J.2 PPQ.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 95332422Q0093
- Issued by
-
Millennium Challenge Corporation
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a federal contract opportunity for a Sierra Leone Agricultural Market Assessment. The Millennium Challenge Corporation seeks a consultant through a firm fixed price contract to assist in project design for Sierra Leone's compact focused on power. The goal is to obtain maximum benefits from the proposed energy investment to catalyze inclusive, job-creating private sector growth and reduce food insecurity through downstream post-harvest processing, milling, and storage within agricultural value chains. Offerors must submit their proposals, including technical and past performance volumes, by August 17, 2022 at 12:00 pm Eastern Time to be considered. The past performance questionnaire collects ratings and narratives on cost control, schedule adherence, performance, quality, business relations, personnel qualifications, and an overall rating for reference projects to assess offerors' past successes.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| AMENDMENT_95332422Q00930001.pdf | ||
| AMENDMENT_95332422Q00930001_MCC RESPONSE TO QUESTIONS.pdf | ||
| J.1. - STATEMENT OF WORK.pdf | ||
| J.3 FORM SFLLL.pdf | ||
| SOLICITATION_95332422Q0093.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Sierra Leone Agricultural Market Assessment (AMA) 95332422Q0093
SOLICITATION:
OFFEROR NAME:
TITLE/ROLE:
EMAIL:
PHONE:
AGENCY:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
CONTRACT #:
TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
PRIME OR SUB?:
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE PROVIDED:
RATING CATEGORIES:
| RATING |
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| Very Good |
| VG |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds several requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| S |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| M |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unacceptable |
| U |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable |
| NA |
| Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed. |
ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:
Using the rating categories on page 1, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.
(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(3) Performance – Rate the contractor's ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems? Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.
(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.
(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?
CERTIFICATION:
I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
[Enter Name of Reference] Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .