIONS, IF ANY, THE AGENCY MAY TAKE TO REMOVE OR

OVERCOME ANY BARRIERS TO COMPETITION BEFORE ANY SUBSEQUENT

ACQUISITION FOR THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED

The EIS multiple award IDIQ contracts are the follow-on contracts to provide the services currently provided under this contract. GSA conducted a FAR Part 15 full and open competition to award the EIS IDIQ contracts to replace all its legacy telecommunications contracts, inclusive of GS09Q11DLD7004. On July 31, 2017, GSA awarded the Enterprise Infrastructure Solutions (EIS) contract to nine (9) contractors (there were initially ten (10) contractor awardees that were reduced to 9 due to a merger). MetTel was awarded an EIS contract. The agency components listed in Table 1 under Section 3 have all awarded or are in the process of awarding their EIS task orders to replace those services listed. All EIS task orders are subject to FAR Part 16.505 fair opportunity procedures. This extension is required to provide user agencies the extra time required for them to transition those services off of this contract to their EIS task order or soon to be awarded task order.

Customer agencies are responsible for their transition from the legacy contracts to EIS and are in various stages of completing transition. GSA has provided significant assistance to agencies in the years since the award of EIS to aid in each phase of the transition. Agencies planning on using the Networx, WITS 3, and LSA contracts extension periods are required to sign a MOU with GSA acknowledging that during the additional time period, agencies will have responsibility to transition all remaining services to EIS or another acquisition solution or implement a contingency plan by May 31, 2026.

GSA has had limited information and visibility into agencies’ transition progress in the past. The MOU for agencies using extensions from June 1, 2024 through May 31, 2026 requires increased transparency and monitoring on agency transition status. Increased visibility will encourage agencies to transition faster and allow agencies to recognize earlier that contingency plans must be implemented by the customer agency to avoid disconnects after May 31, 2026.

GSA is not a mandatory source for the telecom services and agencies have the option to choose the procurement vehicle that best suits their needs. GSA does not have the authority to hold agencies accountable to meet the agencies’ transition plan deadlines, however, GSA has no intention of considering further extension of this contract. Any further sole source procurement needs will be executed by customer agencies’ Contracting Officers if needed.

Lastly, to minimize or eliminate the need for non competitive extensions in the future, GSA will apply transition lessons learned to all EIS follow on procurement activities.

12. CERTIFICATIONS AND APPROVALS

TECHNICAL PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION:

I certify that the supporting data for this Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition, was the responsibility of technical or requirements personnel (e.g., verifying the Government’s minimum needs or schedule requirements or other rationale for other than full and open competition). The supporting data provided and which form a basis for the justification have been certified as complete and accurate by the technical or requirements personnel.

___________________________ Date: _______________________ Will Moore GSA Technical Representative

CONTRACTING OFFICER CERTIFICATION AND APPROVAL:

I certify that this Justification for Other than Full and Open Competition, in accordance with FAR 6.302-1, is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief.

___________________________ Date: _______________________ Nancy Gaskins GSA Contracting Officer

DocuSign Envelope ID: 51B4EF2D-256C-4F42-9DAB-C7D878B1E58C

1/22/2024

1/24/2024