HSCGG1-16-R-PRV022-AMENDMENT_0001.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

HSCGG1-16-R-PRV022

PAGE OF PAGES

1 3

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04/11/2016

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

21-16-G16PRV022

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

Contracting Officer CEU Providence 475 Kilvert Street, Suite 100 West Warwick, RI 02893

Sean E. Waldron Contract Specialist 401-736-1721

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., STREET, COUNTY, STATE AND ZIP CODE)

THIS AMENDMENT MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED

WITH YOUR PHASE I PROPOSAL

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

HSCGG1-16-R-PRV022

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

03/24/2016

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE REFERENCED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET

FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (SPECIFY TYPE OF MODIFICATION AND AUTHORITY)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The solicitation referenced in block 9A above is hereby amended as follows:

See pages 2 and 3 for changes, additions and deletions.

The proposal due date remains unchanged at April 25, 2016 by 4:00 PM local time, Warwick, RI.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or Print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

DANIEL B. WALKER, Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16B UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

04/11/2016

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

Solicitation: HSCGG1-16-R-PRV022 Amendment: 0001 2 of 3

Replace the entirety of Section B with the following:

SECTION B

SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS

The procurement is being conducted in accordance with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) Subpart 36.3 Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures. Phase I of the selection will be conducted as outlined in FAR 36.303-1. Phase II is prepared in accordance with FAR Part 15 and includes evaluation factors developed in accordance with FAR 15.304.

Evaluation factors and the submittal format are identified in Section M. Only the most highly qualified offerors will advance from Phase One to Phase Two. Upon completion of the Phase I technical/quality evaluations, between three and five of the most highly qualified offerors will be requested to submit Phase II proposals. One contract award is anticipated to be made from the Phase II proposals received.

Remove the following clause from Section I and move to Section L:

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2015

Delete the following clauses from Section I:

52.215-10 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data AUG 2011 52.215-12 Subcontractor Certified Cost or Pricing Data OCT 2010

Add the following clauses to Section I:

52.219-14 Limitations on Subcontracting NOV 2011 52.222-15 Certification of Eligibility MAY 2014 52.227-17 Rights in Data – Special Works DEC 2007

Replace the entirety of Sub-Section 8.1 of Section M with the following:

8.1. The SSEB will perform the technical/quality evaluation to determine which proposals are the most highly qualified, considering the evaluation factors. The SSEB will recommend to the Source Selection Authority, the offerors which are the most highly qualified.

Upon review of the recommendations, the Source Selection Authority will select between three and five of the most highly qualified offerors to receive a Phase II request for proposals.

The Phase II Requests for proposals will be issued as an amendment to the solicitation and will only be forwarded to the three (up to five) offerors selected from the Phase I evaluations. It is anticipated that Phase I evaluations will be complete and Phase II RFP’s will be released approximately four (4) weeks after the Phase I due date.

Solicitation: HSCGG1-16-R-PRV022 Amendment: 0001 3 of 3

Replace the entirety of Sub-Section 11.1 of Section M with the following:

11.1. The Government will award a firm fixed-price contract to the responsible offeror whose Phase II proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is fair and reasonable, and has been determined to be most advantageous to the Government, with all technical, price and other factors considered. The technical evaluation criteria under Phase II, and price are approximately equal.

The technical evaluation criteria under Phase I will also be used as a basis for award. It may be deemed necessary for the SSEB to review Phase I submittals, to complete the cost/technical trade-off analysis and determine the best value. The Phase I evaluation criteria will be approximately equal to the Phase II evaluation criteria.

As technical scores and relative advantages or disadvantages become less distinct, differences in price between proposals are of increased importance in determining the most advantageous proposal. Conversely, as differences in price become less distinct, differences in rating and relative advantages and disadvantages between proposals are of increased importance to the determination.