IR Mod_IRIS_UI PWS TAS_OPS_LE_12.10.24.docx
DOCX document 103 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Instructional Designer
- Solicitation number
- 25-07
About this file
This is a Performance Work Statement (PWS) for instructional design services issued by the IRS Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) Operations Support Learning & Education division. The contractor will develop experiential activities, workshops, and case studies to enhance training engagement for TAS employees, focusing on transitioning the Foundational Case Advocate Training program from virtual to face-to-face delivery for 10 lessons in accounts issues, while maintaining virtual delivery for 4 examination and 6 collection lessons.
The contract requires a Program Manager (7+ years experience, PMP certification), Lead Instructional Designer (7+ years experience), and Mid-Level Instructional Designers (3-5 years experience) to perform tasks including assessment of existing training materials, development of new learning activities, and project management. Key deliverables include a project management plan, monthly status reports, and Section 508-compliant training materials. The period of performance is 12 months with four 12-month options. Work will be primarily performed at the contractor's site with telework permitted, though personnel must be available for on-site meetings within 2 hours' notice. All deliverables must meet IRS security standards and will become U.S. Government property.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFI Response Template (6).xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| TAS Operations Support L and E Development of Experiential Activities Workshops and Case Studies RFI.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS)
For Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS): Operations Support (OPS): Learning & Education (L&E): Development of Experiential Activities, Workshops, and Case Studies
PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT (PWS) for Instructional Designer to Create Experiential Activities, Workshops, and Case Studies
INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS), Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS), Operations Support (OPS), Learning & Education (L&E) oversees the development and delivery of all TAS-specific training. This includes administration and support for Integrated Talent Management course documentation and reports, and coordination with IRS’s Human Capital Office training component. TAS oversees the development and delivery of the training programs for newly hired Case and Intake Advocates. Due to the demands of other organizational priorities, it is essential for a contract Instructions Designers to support the course development needs for TAS L&E organization.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this contract is to acquire Instructional Designing services from a contractor team responsible for the development of experiential activities, workshops, and case studies for Taxpayer Advocate Service (TAS) employees. The contractor will work closely with the Director and Deputy Director, Operations Support (OPS) and the Learning & Education (L&E) Staff, to create activities, workshops, and case studies to enhance training engagement to meet program objectives.
This effort aligns with TAS Operations Goals, Objectives, and Activities:
· Implement TAS’ redesigned training program to develop our new employees while ensuring our existing employees’ technical and soft skills are consistently strengthened. The focus is on allowing our employees to grow professionally while providing expert taxpayer service.
· Assess current training content and develop experiential activities, workshops, and case studies for our foundational and advanced training program content.
SCOPE OF WORK AND DESCRIPTION OF TASKS
The current content curriculum is Foundational Case Advocate Training, which includes account, examination, and collection topics. The training includes knowledge checks, summary exercises, and small group activities and is delivered via MS Teams. TAS has been tasked to transition to a face-to-face training for the 10 lessons in the account’s issues course, which will also contain some virtual components. The 4 lessons in examination and the 6 lessons in the collection courses will remain virtual.
The contract shall provide Instructional Designing services meeting Section 508 compliance standards on an as-needed basis for TAS course development project managers who lead teams with Subject Matter Experts working in Taxpayer Advocate Services.
Description of Tasks
· Detailed Assessment of Training Materials and Recommendations:
The contractor shall provide a thorough technical assessment of TAS’s existing training materials to identify gaps, redundancies, and improvement opportunities. This review includes both content and mode of delivery.
Deliverable/Work Product:
· Requirements Gathering Materials: Documents (e.g., questionnaires, data collection tools) used to understand current training objectives and constraints.
· Requirements Gathering Meeting Minutes: Summaries of key points, decisions, and action items from meetings with TAS stakeholders regarding training requirements.
· Detailed Assessment of TAS Existing Training Material and Recommendations Report: A comprehensive analysis with identified areas for improvement, suggestions for content enhancement, and recommended delivery methods.
· Design and Development of Experiential Learning Activities, Workshops, and Case Studies:
The contractor shall create experiential learning activities, workshops, and case studies that leverage adult learning theories, principles of Technology-Enabled Learning (TEL), and 508 compliance standards. These activities should address the interplay of people, processes, and technology, and align with IRS security requirements.
Deliverable/Work Product:
· Draft Experiential Learning Activities, Workshops, and Case Studies: Initial versions for review and feedback, ensuring compliance with TEL methodologies and adult learning strategies.
· Final Experiential Learning Activities, Workshops, and Case Studies: Refined, fully compliant materials ready for deployment in TAS’s training programs.
· Project Management and Quality Assurance:
The contractor shall employ robust project management and quality assurance practices throughout the engagement. This includes maintaining timelines, budgets, and scope; tracking action items; ensuring adherence to quality standards; and evaluating outcomes against established benchmarks.
Deliverable/Work Product:
· Project Management Plan: Outlines the project’s scope, schedule, resources, risks, communication strategies, and integration with TAS objectives.
· Quality Assurance Plan: Defines processes and standards for ensuring the quality, consistency, and accuracy of all deliverables and work products.
· Action Item Tracker: A dynamic log of all tasks, responsibilities, deadlines, and status updates to maintain project transparency and accountability.
· Monthly Status Reports: Provide updates on project progress, any deviations from the schedule, risks identified, mitigation strategies, and accomplishments for the reporting period.
· Quarterly Quality Assurance Reports: Summaries of quality checks performed, findings, corrective actions taken, and improvements implemented over the quarter.
· End of Project Summary Report: A comprehensive wrap-up detailing final deliverables, outcomes, lessons learned, and recommendations for future enhancements to TAS training.
4. KEY PERSONNEL
Key Personnel Qualifications: Key Personnel assigned to this task order shall be identified by labor category, name, and resume qualifying certain skill levels and years of experience necessary to perform the required tasks. Resumes shall demonstrate the individuals’ qualifications and capabilities to perform the required activities. Complete Key Personnel chart.
The offeror shall identify certain positions or roles and associated labor categories considered to be Key Positions. The contractor shall submit the name and resume of the contractor employee proposed in each Key Position. No substitution or replacement of the key personnel shall be permitted without Government approval. Contractor employees identified as Key Personnel shall be dedicated to this task order. If any changes in the proposed key personnel become necessary during actual performance, the contractor shall provide written notification 30 days in advance. In the event of a sudden change in key personnel, the contractor shall provide written notice to the Contracting Officer (CO) within 3 calendar days of the event. For any substitution, the contractor shall submit justification with a proposed substitute whose qualifications are equal to or greater than the person being replaced, along with a 1 to 2-page introductory summary, in sufficient detail to permit evaluation within 10 calendar days of notification of a substitution.
The name of key personnel and any alternates who shall act within specified key roles under this task order shall be designated in writing to the Contracting Officer and may, with the consent between the Contracting Officer, Contracting Officer Representative (COR), and contractor be amended from time to time during the course of this award to either add or delete personnel as appropriate. The government reserves the right to disapprove the proposed substitutes and negotiate for an acceptable replacement.
| Key Position |
| Description |
| Program/Project Manager |
| · Oversees the overall direction coordination, and execution of the project. |
· Serves as the primary point of contact with the Government’s Contracting Officer Representative (COR)
· Ensures project milestones, budgets, and deliverables are met according to schedule.
· Experience: Minimum 7+ years of experience managing training development or instructional design projects.
· Certification Required: Project Management Professional (PMP).
| Lead Instructional Designer (Senior Level) |
| · Serves as the Subject Matter Expert in instructional design methodologies and adult learning theories. |
· Oversees the development of experiential learning activities, workshops, and case studies.
· Provides guidance and quality assurance for all instructional materials and deliverables.
· Reviews all instructional materials for accuracy, clarity, and adherence to style and brand guidelines.
· Ensures content is free of typographical, formatting, and technical errors before final delivery.
· Conducts user testing and evaluation of learning materials to identify areas for improvement.
· Experience: 3–5 years of experience in instructional design, developing training content, and applying adult learning principles.
· Advanced degree in Instructional Design, Education, or related field; a recognized professional certification such as the Certified Professional in Talent Development
· Experience: Minimum 7+ years of progressive experience in instructional design, curriculum development, and adult learning methodologies.
· Certification Preferred: Advanced degree in Instructional Design, Education, or related field; a recognized professional certification such as the Certified Professional in Talent Development (CPTD, formerly CPLP) or similar is preferred.
| Instructional Designer(s) (Mid-Level) |
| · Develops training content using established instructional design principles and techniques. |
· Collaborates with Subject Matter Experts (SMEs) to analyze content needs and craft appropriate learning activities.
· Ensures consistency, accuracy and compliance with Section 508 accessibility standards.
· Experience: 3–5 years of experience in instructional design, developing training content, and applying adult learning principles.
· Certification Preferred: A professional certificate in Instructional Design, eLearning, or ATD Instructional Design certificate is desirable. A degree in Instructional Design Educational Technology, or related field. A master’s degree is preferred but not required.
5. SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE AND KNOWLEDGE
In the area of program management, the contractor shall have certified Project Management Professionals (PMP) on their team. Additionally, the contractor shall have experience with managing complex programs and shall also have demonstrated IRS experience in the development of training and educational materials.
The contractor shall have expertise with adult learning theories, practices, and techniques in instructional design of experiential learning activities, workshops, and case studies.
Instructional Designers provided by the contractor shall meet the following qualifications:
· A minimum of three to five (3-5) years of experience in instructional design, specifically focused on creating experiential learning activities, workshops, and case studies for adult learners in professional environments.
· Demonstrated experience working with Technology-Enabled Learning (TEL) solutions, including proficiency in e-learning platforms and course authoring tools.
· A strong understanding of adult learning principles and methodologies, particularly in designing training programs that align with organizational objectives and competencies.
· Knowledge of Section 508 compliance standards and experience developing accessible training content that meets federal guidelines for accessibility.
· A degree in Instructional Design Educational Technology, or related field. A master’s degree is preferred but not required.
· Experience working with federal agencies or within government environments is highly desirable.
The contractor shall ensure that the proposed Instructional Designers demonstrate these qualifications in their resumes and include relevant project experience as evidence of their capability to perform the required tasks
6. PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
Work shall be primarily done at the contractor’s site. Under this task order telework is permissible, the contractor must ensure compliance with all applicable security related clauses regardless of where the work is performed. contractor employees will be expected to use the government spaces provided for this task order when/if needed for onsite support. Contractor personnel shall be prepared to report on-site/government facility, as requested within two (2) hours ‘of notice for mandatory meetings.
7. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE
The period of performance of this task order shall be a base period of twelve (12) months from date of award, plus four (4) 12-month option periods.
8. PROJECT MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
The contractor shall designate a Project Manager (PM) responsible for overseeing all aspects of this task order and for serving as the primary point of contact with TAS and IRS.
The contractor shall provide:
· Monthly Status Reports: The PM shall submit a monthly status report detailing progress on deliverables, any issues encountered, and anticipated challenges or changes in the timeline.
· Monthly Performance Reviews: The contractor shall meet with the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) monthly to review progress, discuss any modifications, and ensure alignment with task order objectives.
· End-of-Project Summary Report: Upon completion of the project, the contractor shall submit a comprehensive report summarizing the activities performed, outcomes achieved, and lessons learned.
The contractor shall use a project management platform accessible to the COR, allowing for real-time monitoring of project milestones and tasks.
9. DELIVERABLES/DELIVERY SCHEDULE
Precisely describe the items to be delivered, both during the period of performance and at completion of the task order. Deliverables should be referenced back to their requirement in the Specific Tasks section. Describe the schedule either in terms of calendar days from the date of Task Order award or in calendar days when other projects or program elements are dependent on the delivery (e.g., 10 calendar days after draft plan is approved). All documentation tied to planning increments and releases is to be updated when a planning increment or release occurs. The table below provides an example list of deliverables.
| DELIVERABLE or WORK PRODUCT |
| FORMAT |
| DUE DATE OR FREQUENCY |
| Project Management Plan |
| MS Word or as designated by the COR or CO. . Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| Draft – X calendar days after award |
Final - X calendar days after acceptance of draft
| Quality Assurance Plan |
| MS Word or as designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| Draft – X-calendar days after award |
Final - X calendar days after acceptance of draft
| Action Item Tracker |
| MS Word, Excel, or another compatible format designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| Draft X calendar days after contract start |
Updated weekly
| Monthly Status Report |
| MS Word, Excel, or another compatible format designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| NLT the X of the following month |
| Quarterly Quality Assurance Reports |
| Every X months during the task order |
| X business days |
| End-of-Project Summary Report |
| X days after project completion |
| X business days |
| Requirements Gathering Materials |
| MS Word, PowerPoint, Excel, or another compatible format designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| X week prior to each requirements gathering session for which contractor is designated facilitator |
| Requirements Gathering Meeting Minutes |
| MS Word, or as designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| Within X business day of all requirements gathering meetings for which contractor is designated facilitator |
| Detailed Assessment of Training Materials |
| X days from task order start |
| X business days |
| Detailed technical assessment of TAS’ existing training material and provide recommendation for improvement. This review should include both content and the mode of delivery. |
| MS Word, PowerPoint, Excel, or another compatible format designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| Within X month of requirements gathering meeting. |
| Provide Draft experiential learning activities, workshops, and case studies using instructional strategies and methodologies for Technology-Enabled Learning (TEL) that addresses people, processes, and technology. |
| MS Word, PowerPoint, Excel, or another compatible format designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| X days out from requirements gathering meeting, X business days review period |
| Provide Finalized Experiential Learning Activities, workshops, and case studies using instructional strategies and methodologies for Technology-Enabled Learning (TEL) that addresses people, processes, and technology. |
| MS Word, PowerPoint, Excel, or another compatible format designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| X days out from requirements gathering meeting, X business days review period |
| Provide the most appropriate learning solutions bases on adult learning theories, practices, and techniques. |
| MS Word, PowerPoint, Excel, or another compatible format designated by the COR or CO. |
| Within X months of requirements gathering meeting. |
| Develop 508 compliant computer-based activities that conform with IRS security standards. |
| MS Word, PowerPoint, Excel, or another compatible format designated by the COR or CO. Must also be Section 508 compliant. |
| Within X months of requirements gathering meeting. |
10. REVIEW OF DELIVERABLES
a) The Government will perform an initial review of deliverables, and if problems are encountered during the review, the contractor must correct them. If necessary, a meeting may be convened to resolve any differences. The contractor shall make all required changes to achieve an acceptable deliverable. The Government will perform its review within approximately X business days from receipt of the deliverable.
b) When the review of a deliverable results in necessary modifications, the Government will, in accordance with the approved task order schedule, provide the necessary documentation to correct the deliverable. It will then be the responsibility of the contractor to properly and consistently incorporate the comments in the final product.
11. OTHER DIRECT COST/TRAVEL
Travel and per diem will be reimbursed at actual cost in accordance with the limitations set forth in FAR 31.205-46 and the General Services Administration’s Federal Travel Regulations. Profit shall not be applied to the travel costs. Local travel may be required for on-site meetings, etc.
The contractor shall provide a travel voucher statement for all travel. The voucher shall ensure verification of costs incurred for local travel under the contract is allowable, allocable, reasonable, and in accordance with regulation FAR 31.205.46. The contractor shall attach the voucher and receipts to the monthly invoice.
12. QUALITY ASSURANCE SURVEILLANCE PLAN (QASP)
The Government shall evaluate the contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with the Government’s Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). This plan is primarily focused on how the Government will ensure that the contractor has performed in accordance with the performance standards. The Quality Assurance Surveillance Matrix (QASM) is contained within the QASP and defines how the performance standards will be applied, the frequency of surveillance, the rating standard, and the person(s) responsible for surveillance. The Quality Assurance Surveillance Form is also contained in the QASP and will be used by the Government to record the results of the surveillance.
The quality of services performed under this task order shall conform to the highest standards in the industry. The contractor shall immediately notify the COR of problems or situations that could negatively impact compliance with the provisions of the task order and the plan the contractor shall implement to resolve problems. The designated COR/ACORs will participate in the administration of this task order by evaluating contractor performance, inspecting, and accepting services for the Government, and providing a report of inspection as well as contractor performance assessments to the CO.
13. SECURITY AND DATA PROTECTION
The contractor shall comply with all IRS and federal security standards, including data protection protocols, cybersecurity requirements, and information confidentiality measures.
Key requirements include:
· Compliance with IRS Security Policies: All contractor personnel must be familiar with and comply with IRS-specific security policies when accessing, handling, or storing data.
· Background Checks: All contractor personnel assigned to this task order must undergo background checks and obtain any necessary clearances prior to accessing IRS facilities or systems.
· Secure Handling of Training Materials: Any training materials or course content that includes sensitive or proprietary information shall be securely handled and stored in accordance with IRS guidelines.
14. DELIVERABLE OWNERSHIP
The Contractor shall not retain, use, sell, or disseminate copies of any deliverable that contains information covered by the Privacy Act of 1974, Internal Revenue Code section 6103 or that which is generally protected from public disclosure by an exemption to the Freedom of Information Act.
IRS owns the rights to all data and records produced as part of this contract. All deliverables under the contract are the property of the U.S. Government for which IRS shall have unlimited rights to use, dispose of, or disclose such data contained therein as it determines to be in the public interest. Any Contractor rights in the data or deliverables must be identified as required by FAR 52.227-11 through FAR 52.227-20.
15. GOVERNMENT FURNISHED EQUIPMENT/PROPERTY (GFE/P) and GOVERNMENT FURNISHED INFORMATION (GFI)
The Government anticipates, but does not guarantee, that it will provide the following GFP in the performance of this task order.
| ITEMS |
| QUANTITY |
| Contractor Identification Badge |
| TBD |
| Contractor Building Access/Proximity Card |
| TBD |
| Desktop/Laptop Computer with Local Area Network Access |
| TBD |
| Microsoft: Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Project Access |
| TBD |
| Contractor Identification Badge |
| TBD |
All required GFI will be provided to the contractor upon task order award. At the end of this task order, the disposition of GFI shall be in accordance with FAR 52.245.5. All IRMs are available to the public at IRS.gov.
INFORMATION ITEMS:
IRM 2.15, Enterprise Architecture
IRM 2.16, Enterprise Life Cycle
IRM 2.22.1, Unified Work Request (UWR) Process
IRM 2.100, Integrated Process Management
IRM 2.110, Requirements Engineering
IRM 2.127, Testing Standards and Procedures
IRM 2.148.2.5.3, KISAM Ticket
IRM 10, Security, Privacy and Assurance
16. PACKAGING, PACKING, AND SHIPPING INSTRUCTIONS IF NOT APPLICABLE TO TASK ORDER, DELETE SECTION
The contractor shall ensure that all items are preserved, packaged, packed, and marked in accordance with best commercial practices to meet the packing requirements of the carrier and to ensure safe and timely delivery at the intended destination. All data and correspondence submitted shall reference:
1. The <Contract Vehicle> Task Order Authorization Number
2. The requiring activity
3. The name and contact information of the COR.
Containers shall be clearly marked as follows:
1. Name of contractor
2. The Task Order Authorization Number
3. Description of items contained therein
4. Consignee(s) name and address
17. INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA
The Government is requiring offerors to submit a proposed Quality Control/Quality Assurance Plan.
The contractor shall ensure that all deliverables are clearly marked with the contract number and task order number and visible on all shipping/service documents, containers, and invoices.
Inspection will be at the same place as performance and delivery, unless otherwise specified.
The Government will inspect all intermediated products/artifacts and/or documentation, and instruction as they are presented to minimize the effects of any misunderstandings to determine if the contractor has provided the necessary information, artifacts, and documentation to meet this requirement.
18. OTHER PERTINENT INFORMATION OR SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS
The COR will review, for completeness, preliminary or draft products that the contractor submits, and may return them to the contractor for correction. The absence of comments by the COR will not relieve the contractor of the responsibility for complying with the requirements of this work statement. Final approval and acceptance of products required herein shall be by letter of approval and acceptance by the COR. The contractor shall not construe any letter of acknowledgment of receipt of products as a waiver of review, or as an acknowledgment that a product is in conformance with this work statement. Any approval given during preparation of a product, or approval for shipment shall not guarantee the final acceptance of the completed product.
19.
20.
21. PERFORMANCE REQUIREMENTS SUMMARY
| Task |
| Standard |
| Acceptable Quality Level (AQL) |
| Surveillance Method |
| Incentive/ Disincentive |
| Section 3.1.1, |
| Kickoff Meeting is conducted within required timeline. Key Government and contractor participants are introduced. Roles and responsibilities are explained and confirmed. Mutual understanding of the work to be accomplished is confirmed. |
| Kickoff Meeting completed on schedule and all required objectives met. |
| 100% review by COR and/or CO and IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
Negative Past Performance Rating
| Kickoff Meeting Notes |
| Meeting notes and any follow-up actions were provided in accordance with the PWS. |
| 100% review by COR and/or CO and IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
| 100% Deliverables completed on schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 98% Deliverables completed on Schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
Negative Past Performance Rating
| Section 3.1.2, |
| 100% Deliverables completed on schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 98% Deliverables completed on Schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
| A complete set of project requirements is gathered and stored in a central repository |
| 100% of all requirements are present and decomposed in a central repository |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
| Planning Increments are defined, and roadmap prepared for each planning increment |
| 100% of all planning increments have roadmaps |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
Negative Past Performance Rating
| Section 3.2.2, |
| 100% Deliverables completed on schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 98% Deliverables completed on Schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
Negative Past Performance Rating
| Section 3.2.3, |
| 100% Deliverables completed on schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 98% Deliverables completed on Schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
Negative Past Performance Rating
| Section 3.3, |
| 100% Deliverables completed on schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 98% Deliverables completed on Schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
| Production defects are documented and reported to the IRS PM |
| 100% completeness and accuracy of reporting |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
Negative Past Performance Rating
| Section 3.4.1, |
| 100% Deliverables completed on schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 98% Deliverables completed on Schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
Negative Past Performance Rating
| Section 3.4.2, |
| 100% Deliverables completed on schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 98% Deliverables completed on Schedule and in accordance with PWS requirements with no re-work required. |
| 100% review by COR and/or IRS PM. |
| Remedies under FAR 52.246-4, |
22. ACRONYMS
| A&A |
| Assessment & Authorization |
| A2A |
| Application to Application |
| AMMPS |
| Automatic Magnetic Media Processing System |
| ACIO |
| Associate Chief Information Officer |
| AD |
| Application Development |
| AIP |
| Accumulated Income Payment |
| ARP |
| American Rescue Plan |
| ATS |
| Application to Application (A2A) (Bulk) & Transmitter Testing |
| BPA |
| Blanket Purchase Agreement |
| CH |
| Contract Holder |
| CM |
| Configuration Management |
| CMO |
| Cloud Management Office |
| COR |
| Contracting Officer Representative |
| COTS |
| Commercial-Off-The-Shelf |
| CR |
| Change Request |
| CRL |
| Core Record Layout |
| CWT |
| Chapter Three Withholding |
| DME |
| Development, Modernization, and Enhancement |
| DP |
| Delivery Partners |
| EA |
| Enterprise Architecture |
| EDOS |
| Enterprise Development, Operations Services |
| ELC |
| Enterprise Life Cycle |
| EMIS |
| Enterprise Mediation and Integration Services |
| EOPS |
| Enterprise Operations |
| EOR |
| Enterprise Organizational Readiness |
| EPMO |
| Executive Program Management Office |
| ES |
| Enterprise Services |
| EST |
| Enterprise Systems Testing |
| ES |
| Enterprise Services |
| ETAAC |
| Electronic Tax Administration Advisory Committee |
| ETL |
| Extract Transform Load |
| EUL |
| End User Layer |
| EVM |
| Earned Value Management |
| FFP |
| Firm Fixed Price |
| FISMA |
| Federal Information Security Modernization Act |
| GFE |
| Government Furnished Equipment |
| GFI |
| Government Furnished Information |
| ICT |
| Information and Communications Technology |
| IIJA |
| Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act |
| IMS |
| Integrated Master Schedule |
| IRA |
| Inflation Reduction Act |
| IRDB |
| Information Returns Database |
| IRM |
| IRS Internal Revenue Manual |
| IR Mod |
| Information Returns Modernization |
| IRIS |
| Information Returns Intake System |
| IRS |
| Internal Revenue Services |
| IRSAC |
| IRS Advisory Committee |
| IT |
| Information Technology |
| KISAM |
| Knowledge Incident/Problem Service and Asset Management |
| LH |
| Labor Hours |
| NIST |
| National Institute of Standards and Technology |
| O&M |
| Operations and Maintenance |
| OMB |
| Office of Management and Budget |
| PI |
| Program Increment |
| PMBOK |
| Project Management Body of Knowledge |
| PMI |
| Project Management Institute |
| PMO |
| Program Management Office |
| PWS |
| Performance Work Statement |
| QASP |
| Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan |
| QCP |
| Quality Control Plan |
| QRP |
| Questionable Refund Program |
| REPO |
| Requirements Engineering Program Office |
| RMF |
| Risk Management Framework |
| RRE |
| Rapid Requirements Elicitation |
| SBSE |
| Small Business/Self-Employed |
| SE |
| Solution Engineering |
| SLA |
| Service Level Agreement |
| TFA |
| Taxpayer First Act |
| TRO |
| Tax Refund Offset |
| TSO |
| Transformation Strategy Office |
| UI |
| User Interface |
| UNS |
| User & Network Services |
| UWR |
| Unified Work Request |
| WBS |
| Work Breakdown Structure |
| W&I |
| Wage and Investment |
| XSD |
| XML Schema Definition |
| XML |
| Extensible Markup Language |
| XP |
| Extreme Programming |
image1.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .