Jacksonville Geotech report.pdf
PDF 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- JACKSONVILLE INTERNATIONAL TRAP BUNKER & FIELD
- Solicitation number
- ITB-06775
- Issued by
- Duval County, Florida
About this file
This document is a geotechnical engineering report prepared by ECS Florida, LLC for the Jacksonville Clay Target Sports facility located at 12125 New Berlin Road in Jacksonville, Florida. The report presents the results of subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and geotechnical engineering analyses conducted to support the design of new target installations at the facility, which will be installed to a depth of 10 feet below the existing ground surface. The borings encountered groundwater at depths ranging from 7.5 to 8.3 feet below the existing ground surface. The report includes a characterization of the subsurface soil conditions, groundwater observations, and visual classifications of the soil samples.
The report does not contain any information related to a state or local contract opportunity. It appears to be a technical document providing geotechnical details to support construction activities at the Jacksonville Clay Target Sports facility.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| FWC 22.23-126C ITB-Final.pdf | ||
| Addendum 2 Revised Plans.pdf | ||
| Addendum 1 Q&A.pdf | ||
| FWC 22.23-126C Terms and Conditions Final.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ECS Florida, LLC Geotechnical Engineering Report
Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
12125 New Berlin Road Jacksonville, Florida
ECS Project Number 35:33687
November 29, 2022
11554 Davis Creek Court, Jacksonville, FL 32256 • T: 904-880-0960 • F: 904-880-0970 • ecslimited.com
ECS Capitol Services, PLLC • ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid-Atlantic, LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Southeast, LLP • ECS Southwest, LLP
November 29, 2022
Mr. Bobby Turner
Jacksonville, Florida 32226
ECS Project No. 35:33687
Reference: Geotechnical Engineering Report
Jacksonville, Florida 32226
Dear Mr. Turner:
ECS Florida, LLC. (ECS) has completed the subsurface exploration, laboratory testing, and geotechnical engineering analyses for the above-referenced project. Our services were performed in general accordance with our agreed to scope of work. This report presents our understanding of the geotechnical aspects of the project along with the results of the field exploration and laboratory testing conducted, and our design and construction recommendations.
It has been our pleasure to be of service to Jacksonville Clay Target Sports during the design phase of this project. We would appreciate the opportunity to remain involved during the continuation of the design phase, and we would like to provide our services during construction phase operations as well to verify the assumptions of subsurface conditions made for this report. Should you have any questions concerning the information contained in this report, or if we can be of further assistance to you, please contact us.
Respectfully submitted, ECS Florida, LLC.
Nathan D. Hildreth, E.I. Chris M. Egan, P.E.
Geotechnical Staff Project Manager Associate Principal Engineer NHildreth@ecslimited.com Registered, Florida No. 79645 CEgan@ecslimited.com mailto:NHildreth@ecslimited.com mailto:princeng@ecslimited.com
Jacksonville Clay Target Sports November 29, 2022 ECS Project No. 35:33687 Page i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
2.1 Project Location/Current Site Use
2.2 Proposed Construction
3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
3.1 Subsurface Characterization
3.2 Groundwater Observations
3.2.1 Encountered Groundwater
3.2.2 Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater
3.3 Visual Classification
4.0 CLOSING
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Drawings & Reports
• Figure 1 - Site Location Diagram
• Figure 2 - Field Exploration Diagram
• Figure 3 - Generalized Subsurface Profiles
Appendix B – Field Operations
• Reference Notes for Boring Logs
• Subsurface Exploration Procedure: Standard Penetration Testing (SPT)
• Boring Logs
ECS Project No. 35:33687 Page 1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This Executive Summary is intended as a very brief overview of the primary geotechnical conditions that are expected to affect design and construction. Information gleaned from the Executive Summary should not be utilized in lieu of reading the entire geotechnical report.
• The borings encountered groundwater at depths varying from 7.5 feet to 8.3 feet below the existing ground surface at the time of our exploration.
ECS Project No. 35:33687 Page 2
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this study was to provide geotechnical information for the design of the proposed new targets. The project will include several new targets installed to a depth of 10 feet below the existing ground surface. The recommendations developed for this report are based on project information supplied by you.
Our services were provided in accordance with our Proposal No. 35:19968-GP, dated November 7, 2022, as authorized by Mr. Bobby Turner on November 8, 2022, which includes our Terms and Conditions of Service.
This report contains the procedures and results of our subsurface exploration and laboratory testing programs and review of existing site conditions.
The report includes the following items:
• A brief review and description of our field and laboratory test procedures and the results of testing conducted.
• A review of surface topographical features and site conditions.
• A review of subsurface soil stratigraphy with pertinent available physical properties.
• Final copies of our soil boring logs.
2.0 PROJECT INFORMATION
2.1 PROJECT LOCATION/CURRENT SITE USE
The project site is located near the skeet range at 12125 New Berlin Road in Jacksonville, Florida 32226.
The site is located within the grassy field northeast of the skeet range at Jacksonville Clay Target Sports.
The general site location is shown on Figure 1 in Appendix A and Figure 2.1.1 following.
ECS Project No. 35:33687 Page 3
Figure 2.1.1. Site Location
At the time of our exploration, the site was developed as a skeet range, with surface cover consisting of grass. A site survey was not available to our office at the time of this report preparation. However, based on publicly available information, we understand that the site generally slopes downward to the northeast. Surface water was not observed near planned structural areas at the time of our exploration.
2.2 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION
We understand that new targets will be added near the skeet range. We understand the targets will be installed to a depth of 10 feet below the existing ground surface. If actual project information varies from these conditions, then the recommendations in this report may need to be re-evaluated. We should be contacted if any of the above project information is incorrect so that we may reevaluate our recommendations.
3.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
Our exploration procedures are explained in greater detail in Appendix B including the insert titled Subsurface Exploration Procedures. Our scope of work included drilling four Standard Penetration Test (SPT) borings. Our borings were located with a handheld GPS unit and their approximate locations are shown on the Field Exploration Diagram (Figure 2) in Appendix A.
3.1 SUBSURFACE CHARACTERIZATION
The subsurface conditions encountered were generally consistent with published geological mapping.
The following sections provide generalized characterizations of the soil strata. Please refer to the boring logs in Appendix B.
ECS Project No. 35:33687 Page 4
Typical Depth (ft) Stratum Description
From To
Existing Ground Surface
0.5 -1 n/a Topsoil
0.5 - 1 8 I Very Loose Fine SAND (SP) and Fine SAND With Silt (SP-SM), Moist
8 15 II
Loose to Medium Dense Fine SAND (SP), Fine SAND With Silt (SP-SM), Silty Fine SAND (SM), and Clayey Fine SAND (SC), Moist to Wet
A graphical presentation of the subsurface conditions is shown on the Generalized Subsurface Profiles included in Appendix A.
3.2 GROUNDWATER OBSERVATIONS
3.2.1 Encountered Groundwater
Water levels were measured during our field exploration and are presented in our boring logs in Appendix B. Groundwater depths measured at the time of drilling ranged from 7.5 feet to 8.3 feet below the ground surface. Variations in the long-term water table may occur as a result of changes in precipitation, evaporation, surface water runoff, construction activities, and other factors.
3.2.2 Estimated Seasonal High Groundwater
The normal seasonal high groundwater level is affected by a number of factors. The drainage characteristics of the soils, land surface elevation, relief points such as drainage ditches, lakes, rivers, swamp areas, etc., and distance to relief points are some of the more important factors influencing the seasonal high groundwater level.
Based on our interpretation of the site conditions, including the boring logs and Web Soil Survey, we estimate the normal seasonal high groundwater level at the boring locations to be approximately at the depths shown on the Generalized Subsurface Profiles. It is possible that groundwater levels may exceed the estimated normal seasonal high groundwater level as a result of significant or prolonged rains.
3.3 VISUAL CLASSIFICATION
Each sample was visually classified on the basis of texture and plasticity in accordance with ASTM D2488 Standard Practice for Description and Identification of Soils (Visual-Manual Procedures) and including USCS classification symbols, and ASTM D2487 Standard Practice for Classification for Engineering Purposes (Unified Soil Classification System (USCS)). After classification, the samples were grouped in the major zones noted on the boring logs in Appendix B. The group symbols for each soil type are indicated in parentheses along with the soil descriptions. The stratification lines between strata on the logs are approximate; in situ, the transitions may be gradual.
ECS Project No. 35:33687 Page 5
4.0 CLOSING
Our geotechnical exploration has been performed and our findings presented in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical engineering principles and practices. ECS is not responsible for any independent conclusions, interpretation, opinions, or recommendations made by others based on the data contained in this report.
Our scope of services was intended to evaluate the existing soil conditions. Our scope of services does not address geologic conditions, such as sinkholes or soil conditions existing below the depth of the soil borings.
ECS is not responsible for the conclusions, opinions, or recommendations of others based on the data in this report.
APPENDIX A – Diagrams & Reports
Figure 1 - Site Location Diagram Figure 2 - Field Exploration Diagram Figure 3 - Generalized Subsurface Profiles
Figure 1
Jacksonville, Florida Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
Site Location Diagram
Project No.: 35-33687Date: 11/29/22
Site LocationSite Location Approximate
JA
S
- 3 5-
Geotechnical Construction Materials Environmental Facilities
T: (904) 880-0960 F: (904) 880-0970 11554 Davis Creek Court, Jacksonville, FL 32256
TM
www.ecslimited.com
ECS Florida, LLC
Graphical Scale
~200'0' ~400'
Jacksonville, Florida Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
Field Exploration Diagram
Project No.: 35-33687 Figure 2Date: 11/29/22
Approximate Location of Standard Penetration Test (SPT) Boring
LEGEND
JA
S
- 3 5-
Geotechnical Construction Materials Environmental Facilities
T: (904) 880-0960 F: (904) 880-0970 11554 Davis Creek Court, Jacksonville, FL 32256
TM
www.ecslimited.com
ECS Florida, LLC
B1 B2
B3
B4
N
1/12" One Blow to Drive Split Spoon Sample Twelve Inches
BT Boring Terminated at Depth Below Grade
SP Unified Soil Classification System
Groundwater Level at Time of Drilling
Fine SAND (SP) Fine SAND With Silt (SP-SM)
Silty Fine SAND (SM) Clayey Fine SAND (SC)
Estimated Normal Seasonal High Groundwater Level
N Standard Penetration Resistance, Blows/Foot
LEGEND
D E
P T
H , F
E E
T
PROJ. NO.: 35-33687 Figure 3
Jacksonville Clay Target Sports Jacksonville, Florida
D E
P T
H
F E
E T
DATE: 11/29/22
Boring No.
Generalized Subsurface Profiles
B1
BT @ 15.0'
N B2
BT @ 15.0'
N B3
BT @ 15.0'
N B4
BT @ 15.0'
11/23/2022 11/23/2022
11/23/2022 11/23/2022
VERY LOOSE Brown to Light Brown Fine SAND With Silt (SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine
SAND (SP)
VERY LOOSE Gray Brown Silty Fine
SAND (SM)
LOOSE Light Gray Fine SAND (SP)
MEDIUM DENSE Gray Fine SAND With Clay Layer (SP)
1/12"
VERY LOOSE Gray Brown to Light Brown Fine SAND With Silt (SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine
SAND (SP)
VERY LOOSE Brown Fine SAND With Silt (SP-SM)
LOOSE Gray Silty Fine SAND (SM)
LOOSE Brown Clayey Fine SAND
(SC)
VERY LOOSE Light Gray Brown to Light Brown Fine SAND With Silt
(SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE to MEDIUM DENSE Brown to Light Brown Fine SAND
(SP)
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine SAND With Silt (SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE to MEDIUM DENSE Brown and Dark Brown to Gray Brown and Light Brown Fine SAND (SP)
APPENDIX B – Field Operations
Reference Notes for Boring Logs Subsurface Exploration Procedure: Standard Penetration Testing (SPT) Boring Logs
REFERENCE NOTES FOR BORING LOGS
MATERIAL1,2
1Classifications and symbols per ASTM D 2488-17 (Visual-Manual Procedure) unless noted otherwise.
2To be consistent with general practice, “POORLY GRADED” has been removed from GP, GP-GM, GP-GC, SP, SP-SM, SP-SC soil types on the boring logs.
3Non-ASTM designations are included in soil descriptions and symbols along with ASTM symbol [Ex: (SM-FILL)].
4Typically estimated via pocket penetrometer or Torvane shear test and expressed in tons per square foot (tsf).
5Standard Penetration Test (SPT) refers to the number of hammer blows (blow count) of a 140 lb. hammer falling 30 inches on a 2 inch OD split spoon sampler required to drive the sampler 12 inches (ASTM D 1586). “N-value” is another term for “blow count” and is expressed in blows per foot (bpf). SPT correlations per 7.4.2 Method B and need to be corrected if using an auto hammer.
6The water levels are those levels actually measured in the borehole at the times indicated by the symbol. The measurements are relatively reliable when augering, without adding fluids, in granular soils. In clay and cohesive silts, the determination of water levels may require several days for the water level to stabilize. In such cases, additional methods of measurement are generally employed.
7Minor deviation from ASTM D 2488-17 Note 14.
8Percentages are estimated to the nearest 5% per ASTM D 2488-17.
Reference Notes for Boring Logs (09-02-2021).doc © 2021 ECS Corporate Services, LLC. All Rights Reserved
COHESIVE SILTS & CLAYS
UNCONFINED
COMPRESSIVE
STRENGTH, QP4
<0.25
0.25 - <0.50
0.50 - <1.00
1.00 - <2.00
2.00 - <4.00
4.00 - 8.00
>8.00
SPT5
(BPF)
CONSISTENCY7
(COHESIVE)
GRAVELS, SANDS & NON-COHESIVE SILTS
SPT5
DENSITY
<5 5 - 10
11 - 30 31 - 50
>50
Very Loose Loose
Medium Dense Dense
Very Dense
WATER LEVELS6
RELATIVE
AMOUNT7
Trace
With
Adjective (ex: “Silty”)
COARSE
GRAINED
(%)8
<5
FINE
GRAINED
(%)8
<5
DRILLING SAMPLING SYMBOLS & ABBREVIATIONS
PARTICLE SIZE IDENTIFICATION
DESIGNATION PARTICLE SIZES
Hollow Stem Auger Power Auger (no sample) Bulk Sample of Cuttings Wash Sample Shelby Tube Sampler Split Spoon Sampler
Rock Quality Designation % Rock Sample Recovery % Rock Core, NX, BX, AX Rock Bit Drilling Pressuremeter TestSS
ST
WS
BS
PA
HSA
RQD
PM
RD
RC
REC
Boulders Cobbles
Gravel:
Sand:
Silt & Clay (“Fines”) Fine Medium
Coarse Fine Coarse
0.074 mm to 0.425 mm (No. 200 to No. 40 sieve) <0.074 mm (smaller than a No. 200 sieve)
0.425 mm to 2.00 mm (No. 40 to No. 10 sieve)
2.00 mm to 4.75 mm (No. 10 to No. 4 sieve)
4.75 mm to 19 mm (No. 4 sieve to ¾ inch) ¾ inch to 3 inches (19 mm to 75 mm) 3 inches to 12 inches (75 mm to 300 mm) 12 inches (300 mm) or larger
>50 31 - 50 16 - 30
9 - 15 5 - 8 2 - 4 <2
Very Hard Hard
Very Stiff
Stiff Firm Soft
Very Soft
ASPHALT
CONCRETE
GRAVEL
TOPSOIL
VOID
BRICK
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
GW
GP
GM
GC
SW
SP
SM
SC
ML
MH
CL
CH
OL
OH
PT
WELL-GRADED GRAVEL
gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines
POORLY-GRADED GRAVEL
gravel-sand mixtures, little or no fines
SILTY GRAVEL
gravel-sand-silt mixtures
CLAYEY GRAVEL
gravel-sand-clay mixtures
WELL-GRADED SAND
gravelly sand, little or no fines
POORLY-GRADED SAND
gravelly sand, little or no fines
SILTY SAND
sand-silt mixtures
CLAYEY SAND
sand-clay mixtures
SILT
non-plastic to medium plasticity
ELASTIC SILT
high plasticity
LEAN CLAY
low to medium plasticity
FAT CLAY
high plasticity
ORGANIC SILT or CLAY non-plastic to low plasticity
ORGANIC SILT or CLAY high plasticity
PEAT
highly organic soils
WL (First Encountered)
WL (Completion)
WL (Seasonal High Water)
WL (Stabilized)
FILL POSSIBLE FILL PROBABLE FILL ROCK
FILL AND ROCK
25 - 45
10 - 20
30 - 45
10 - 25
SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION PROCEDURE:
STANDARD PENETRATION TESTING (SPT)
ASTM D 1586
Split-Barrel Sampling
Standard Penetration Testing, or SPT, is the most frequently used subsurface exploration test performed worldwide. This test provides samples for identification purposes, as well as a measure of penetration resistance, or N-value. The N-Value, or blow counts, when corrected and correlated, can approximate engineering properties of soils used for geotechnical design and engineering purposes.
• Involves driving a hollow tube (split-spoon) into the ground by dropping a 140-lb hammer a height of 30-inches at desired depth
• Recording the number of hammer blows re-quired to drive split-spoon a distance of 12 inches (in 3 or 4 Increments of 6 inches each)
• Auger is advanced* and an additional SPT is performed
• One SPT typically performed for every two to five feet
• Obtain 1.5-inch diameter soil sample
*Drilling Methods May Vary— The predominant drilling methods used for SPT are open hole fluid rotary drilling and hollow-stem auger drilling.
SPT Procedure:
1/12"
VERY LOOSE Brown Fine SAND With Silt (SP-
SM)
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine SAND With Silt
(SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine SAND (SP)
VERY LOOSE Gray Brown Silty Fine SAND (SM)
LOOSE Light Gray Fine SAND (SP)
MEDIUM DENSE Gray Fine SAND With Clay Layer (SP)
Boring Terminated @ 15 ft.
1/12"
1/12"
See Field Exploration Plan
Time: Drilling
Unconfined Compression
Length of Casing:
S A
M P
L E
T Y
P E
Driller: S. BurnsDrill Rig: 111G
DESCRIPTION
L
IQ
U
ID
L
IM
IT
N V al u e
M O
IS
T
U R
E C
O N
T E
N T
Remarks
Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
P E
R C
E N
T O
R G
A N
IC
M
A T
E R
IA
L
Groundwater Depth: 7.5 ft
0 1 20 10 20 30 40
P E
R C
E N
T P
A S
S
IN
G N
O . 2
S
IE
V
E
D E
P T
H , F
E E
T
Casing Size:
Boring Begun: 11/23/22Date: 11/23/22
Triaxial Compression
Project: Client: Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
S A
M P
L E
N O
LOG OF BORING
Project No.: 35-33687
Pocket Penetrometer Disturbed Sample
Torvane
Sheet 1
P
A
S T
IC
L
IM
IT
Pocket Penetrometer Undisturbed Sample
SHEAR STRENGTH
(ksf)
Drill Rod: AWJHammer Type: Auto
Boring Completed: 11/23/22
Boring No.: B1
Boring Location:
B L
O W
S P
E R
IN
of 1
VERY LOOSE Gray Brown Fine SAND With Silt
(SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine SAND With Silt
(SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine SAND (SP)
VERY LOOSE Brown Fine SAND With Silt (SP-
SM)
LOOSE Gray Silty Fine SAND (SM)
LOOSE Brown Clayey Fine SAND (SC)
Boring Terminated @ 15 ft.
1/12"
See Field Exploration Plan
Time: Drilling
Unconfined Compression
Length of Casing:
S A
M P
L E
T Y
P E
U
ID
L
IM
IT
N V al u e
M O
IS
T
U R
E C
O N
T E
N T
Remarks
Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
P E
R C
E N
T O
R G
A N
IC
M
A T
E R
IA
L
Groundwater Depth: 7.8 ft
0 1 20 10 20 30 40
P E
R C
E N
T P
A S
S
IN
G N
O . 2
S
IE
V
E
D E
P T
H , F
E E
T
Casing Size:
Boring Begun: 11/23/22Date: 11/23/22
Triaxial Compression
Project: Client: Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
S A
M P
L E
N O
LOG OF BORING
Project No.: 35-33687
Pocket Penetrometer Disturbed Sample
A
S T
IC
L
IM
IT
Pocket Penetrometer Undisturbed Sample
SHEAR STRENGTH
(ksf)
Drill Rod: AWJHammer Type: Auto
Boring Completed: 11/23/22
Boring No.: B2
Boring Location:
B L
O W
S P
E R
IN
of 1
VERY LOOSE Light Gray Brown Fine SAND With Silt (SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine SAND With Silt
(SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE to LOOSE Brown Fine SAND (SP)
MEDIUM DENSE Light Brown Fine SAND (SP)
Boring Terminated @ 15 ft.
See Field Exploration Plan
Time: Drilling
Unconfined Compression
Length of Casing:
S A
M P
L E
T Y
P E
U
ID
L
IM
IT
N V al u e
M O
IS
T
U R
E C
O N
T E
N T
Remarks
Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
P E
R C
E N
T O
R G
A N
IC
M
A T
E R
IA
L
Groundwater Depth: 8.3 ft
0 1 20 10 20 30 40
P E
R C
E N
T P
A S
S
IN
G N
O . 2
S
IE
V
E
D E
P T
H , F
E E
T
Casing Size:
Boring Begun: 11/23/22Date: 11/23/22
Triaxial Compression
Project: Client: Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
S A
M P
L E
N O
LOG OF BORING
Project No.: 35-33687
Pocket Penetrometer Disturbed Sample
A
S T
IC
L
IM
IT
Pocket Penetrometer Undisturbed Sample
SHEAR STRENGTH
(ksf)
Drill Rod: AWJHammer Type: Auto
Boring Completed: 11/23/22
Boring No.: B3
Boring Location:
B L
O W
S P
E R
IN
of 1
VERY LOOSE Light Brown Fine SAND With Silt
(SP-SM)
VERY LOOSE Brown Fine SAND (SP)
VERY LOOSE Dark Brown Fine SAND (SP) VERY LOOSE Gray Brown Fine SAND (SP)
MEDIUM DENSE Light Brown Fine SAND (SP)
Boring Terminated @ 15 ft.
1/12"
See Field Exploration Plan
Time: Drilling
Unconfined Compression
Length of Casing:
S A
M P
L E
T Y
P E
U
ID
L
IM
IT
N V al u e
M O
IS
T
U R
E C
O N
T E
N T
Remarks
Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
P E
R C
E N
T O
R G
A N
IC
M
A T
E R
IA
L
Groundwater Depth: 8.3 ft
0 1 20 10 20 30 40
P E
R C
E N
T P
A S
S
IN
G N
O . 2
S
IE
V
E
D E
P T
H , F
E E
T
Casing Size:
Boring Begun: 11/23/22Date: 11/23/22
Triaxial Compression
Project: Client: Jacksonville Clay Target Sports
S A
M P
L E
N O
LOG OF BORING
Project No.: 35-33687
Pocket Penetrometer Disturbed Sample
A
S T
IC
L
IM
IT
Pocket Penetrometer Undisturbed Sample
SHEAR STRENGTH
(ksf)
Drill Rod: AWJHammer Type: Auto
Boring Completed: 11/23/22
Boring No.: B4
Boring Location:
B L
O W
S P
E R
IN
of 1
| Fig2.pdf |
| Sheets and Views |
| Model |
| Fig1.pdf |
| Sheets and Views |
| Model |
| Reference Notes for Boring Logs (09-02-2021) (002).pdf |
| Sheets and Views |
| Layout2 |
| 2022-11-29T16:24:05-0500 | |
| Christopher M Egan |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .