RFP_Attachment_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 75 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Technical Support of SO/LIC Oversight Responsibilities Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-18-R-0172
- Issued by
- DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
RFP Attachment 4_Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| HQ003418R0172_SOLIC_QA_Responses_Amended.pdf | ||
| RFP_Attachment_1_HQ0034-18-R-0172_Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| HQ003418R0172_SOLIC_QA.pdf | ||
| RFP_Attachment_5_Provisions_and_Clauses_HQ0034-18-R-0172_Amendment_1.pdf | ||
| RFP_Attachment_2_PWS_HQ0034-18-R-0172.pdf | ||
| RFP_Attachment_3__Pricing_Template.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| RFP_Attachment_1__HQ0034-18-R-0172.pdf | ||
| RFP_Attachment_5_Provisions_and_Clauses.pdf | ||
| RFP_Attachment_6_DD254_Draft.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 <Past Performance Questionnaire - HQ0034-18-R-0172 Attachment 4
Instructions: The Contractor who has provided you with this form is proposing to submit an offer to the Government to provide Technical Support of SO/LIC Oversight Responsibilities for the Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense (OASD) for Special Operations and Low-Intensity Conflict (SO/LIC). Past Performance is a part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition; therefore, your input is important. Please review the definitions of adjectival ratings on page 3 before completing the questionnaire.
The entire questionnaire should be filled out and emailed to latova.j.greene.civ@mail.mil no later than 9:00 AM ET on 29 August 2017. This information will not be disclosed to the contractor.
If reference is for a contractor who will participate as a subcontractor or team member in this acquisition, name the prime contractor with which you will participate here: ____________________________ Contractor Name & Address:
Contract Number:
Period of Performance:
Contract Value:
Complexity: Routine Moderate Difficult
Contract Role: Prime Subcontractor Team Member
Description of the Work Performed Under the Contract (please be specific about tasks performed):
Performance Survey
| Performance Questions |
| E=Exceptional VG=Very Good |
S=Satisfactory M=Marginal
U=Unacceptable N/A= Not Applicable *See page 3 for additional information
| No. |
| Ratings (Mark an “X” in the appropriate selection) |
| E |
| G |
| S |
| M |
| U |
| N/A |
| 1 |
| If applicable, how did the contractor perform during a transition of task from another firm? |
| 2 |
| General quality of services and support provided during their period of performance? |
| 3 |
| Content, accuracy, and timeliness of technical reports and deliverables? |
| 4a |
| Contractor’s ability to identify and correct performance deficiencies in a timely manner? |
| 4b |
| Contractor’s ownership of problems and actively working to resolve them? |
| 5 |
| Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner? |
| 6 |
| Ability to handle fluctuating workloads? |
| 7 |
| Communicating schedules, delays, and expectations and interfacing with |
Government employees?
| 8 |
| Overall Responsiveness to Government |
requests?
| 9 |
| If performance based, how successful was the Contractor in meeting the contract metrics? |
| 10 |
| Overall Contract Performance Rating? |
Additional Rater Comments About Contractor Performance
Definitions:
i.
Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Customer's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
ii.
Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
iii.
Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
iv.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified or taken satisfactory corrective action.
v.
Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery did not occur or is not likely to occur in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions were ineffective.
Not applicable: Does not apply to the acquisition.
Rater Information
Name:
Title:
Agency/Company:
Phone:
Email:
Signature:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .