ATAMMC ACC RFI Feedback update 1 20231017 V2.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HT0015-24-RFI-ATAMMC
- Issued by
-
Defense Health Agency
About this file
This document provides an Excel feedback form for industry responses to a Request for Information (RFI) regarding the Defense Health Agency's (DHA) draft Request for Proposal (RFP) for healthcare services at the AT Augusta Military Medical Center Ambulatory Care Center (ATAMMC ACC). Respondents are asked to provide specific feedback on eight topic areas and six questions relating to the draft RFP's performance work statement, CLIN structure, transition schedule and costs, MRI requirements, provider staffing incentives, potential primary care incentives including ancillary services, proposed PMPM payment rates tied to beneficiary enrollment levels, and any other comments. Responses must be submitted using the Excel form by November 1, 2023 to the provided email address. Feedback received will be considered for revisions to the final RFI.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Instructions
| Instructions for Providing Specific Feedback on AT Augusta Military Medical Center (ATAMMC) Ambulatory Care Center (ACC) Draft RFP Feedback Form |
| The Defense Health Agency (DHA) is releasing the ATAMMC ACC Draft RFP for the purpose of obtaining feedback from industry. All questions or comments related to this ATAMMC ACC Draft RFP must be submitted on this Excel feedback form. Questions or comments submitted via a narrative email or in any other format will not be accepted. |
All comments and feedback for your company will be submitted using this Excel Form (with attachments if applicable) to DHA no later than November 01, 2023. Specific comments contained in the Excel tool may be considered in revisions to the final ATAMMC ACC RFP.
Feedback will be SENT by email to the ATAMMC ACC mailbox at dha.ncr.Acq-Sustainment.mbx.ataamc-acc@health.mil
Please ensure the Excel file is clearly LABELED with your Organization's Name (for example: XYZCompany_Comments on Draft ATAMMC ACC RFP)
Instructions for completing the Excel Worksheet:
- Select from drop down the RFI corresponding Topic letter (a-h) or Question number (1-6). Also available is 'Other'.
- Type in your comment/feedback - you may provide a 'see attached'
- Save the file and email to the ATAMMC ACC mailbox as indicated above
| Topics and Questions to Industry |
| a. Performance Work Statement. |
| b. CLIN structure. |
| c. Transition schedule and costs (including facility preparation costs), if applicable. The DHA intends to require offerors to propose transition schedules, to cap the transition phase at 180 days, and to reimburse transition costs under the PMPM CLIN once health care delivery under the contract begins. This means the contractor will be required to amortize its transition costs, if applicable |
| d. MRI requirement |
| e. Incentivizing contractor to maintain full provider staffing to ensure timely beneficiary care and to prevent leakage of care to the TRICARE network. |
| f. Other potential incentives for the Primary Care setting, including incentives relating to the delivery of Ancillary Services |
| g. PMPM payment rates tied to beneficiary empanelment levels (see Special Clause) |
| h. Any additional comments in regard to the RFI that may help clarify and develop this requirement |
| 1. Will a 6-month transition-in period be feasible, especially if payment will not be authorized until healthcare delivery services begin (post transition)? |
| 2. Describe any incentive structures that could be used to support maintaining providing staffing levels. Would a stated minimum staffing complement (for primary care providers and/or specialty care providers) be appropriate for this requirement? Should the government allow offerors to propose a la carte staffing? |
| 3. What other incentives could be effective in the Primary Care Healthcare setting? |
| 4. Is it feasible to equip the ACC (at one site) with MRI equipment/capability and, if so, how would you propose providing this capability? |
| 5. Does the proposed CLIN Structure provide clarity on requirements and payment, especially related to the transition costs and PMPM? |
| 6. Will the proposed PMPM payment structure, with PMPM payment rates tied to beneficiary empanelment levels, effectively incentivize the contractor to maintain sufficient PCM staffing? Are there any shortcomings with this payment approach? Would you recommend using a different (other than 75%) PMPM payment rate in the case of the non-empaneled beneficiaries? |
| Other |
ACC Draft RFP Feedback Form
| Insert Organization's Name: | |
| RFI Topic/RFI Question | Comment/Feedback |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .