AMEND002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

PAGE OF PAGES

1 2

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO.

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

11/23/2015

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

Contracting Officer, CEU Providence 475 Kilvert St. Suite 100 Warwick, Rhode Island 02886

Same as Block #6 Attn: Jerry Fortin, Contracting Officer

(508) 968-6499

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (NO., STREET, COUNTY, STATE AND ZIP CODE)

PROSPECTIVE BIDDERS

THIS AMENDMENT MUST BE ACKNOWLEDGED

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

HSCGG1-16-B-PRV001

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10/15/2015

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

CODE FACILITY CODE

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

[X] The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers [XX ] is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 001 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE REFERENCED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET

FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (SPECIFY TYPE OF MODIFICATION AND AUTHORITY)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Solicitation referenced in Block 9A for Window Replacement at Coast Guard Station Menemsha, Martha’s Vineyard, MA, IFB HSCGG1-16-B-PRV001 is hereby amended:

1. See questions and answers, page 2.

2. See attached Asbestos Survey listed as Reference A in the Specification Table of Contents.

The hour and date for receipt of bids is extended to 12/08/2015 at 2:00 PM.

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or Print)

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

G. J. Fortin, Contracting Officer

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED

16B UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BY

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Question 1: The W4 windows at the fire escape do not meet egress (values calculate out at 4.67sf). If an Alternate is necessary, will a Casement with simulated check rail be considered that will meet egress?

Answer: Yes, the two (2) 'W6' fire escape windows as mentioned do not meet egress requirements. Windows of the same overall dimensions with casements with simulated check rails will be necessary to meet egress requirements for those two locations on the 3rd deck. The several larger 'W4' windows can remain as designed as double hung windows and do not require simulated check rails. (Note that W6 windows do not meet egress requirements)

Question 2: Window notes in Bid Docs - How much size variation is allowable for a unit to be considered standard size?...will padding in the rough opening be an option considering that the siding is not being replaced?

Answer: No, padding in the rough openings will not be acceptable to enable utilizing standard sized windows. Contractors should ignore Note B on drawing sheet 8 of the plans. Windows should be custom manufactured to correctly accommodate the existing window openings.

Question 3: Should the aluminum nail flange be used? It is a better performing product for Impact Zone.

Answer: Yes, aluminum nail flanges should be used (as shown on the drawings (except at basement windows) as a heavier line below the sill, but not specifically labeled). They are normally shipped with the windows, and are required to be included in this project. The other flashing materials indicated will be in addition to the window components. The flange will not fit in the masonry openings in the basement and thus are not required in the basement windows.

Question 4: During the course of construction, will we encounter any asbestos?

Answer: Not likely. Please see attached Asbestos Survey report.

Question 5: During the course of construction will we encounter any lead paint?

Answer: Unknown.

Question 5: Are the units in the basement to be non-operating? If so, would an Alternate for Integrity fiberglass be considered because of proximity to grade?

Answer: No, the project requires operating windows in the basement as specified in spec section 01 11 00 & section 08 52 00 (double hung windows). The basement windows will be sliding double hung windows as shown in the drawings.

Limited Asbestos Building Survey

Main Building at United States Coast Guard Station Menemsha, Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts

Prepared for:

US Coast Guard Civil Engineering Unit Providence Attention: Jerry Fortin, contracting Officer

475 Kilvert Street, Suite 100 Warwick, RI 02886

508-968-6499 Contract Number: HSCGG1-15-C-PRV156

Requisition number: 2115G15PRV156 Order Number: 2415G15PRV156

Prepared by:

38 Elm Street

New Bedford, MA 02740 508-858-5606

June 2015

Table of Contents

Section 1.0 Introduction

Section 2.0 Bulk Sampling Information

Section 3.0 Description of Identified Areas and Suspect Materials

Section 4.0 Summary/Conclusions

Section 5.0 Signature(s) of Environmental Professional(s)

Figures:

Figure 1 – Sample Locations

Appendices:

Appendix A Laboratory Data

Appendix B Photographs

Appendix C Historic documents provided by USCG

Limited Asbestos Survey Report USCG – Menemsha Occupied Main Building US Coast Guard, Martha’s Vineyard, MA

Common Sense Environmental, Inc. WBE/DBE 1 June 2015

1.0 Introduction

This asbestos survey report is being submitted to the United States Coast Guard (USCG) in support of a window replacement project located at the USCG Menemsha Main Building (MMB) by Common Sense Environmental, Inc (Common Sense). In order to determine the feasibility of completing the window replacement, a limited non-destructive survey for asbestos containing materials (ACMs) was conducted at the Main Building.

The Station Menemsha MMB was built in 1936 on Cuttyhunk Island and was moved to its current location in 1952 in Chilmark, MA. The home is a 5600 square foot, 3 story (with cupola and basement) building designed in the Roosevelt Style. The current basement windows were all installed in 1983 and all above grade windows including the cupola windows were installed in 1993. The MMB is an occupied mixed use dwelling/office.

The USCG also provided the attached site diagrams for the building (Appendix C).

Qualified personnel conducted the asbestos survey sampling following procedures generally accepted and recommended by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), the United States Occupational Safety Health Administration (OSHA) and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Labor.

The suspect asbestos containing material (ACM) sampled during the survey of the subject property included interior and exterior window caulk and joint compound.

Upon sampling and analysis, none of the sampled materials were found to contain greater than 1% asbestos (see Section 4.0 for identified ACMs); therefore, the sampled materials do not have to be removed by a Massachusetts licensed asbestos abatement contractor in accordance with an approved Asbestos Abatement Plan written by a Massachusetts licensed Asbestos Project Designer, prior to disturbance during any planned demolition.

2.0 Bulk Sampling Information

The suspect ACMs were characterized by the analysis of bulk samples collected by Cynthia Gilchrest (MA Inspector AI900583) on May 28, 2015. Photographs taken at the property are presented as Appendix B.

Per the scope of work provided by the USCG, the following materials were identified for asbestos testing:

A. Caulk and joint compound at 1 window on each face of the building at each floor (basement, 3 floors and cupola).

Upon visiting the property, Common Sense observed several storm windows with no visible caulk or joint compound at the third floor rear interior window, the cupola interior, rear first floor

Common Sense Environmental, Inc. WBE/DBE 2 June 2015 windows, basement and first floor exterior left windows. No caulk was observed at the right basement window as the window frame consists of painted wood.

Additional suspect ACM, outside the scope of work, were observed and also sampled as directed by USCG. Additional samples were collected at the pipe insulation at the basement window and insulation between the window frame and wall at the basement left interior window (see photographs in Appendix B).

Licensed and trained personnel have made an effort to characterize visible and readily accessible suspect ACMs within/along the interior/exterior areas of one window at each floor the subject property building as outlined in the scope of work. The survey was not a destructive survey and no survey can be all encompassing. As such, should construction workers encounter and/or need to disturb any product(s) suspected as being ACM, that have not been previously identified or sampled, during any renovation activities in the future, all proper precautions should be taken to ensure these materials are appropriately characterized and handled accordingly. While heating system pipes appeared to be visible and located outside of wall cavities in many cases, it is possible that older pipes insulated with asbestos thermal system insulation exists in uninspected wall cavities. If these materials are encountered, they should be characterized and handled in accordance with applicable local, state and federal regulations.

Survey procedures included a visual assessment of suspect ACM and painted surfaces identified by licensed and trained personnel. Visual assessment included the touching of identified suspect ACM to determine its friability, (when dry, may be crushed, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure), identification of homogeneous areas of identified suspect ACM, approximate quantification of identified suspect ACM, collection of bulk samples for analysis, and assessment of the condition of suspect ACM. The USEPA’s Managing Asbestos in Place, A Building Owner's Guide to Operations and Maintenance Programs for Asbestos-Containing Materials, was used as a guide for this survey.

Each homogenous area of suspect ACM was assessed to determine the asbestos hazard. A homogeneous area is defined as a material that is uniform in color or texture with a similar appearance and an application on similar components. Factors considered when assessing homogeneous area hazards include the friability of the material, the condition of the material including type, severity, and extent of damage, and accessibility of the material and potential for further damage and disturbance.

Sampling methods were designed to minimize damage to the ACM and subsequent fiber release.

Samples were collected using disposable samplers, similar to a utility knife. Samples were extracted to the substrate and placed into a pre-labeled asbestos sample bag. The bag was then sealed, recorded in a sample logbook, and sent to the laboratory for analysis.

Samples were submitted to and analyzed by Asbestos Identification Laboratory (AIL) of Woburn, Massachusetts. AIL is accredited through the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP No. 2000919-0) and with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts Office of Labor and Workforce Development (AA00208). All samples were analyzed in accordance with USEPA recommended protocol ("Follow-up to the Interim Method for Determination of Asbestos in Bulk

Common Sense Environmental, Inc. WBE/DBE 3 June 2015

Insulation Samples" - EPA 600/R-93/116 method “Visual Estimate”) using polarized light microscopy (PLM) supplemented by dispersion staining techniques.

Twenty-nine (29) asbestos bulk samples were collected at the subject property building, with instructions to the laboratory to stop at the first positive results obtained for each homogeneous material sample set. Based on this instruction, 29 bulk samples were laboratory analyzed by AIL.

Appendix A contains a chain-of-custody and a copy of the bulk sampling results, as provided by

AIL.

As confirmed by laboratory analyses and as summarized in Section 4.0 of this report, none of the sampled materials were found to have asbestos content equal to or greater than 1% asbestos. As such, the sampled materials do not have to be removed by a Massachusetts licensed asbestos abatement contractor in accordance with an approved Asbestos Abatement Plan written by a Massachusetts licensed certified Project Designer, prior to disturbance during any planned renovations.

3.0 Background Air Sampling

As the scope of this project consisted solely of an asbestos survey only, no background air sampling was conducted during this survey.

Should asbestos be detected in the future which require abatement pre-abatement air samples may be required as a part of the development of a required Asbestos Abatement Plan, if abatement is to take place.

4.0 Description of Identified Areas and Suspect Materials

This asbestos survey has been completed at the occupied mixed use dwelling/office as a part of a window replacement plan. Sampled materials and results are summarized in the following table and the laboratory report is presented as Appendix A. Materials which tested positive for asbestos through laboratory analysis would be indicated by red type on the tables below and would include the asbestos content identified through laboratory analysis. No sampled materials tested positive for asbestos via laboratory analysis.

Common Sense Environmental, Inc. WBE/DBE 4 June 2015

Common Sense Environmental, Inc. WBE/DBE 5 June 2015

5.0 Summary/Conclusions

Common Sense completed a limited asbestos survey at the USCG Menemsha Main Building, Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts. Twenty-nine (29) asbestos bulk samples were collected from the subject structure, with instructions to the laboratory to stop analyses at the first positive result obtained for each homogeneous material sample set. Based on this instruction, Common Sense Environmental, Inc. WBE/DBE 6 June 2015

29 bulk samples were laboratory analyzed by AIL. Appendix A contains a chain-of-custody and a copy of the bulk sampling results, as provided by AIL.

As can be seen in the attached results and as summarized in Section 4.0 of this report, sampled materials were not found to have asbestos content equal to or greater than 1% asbestos.

This report has been prepared for the sole benefit of the USCG and may not be used by any other person or entity without the express written consent of Common Sense Environmental, Inc. Any use which a third party makes of this report, or any reliance on decisions made based on it, are the responsibility of such third parties. Common Sense accepts no responsibility for damages, if any, suffered by any third party as a result of decisions made or actions based on this report.

The information and conclusions contained in this report are based upon work undertaken by trained professional and technical staff in accordance with generally accepted engineering and scientific practices current at the time the work was performed. Conclusions presented in this report should not be construed as legal or medical advice.

The conclusions presented in this report represent the best technical judgment of Common Sense based on the data obtained from the work. The conclusions are based on the site conditions encountered by licensed and trained personnel at the time work was performed at the specific inspection and/or sampling locations.

5.0 Signature(s) of Environmental Professional(s)

Cynthia S. Gilchrest Vincent L. Jacques, P.E.

Senior Project Manager MA Inspector AIO40309 MA Inspector AI900583

Figures

Figure 1 – Sample Locations

Common Sense Environmental, Inc. Figure 1 – Sample Locations West and North 38 Elm Street Main Building New Bedford, MA 02740 USCG, Menemsha, Martha’s Vineyard, MA 508-858-5606 June 2015 Figure provided by USCG, Civil Engineering, Drawing 7029, A-6, dated January 7, 1989 USCG Station Menemsha at Martha’s Vineyard, Main Building

West/Left Side Elevation North/Front Side Elevation

X – sample collection point not submitted for laboratory analysis

6C,7B

2A

5B

2C

14, 15,16A

7C

8A

3, 6A

X

Common Sense Environmental, Inc. Figure 1A – Sample Locations West and North 38 Elm Street Main Building New Bedford, MA 02740 USCG, Menemsha, Martha’s Vineyard, MA 508-858-5606 June 2015 Figure provided by USCG, Civil Engineering, Drawing 7029, A-7, dated January 7, 1989 USCG Station Menemsha at Martha’s Vineyard, Main Building

East/Right Side Elevation South/Rear Side Elevation

12C, 16B, 13B

4, 5A, 7A

5C,10

9, 6B

7C

8A

3, 6A

X

X – sample collection point not submitted for laboratory analysis

APPENDIX A

Laboratory Data

Batch: 6301

165 New Boston St., Ste 271 Woburn, MA 01801

781-932-9600 Web: www.asbestosidentificationlab.com

Email: mikemanning@asbestosidentificationlab.com

Asbestos Identification Laboratory

Dear Cynthia Gilchrest, Thank you Cynthia Gilchrest for your business.

Michael Manning Owner/Director

Asbestos Identification Laboratory has completed the analysys of the samples from your office for the above referenced project

The information and analysis contained in this report have been generated using the EPA /600/R-93/116 Method for the Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials. Materials or products that contain more than 1% of any kind or combination of asbestos are considered an asbestos containing building material as determined by the EPA. This Polarized Light Microscope (PLM) technique may be performed either by visual estimation or point counting. Point counting provides a determination of the area percentage of asbestos in a sample. If the asbestos is estimated to be less than 10% by visual estimation of friable material, the determination may be repeated using the point counting technique. The results of the point counting supersede visual PLM results. Results in this report only relate to the items tested. This report may not be used by the customer to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other U.S. Government Agency.

Laboratory results represent the analysis of samples as submitted by the customer. Information regarding sample location, description, area, volume, etc., was provided by the customer. Asbestos Identification Laboratory is not responsible for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations. Unless notified in writing to return samples, Asbestos Identification Laboratory discards customer samples after 30 days. This report shall not be reproduced, except in full, without the written consent of Asbestos Identification Laboratory.

Work Received: 2015-06-03

USCG Menemsha

Cynthia Gilchrest Common Sense Environmental, Inc.

38 Elm St.

New Bedford, MA 02740

2015-05-28

Project Number:

Project Name:

June 05, 2015

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

• NVLAP Lab Code: 200919-0

• Massachusetts Certification License: AA000208

• State of Connecticut, Department of Public Health Approved Environmental Laboratory Registration Number: PH-0142

• State of Maine, Department of Environmental Protection Asbestos Analytical Laboratory License Number: LB-0078(Bulk) LA-0087(Air)

• State of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations Department of Health Certification: AAL-121

Work Received: 2015-06-03

USCG Menemsha

Cynthia Gilchrest Common Sense Environmental, Inc.

38 Elm St.

New Bedford, MA 02740

2015-05-28

Project Number:

Project Name:

June 05, 2015

Date Sampled:

Analysis Method: BULK PLM ANALYSIS EPA/600/R-93/116

Asbestos %Material Color Non-Asbestos %LocationFieldID

LabID black Non-Fibrous 100

68359

1 Exterior C-Pole Rt SideJoint Compound None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68360

2A Exterior C-Pole Left SidePainted Caulking None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68361

2B Exterior North FrontPainted Caulking None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68362

3 1st Floor Rear Interior RearJoint Compound None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68363

4 1st Floor Interior RightCaulking None Detected tan Non-Fibrous 100

68364

2C 1st Floor Interior LeftBeige Caulking None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68365

5A 1st Floor Interior RightWhite Caulking None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68366

6A 1st Floor RearWhite Caulking (Painted Beige)

None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68367

7A 1st Floor Exterior RightCaulking None Detected tan Non-Fibrous 100

68368

8A 1st Floor Rear InteriorBeige Caulking None Detected white Synthetic 80 Non-Fibrous 20

68369

9 2nd Floor Right InteriorInsulation- White None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68370

5B 2nd Floor Left InteriorWhite Caulking None Detected tan Non-Fibrous 100

68371

6B 2nd Floor Right InteriorBeige Painted Caulking None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68372

5C 3rd Floor Rt ExteriorWhite Caulking None Detected

Page 1 of 2Friday 05 June 2015

Asbestos %Material Color Non-Asbestos %LocationFieldID

LabID white Non-Fibrous 100

68373

10 3rd Floor Interior Right Caulking

Caulking- White None Detected tan Non-Fibrous 100

68374

6C 3rd Floor Interior LeftBeige Painted Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68375

7B 3rd Floor Exterior LeftCaulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68376

7C 3rd Floor Rear InteriorCaulking None Detected tan Non-Fibrous 100

68377

8B 3rd Floor Front InteriorBeige Caulking None Detected gray Non-Fibrous 100

68378

11 Basement Rear ExteriorGray Painted Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68379

12A North Exterior BasementWhite Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68380

12B North Basement InteriorWhite Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68381

13A Basement Interior Front North

White Joint None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68382

12C Basement Rear Interior Window

White Painted Caulk None Detected brown Cellulose 95 Non-Fibrous 5

68383

14 Basement Left InteriorPaper Insulation by Window

None Detected yellow Non-Fibrous 100

68384

15 Basement Left InteriorPipe Insulation by Window None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68385

16A Basement Interior LeftChalk on Window None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68386

16B Basement Right Interior Window

White Painted Caulk None Detected white Non-Fibrous 100

68387

13B Basement Interior Right/Left

Joint Compound White None Detected

Analyzed by: 6301Batch:

Page 2 of 2Friday 05 June 2015 End of Report

APPENDIX B

Photographs

Photographic Record

Client: US Coast Guard Project Number:

Site Location :

Photographer:

Date:

Comments:

Limited Asbestos Survey, Menemsha, Martha’s Vineyard, MA

Cynthia Gilchrest

5/28/2015

North approach to front of main building.

Photographer:

Comments:

Rear/south approach to main building.

Main Building

Common Sense Environmental, Inc WBE/DBE, 38 Elm Street, New Bedford, MA 02740 508-858-5606 www.CommonSenseEnv.com

Site Location :

Photographer:

Rear of main building. West /left side of building is at left of photo.

Comments:

West /left side of building.

Main Building

Site Location :

Photographer:

East/right side of building.

Comments:

Basement left interior window. Note paper insulation, yellow pipe insulation and window chalk.

Main Building

Site Location :

Photographer:

East first floor interior caulk.

Comments:

Right first floor exterior caulk.

Main Building

Site Location :

Photographer:

First floor front interior caulk.

Comments:

Main Building

Common Sense Environmental, Inc WBE/DBE, 38 Elm Street, New Bedford, MA 02740 508-858-5606 www.CommonSenseEnv.com

First floor rear interior white caulk painted beige.

Site Location :

Photographer:

North interior basement.

Comments:

Main Building

Common Sense Environmental, Inc WBE/DBE, 38 Elm Street, New Bedford, MA 02740 508-858-5606 www.CommonSenseEnv.com

North exterior basement white caulk.

Site Location :

Photographer:

Third floor interior right caulking.

Comments:

Main Building

Common Sense Environmental, Inc WBE/DBE, 38 Elm Street, New Bedford, MA 02740 508-858-5606 www.CommonSenseEnv.com

Second floor right interior insulation.

Site Location :

Photographer:

Third floor exterior rear caulk and joint compound.

Comments:

Main Building

Common Sense Environmental, Inc WBE/DBE, 38 Elm Street, New Bedford, MA 02740 508-858-5606 www.CommonSenseEnv.com

Third floor right exterior caulk.

Site Location :

Photographer:

Third floor rear deteriorated wood window frame. Note absence of caulk or joint compound.

Comments:

Main Building

Common Sense Environmental, Inc WBE/DBE, 38 Elm Street, New Bedford, MA 02740 508-858-5606 www.CommonSenseEnv.com

Third floor front beige painted caulk.

Site Location :

Photographer:

Comments:

Main Building

Common Sense Environmental, Inc WBE/DBE, 38 Elm Street, New Bedford, MA 02740 508-858-5606 www.CommonSenseEnv.com

Interior of cupola. Not absence of caulk and joint compound.

Exterior joint compound at copula.

APPENDIX C

Historic Documents Provided by USCG