JA SPE7L326RX009 - redacted_Redacted.pdf

JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

FAR 6.302-1 (ONE OR LIMITED NUMBER OF RESPONSIBLE SOURCES)

SOLICITATION NO.: [ SPE7L326RX009]

DLA Weapons Support (Columbus) Justification for Other Than Full & Open Competition (February 2025)

1. The Defense Logistics Agency, DLA Weapons Support (Columbus), is the contracting activity.

2. The action being approved is the acquisition of supplies on other than a full and open competition basis.

[X] Original [] Addendum: _________________

[ ] FAR Part 15 [ ] FAR Part 12 [X ] FAR Subpart 13.5

Contract Type:

[X] Firm-Fixed Price [ ] Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) [ ] Cost Reimbursable [ ] Other (explain)_____________________________

[ ] Fixed Quantity: [ ] Option: ____% [ ] No Option

[X] Indefinite Delivery Contract (IDC) [ X] Indefinite-Quantity Contract [ ] Requirements

Total Contract Length: ___1_years: Base Period (years): _1__ Option Period (years): ____ of Options: ___

Scope (if applicable):

3. The supplies required to meet the using activity’s needs are described as follows:

CLIN NSN/P/N Item Description

Unit of

Issue

AMC AMSC ADQ ADV Estimated Base (1year)

Est Contract Value (with options)

Contract Max

0001 6140-01- 77-2079

Battery, Storage

EA 3 D

Decontrolled 3/16/2026 Karin Wilson

SOLICITATION NO.: [ SPE7L326RX009]

DLA Weapons Support (Columbus) Justification for Other Than Full & Open Competition (February 2025)

End item, weapon system, or class of item: _

Estimated Base Value: __ _______________

Estimated Total Value (Base + Options): __ ________________

Maximum Contract Value: _ ____________

For Add-Ons, Value of Option Years Remaining: __________________

4. The statutory authority permitting other than full and open competition is 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(1) as implemented by FAR 6.302-1.

5. The Government requires spare parts that are form, fit, and functionally interchangeable with those currently used on the supported end item or weapon system. The acquisition is restricted to the following source(s) of supply, which are the only source(s) known to have the capability of furnishing the required supplies and the only source(s) currently approved by the design control activity.

CAGE COMPANY NAME

0UMT8 INTELLIPOWER

The use of the authority at 10 U.S.C. 3204(a)(1) is based on:

[X] AMC 3. Acquire, for the second or subsequent time, directly from the actual manufacturer.

The following AMSC descriptions are available in DFARS PGI 217.7506 Part 2.

[X] AMSC D. The data needed to acquire this part competitively is not physically available, it cannot be obtained economically, nor is it possible to draft adequate specifications or any other adequate, economical description of the material for a competitive solicitation. AMCS 3, 4, or 5 are valid.

SOLICITATION NO.: [ SPE7L326RX009]

DLA Weapons Support (Columbus) Justification for Other Than Full & Open Competition (February 2025)

On __8/5/25_, the Product Specialist of record certified the accuracy of the approved source(s) and applicable AMC/AMSC codes. A copy of the certification is attached (Attachment #1).

6. The following efforts are being taken to ensure that offers are solicited from as many sources as practicable:

[X] The acquisition will be synopsized on or about _2/10/26___ for a period of _1__ day(s).

[] A synopsis exception cited in FAR 5.202 applies (Explain): __________________.

[] Dealers of the approved source(s) will be solicited.

[X] The solicitation will be posted to the DLA Internet Bid Board System for a minimum of _10______ days.

[ ] Other (Explain): _________________.

7. I hereby determine that the anticipated cost to the Government will be fair and reasonable.

A price analysis will be conducted based on a comparison of proposed prices received in response to the solicitation and/or a comparison of proposed prices to historical prices paid. Certified cost or pricing data, when required by FAR 15.403-4, and data other than certified cost or pricing data, will be requested and obtained as necessary to establish a fair and reasonable price, and a cost analysis may be performed on the data submitted.

8. Market Research/Efforts to Obtain Competition:

Sources Sought Notice:

[x] A Sources Sought Notice was posted to Contract Opportunities on SAM.gov on _8/6/25_ for a period of five business days and 1 result from MAK ENGINEERING SERVICES 7DUH6 expressing interest and supplied a completed market survey.

[ ] A waiver of the Source Sought Notice was approved by the HCA or designee on ________________ and is hereby attached.

MAK ENGINEERING SERVICES, CAGE 7DUH6, Large Manufacturer POC

“NO” to commercial distribution network, “NO” to item determined commercial, “NO” to exact item sold in market, “YES” to similar item in market, “YES” to published catalogs, “NO” to website, “NO” to complete set of drawings, , , and “NO” delivery days listed.

Market Survey:

[x] A market survey was conducted on/during __8/6/25_.

SOLICITATION NO.: [ SPE7L326RX009]

Names and CAGE Codes of vendors contacted: _INTELLIPOWER CAGE 0UMT8, KAMPI

COMPONENTS CAGE 7Z016, DELA TECHNOLOGY CAGE 2U435, AND MDF INTERNATIONAL

CAGE 1P0H6.

Names and CAGE Codes of vendors responding: __2_ Summary of information received relevant to sourcing (i.e., dealer/manufacturer; intended manufacturing source): _________________.

o Names of Vendors Contacted:

• 1) INTELLIPOWER CAGE 0UMT8

• 2) KAMPI COMPONENTS CAGE 7Z016

• 3) MDF INTERNATIONAL CAGE 1P0H6

o Name of vendor and summary of information Received:

Intellipower- CAGE 0UMT8, Large Manufacturer POC “YES” to having commercial distribution network. “NO” to dealers being exclusive. “NO” to item determined commercial, “YES” to exact item sold in market, “YES” to similar item in market, “YES” to published price list ,“YES” to website, “NO” to complete set of drawings, “NO” to unredacted commercial sales invoices- provided, “YES” to military equivalent manufactured on same production line-no difference- they are the same.

Kampi Component, CAGE 7Z016 Small Business Dealer Did not respond to market survey. Just stated that they already had an LTC and didn’t need to answer. No other response received.

MDF Technologies, CAGE 1P0H6 Small Business Dealer Just provided a completed market survey provided by Intellipower with same answers as above.

[] A market survey was not conducted due to: _________________.

Procurement History:

[x] A review of procurement history for potential manufacturing sources other than those listed above Section 5 above yielded the following results (If none, so state): _NONE - Contract History is entirely comprised of contracts provided by dealers primarily Kampi Components and MDF Technologies

SOLICITATION NO.: [ SPE7L326RX009]

General Internet Search:

[x] A general internet search for potential manufacturing sources other than those listed above Section 5 above yielded the following results (If none, so state): _____None located_____________.

CID consulted – CID located under Manufacturing CAGE 0UMT8.

(Attachment)

[] Other (Explain): _________________.

9. A listing of sources, if any, indicating an interest in the acquisition is (If none, so state):

CAGE COMPANY NAME

0UMT8 Intellipower 7Z016 Kampi Component 1P0H6 MDF Technologies 7DUH6 Mak Engineering

10. The following actions are being taken to overcome barriers to competition before any subsequent acquisition is made:

[X] The solicitation contains DLAD Procurement Note, L04 Offers for Part Numbered Items, which describes the process for submitting an alternate offer on the current procurement and requesting evaluation of an alternate product’s technical acceptability for future procurements of the same item. (All AMSC codes EXCEPT AMSC B)

[] The solicitation contains DLAD Procurement Note, L22 Restriction of Alternate Offers for Source Controlled Items, which advises Offerors who are interested in qualifying their product for purposes of future acquisitions that they must contact the design control activity specified on the source control drawing. (AMSC B only)

DLA Weapons Support (Columbus) encourages vendors that may be interested in becoming an approved source, even if there is not an active solicitation, to contact the DLA Weapons Support (Columbus) Source Approval Monitor at DSCCAO-SAR@dla.mil for additional information on the steps required to submit a Source Approval Request Package for evaluation.

[] Other (Explain): _____________________.

In accordance with DFARS PGI 206.303-2, [] A copy of the previous justification from contract __ ___ is attached.

SOLICITATION NO.: [ SPE7L326RX009]

[X] Prior justification is not available since all prior acquisitions were under the Simplified Acquisition Threshold

(SAT)

[] The Contract Specialist could not locate the prior J&A for contract __ _______________.

I hereby certify that the information contained in this justification is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. If not exceeding $900,000, this signature serves as the approval.

Contracting Officer Date

APPROVAL/CERTIFICATION

I have reviewed and approve this justification:

Competition Advocate Signature Date

APPROVAL REQUIREMENTS

[] Up to $900,000 Contracting Officer

[X] Over $900,000 to $20,000,000 Competition Advocate

WILSON.KARIN

.M.

MELENDEZ.WILL

IAM.

SOLICITATION NO.: [ SPE7L326RX009]

Attachment(s):

#1 -Technical Certification #2- Mak Engineering email & market survey response #3- Intellipower email & market survey response #4- Kampi Component email response #5- MDF Technologies email response #6- CID for Intellipower