Performance_Questionnaire based on CPARS.doc
DOC document 48 KB Posted
- Attached to
- USCGC SEA FOX (WPB-87374 FY13 DRYDOCK REPAIRS
- Solicitation number
- HSCG80-13-R-PV1018
About this file
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE NOTE QUESTIONNAIRE TO BE SUBMITTED TO YOUR CUSTOMER AND RETURNED DIRECTLY TO MABLE LEE AT mable.l.lee uscg.mil
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| SEA FOX SPEC REV 0 FY13.pdf | ||
| SEA FOX Blank Schedule.xlsm | XLSM spreadsheet | |
| SEA FOX RFP PV1018.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTONNAIRE
The same ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance in this questionnaire.
A common five level assessment rating system is used to evaluate a contractor’s performance. Ratings range from Unsatisfactory to Exceptional. Here is a breakdown of each category:
· Quality of Products or Service
· Schedule
· Cost Control
· Business Relations
· Management of Key Personnel
· Utilization of Small Business
| 0 = Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| 1 = Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| 2 = Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| 3 = Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| 4 = Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Governments benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
The ratings used in the Contractor Performance Assessment Review System shall be used to evaluate Past Performance.
| 0 |
| 1 |
| 2 |
| 3 |
| 4 |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| Quality of Product or Service – please rate |
Comments:
| 2. |
| Schedule - Timeliness of Performance – please rate |
Comments:
| 3. |
| Cost Control – please rate |
Comments:
| 4. |
| Business Relations – please rate |
Comments:
| 5 |
| Management of Key Personnel – please rate |
Comments:
| 6 |
| Utilization of Small Business |
Comments:
Were Subcontractors Used? ____Yes _____No
Comments for Subcontracts
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .