Amendment0001_16-B-PRV150.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

1 3

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

06/23/2016

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

2116G16PRV150

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

PSN 6024673

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

Contracting Officer USCG Civil Engineering Unit Providence 475 Kilvert ST STE 100 Warwick, RI 02886

Same as Block 6 Attn: Daniel B. Walker, Contracting Officer

(401) 736-1764

(401) 736-1704 (fax)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., STREET, COUNTY, STATE AND ZIP CODE)

THIS AMENDMENT MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED

See Block 11 below

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

HSCGG1-16-B-PRV150

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

05/27/2016

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such Change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE REFERENCED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET

FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (SPECIFY TYPE OF MODIFICATION AND AUTHORITY)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

The solicitation referenced in block #9A to REPLACE FLOATING DOCKS AT USCG SECTOR NORTHERN NEW ENGLAND SOUTH PORTLAND, ME (CUMBERLAND COUNTY) & USCG STATION PORTSMOUTH HARBOR NEW CASTLE, NH (ROCKINGHAM COUNTY is amended as follows:

1. The PROPOSAL DUE DATE is hereby extended to July 6, 2016 by 2:00 pm local time, Warwick, RI.

Continued…

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or Print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

DANIEL B. WALKER, Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16B UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

06/24/2016

NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53

2 3

2. In SECTION I, CONTRACT CLAUSES, I.1 CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE (FAR 52.252-2) (FEB 1998), add the following:

52.204-18 Commercial and Government Entity Code Maintenance JUL 2015 52.214-26 Audit and Records – Sealed Bidding...........................OCT 2010 52.214-27 Price Reduction for Defective Certified Cost or Pricing Data – Modifications – Sealed Bidding...............................AUG 2011 52.214-28 Subcontract Certified Cost or Pricing Data – Modifications Sealed Bidding OCT 2010

3. In SECTION L.2, Delete the following:

52.204-18 COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENT ENTITY CODE MAINTENANCE JUL 2015

4. Questions and answers submitted during the period for receipt of questions:

Does any of the concrete floating docks have any utilities and, or mechanicals on it that require internal tubes and junction boxes?

ANSWER: “No mechanicals or utilities are needed.”

Is the deck between the floats required or can a concrete platform be provided with an internal pile guide.

ANSWER: “I am not sure exactly what this question is asking. We called out a deck between two floats but did not provide details. The deck needs to provide the same load rating as the surrounding float. How they achieve that is not important to us so I think the answer is a concrete platform will be acceptable provided it will support the specified loads.”

Is there any type of fendering required?

ANSWER: “See the detail on drawing sheet 5 which shows a 3 x 3 D rubber fender.”

Just confirming that the job consists of blasting and coating all 7 float piles with each pile getting a new pile guide assembly, with new floats.

ANSWER: “That is correct in South Portland. At Portsmouth Harbor we are replacing some and reusing some. No recoating is required since the piles to be reused are galvanized.

Reading the specs for the above referenced job and came upon Section 31 68 13 Soil and Rock Anchors which has me a little confused. There are no Rock Anchors in this job. These specs talk about a DCP Rock anchor with testing etc. etc. The plans show a simple 1” rod grouted into the ledge. These are two different animals.

ANSWER: "I think I understand what he is saying but I am not sure why it is a problem. The spec tells them to hire a PE to certify that the rock anchors used will support the piles. If the engineer is ok with grouted rods (which I expect) no trouble, if they can't get enough loading from the grouted rods, they need to provide more elaborate anchors. The detail shows the rod anchors (the simplest solution) but the specs explain what we expect."

Continued…

3 3

The note on page 5 of 5 Number 1 says there are three new steel guide piles. On Page 4 of 5 shows only 2 new steel guide piles.

ANSWER: “that's correct. Pull 3, install 2.”

Is the rock bolt as shown on the plans considered to be the same as a rock anchor which is detailed in the specifications? If it is does the government expect the contractor to install four Dwi Dag style rock anchors in the two new concrete pedestals with anchor design load, bond length, tendon bond length and un bonded length provide as a submittal and sealed by a PE. Also included would be double corrosion protection, bearing plates and nuts. The bars shall be ASTM A722/A 722M and shall be epoxy coated. Centralizers and spacers will be required for the 6" drill hole which is required for the 4" diameter of the DCP epoxy coated bar.

Trumpets will be required to provide a transition from the bonded to un bonded length. Design calculations will be provided by a licensed PE who is experienced with this type work. Load tests will be applied to each anchor. Rock Anchors will be threaded bar or the strand type. The anchor installer shall have at least 10 years experience in the installation of rock anchors.

ANSWER: "The detail should be considered a sketch to be used to determine the locations of the rock anchors, holes and geometry of the concrete pedestals. The specifications detail what the rock anchors are."

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged