J.4 - Past Performance Survey.pdf
PDF 87 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Tuberculosis Trials Consortium Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 75D30120R67869
About this file
This document contains a past performance survey for a federal solicitation. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is seeking proposals to provide clinical trials and clinical research support services for the treatment, diagnosis and prevention of latent tuberculosis and the study of active tuberculosis disease domestically and internationally from 2020 through 2030. Contractors must identify relevant past performance for evaluation. The survey collects ratings on qualifications, workforce stability, performance, responsiveness, reporting, problem-solving, cost reporting, and willingness to integrate with other contractors. Favorable reviews and willingness to use the contractor for future work are also assessed. Comments provide additional context on contractor strengths and weaknesses.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 20
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J.4 - Solicitation 75D301-20-R-67869
Past Performance Survey
Please e-mail completed surveys to:
Iie3@cdc.gov to Attn: Candice L. Simmons
International Acquisition and Assistance Branch
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
2939 Flowers Road, Vanderbilt Building, Room 1207
Atlanta, Georgia 30341
Phone: (770) 488-1432 Fax: (770) 488-2670
The below contractor has submitted a proposal to provide the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention with clinical trials and clinical research support services on the treatment, diagnosis and prevention of latent tuberculosis
(TB) and the study of active TB disease both domestically and internationally in response to solicitation #75D301-
20-R-67869. This contractor has identified your contract listed below as containing like or similar services as required under our solicitation. Please complete this Past Performance Survey and fax it to the above POC by the proposal due date in the solicitation.
Contractor Information:
a. Contractor Name:___________________________________________________________________________
b. Program Name:____________________________________________________________________________
c. Contract Number: __________________________________________________________________________
d. Contract Type: _____________________________________________________________________________
e. Contract amount:____________________________________________________________________________
f. Period of performance:________________________________________________________________________
g. Description and Location of work:
TO BE COMPLETED BY REFERENCE
a. Name of person completing this questionnaire: __________________________________________________
b. Signature of person completing this questionnaire: __________________________________________________
c. Your role with respect to the contractor (e.g., Contracting Officer/Contract Manager, COR/COTR, Program
Manager, etc.): _______________________________________________________________________________
d. Agency/company: ________________________________________________________________________
e. Telephone with area code: ________________________________________________________________
f. Fax number with area code: ________________________________________________________________
g. Date questionnaire completed: ________________________________________________________________ mailto:Iie3@cdc.gov
Objective Measurable Performance Iindicators
Excellent: Performance consistently exceeded contract requirements, customer expectations, and provided significant, unique or worthwhile features or benefits.
Good: Performance consistently met, and occasionally exceeded, contract requirements and customer expectations. Demonstrated an understanding of the requirements, provided an acceptable management and technical approach, and provided complete responses to customer needs.
Satisfactory: Met the performance level of the contract.
Marginal: Usually met the contract performance level, however at a marginal level. Performance could have been improved and occasionally fell short of customer expectations.
Poor: Performance did not meet customer expectations and/or contract requirements.
Please answer each of the following questions with a rating based on the objective measurable performance indicators listed above. Commentary to explain any rating can be noted in the margins or on an attachment.
1. Evaluate the contractor’s labor force in terms of overall qualifications to perform the work required.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
2. Evaluate the stability of the contractor’s work force as affected by employee turnover and contract vacancies.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
3. Evaluate how well the contractor conducted work in a smooth and responsive manner during the initial start up or transition period. Please indicate whether the work was transitioned from Government responsibility or another contractor’s responsibility.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
Previous Contractor Responsibility Previous Government Responsibility
4. Evaluate the contractor’s adherence to task schedules and mission requirements.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
5. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to provide clinical trials and clinical research support services on the treatment, diagnosis and prevention of latent tuberculosis (TB) and the study of active TB disease both domestically and internationally.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
6. Evaluate the contractor’s responsiveness to technical direction.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
7. Evaluate the responsiveness and quality of the contractor’s reports and documentation.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
8. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to solve business management problems without extensive guidance from the procuring agency.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
9. Evaluate the contractor’s ability to overcome program, technical, or schedule difficulties without extensive guidance from the procuring agency.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
10. Evaluate the contractor’s willingness and ability to integrate as a team and work cooperatively with the existing work force (Government and/or other contractors).
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
11. Evaluate the contractor’s cost reporting and estimating system.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
12. Evaluate the contractor’s overall performance.
Excellent Good Satisfactory Marginal Poor
13. Would you be willing to have this contractor do additional work for your Orginazition in the future?
Yes_____ No______
Other Informational Comments:
Pro:
Con:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .