r_J A 11-02 Sea-Air Multimodal Mod USC-6 .pdf

PDF 446 KB Posted

Attached to
Sea-Air Multimodal Modification to USC-6
Solicitation number
HTC711-08-R-0011
Issued by

View the file

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

" JUSTIFICATION FOR OTHER J'HAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

SEA- AIR MULTI-MODAL MODIFICATION TO USC-6

1. CONTRACTING ACTIVITY, United States Transportation Command (USTRANSCOM), Sealift Services Division, 508 Scott Drive, Scott AFB IL62225-5357. USTRANSCOM is DoD's single manager of common user transportation of all modes (sea, air, surface).

2. NATURE AND/OR DESCRIPTION OF THE ACTION BEING APPROVED. USTRANSCOM has an urgent requirementto add transportation by air to an existing intennodal (sea and surface transportation) contract known as the Universal Services Contract (USC)-6~ USC-6 awards currently are made only to ocean common or contract carriers. USTRANSCOM's intent is to acquire the required services by increasing temporarily the scope of the USC-6 through modifications that will add flexibility to allow contractors to transport limited segments of door-to-door service via air to their existing contract for sea. and surface transportation over selected routes,

3. DESCRIPTION OF THE SUPPLIES/SERVICES REQUIRED TO MEET THE AGENCY'S

NEEDS. USTRANSCOM requires USC-6 carriers to add an air mode to the existing intermodal (sea, surface) door-to-door movement ofcargo under USC-6. The carriers will be required to trans load cargo from seaport to aerial port, and deliver cargo to fmal destinations u modes of transportation, including the air mode. The estimated value ofthis acquisition is for the added scope ofwork toUSC-6 contracts through 31 Dec 2011. If a new, unrestricted contract for the' urgently needed services can be awarded before 31 Dec 2011, the estimated value may be less. USTRANSCOM is starting work at once on efforts intended to lead to a new, unrestricted contract. The modificationwill be effective 1 Jan 2011 or at time ofaward through 31 Dec 2011 or such earlier time asa new, unrestricted contract is effective.

The requirement consists of the following general services-

a) Select multi-modal location (seaport/airport) that is suitable for offioadingcargo from USC-6 sealift vessels.

b) Multi-modal location must be able to accommodate DoD provided anned couriers to escort missions sensitive cargo moving via air to final destination.

c) Provide secure cargo holding location to accommodate cargo being prepared to beairlifted.

d) Provide aircraft, personnel, equipment, tools, material, maintenance, supervision, ground transportation, unloading and loading capability of cargo for transload operations, and deliver cargo.

e) Coordinate all activities with the host nation to implement the requirements in the work statement.

£) Provide reliable and secure time definite delivery, in-transit visibility (lTV), and door-to-door managementof military cargo.

4. STATUTORY AUTIIORITYPERMITTINGOTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN

COMPETITION. Authority for this acquisition is 10 USC 2304(c)(2) artdFAR 6.302-2, Unusual and Compelling Urgency.

5. DEMONSTRATION THAT THE CONTRACTOR'S UNIQUE QUALIFICATION OR NATURE

OF THE ACQUISITIONREQUlRES USE OF ONLY ONE RESPONSmLE SOURCE AND NO OTHER SUPPLIES OR SERVICES WILL SATISFY AGENCY REQUIREMENTS AUTHORl1Y.

USTRANSCOM's current ability to meet United States Central Command's (CENTCOM) distribution requirements have recently been stressed due to Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) surge requirements of 30,000 personnel and associated equipment combined with capacity saturation due to metering by officials at the Afghanistan and Pakistan borders, closure ofTorkham border, and increased hostilities along the Ring Road. The recent closure of the Torkham border. resulted in a severe cargo bottleneck at the border and subsequent attacks on USC cargo. Continuing instability may lead to deteriorating security on roads in Pakistan and Afghanistan, border closures, and subsequent attacks on USC cargo. USTRANSCOM must have a contractual mechanism in-place to provide an immediate and secure alternate method to move cargo

Page 1 of4 i from nearby seaports into Afganistan when these types of disruptions occur. A tender or separate contract would require approximately six months to a year to execute depending on a finalized performance work statement/requirement from the customer and resolution of operational challenges. Therefore, in order to meet mission requirements within established timelines USTRANSCOM must modify the USC-6 contract to provide USC carriers the ability to expedite cargo via air (vice trucking) to final destination. The time to develop and award a new, unrestricted contract would constitute a delay that could result in avoidable physical injury or death to DoD personnel and others, could result in avoidable financial losses ofDoD cargo and equipment, and could jeopardize DoD's mission accomplishment.

The USC-6 carriers currently provide international, door-to-door cargo transportation and distribution services using ocean common or contract carriers, as defined in the Shipping Act of 1984, offering regularly scheduled commercial liner service, along with inland linehauls, for requirements that arise in any part of the world. Approximately 90% of DoD international cargo moves under the USC-6 contracts. These contracts call for the USC-6 carriers to provide ocean, intermodal, and related transportation and distribution services to support their offered services as required. The USC-6 contract applies to Unit Movement Cargo and Other Than Unit Movement (OTUM) Cargo. Unit Movement Cargo is described by Unit Line Numbers (ULNs) and Plan Identification Numbers (PIDs) in the Joint Operation Planning and Execution System (JOPES) -whether contingency, exercise or administrative in nature - whether characterized as deployment, redeployment or retrograde cargo. As such, adding a limited air piece to this existing international transportation/distribution services contract is the most expeditious means to meet this requirement. The world-wide and intermodal nature ofUSC-6 makes it the best existing contract vehicle for immediate expansion to meet the urgent requirement.

6. DESCRIPTION OF EFFORTS MADE TO ENSURE THAT OFFERS ARE SOLICITED FROM

AS MANY POTENTIAL SOURCES AS IS PRACTICABLE. This action was not synopsized in accordance with FAR 5.202(a)(2). Due to the short lead time and complexity of this requirement, it is in the Government's best interest to add air transportation to the USC-6 contract, as the need to quickly move troops and associated equipment into Afghanistan does not allow time to solicit other sources. It is the govcrnment's intent to begin immediately efforts to develop and solicit a long term requirement on an unrestricted basis and consider all interested sources (not just ocean common and contract carriers).

Simultaneously, USTRANSCOM will evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the immediate addition of air transportation to USC-6.

7. DETERMINATION BY THE CONTRACTING OFFICER THAT THE ANTICIPATED COST

TO THE GOVERNMENT WILL BE FAIR AND REASONABLE. The Contracting Officer will detennine that the anticipated price will be fair and reasonable in accordance with FAR Subpart 15.4. Based on market research, competition is expected for the sea-air routes added to USC-6 and USTRANSCOM, which is the DOD single manager for all modes of common user transportation, is equipped to evaluate prices for air transportation, as well as sea and surface transportation.

8. DESCRIPTION OF THE MARKET RESEARCH CONDUCTED AND THE RESULTS, OR A

STATEMENT OF THE REASONS MARKET RESEARCH WAS NOT CONDUCTED.

USTRANSCOM's International Scheduled Services Division conducted a market survey on industry capabilities and potential sources for intra-theater surface and air (multi-modal) transportation of military break-bulk cargo to/from various destinations in Afghanistan and Iraq. The Government was looking for commercial solutions to maximize the cost savings associated with surface (primarily ocean) transportation for the longest and safest portions of these movements, while capitalizing on the speed and safety of airlift to move designation break-bulk cargo to the fmal destinations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Numerous carriers showed an interest by responding to the request for infonnation market survey. The responses from the industry offered a door-to-doormulti-modal solution for transporting break-bulk, oversized/outsized cargo through partnerships with ocean carriers and DoD approved foreign airlines. Since receipt of the responses, the surge of requirements in support of Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF), increased hostilities, and uncertainties of border crossings have led to an immediate need to add this capability to the USC contracts.

Page 2 of4

9. ANY OTHER FACTS SUPPORTING THE USE OF OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN

COMPETITION. There are several factors that make this a complex effort. First, there are different laws and regulations applicable to the movement of government cargo via sea and air. Second, any resulting contract would require a system capable of allowing the government to book cargo over various multimodal routes. Due to the complexity and necessity for a long-term acquisition plan to achieve successful completion of this activity in a timely and economic manner, it is in the government's best interest to have a short term and long term solution. The short term solution is to modify the USC-6 contract by adding language to allow USC carriers to transport cargo via air vice land when determined to be in the best interest of the Government. The USC-6 contract already encompasses multimodal transportation and is supported with a comprehensive web based booking system. The long term solution will be to solicit the requirement on an unrestricted (not just to ocean common or contract carriers) basis to both large and small businesses to stimulate competition to the fullest extent possible.

10. A LISTING OF SOURCES, IF ANY, THAT EXPRESSED, IN WRITING, AN INTEREST IN

THE ACQUISITION.

Agility International Inc.; AKSU Transport and Foreign Trade Co; ANHAM, L.L.C.; America President Lines Ltd Inc.; ATLAS Air Worldwide Holdings & American Shipping and Logistics Group (ASL); DB Schenker; DHL Global Forwarding; DHL Express; Evergreen Airlines; HEB International Logistics; Liberty Global Logistics and UPS; Maersk Line, Limited; Mondo International, Inc.; Nassery Transportation;

National Airlines; Safe Ports; Rig Boss LLc/Sky Boss Logistics; SRX Transcontinental Inc.; TransAtlantic Lines; National Air Cargo

11. A STATEMENT OF ACTIONS, IF ANY, THE AGENCY MAY TAKE TO REMOVE OR

OVERCOME ANY BARRIERS TO COMPETITION BEFORE MAKING ANY SUBSEQUENT

ACQUISITION FOR THE SUPPLIES OR SERVICES REQUIRED. USTRANSCOM's intent is to continue to perform market research and immediately begin developing a long term solution to be solicited on an unrestricted basis to all carriers and/or third party logistic companies to bid door-to-door services.

Simultaneously, USTRANSCOM will evaluate the effectiveness and efficiency of the immediate addition of air transportation to USC-6.

12. CONTRACTING OFFICER'S CERTIFICATION. I certify that the data supporting the recommended use of other than full and open competition is accurate and complete to the best ofmy knowledge and belief.

~~. Date

Contracting Officer

13. TECHNICALIREQUlREMENTS PERSONNEL CERTIFICATION. I certify that the data supporting the recommended use of other than full and open competition is accurate and complete to the best ofmy knowledge and belief.

]S~ __~ BRIAN RIVERA Date

Chief, Business Processes (SDDC-G9)

WILLIAM P. MANN, Lt. Col, USAF Date USTRANSCOMrrCJ3

SEA - AIR MULTI-MODAL MODIFICATION TO USC-6

JUSTIFICATION & APPROVAL (J&A)

PROGRAM: Sea-Air Multimodal modification to USC-6.(outofscope modification)

AUTHORITY: 10 USC 2304(c)(2) FAR 6.302·2, Unusual and Compelling Urgency.

ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST:

TYPE OF J&A; Individual

REVIEW AND APPROVAL:

C10~dolO Date

Chief, Sealift Diyi '_~n",,--__ Directorate ofAcquisition

Chief, Acquisition Law Staff Judge Advocate

LARYM HL

JEFFE

Chief, u· ess Support and Policy Division Directorate ofAcquisition

~7rf4

WILLIAM T. RACHAL

Competition Advocate Directorate ofAcquisition

D!d'tH~rm= Head of the Contracting Activity

Senior Procurement

Date

27 t>te /(2

Date

C:<<2J~/o

Date

Date

JAN 06 20n

Date

Page 4 of4

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .