Attachment_4_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc

HTC711-13-R-D008

Attachment 4

Index Number (internal use) ______

Source Selection Information - See FAR 3.104

For Official Use Only Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In

Past Performance Questionnaire

USTRANSCOM

HTC711-13-R-D008

Analysis of Mobility Platform

Please provide concise comments regarding your overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract or workload identified below. Please respond by sending the entire completed questionnaire, including these instructions, via e-mail to the address below:

E-mail: jennifer.knobeloch@ustranscom.mil NOTE: CPARS may be reviewed for the contractors in addition to the responses to this questionnaire. Although you may have filed a CPARS for the contract listed, we would appreciate your response to this questionnaire because some of the questions relate to areas not covered by CPARS.

I. WORK PERFORMED IDENTIFICATION

Contractor (Company/Division):

Contract Number/Type (FFP, CPFF, etc):

Work Performed Title:

Dollar value:

Period of Performance:

II. RESPONDENT(S) TO QUESTIONNAIRE

Name:

Position/Title:

Relation to Program:

Phone:

Email:

Other suggested points of contact:

Please note that if your responses indicate a weakness in the contractor’s performance, a notification may be submitted to the contractor, and they may be made aware of the comment. The contractor will not be made aware of the commenter’s name or office.

III. PERFORMANCE EVALUATION

1. Staffing

a. Were the types of personnel (skill and expertise) the contractor used adequate to accomplish the effort without government intervention?

Yes ( No (

REMARKS:

b. Did the contractor provide replacement personnel of the same quality and skills of vacancies with minimum disruption to the support effort?

Yes ( No (

c. How effective was the contractor in aligning and re-aligning resources (personnel and other ) to meet varying workloads?

Exceptional____Very Good____Satisfactory____Marginal____Unsatisfactory____N/A____

d. How would you rate the contractor’s emphasis on customer satisfaction?

2. Technical

a. How would you rate the contractor's overall technical approach?

b. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing planned project activities/requirements within the established milestones/timeframes?

c. How effective was the contractor in accomplishing quality checks to ensure that the final deliverables met the Statement of Work requirements?

d. Are you aware of any performance issues which have resulted in, or contributed to, less than satisfactory performance?

3. Cost Control

a. If the contract was other than firm fixed price, did the contractor use effective methods and effective cost controls?

Yes (

4. Key Areas

a. Performance of system or modeling and simulation software development projects and/or programs that include identification and development of requirements, scheduling, and life-cycle management.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

b. Performance of projects that required the automated or manual linking of feeds from real world operational command and control systems, to distribution or mobility modeling and simulation platforms.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

c. Performance in developing, sustaining, and supporting (to include any engineering and architectural activities) a modeling environment at the enterprise level.

If the above experience is applicable, provide a description of the effort performed and a performance rating.

5. Would you award to this contractor in the future?

PAGE

Source Selection Information - See FAR 3.104

For Official Use Only Source Selection Sensitive When Filled In