Industry Comments.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 28 KB Posted
- Attached to
- FSS Base Support Internet
- Solicitation number
- FA481923TC005
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SOURCES SOUGHT EXP.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Comment Matrix
| Overall Comment Number | Reference to PWS Section | Commercial Sector Comment | Government Reply or Action Taken Brief Description |
| 84 | 1.19 | Could the government clarify key personnel for this requirement? | |
| 85 | 1.19 | Could the government provide a historical level of effort for this work? | This is something that we may not be able to provide. We are trying to get away from including the FTE's in the PWS so we can talk more about this on Tuesday. |
| 52 | 1.2 | Do you expect transition to take 14 calendar or business days? Given that the AF intends to award the contract to an 8(a) company, we would request at least 15 business days to allow for travel to and from the three different locations to meet with employees. | |
| 53 | 1.4 | PWS states that normal duty hours are 0730 - 1630 which consists of nine work hours per day. The normal hours extend Monday - Friday which constitutes a 45 hours per week. Please confirm that for non-exempt employees, the PWS nine hour daily construct includes a combination of non-paid breaks and a lunch period so as to not exceed 40 hours of work per week. | |
| 94 | 1.5 | As formal federal senior directors/CORs, we required our contractors to provide surge support during COOP exercises on the Walter Reed campus; will surge be a requirement during future COOP exercises? | |
| 95 | 1.9 | We currently provide these services to several government agencies and consider these essential to assist agencies in maintaining operations, especially during disasters, mission critical assignments or supporting high ranking officials. Will the government allow us to training multiple employees (at least two) to ensure coverage at all times to prevent mission gaps, breakdown in mission completion? | |
| 97 | 2.3 | As formal federal senior directors, we led major DoD/Army BRAC initiatives (CONUS/OCONUS) to include strategic planning, site closure/buildout, OMB/Congressional briefings for funding, new site location or closure, media interviews/notifications etc. Will the facility operations include any BRAC or maintaining current building/maintenance structure? | |
| 99 | 2.7 | We currently/have provide the full range of instructional design throughout the government to include instructional design, training, teaching. Our team consists of former federal certified trainers, adjunct professors at higher level institutions of training and intelligence community. Can the government please clarify if the contractor is required to develop course/training content? | |
| 66 | 3 | Please provide the performance objectives referenced in this paragraph. | |
| 77 | 4.0 | Will the Government furnish appropriate equipment and tools required to complete tasks under PWS Section 2.3 (Facility Support). I.e., for carpentry, plumbing, painting, masonry, and other Allied Trades tasks, will the Government furnish the construction/repair materials, tools and toolboxes, and heavy machinery like tractors, Bobcats, sweepers, etc...? | |
| 78 | 5.3 | Section 5.3 states "The contractor must possess or obtain an appropriate secret facility security clearance prior to performing work on a classified government contract". Since this contract involves the contractor to supply TS/SCI personnel (Appendix B), should the PWS clarify that this contract requires a Top Secret facility clearance? | |
| 30 | (Not specified in draft PWS) | Will there be any key personnel on this opportunity? | |
| 31 | (Not specified in draft PWS) | Will there be a billable PM on this opportunity? | |
| 100 | 1.0 General | Does the government envision this being an IDIQ contract type with ability to team with niche subcontractors? | |
| 64 | 1.10.4 | Is it a Government or contractor responsibility to provide OPSEC training? | |
| 102 | 1.19, pg 11 | Will the RFP Section L require Candidate Key Personnel Resumes and/or Qualification Summaries? | |
| 32 | 1.2. | The last line in paragraph 1.2 states that if the incumbent workforce is hired, no transition period should be required. Based on the rest of the PWS, contract positions grow by about 20% with workforce size in Rome, NY doubling. For those positions there is no incumbent workforce and a transition may be required. | |
| 59 | 1.4.1 and 1.4.4 | It appears that the PWS intent is to define EWW and OT as two separate items. Please clarify the use and intent of the terms EWW and Overtime with respect to notification and approval. | |
| 54 | 1.4.3 | It is normal commercial business best practice to pay non-exempt employees a shift differential for work performed outside of PWS defined "hours of operations" (paragraph 1.4). Does the Government support this concept? We know that shift differential is a key benefit that encourages recruiting and improves employee retention. How should we account for this best commercial practice in our pricing model? | |
| 58 | 1.4.3, 1.4.4, Appendix A | Please clarify if the PWS requires a specific job description to work 1920 hours per year IAW Appendix A. If it does, then it will be necessary for Offerors to know the seniority dates of the personnel subject to Service Contract Labor Standards (SCLS) to accurately plan for the impacts that employee vacation allowances has on their work availability throughout the year. As an example, Appendix A indicates a need for 3840 hours for an ECP Technician; that is, two FTE employees based on the PWS 1920 hour model. If one of the two ECP Technicians is authorized three weeks of vacation time IAW the SCLS wage determination, then that employee would not be able to work 1920 hours in a year without OT authorization. | |
| 55 | 1.4.3, Appendix B | Please clarify. Paragraph 1.4.3 states that the activities requiring shift work are identified in the individual "PWS paragraphs." That appears to be activities 2.5.7.9 (CNOC Ops Planner) and 2.6.2.2 (Entry Control Point) Technician. However, Appendix B identifies many more, shift work positions. | |
| 56 | 1.4.4 | Please clarify. IAW the Department of Labor (DoL) guidelines, Service Contract Act (SCA) labor categories are "non-exempt" as opposed to "exempt." | |
| 57 | 1.4.4 | Would the government provide a mapping of the SCA WD labor categories to the associated PWS job description to ensure common understanding between the Government and industry? | |
| 60 | 1.4.5.8 | The DoL requires a company to pay non-exempt personnel 1.5x their hourly rate for any hours worked more than 40 per week in FL, NY, and WA. If a non-exempt employee completes 40 hours of work M-F and then is called out late Friday evening or Saturday, then that employee is entitled to OT IAW DoL. Therefore, compensation time off would not be an option nor allowed as suggested in the PWS. | |
| 01 | 1.4.6 | Will Junteenth be considered a Federal Holiday on this contract? | |
| 33 | 1.4.6. | In the list of Federal Holidays Independence Day - 4 July should be on its own line to prevent confusion. | |
| 61 | 1.4.7, Appendix B | Please define or identify "non-essential tasks." Does "non-essential" map to "No" in "Mission Critical" column noted at the chart in Appendix B? Note, the Knowledge Management Specialist for the Command Section and A3 is marked Yes as Mission Critical, yet, the A9 Knowledge Management Specialist is marked No. All three positions reference PWS paragraph 2.4.4. | |
| 34 | 1.4.7. | Down Days are not non-working days for contractors or Title 5 civilians. They are liberal leave days with personnel required to take vacation or paid time off in order not to be present. | |
| 62 | 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 | Commercial best practices for SCA employees who successfully work in Mission Essential positions, or support Contingency operations, and/or respond to Mission Availability recalls would be paid an annual stipend for successfully supporting these specific, non-standard Government requirements. Would the Government support payment of an annual stipend and if yes, how should we price this employee benefit? We have documented improvements in employee recruiting and retention for similar stipends. | |
| 63 | 1.6, Appendix D | Please clarify. Paragraph 1.6 refences Appendix D which is Acronyms and Definitions; it appears that paragraph 1.6 should reference Appendix B. | |
| 35 | 1.6. | Paragraph 1.6. states that Appendix D identifies Mission Essential position. Appendix D is Acronyms. Appendix B on page 55 identifies positions as Mission Critical or not. Recent experience with the pandemic and other events has proven Mission Critical is not the same as Mission Essential and consistency in terms | |
| 36 | 2.2.1. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, Administrative Assistant positions would no longer require Secret clearances. Administrative Assistants in A5/8 and AFRCC would work in controlled areas with classified networks and open storage. Their counterpart in A9 enters a controlled area and manages classified IT equipment as part of ITEC additional duties, assigns and tracks taskers in TMT on SIPRNet, and accesses SIPRNet Protected Distribution System (PDS) lockboxes in the Director and Deputy Director's office. | |
| 03 | 2.2.2.3, 2.2.2.12, 2.2.2.14 | These requirements are too specific and will tend to favor an incumbent contractor. The requirement needs to be more generalized so that any viable personnel specialist has a fair chance to compete. | |
| 65 | 2.2.2.5, Appendix D | Believe Status of Resources and Training System (SORTS) is more accurate. | |
| 96 | 2.2.2.6 | We currently provide the full range of Human Resources support to the Federal Communications Commission and have supported the National Guard Bureau and led Military, Manpower and Personnel Operations for DoD and the federal government. Will the government provide a direct POC for us to collaborate with for hiring ANG positions outside the organization or will this come through the COR? | |
| 02 | 2.3.1 | The Allied Trades description is very detailed, but only represents one FTE in the worklaod requirements section (Section 2.1). Is the expectation of the Government to have one FTE who can provide for all of these trades? | |
| 04 | 2.3.1 | The sub-requirements (2.3.1.1 to 2..3.1.12) are collectively a compilation of different skills - typically requiring different personnel. Appendix A lists only a single FTE for this position. Is it the Government's intent that a contractor provide a single (one) person to fulfill all these requirements, or will the Government allow the use of multiple persons to perform these requirements as long as the total labor hours do not exceed one (1) FTE)? | |
| 79 | 2.3.1 thru 2.3.1.12 | The requirements for Allied Trades seem incongruent to the relatively administrative requirements in the Draft PWS. If this is the intent, what equipment and tools does the government provide? | |
| 37 | 2.3.1. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Allied Trades position would no longer require a Secret Clearance. The Allied Tradesman's duties require access to almost all spaces within the Sector including open storage areas. It would seem a clearance would be necessary for this position. | |
| 80 | 2.3.2 thru 2.3.2.6 | The requirements for Civil Engineer seem incongruent to the relatively administrative requirements in the Draft PWS. If this is the intent, where are the aircraft crash rescue and EOD infrastructure located? | |
| 38 | 2.3.2. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Civil Engineer position would no longer require a Secret Clearance. The Civil Engineer works in a controlled area with classified networks and open storage. Duties of the position require access to almost all spaces within the Headquarters including open storage areas. It would seem a clearance would be necessary for this position. | |
| 81 | 2.3.3 thru 2.3.3.12 | The requirements for Electrical Systems Support seem incongruent to the relatively administrative requirements in the Draft PWS. If this is the intent, does the government provide the tools and equipment to perform these tasks? | |
| 39 | 2.3.3. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Electrical Systems Support position would not require a Secret Clearance. The position may have access to almost every area in the Sector including open storage areas. It would seem a clearance would be necessary. | |
| 05 | 2.3.3.6 | These requirements are too specific and will tend to favor an incumbent contractor who already knows what Sector BCC utilities operator tasks are. At least The requirement needs to be more generalized so that any viable Electrical Systems Support specialist has a fair chance to compete. | |
| 40 | 2.3.4. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Facility Manager position would no longer require a Secret Clearance. The Facility Manager works in a controlled area with classified networks and open storage and has access to almost every area in the Headquarters including open storage areas. It would seem a clearance would be necessary. | |
| 82 | 2.3.5 thru 2.3.5.13 | Same as above. Can you confirm these requirements are for working with hazardous materials such as abestos at the CONR facility at Tyndall or off-site location? | |
| 41 | 2.3.5. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Powered Support System Mechanic position would no longer require a Secret Clearance. The Power Pro Mechanic duties require access to almost all spaces within the Sector including open storage areas. It would seem a clearance would be necessary for this position. | |
| 06 | 2.3.5.10 | These requirements are too specific and will tend to favor an incumbent contractor who already knows what Sector BCC utilities operator tasks are. The requirement needs to be more generalized so that any viable Powered Support Systems Mechanic has a fair chance to compete. | |
| 88 | 2.4.1 | Does the Government have an existing contract with O&M sustainment established with documented SLA support or are all repairs performed using on site spares? | |
| 07 | 2.4.3 | The sub-requirements (2.4.3.1 to 2.4.3.37) are collectively a compilation of several skill sets- typically requiring different personnel. For example, 2.4.3.1 - 2.4.3.7 are system administrator type of tasks, 2.4.3.8 - 2.4.3 14 are skill sets typically provided by web-graphic person, whereas 2.4.3.16 - 2.4.3.20 belong to an asset management type of person who doesn't have to be an IT support peron. Is it the Government's intent that any potential IT Support contractor person must satisfy ALL of the sub-requirements? If that is not the Government's intent, we recommend that the Government breakup the 2.4.3 sub-requirements into the appropriate labor categories that correspond to specific sub-requirements (e.g., Graphics/Web/Multimedia Designer for 2.4.3.8 - 2.4.3.14). | |
| 98 | 2.4.3 | We currently provide the full range of IT and wireless communication for Arlington National Cemetery. Our project manager had to have Aruba certification which is still rare in the government. Will Aruba certification be a requirement in the revised PWS? | |
| 42 | 2.4.3. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Information Technology positions would no longer require Secret slearances. Given that they work in controlled areas and have access to classified networks and open storage areas. We believe these positions would require Secret clearances. | |
| 89 | 2.4.3.10 | Is the contractor designated by the military as the COMSEC Responsible Officer in charge of keymat management and interfacing with base COMSEC office? | |
| 90 | 2.4.3.20 | Is the contractor designated by the military as the Automated Data Processing Equipment (ADPE) Custodian in charge of all IT asset inventory management and overseeing IT custodians? | |
| 91 | 2.4.3.33 | Does the list of secure voice capabilities include any vIPer devices? In addition, is the contractor expected to manage any secure voice over internet protocol (VOIP) capabilities such as EC-VOIP or releasable VOIP devices? Is there a requirement to manage a call manager such as the existing NORAD Enterprise Network VOIP solution housed at the sector? | |
| 43 | 2.4.4. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Knowledge Management Specialist in A9 would not require a security clearance. The position will be located in a controlled area with access to classified systems. | |
| 09 | 2.4.5 | The category "Network Analyst" is only used in the Eastern Air Defense Sector location. The responsibilities of Network Analyst are essentially similar (if not the same) to the responsibilties of 2.4.3 (Information Technology Support 2.4.3.1 - 2.4.3.7). Why is the Government using two (2) different names for essentially the same position? | |
| 08 | 2.4.5.1 | What is "basic cyber system support" - please define the scope of this support. | |
| 10 | 2.5.1 | The Air Defense Sector Operations sub-requirements (2.5.1.1 - 2.5.1.8) point to two (2) different skill sets. Appendix A indicates that two (2) FTEs are needed for this position. Is it the Government's intent that each of the bidder's candidates be able to perform all of the sub-requirements? | |
| 11 | 2.5.1.1 - 2.5.1.8 | The sub-requirements are so specific as to favor an incumbent. The requirements needs to be generalized so that any viable communications and data technician has a fair chance to compete. | |
| 16 | 2.5.10.1 - 2.5.10.8 | Undefined acronym (DOO) | |
| 17 | 2.5.10.8 | This sub-requirement is not related to Flight Operations Specialist functionality. It implies that this sub-requirement is currently being performed by an incumbent at Rome NY. This may imply that the requirement was writtten to favor the incumbent. | |
| 44 | 2.5.12 | It appears this position title should be Global Force Management Specialist, as it is listed in Appendix B | |
| 18 | 2.5.12 / Appendix A | Which is the correct term "Force Management Specialist" or "Flight Management Specialist"? | |
| 12 | 2.5.2 & 2.5.3 | The 2.5.2 and 2.5.3 requirements (and their sub-requirements) are identical, Why do they have two (2) different function labels (Manager vs Support)? | |
| 45 | 2.5.4. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Exercise Planner in A9 would not require a security clearance. Given the sensitivity of the position as an international planner involved in air defense and Theater Security Cooperation efforts, it would seem a security clearance would be required. | |
| 92 | 2.5.5.3 | Does the list of data link equipment also include the recently fielded Link Monitoring and Management Systems (LMMT)? | |
| 13 | 2.5.8 | The sub-requirements (2.5.8.1 to 2.5.8.5) are collectively a compilation of several skill sets (program analyst, project manaager, trainer, operations support) - typically requiring different personnel. Appendix A indicates that this Senior Requirments Analyst is needed at two (2) offices. Is it the Government's intent that any potential Seniort Requirments Analyst candidate must satisfy ALL of the sub-requirements? If that is not the Government's intent, we recommend that the Government breakup the 2.5.8 sub-requirements into the appropriate labor categories that correspond to specific sub-requirements (e.g., Program Analyst for 2.5.8.1 - 2.5.8.2). | |
| 14 | 2.5.9.3 / 2.5.9.5 | These two (2) sub-requirements are IDENTICAL. Suggest deleting one of them. | |
| 15 | 2.5.9.7 | This sub-requirement is not related in any way to Standardization and Evaluation. It implies that sub-requirement is currently being performed by an incumbent at Rome NY or JBLM WA. This may imply that the requirement was writtten to favor the incumbent. | |
| 19 | 2.6.1.3 | This seems written as a job requirement, instead of a job function (see 2.6.1.1, 2.6.1..2, etc.) | |
| 46 | 2.6.2. | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the AOC Entry Control Point Technicians would not require a security clearance. As alternate security managers for the AOC with access to the secuirty clearance database, and DISS, and being responsible for programming badges that provide access to classified systems and open storage areas that a security clearance would be required. | |
| 21 | 2.6.2.1 - 2.6.2.44 | These sub-requirements are collectively a compilation of duties that are performed by two (2) different level technicians (e.g., I, II) - typically requiring different labor categories. Appendix A indicates that 2 FTEs are needed for the ECP technician function. Is it the Government's intent that any potential ECP Technician candidate must satisfy ALL of the sub-requirements? If that is not the Government's intent, we recommend that the Government breakup the 2.6.2 sub-requirements into the appropriate labor categories that correspond to specific sub-requirements. | |
| 22 | 2.6.2.1 - 2.6.2.44 | The level of detail provided by these sub-requirements are extremely more detailed than the the other sub-requirments in this PWS. This may imply that these sub-requirements were writtten to favor the incumbent. | |
| 20 | 2.6.2.1 / 2.6.2.16 | These sub-requirements are essentially duplicates. | |
| 24 | 2.7.1 / 2.7.2 | These two (2) positions essentially perform the same function, but seems to have been written to reflect the duties performed by 2 separate individuals. This may imply that these sub-requirements were writtten to favor the incumbent. | |
| 23 | 2.7.2 | This category is missing from Appendices A and B | |
| 25 | 2.7.2 / 2.7.3 | These two (2) positions essentially perform the same function, but seems to have been written to reflect the duties performed by 2 separate individuals at 2 different locations (Tyndall / Rome). This may imply that these sub-requirements were writtten to favor the incumbent. | |
| 47 | 2.7.3 | Per Appendix B: Special Requirements, the Taining Analysis and Management position in A9 would no longer require a security clearance. The duty location is in an open storage area with access to classified systems. A security clearance would seem appropriate. | |
| 67 | 5.1 and Appendix B | Please clarify. Para 5.1 indicates that only the Operations Planner position requires a TS clearance with SCI access; however Appendix B identifies several other positions with a TS/SCI requirement. | |
| 69 | 5.1 and Appendix B | Para 5.1 states that all position requires Secret security clearance; however Appendix B identifies multiple positions as "N/A" suggesting that these positions do not require a security clearance. Please clarify. Note, as an example, it would seem that at Personnel Program Specialist with access to SORTS data (para 2.2.25) would require a Secret PCL. | |
| 68 | 5.1, 5.3, Appendix B | Please clarify. Appendix B indicates that several positions require a Top Secret personnel clearance level (PCL). Thus, the company corresponding facility clearance level (FCL) should also be Top Secret as opposed to Secret as referenced in 5.1 and 5.3. The DD254 would state a TS FCL is required by the company to support the highest PCL security clearance noted at Appendix B. | |
| 48 | 5.1. | Paragraph 5.1. identifies the Operations Planner as the only positioning performing TS/SCI work and requiring access to TS/SCI material, information or systems, but Appendix B identifies six additional positions as requiring TS/SCI. (Knowledge Management Specialist x4, GFM Specialist, CNOC AO, Operations Planner, and the Sr. Requirements Analyst). | |
| 49 | 5.2. | Per the 325FW ISPM, Visitor Group Security Agreements are no longer required. | |
| 50 | 5.2. | Paragraph 5.2. states that "As a minimum, all contractor personnel performing on this contract shall have a secret clearance prior to performing any task", however, Appendix B indicates 19 positions not requiring a security clearance. This should be clarified to prevent offerors from proposing uncleared personnel. | |
| 103 | 5.3, pg 50 | The new revisions to 13 CFR § 121.103(h)(4) - Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 201 / Friday, October 16, 2020, page 66180 - states, "A joint venture may be awarded a contract requiring a facility security clearance where either the joint venture itself or the individual partner(s) to the joint venture that will perform the necessary security work has (have) a facility security clearance." For an 8(a) Joint Venture (JV), can the government confirm they will accept FCL status (Top Secret) from each of the partner (member) companies of the JV? | |
| 76 | Acquisition Strategy | Has the 325 CONS considered placing this professional services requirement under the OASIS SB Pool 1 8(a) subpool IDIQ contract which would tie directly into OMB M-19-13 encouraging the use of Tier III Best In Class (BIC) contracts and therefore reducing the percentage of unaligned spend under Tier O contracts? | |
| 29 | Appendix A | Personnel Program Specialist indicates 3,820 hours, which is not quite 2 FTEs. Is this a typo that should be 3,840, which would be 2 FTEs? | |
| 70 | Appendix A | Please clarify the number of FTE Hours. The SCLS authorizes SCLS employees two weeks vacation time (80 hours) after one year of employment, plus paid time off for the 11 holidays mentioned in paragraph 1.4.6 (88 hours), plus the Federally mandated sick leave (56 hours). This total time off calculates an SCLS covered employee as 1856 FTE hours as opposed to 1920, as noted in Appendix A. | |
| 26 | Appendix A (NSEP) | Mission Support Analysis? Should this be Mission Support Analyst? | |
| 101 | Appendix A, pg 54 | The first job, KM Specialist, lists 4,800 hours. All other job positions are divisible by a 1920 (assumed FT annual hours). For the KM Spedcialist, do we expect a combination of Full-0time and Part-time support? | |
| 74 | Appendix A: Workload Data | Can the Government confirm the anticipated level of effort in this table? We calculated 108,460 total hours which translates into 56 FTEs. | |
| 75 | Appendix A: Workload Data | Now that Juneteenth is a federal holiday, is 1920 hours an accurate reflection of a man year. Or should the total hours for a man year equate to 1912 hours? | |
| 51 | Appendix B | Under the Eastern Air Defense Sector positions the FTE hours for the Powered Support System Mechanic are 3,820. Given the apparent use of 1,920 hours as a standard for an FTE, it appears the total should be 3,840. | |
| 71 | Appendix B | Appendix B provides an OT indication (Yes/No) for each of the Job Descriptions. Does that indication mean that the position are exempt or non-exempt; or does it signal the Government determination that even though it is a non-exempt position and OT is not anticipated / permited for that position. | |
| 27 | Appendix B (NSEP) | Mission Support Analysis? Should this be Mission Support Analyst? | |
| 72 | Appendix C | Exercise Planner position requires the employee to be "fluent" in Spanish. Please define "fluent." We have seen some PWSs define fluent IAW the Interagency Language Roundtable ( https://www.govtilr.org/ ) set forth by the U.S. Foreign Service Institute. | |
| 28 | Appendix C (Operations Support) | Mission Support Analysis? Should this be Mission Support Analyst? | |
| 87 | Appendix C: Special Experience Requirements | Could the government clarify if there are no minimum education requirements for Administrative Support personnel, IT personnel (excluding Knowledge Management Specialist), Training personnel, Operations Support personnel, and Facility Support personnel (excluding Civil Engineer)? | |
| 93 | Contract Vehicle | Team BovianTTC requests the Government compete this effort on STARS III | |
| 73 | Cover page, all pages | Each page is marked "CUI" or Controlled Unclassified Information. Typically, CUI data is released on SAM.gov via "controlled" as opposed to "public" release measures and instructions. Please see the cover page lower right hand area where "Limited Dissemination Control: FED ONLY," please clarify dissemination instructions and controls. | |
| 86 | General | Is there an incumbent? And if so, could you please provide the contract number? | |
| 104 | GENERAL | What is the government's estimate on timeline for an AFNORTH RFP? We understand this is only an approximation, but this will give industry adequate lead-time to conduct researc, planning, and ultimately provide the best response to the government. | |
| 105 | GENERAL | Given the diverse set of skills and positions required on this contract, we think NAICS 541990 is an appropraite catch-all for professional, technical, IT, and training services. |
PWS Comments
| Socio-Economic Status | ||||
| Company Name | 8(a) Y/N | Company Cage Code | ||
| Insert Name Here | Yes | |||
| No | ||||
| Current Contract NAICS | 517311 | Please address sections you feel are not articulated to what you would expect from industry. Provide as much detail as you would like in your comments. We are loooking to provide a cleaner version of the PWS before we submit the final version to sam.gov. Please provide comments to the spreadsheet and not the PWS. The more information we have the better the PWS will be. Thank you for your help with this PWS. | ||
| Size Standard | 1500 Employees | |||
| Contractor | ||||
| Recommended NAICS | ||||
| Contact Name: | Comment | Reference to | Commercial Sector | Government Follow up |
| Contact Email: | Number | PWS Section | Comment | comment |
| Contact Phone: | 01 | |||
| Socio-Economic Status: | 02 | |||
| 03 | ||||
| 04 | ||||
| 05 | ||||
| 06 | ||||
| 07 | ||||
| 08 | ||||
| 09 | ||||
| 10 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .