Amendment 0001 (HQC00822R0003)-Section M Changes.pdf

HQCSJM227605

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to revise clause 52.215-4507 Proposal Evaluation (Dated April 2004) in Section M.

Contract Specialist: Jessica Rivera-Umipeg; jessica.rivera-umipeg@deca.mil; 804-734-8000 Ext 48588 Contracting Officer: Diana Gross-Bendall; Diana.Gross-Bendall@deca.mil; 804-734-8000 Ext 48185

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 3

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 05-Apr-2022

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X HQC00822R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Mar-2022

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

05-Apr-2022

CODE

DEFENSE COMMISSARY AGENCY

STORE SERVICES SUPPORT DIVISION

1300 E AVENUE

FORT LEE VA 23801-1800

HDEC08 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

X

HQC00822R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

52.215-4507 PROPOSAL EVALUATION (APR 2004)

PROPOSAL EVALUATION

(a) GENERAL:

(1) Using the tradeoff process, award will be made to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will provide the best value to the Government considering the factors set forth below. The process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

(2) All proposals submitted which comply with the solicitation requirements will be evaluated. Proposals that fail to comply with content or format requirements specified in Section L of this solicitation may be rejected without further evaluation.

(b) OUTLINE OF EVALUATION FACTORS, SUBFACTORS, AND ELEMENTS

FACTOR 1: PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY

Subfactor: Technical Capability Element:

Night Shelf Stocking Receiving/Storage/Holding Night Custodial Day Requirements

Quality Control

Subfactor: Personnel Element

Night Shelf Stocking Receiving/Storage/Holding Night Custodial Day Requirements

Indirect Labor

FACTOR 2: PRICE

(c) RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATION FACTORS and SUBFACTORS:

(1) FACTORS: Of the three evaluation factors, PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY and PAST PERFORMANCE, when combined, are approximately equal to PRICE.

(2) PERFORMANCE CAPABILITY:

HQC00822R0003

(i) Technical Capability is significantly more important than Personnel

FACTOR 3: PAST PERFORMANCE:

Subfactor: Similarity of Experience Quality of Service Timeliness of Performance Business Relations

(1) Past performance evaluation is a subjective process considering relevant facts, circumstances, and trends. The evaluation will consider:

(i) similarity or dissimilarity of size, scope, and complexity of experience to current contract requirements, and recentness of performance;

(ii) the offeror's demonstrated ability to provide quality services;

(iii) the offeror's ability to complete services on time;

(iv) the offeror's ability to develop and maintain productive and responsible business relations and to address concerns and resolve problems during contract performance.

(2) In addition to information provided by the offeror in the proposal, the government may use data from other customers, consumer protection organizations, and other entities with useful and relevant information.

(3) If neither the business nor any key personnel have a record of relevant past performance or past performance is not available, past performance will not be rated favorably or unfavorably.

(e) Performance Capability Weighted Rating Scale

Outstanding: Probability of successful performance is extremely high. The risk of failure is virtually non-existent.

Very Good: Probability of successful performance is very high. The risk of failure is minimal.

Satisfactory: The probability of successful performance is significantly greater than the risk of failure.

Marginal: The risk is very high that the offeror is not capable of performing successfully.

Unsatisfactory: The risk is extremely high that the offeror is not capable of performing successfully.

(f) Offerors receiving a Marginal or Unsatisfactory rating in any element may be considered ineligible for award.

(g) PRICE AND PRICE REALISM: Proposals will be evaluated to determine whether offered prices are realistic in relation to the work to be performed, reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and are consistent with other portions of the offeror's proposal. The PRICE factor will not be scored.

(End of Summary of Changes)