J-and-A-CRIMS_Maintenance_FY25_12-13-2024_Redacted.pdf
PDF 401 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CRIMS Maintenance - Intent to Sole Sources
- Solicitation number
- 2025-NLS-0026
- Issued by
-
Library of Congress
About this file
This is a Justification & Approval (J&A) document for other than full and open competition for software system maintenance from Capstone IT for the Currency Reader Information Management System (CRIMS) at the Library of Congress. The contract period is February 18, 2025 to February 17, 2026, supporting the National Library Service for the Blind and Print Disabled (NLS) staff users who service specialized devices to NLS patrons and maintain patron records for the US Currency Reader Program.
The J&A justifies sole-source procurement because CRIMS was custom-built in 2016 and began degrading in May 2024. Capstone IT is already migrating key modules from custom coding to the Microsoft Azure platform to increase security and modernize the system. The maintenance is needed to support new enhancements in production, continue removing modules from the old environment, and sustain current operations. The Library plans to increase competition in FY2026 by fully migrating to the MS Azure COTS platform. The contracting officer will publish advance notice on SAM.gov for 15 days before contract award, with historical prices and Bureau of Labor Statistics information used to determine fair and reasonable pricing.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Draft SOW CRIMS Maintenance_FY25_12122024.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Justification and Approval For Other than Full and Open Competition
Plan ID Number: 2025-NLS-0026
Form Updated 4/14/2023
Justification & Approval For Other than Full and Open Competition
As a legislative branch agency, the Library is subject to the competition and advertising requirements of 41 U.S.C. § 6101. Like the Competition in Contracting Act and the FAR, 41 U.S.C. § 6101 does not require competition when a contracting officer certifies that only one source or brand-name item is available, when dictated by public exigency, or when otherwise authorized by law.
This document sets forth the justification and approval for award of a contract or order by means providing for other than full and open competition per 41 U.S.C. § 6101, LCR 7-210, and, as applicable, FAR 6.302, FAR 13.106-1, FAR 8.405, and FAR 16.505. Contracting without competition shall not be justified on the basis of a lack of advance planning or concerns related to availability of funds.
This form shall be used to support instances where competition will be limited to a single source, a limited number of sources, including where a brand name product is required.
Part 1 – Identification
1. Contracting Agency and Activity: Library of Congress, LCSG/NLS/PNE/BEP
2. Nature of Action Being Approved
Contract (or modification) LC or Leg Branch Order (or modification) GSA Schedule or GWAC: Identify Schedule/Contract Other: Identify
Plan ID Number: 2025-NLS-0026 Contractor (or Brand Name): Capstone IT Estimated Value (Base and all options):
Period of Performance: 02/18/2025 – 02/17/2026
3. Description of Supplies or Services Required to Meet Library Needs
Describe the supplies or services that are required to meet the Library’s minimum needs and the delivery schedule required to meet those needs. Do not focus on a description of the program.
Library requires 12-months of software system maintenance from February 2025 – February 2026 for the Currency Reader Information Management System (CRIMS) to support National Library Service for the Blind and Print Disabled (NLS) staff users servicing specialized devices to NLS patrons and the general public. CRIMS maintains all patron records affiliated with the US Currency Reader Program which exists under an inter-agency agreement with the Bureau of Engraving and Printing.
The system currency is maintained under contract NLS23T0017 which is expiring. The system requires additional support for recent upgrades aimed at migrating legacy CRIMS away from custom coding to a more robust MS Azure software platform which is a COTS product. It requires additional maintenance to sustain operations in production environment while continuing to remove obsolete features.
Part 2 – Program Office Justification & Approval
4. Authority for Contracting Without Competition Over $250,000 For this requirement over $250,000, under FAR part 6, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
There is only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy Library requirements.
41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(C); FAR 6.302-1.
Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by contractor’s unique capabilities or products. FAR 6.302-1(b)(1).
Source controls copyrights, patents, raw materials, or secret processes cannot be acquired otherwise, or similar circumstances. FAR 6.302-
1(b)(2).
Other exception identified in FAR 6.302-1: Identify the exception
There is such unusual & compelling urgency that the Government would be seriously injured if competition is not limited.
41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(B); FAR 6.302-2. Option years are not permitted.
Source is expressly authorized or required by statute (e.g., AbilityOne, UNICOR, GPO, GSA Public Buildings Service, Appropriations Act, etc.) per 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 6.302-5: Identify the authority
Other basis authorized in 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b) or FAR part 6.302: Identify the exception
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product or item which is essential to the Government’s requirement. FAR 6.302-1(c).
The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
IT Standard Data Sheet)
Up to and including $250,000 For this requirement up to $250,000, using simplified acquisition procedures under FAR part 13, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
Only one responsible source is reasonably available to meet Library requirements. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b); FAR 13.106-1.
Product or service is reasonably available from only one source.
Source controls copyrights, patents or other exclusive licensing arrangements.
Urgent circumstances; only one source can reasonably deliver by required date. Option years are not permitted.
Source is expressly authorized or required by statute: Identify the authority
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product The Product is listed the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
IT Standard Data Sheet)
GSA Schedule Order For this GSA schedule order under FAR part 8, the basis for not competing among GSA schedule-holders and/or specifying a brand name product or item is:
An urgent and compelling need exists, and following GSA procedures would result in unacceptable delays.
FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A).
Only one GSA source is capable of fulfilling the requirement at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized. FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B).
In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original order that was placed competitively among GSA schedule-holders (i.e., the original order was not sole-source or limited-source.) FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C).
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
Order Under Multiple Award Indefinite-Delivery Contract or GWAC For this order under FAR subpart 16.5, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
The need is so urgent fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(C) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A).
The Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by contractor’s unique capabilities or products. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR
16.505(b)(2)(i)(B).
A logical follow-on order in the interest of economy and efficiency. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(i)(2)(C).
To satisfy a minimum guarantee. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(D).
Authorized or required by statute. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(E).
The Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product or item which is essential to the Government’s requirement. 41
U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(B) and FAR 16.505(a)(4)(i).
The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
5. Rationale for Contracting Without Competition
In supporting an action not providing for full and open competition, it is not sufficient to demonstrate that the contractor is exceptionally well qualified or even the best qualified, or that the required brand name product is well suited to the Library’s needs. The rationale must demonstrate that no one else, or no other competing product, can satisfactorily fulfill the Library’s requirement. Do not focus on the importance of the requirement; the issue is the rationale for not competing.
In supporting urgency, address the following What are the unexpected facts or the unpredictable events that led to this situation? When is the required delivery or performance start date? Why this date? What specific harm to the Government will occur if the delivery is not made or performance not begun as scheduled? (Note that expiration of funds is not sufficient harm to justify not competing.) Demonstrate that the contract is only for items and quantities urgently needed until a competitive procurement action can be developed, or that a separate competitive follow-on is not practical.
In supporting a brand name justification, the brand name or feature must be essential to the Library’s requirements, and market research indicates that other company’s similar products or products with similar features cannot meet or be modified to meet the Library’s needs.
We are authorized to limit competition on the basis of the citation in section 4 because: the CRIMS System was built using custom coding in 2016 and began degrading in May of 2024 under the current maintenance contract. Attempts were made to repair the system but were not sufficient to sustain operations in this old environment without introducing new software. Capstone IT is already migrating key modules of CRIMS to MS Azure to increase security and modernize the system using this COTS platform. Additional maintenance is needed to support new enhancements already in production, continue removing select modules from the old environment and sustain current state for users. (System is hosted remotely.)
6. Actions to Overcome Barriers to Competition Before Subsequent Contract Is Required
State what actions, if any, the program office can take to overcome barriers to competition before a contracting for this requirement again, such as:
using action to provide time to develop specifications for a competitive procurement by a certain date; licensing copyrights or patents so other contractors may use the works; or breaking the requirement into parts that may be purchased competitively. If this is a one-time requirement, explain that action to increase future competition is not needed. If the source is expressly required by statute, state “Source is statutory.”
To increase competition, we will: increase the competitiveness of CRIMS in Fiscal Year 2026 (FY26) by fully migrating the system to the MS Azure COTS platform, which is scalable, allowing the Library to acquire future operations and maintenance and new capability to meet future needs. Future development using MS Azure will be competed in FY26.
7. Program Office Certification
I certify that the description of the Government’s minimum needs, schedule requirements, and technical information that provide the basis for this justification are accurate and complete.
DIGITAL PROJECT COORD
Name
Title
Signature _______11.19.2024__
Date
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .