Attachment_J-3_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 88 KB Posted
- Attached to
- WHS Administrative and Clerical IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- HQ0034-17-R-0273
- Issued by
-
DOD Washington Headquarters Service
About this file
Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Attachment_J-4_Cost_Price_Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_J-6_Wage_Determination.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J-1_Offeror_Project_Declaration_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attachment_J-5_DD254_Draft_RFP.pdf | ||
| HQ0034-17-R-0273_Solicitation.pdf | ||
| Attachment_J-2_Relevant_Experience_Project_Template.docx | DOCX document | |
| Administrative_Support_PWS_Draft.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment J-3 Past Performance Questionnaire
Past Performance Questionnaire
RFP - HQ0034-17-R-0273
The company who has provided you with this form is proposing to submit a quotation to the Washington Headquarters Services/Acquisition Directorate (WHS/AD) for Administrative and Clerical Services. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition; therefore, your input is extremely important.
The questionnaire should be filled out and emailed to Earl Anderson at earl.e.anderson51.civ@mail.mil and Khalil Mack at khalil.r.mack.civ@mail.mil by October 6, 2017. If you have any questions, please contact Earl Anderson at the above email address.
This Section is to be Filled Out by the Offeror
Company Name & Address:
| 2. Contract Number: |
| 3. Period of Performance (Including All Options): |
4. Contract Value:
| 5. Contract Role: |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
Prime FORMCHECKBOX Subcontractor FORMCHECKBOX Team Member
6. Performance Survey
| No. |
| Performance Questions |
E = Exceptional VG = Very Good S = Satisfactory M = Marginal
U = Unacceptable N/A = Not Applicable
| Ratings (Mark an “X” in the appropriate Selection) |
| U |
| M |
| S |
| VG |
| E |
| N/A |
| 1. |
| If applicable, how did the contractor perform during a transition of task from another firm? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 2. |
| General quality of services and support provided during their period of performance? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 3. |
| Content, accuracy, and timeliness of technical reports and deliverables? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 4. |
| Contractor’s ownership of problems and actively working to resolve them? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 5. |
| Ability to recruit and retain highly skilled personnel, including ability to fill key vacancies in a timely manner? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 6. |
| Ability to handle fluctuating |
workloads?
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 7. |
| Communicating schedules, delays, and expectations and interfacing with Government employees? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 8. |
| Overall Responsiveness to Government requests? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 9. |
| If contract was performance based, how successful was the Contractor in meeting the contract metrics? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
| 10. |
| Overall Contract Performance Rating based on performance and mission impact? |
| FORMCHECKBOX |
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
FORMCHECKBOX
Additional Rater Comments About Contract Performance
Definitions:
i. Exceptional: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Customer's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
ii. Very Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the customer's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
iii. Satisfactory: Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
iv. Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified or taken satisfactory corrective action.
v. Unsatisfactory: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery did not occur or is not likely to occur in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions were ineffective.
vi. Not applicable: Does not apply to the acquisition.
This questionnaire is to be returned along with a copy of the “Relevant Experience Project Template”
9. Rater Information
| Name: |
| Title: |
| Agency/Company: |
| Phone: |
| Email: |
Signature (Digital or Wet)
Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 20 September 2017
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .