Performance_Questionnaire_based_on_CPARS_Template.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HSCG8014RP45C90
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Individual_Part_List_Make_Up_Overhaul_Kit.pdf | ||
| SF33_FORM.pdf | ||
| RFQ_HSCG80-14-R-P45C90_FME_AUG_12.pdf.docx | DOCX document | |
| FBO_RFP_FME_Schedule_B_Final_8-15-14.pdf | ||
| Redacted_JA_FME_Engine_for_Solicitation_Redacted.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTONNAIRE
FOR
SOLICITATION HSCG80-14-R-P45C90
FME PARTS
The same ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance in this questionnaire.
A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor’s performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here is a breakdown of each category:
· Quality of Products or Service
· Schedule
· Cost Control
· Business Relations
· Management of Key Personnel
· Utilization of Small Business
| 1 = Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| 2 = Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| 3 = Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| 4 = Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| 5 = Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
See Attached Pages
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTONNAIRE
FOR
SOLICITATION HSCG80-14-R-P45C90
FME PARTS
The ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance. Please provide indepth details of contractors’ performance and services provided.
Point of Contact Name and telephone No:
Contract Number:
Dollar Value of Contract: Original: Final:
Type of Services Performed:
Vessel Name, Hull No.
Contract Type:
Contract Start Date: Contract End Date:
Percentage of Growth Work:
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Quality of Product or Service – please rate |
Comments:
| 2. |
| Schedule - Timeliness of Performance – please rate |
Comments:
| 3. |
| Cost Control – please rate |
Comments:
| 4. |
| Business Relations – please rate |
Comments:
| 5 |
| Management of Key Personnel – please rate |
Comments:
| 6 |
| Utilization of Small Business |
Comments:
Were Subcontractors Used? ____Yes _____No Comments for Subcontracts
Any additional information you would like to provide about contractor being rated:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .