AMENDMENT_0002_HSCG8417QAA8516_GROUNDS_MAINTENANCE_AT_USCG_SFO_GALVESTON _TX.pdf
PDF 64 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HSCG84-17-Q-AA8516
About this file
AMENDMENT 0002 FOR RFQ HSCG84-17-Q-AA816 FOR GROUNDS MAINTENANCE SERVIC4S AT USCG SFO GALVESTON TX
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1 1
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable) 0002 14 November 2016
6. ISSUED BY CODE det 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
COMMANDING OFFICER (COB2E)
USCG SHORE INFRASTRUCTURE LOGISTICS CENTER
300 EAST MAIN STREET, SUITE 965 ATTN: Ms. Danielle Tonsel (757) 628-4120
NORFOLK, VA 23510-9113
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State, and ZIP Code) (4) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
X HSCG84-17-Q-AA8516
9B. DATED
2 November 2016
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
CODE: FACILITY CODE:
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning ONE copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; of (c) By separate letter of telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS,
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
(4) A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.
IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b)
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _ copies to the issuing office.
14. DECRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
A. The purpose of this amendment is to amend the following:
1. On Attachment 4, Page 2 of 4, the date to email the completed questionnaire is amended to read “11/29/2016” in lieu of “05/11/2015”.
As a result, Page 2 of 4 of Attachment 4, Past Performance Questionnaire, is hereby replaced with the attached Amended Page 2 of 4 of Attachment 4, Past Performance Questionnaire.
B. Also attached is a Questions/Response #1 document dated 11/14/2016.
C. The cutoff date for questions is Wednesday, November 15, 2016 at 5:00 P.M., EST. The Government reserves the right not to provide an answer for any questions received after November 15, 2016, 5:00 P.M., EST. If however, in the Government’s opinion, the question cites an issue of significant importance, the Government may provide written responses to all Quoters.
D. The closing date remains: November 29, 2016 at 4:30 PM EST.
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type of print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or Print)
15B. CONTRACT/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
NSN 7540-01-152-8070 STANDARD FROM 30 (REV. 10-83)
PREVIOUS EDITION UNUSABLE Prescribed by GSA
AMENDMENT 0002 Amended
RFP HSCG84-17-Q-AA8516 PAGE 3 OF 4
JANITORIAL SERVICES AT USCG SECTOR FIELD OFFICE GALVESTON
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
e. Current Contract Value: __________________________
f. Estimated Value at Completion: __________________________
Please e-mail the completed questionnaire by 11/29/2016 to: danielle.e.tonsel@uscg.mil
**SEE ATTACHED PAGES FOR MORE INFORMATION ON FACTORS BEING RATED**
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OFFEROR’S REFERENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
1. Complete this questionnaire using the grading system explained below. Your assessment should only consider performance for which the contractor is responsible and accountable. Each offeror shall be assigned one the following ratings:
(E) Exceptional- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the company’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
(VG) Very Good- Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the company’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective.
(S) Satisfactory- Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
(M) Marginal- Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or subelement being evaluated reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
(U) Unsatisfactory- Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
(N) NOT APPLICABLE/UNKNOWN CONFIDENCE - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area is not applicable to effort assessed.
2. Please circle the rating, the appropriate letter, for each item on the questionnaire, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance. Provide frank, concise comments or supporting narrative explanations in the spaces provided. When responding to the descriptive statements, select the answer, which most accurately describes the contractor’s performance or situation. You may use additional sheets if more space is needed.
mailto:danielle.e.tonsel@uscg.mil
QUESTIONS/RESPONSES #1
Grounds Maintenance Services @
USCG SFO GALVESTON, TX
RFQ: HSCG84-17-Q-AA8516
DATE: 14 November 2016
1. QUESTION: Who’s the current vendor and contract value?
RESPONSE: There is no current contract. A purchase order, #HSCG29-16-C- SG2168, was issued for grounds maintenance work from March 2016 through September 2016 in the amount of $30,036.00 That purchase order was with Marfran Cleaning Limited Liability Company, Houston, TX.
X
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .