ID04150093_TAB_10__Past_Performance_Questionnaire_10292015.docx

DOCX document 29 KB Posted

Attached to
EPA PM 2. 5 PFTE Teflon Filters
Solicitation number
ID04150093
Issued by

About this file

Offerors Pricing Worksheet dated 10/29/2015

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please return completed questionnaire via ITSS with proposal due 18 Dec 2015

Please complete this evaluation document and send via ITSS as soon as possible for inclusion in the Pre-Award Technical Evaluation process.

Please reference attachment: PPQ - ID04150093

Your participation in this acquisition is greatly appreciated!

Keierrah P. Beasley Contract Specialist Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) GSA, Region 4 - Atlanta Office: 404-215-6878 Keierrah.Beasley@gsa.gov

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Quoters:

This questionnaire will be used in evaluating your ability to perform the required services listed in the Performance Work Statement. Provide your name, address and contract number to the references in order to fill out the form and submit through the ITSS program, Attachment: PPQ - ID04150093

Instructions to Evaluator:

1. Please complete this questionnaire based on the following guidance:

a. Typed or handwritten responses are sufficient.

b. Indicate, based on the adjectival ratings below, the contractor's performance on the identified program. Assessments should reflect only contractor liable performance. The following is a definition of the scoring levels:

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Based on the offeror’s performance record, essentially no doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work.
Very Good
Based on the offeror’s performance record, little doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work.
Satisfactory
Based on the offeror’s performance record, some doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work.
Margin
Based on the offeror’s performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work. Changes to the offeror’s existing processes may be necessary in order to achieve contract requirements.
Unsatisfactory
Based on the offeror’s performance record, extreme doubt exists that the offeror will successfully perform the required work.
Not Observed
This element was not observed.

c. For each question please circle or bold one rating. Select "Not Observed" if you are unable to provide a score for an area.

d. Please provide narrative explanations for your answers. Space for your remarks is provided after each question. If more space is needed, use the back of this questionnaire or attach additional sheets.

e. You are urged to supplement your own knowledge of the contractor's performance with the judgment of others in your organization. In addition to completing the attached questionnaire for the identified program, you may provide comments on other similar programs with which your activity has contracts with this offeror.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Please return completed questionnaire via ITSS by 18 Dec 2015

Reference: PPQ - ID04150093

Company Information

Company Name:

Contract/Task Number:

Contract/Task Information

Title of Work Performed:

Type of Contract: Firm Fixed Price, Labor Hour, Time & Materials, Cost-Reimbursement

Date of Award:

Period of Performance:

Dollar Value of Contract:

Description of Work Performed:

Quantity of filters delivered per year:

Delivery Schedule:

Evaluation

1. How well did the contractor meet schedule compliance (Milestones, Deliverables and Contract Activities)?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

2. How well did the contractor provide quality customer relations and thorough contract administration (reasonable and cooperative behavior, commitment to customer service, responsiveness to issues)?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

3. How well did the contractor comply with contract requirements, accuracy/compliance with the quality of delivered items?

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

4. The contractor’s overall performance on this contract is/was:

Exceptional Very Good Satisfactory Marginal Unsatisfactory Not Observed

5. Would you hire this company again? Yes No

Evaluator Information

Name of Evaluator: ______________________________________________________________________

Position/Title: ______________________________________________________________________

Organization: ______________________________________________________________________

Length of Involvement in Program/Contract: ________________________________________________________

Phone Number: ________________________________

Email: _______________________________________

Date Questionnaire Completed: ______________________________________

ID04150093

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .