J.2 Past_Performance_Questionnaire_.docx
DOCX document 35 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Malawi Land Productivity Project Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 95332421Q0045
- Issued by
- Millennium Challenge Corporation
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire and details of a related federal contract opportunity for land productivity project services in Malawi. The past performance questionnaire requests ratings and commentary on an unidentified offeror's previous contract performance relating to cost control, schedule adherence, performance quality, business relations, personnel qualifications, and an overall rating. It also solicits strengths, weaknesses, and whether the reference would award to the contractor again. The federal contract opportunity notice is from the Millennium Challenge Corporation to provide analysis and preparatory work supporting compact development and implementation for proposed land project activities in Malawi. Services include supporting inputs for estate lands, customary lands, and land revenues activities. The solicitation number is provided, along with proposal submission and inquiry deadlines of September 15, 2021 and August 31, 2021 respectively. Proposals must cite the solicitation number and be emailed to the specified contracting specialist at the Millennium Challenge Corporation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Amendment_95332421Q00450001_FE.pdf | ||
| 95332421Q00450001_Govt Response to Questions.pdf | ||
| SOLICITATION_95332421Q0045.pdf | ||
| J.1 Section C - SOW.pdf | ||
| J.3 DISCLOSURE OF LOBBYING ACTIVITIES FORM SFLLL.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Malawi Land Productivity Project 95332421Q0045
SOLICITATION:
OFFEROR NAME:
TITLE/ROLE:
EMAIL:
PHONE:
AGENCY:
CONTRACT INFORMATION:
CONTRACT #:
TOTAL CONTRACT VALUE:
PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE:
PRIME OR SUB?:
DESCRIPTION OF SERVICE PROVIDED:
RATING CATEGORIES:
| RATING |
| CODE |
| PERFORMANCE LEVEL |
| Very Good |
| VG |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds several requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| S |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| M |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unacceptable |
| U |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element being assessed contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Not Applicable |
| NA |
| Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed. |
ASSESSMENT ELEMENTS:
Using the rating categories on page 1, check the appropriate box for each assessment element and provide supporting narrative.
(1) Cost/Price Control – Rate the contractor's ability to control cost and deliver at the agreed-to price. Describe the reasons for changes to contract value (e.g., scope changes, overrun/underrun, Government-imposed schedule changes, etc.).
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
Supporting Narrative:
(2) Schedule Adherence – How well did the contractor adhere to the agreed-to schedule? What were the causes of any schedule variances? Were data deliverables and reports submitted on time?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(3) Performance – Rate the contractor's ability to successfully comply with the contract requirements, statement of work, subcontracting plan, etc.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(4) Quality – How well did the contractor adhere to the requirements of a Quality Assurance Plan or Performance Based Contracting requirements? Did the services provided meet the required level of quality or results?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(5) Business Relations – Did the contractor exhibit reasonable/cooperative behavior in dealing with problems? Was turnover of personnel frequent? Rate the contractor's responsiveness to managing changes in providing replacement personnel.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(6) Personnel Qualifications – Rate the contractor’s ability to staff and retain a highly-qualified team with the knowledge and experience required to successfully complete the project.
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(7) What is your overall rating of the contractor’s performance?
|_| VG |_| S |_| M |_| U |_| NA
(8) Please identify the contractor’s strengths.
(9) Please identify the contractor’s weaknesses.
(10) Given the choice, would you award to this contractor again? Why?
CERTIFICATION:
I certify that the ratings and comments reflected in this questionnaire were made by the undersigned and are accurate to the best of my knowledge.
[Enter Name of Reference] Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .